Session 14 April 2018

BrendaH

Jedi
We have translation teams that ensure the accuracy of translations. Please contact them via the forum to participate.
Yes, I'm aware of that, thank you!


Thank you Gandalf for the link! I read very quickly that thread many times before and I doubted whether to join or not the translation team. I'll read it carefully this time and will think about it and see if it's time to ask if I can join the team.
 

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Yes, I'm aware of that, thank you!




Thank you Gandalf for the link! I read very quickly that thread many times before and I doubted whether to join or not the translation team. I'll read it carefully this time and will think about it and see if it's time to ask if I can join the team.
We can't give permission to share or publish translated transcripts that have not been through the editing/vetting process.
 

c.a.

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Stephen Hicks: Nietzsche Perfectly Forecasts the Postmodernist Left
Published on Aug 1, 2017
Stephen Hicks is a Canadian-American philosopher who teaches at Rockford University, where he also directs the Center for Ethics and Entrepreneurship. In 2004 he wrote a book named "Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault" which was e.g. recommended by Jordan Peterson for understanding postmodernism (cf. [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPojltjv4M0']https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPojl...[/URL]) Full clip, quoted under fair use: [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bChKoll81r4']https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bChKo...[/URL] -------------------- This channel aims at extracting central points of presentations into short clips. The topics cover the problems of leftist ideology and the consequences for society. The aim is to move free speech advocates forward and fight against the culture of SJWs.
 

Jtucker

Padawan Learner
Session Date: June 13th 2015


Better to be ready then sorry and end up like Iraq, Libya, etc...
As Corvus quoted from a session in 2015 - Iran has a nuclear bomb/missile according to the C's.

The question I have is (assuming this is an actual fissionable warhead and not nuclear technology that could be turned into a bomb) - is where did they get it from?

I've always suspected that the Iran-Contra deal may have included the transfer of something more than non-nuclear ballistic tech. If the Bush team/Oliver North etc. traded ballistic nuclear missiles for the big payout they received to try and massacre the resistance to the Contras (which was logistically very expensive) - then possibly Iran received nuclear weapons.

It would make sense that the Obama Iran nuclear deal is some sort of cover up/smoke screen to prevent a full blown Israeli revelation. All of Netanyahu's posturing on nukes could be read as pressure on the U.S. - with this knowledge in mind. If the nuclear watchdogs have never found any "program" for Iranian nukes - that means nothing. If there were already warheads there in the 80's. Hiding a factory full of nuclear material is hard - hiding a weapon isn't as hard. As Mossad would have facilitated or at least known about Iran-Contra's full scope, then this puts the Ace in Israel's pocket to never reveal/blackmail the U.S. until its needs are met. Which of course - are never met.

I think that if the C's are right and there is a nuclear weapon in Iran's hand, Israel would have revealed it was Soviet quite a while ago (which I don't think is possible reading Soviet arms transfer history - at least in English). If the weapon(s) are American - then the blackmail element of revealing its source takes on all sorts of Israeli power over America. If the headline read, "Reagan Administration sold Nukes to Iran" - then I guess the type of USA civil war implied in the earliest Qanon posts might happen? I can't say that's a cultural zeitgeist that would even happen in America, but I would bet it's not a revelation the beltway guys want to bet on turning out in their favor.
 

BlackCartouche

Jedi Master
It's hard to admit but I was raised in such environment that made me scared and believe we will be imprisoned by technology and become slaves and die of hunger and all is hopeless.
Why did I developed such a fear in first place? Because I was a kid when there was a war in my country and we had evacuation exersises when we needed to run in basements or other shelters very often, there were violent movies on television all the time- we watched Terminator almost every day at my friend's house on VHS to prove we're brave plus other horror movies, there was mass hysteria present at adults, my neighbours invented we're Serbs to rob and burn our garage, it was really crazy time.
Since everything is a lesson in life, what could I say to others is it's important to get rid of even the slightest paranoia and why I think networking is important because together we see the bigger picture.
I want to thank all of you because you've helped me a lot to recover.
That was a crazy time of place to be growing up as a child. I can only hope you came out of it stronger with a far higher understanding of the 'darkness' - without too great a sacrifice to you and loved-ones: Learning lessons is certainly NOT always fun!

Its an interesting thing, robot AI becoming more like humans, whilst, paradoxically, an apparent push for 'cybergeneticizing' of humans to become more an android. I wonder... Where does that leave our feeding for 4D STS? Does Data in StarTrek:Next-Gen theoretically develop an AI 'soul' of sorts - more-so post 'emotion-chip'? Can 4D STS feed off of an advanced AI like a Cylon 'skin-job' (Battlestar Galactica)?... And how much can we replace our own bodies with biological implants before we become more 'mechanical-like' than 'organic-human' before it, theoretically, compromises the soul?
Do 4D STS really want us like robots - even metaphorically? Free-range chicken tastes much better that battery-chickens... It has more sustenance... Would not the same apply to us? Surely 4D STS want us to have a certain amount of 'freedom' - or at least the conviction of it - for a much tastier soul-sucking? I believe 4D STS don't want us repressed too much for this very reason... And like to replenish their captive-bred underground human-stock supply with 'free-range' humans such like us on the planet's surface to keep their meat supply genetically 'healthily' topped-up.
 

MayaDawn

The Force is Strong With This One
Thank you for the time and energy put into this session. Much to think about here. The mention of Dionysius is particularly interesting to me. As always the session brings a bounty of food for thought.
 

