Laura said:
As the years have passed, I have become better able to see how this concept was conveyed through various interactions with the C’s, myself, and the other participants or attendees at the sessions. There are various points where the C’s were wrong – probably consciously – but I can see no fault or bad intent, because they were definitely working within the psychological parameters given them by those present. And this is a crucial thing to understand about this kind of work: it is definitely a reality where the observer/participant has a powerful influence and it is harder for a materially minded, black-and-white thinker to grasp the essence of this reality than that a camel should go through the eye of a needle!
One of the things early investigators of the paranormal discovered, and which became clear as I followed through with this experiment and learned from the experiences, is that psychic phenomena can be strongly influenced or ‘colored’ by a sitter’s preconceived beliefs. In the case of the C’s, it is not that they are ‘controlled’ by these prejudices; it rather seems that they do not contradict them out of scrupulous respect for free will. I was surprised to realize, after the fact, that on many occasions, the C’s conveyed information in the presence of such individuals that was ‘coded’, so to say; in short, they managed to say what needed to be said without offending anyone.
How else could it be in a "double-slit world"?
Thus the situation of the Ra group project in regards to Carla's channeling... later the Ra/Quo group's encouragement to Jim to continue channeling the Q&A parts, as he increasingly was reluctant to do... you can see the energy fade out as he essentially stopped... same with Don before and that energy is in the answers to the questions... simplistic in, simplistic out... and quite repetitive at that.
Another point of contention is in that session after 'Frank' left and when asked about accuracy concerns... the C's said it was just a little here and there on predictions ?!?!?!?! That's a real red flag... but not caught in the 'heat of the moment', especially given the attacks throughout the process... with their accompanying factor of confusion of the energy flow... then others coming in to keep the vectoring of energies off course.... to keep this opposing orchestra off key.
That said, the regret issue of this JC reminds me of the same with the G man and many others(Linclon?) after wandering into Purgatory and finding the native assumptions inadequate to the task at hand... thinking they can effect great change in the school.... as the C's put it: when they are only students themselves... and the faculty doesn't like such students invading their turf... and most of the other native students are on autopilot... 'you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink'... though if you add a lot of sugar and spice, flouride and everything not nice, it seems you can.
Pashalis quote by G on the allotment of shares of knowlege is funny or interesting given the later example in Russia under Yeltsin as the oligarchs sold to the public so many shares in the public corporations, most of which came right back to themselves.... as intended... what would the regular person want or do with them but sell them for what they could get during a stressful time in an engineered financial collapse in the economy/society around them? Sort of the 'as above, so below' situation demonstrated it seems."So it indeed seems to be impossible that the masses will wake up"... isn't this as Laura wrote about with the turtle eggs on the beach and the ever so tiny percentage of them that will make it to the safety of the water and survive? And is does seem to be by design as this school doesn't grade on a curve.... a very declining on to use the American example and thus the need for Mother Nature to come in and reminds the staff, that they too don't control the curriculum, though they really, really want to, especially they psychopathic reflections, who seem hard-wired to do so.
Boring? Really? it seems a great reminder of all it really is a school for everyone... or as Ra put it, 'teach/learn'... 'honor/duty'... you can only try... you can only do the best to you ability, but then learn to let the game go on without you... for better or for worse... and what 'fun' would it be without the latter? that would really be 'boring'.... like a fixed game... ie Wall Street, NATO's use of false flag ops, terrorists and the like... not much of a contest that way, and thus the 'winner' remains as weak as its competition... or lack of... 'as above, so below'.
"Rome could have been..." reminds me of that line from Marlon Brando in 'On the Waterfront'... "could have been a contender" ;)