Hindsight Man

Jedi Master
That was a crazy time of place to be growing up as a child. I can only hope you came out of it stronger with a far higher understanding of the 'darkness' - without too great a sacrifice to you and loved-ones: Learning lessons is certainly NOT always fun!

Its an interesting thing, robot AI becoming more like humans, whilst, paradoxically, an apparent push for 'cybergeneticizing' of humans to become more an android. I wonder... Where does that leave our feeding for 4D STS? Does Data in StarTrek:Next-Gen theoretically develop an AI 'soul' of sorts - more-so post 'emotion-chip'? Can 4D STS feed off of an advanced AI like a Cylon 'skin-job' (Battlestar Galactica)?... And how much can we replace our own bodies with biological implants before we become more 'mechanical-like' than 'organic-human' before it, theoretically, compromises the soul?
Do 4D STS really want us like robots - even metaphorically? Free-range chicken tastes much better that battery-chickens... It has more sustenance... Would not the same apply to us? Surely 4D STS want us to have a certain amount of 'freedom' - or at least the conviction of it - for a much tastier soul-sucking? I believe 4D STS don't want us repressed too much for this very reason... And like to replenish their captive-bred underground human-stock supply with 'free-range' humans such like us on the planet's surface to keep their meat supply genetically 'healthily' topped-up.
My guess -and that's all it is- would be that as long as you have a physical brain and heart most other things can be replaced with prosthetics and retain the soul,given that C's mentioned that the main uplink to 4d is the pituitary gland.
 

BlackCartouche

Jedi Master
as long as you have a physical brain and heart most other things can be replaced with prosthetics and retain the soul,given that C's mentioned that the main uplink to 4d is the pituitary gland.
Hearts can be replaced with prosthetics also - though not the brain. I guess it all comes down to the brain, or more specifically the particular area that is the pituitary gland... This must be where the soul is stored/resides/interacts in 3D - and acting as the interface/conduit for an interconnective gateway-point to Cosmos-conscious and/or higher Self.
 

anartist

Jedi Master
FOTCM Member
As Corvus quoted from a session in 2015 - Iran has a nuclear bomb/missile according to the C's.

The question I have is (assuming this is an actual fissionable warhead and not nuclear technology that could be turned into a bomb) - is where did they get it from?

I've always suspected that the Iran-Contra deal may have included the transfer of something more than non-nuclear ballistic tech. If the Bush team/Oliver North etc. traded ballistic nuclear missiles for the big payout they received to try and massacre the resistance to the Contras (which was logistically very expensive) - then possibly Iran received nuclear weapons.

It would make sense that the Obama Iran nuclear deal is some sort of cover up/smoke screen to prevent a full blown Israeli revelation. All of Netanyahu's posturing on nukes could be read as pressure on the U.S. - with this knowledge in mind. If the nuclear watchdogs have never found any "program" for Iranian nukes - that means nothing. If there were already warheads there in the 80's. Hiding a factory full of nuclear material is hard - hiding a weapon isn't as hard. As Mossad would have facilitated or at least known about Iran-Contra's full scope, then this puts the Ace in Israel's pocket to never reveal/blackmail the U.S. until its needs are met. Which of course - are never met.

I think that if the C's are right and there is a nuclear weapon in Iran's hand, Israel would have revealed it was Soviet quite a while ago (which I don't think is possible reading Soviet arms transfer history - at least in English). If the weapon(s) are American - then the blackmail element of revealing its source takes on all sorts of Israeli power over America. If the headline read, "Reagan Administration sold Nukes to Iran" - then I guess the type of USA civil war implied in the earliest Qanon posts might happen? I can't say that's a cultural zeitgeist that would even happen in America, but I would bet it's not a revelation the beltway guys want to bet on turning out in their favor.
Interesting ideas. What occurs to me is that IF the USA was involved in this nuclear shenanigans, would that also not give leverage(blackmail as you say) to Iran as well? If Iran were to show that the USA provided nuclear weapons, what would that mean? Perhaps, IF Iran has nuclear weapons they may have been provided by -Pakistan?, -France? or (probably not) UK or Germany or China?
 
T

TomSquared

Guest
So what would happen if you took a perfectly normal, healthy person and removed only their pituitary gland?
 

goyacobol

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
So what would happen if you took a perfectly normal, healthy person and removed only their pituitary gland?
They might call you Josef Mengele or Dr. Frankenstein? I doubt the patient would survive the surgery, not sure but why bother when you can just fluoridate the water.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pineal_gland said:
By old age, the pineal gland contains about the same amount of fluoride as teeth.[36] Pineal fluoride and pineal calcium are correlated.[36]
 

BlackCartouche

Jedi Master
So what would happen if you took a perfectly normal, healthy person and removed only their pituitary gland?
A very good question. Its called 'Hypophysectomy'. Here's a brief overview in Wikipedia:

"Hypophysectomy performed at any age causes atrophy of the thyroid and adrenal glands as well as asthenia and cachexia. When the procedure is performed before sexual maturity, the reproductive tract remains undeveloped and non-functional. There is also a general lack of growth. If performed after sexual maturity, there will be a loss of reproductive function along with atrophy of gonads and accessory reproductive structures."

I thought this part particularly interesting:

"Post surgery, patients may have a severely altered self-image that may lead to an increased risk of suicide."

And its only the size of a pea!
 
Top Bottom