At the beginning of the plandemic, seeing Putin downcast made me sad...i was waiting for a hit of him!I had a feeling Putin knew it was safe enough..to be willing have his daughter take it. Another great move on the chessboard! Of course no vaccine has been developed for Corona viruses precisely because of their mulitple mutations..but the Russian one comes without the Bill Gates 'bonuses' and naturally the Global PTB are furious, judging by the media backlash.
(Ark)...Okay. Is there any kind of a fundamental physical law? Well, not physical... Some fundamental law of creation?
A: Free will.
I was thinking exactly the same thing.I wondered about the name 'Quinnilln' which reminds me of Quinine which brings up hydroxychloroquine.
Yeah, it’s interesting how the narrative has changed from the 1st wave, which focused mainly on case fatality rates, and ‘flattening the curve, stay at home’, to focusing purely on case numbers and masks. Rising case numbers make the mortality rates even lower, but you won’t hear that in the MSM. They’ve been testing obedience. Wearing a mask symbolises acquiescing to all this madness, but they’re very clever in forcing people to do so (using the weight weight of the law and shaming those who don’t), so it appears that there’s no choice. Forced compulsion.A: Facial recognition was never the full plan as it can be easily thwarted. It was used to accustom populace to tracking and surveillance. The ultimate surveillance is chipping. The fake pandemic justifies the vaccine with chip and wider tracking mandate. The mask is similar to antismoking. It induces obedience and allows identification of dissidence. Masks have the additional advantage of inducing brain damage and lowering of intelligence and general health.
(Ark) So the first question is about the idea of multiverse. There is such a thing that is called multiverse. It's supposed to be like a soup that is boiling, and that produces bubbles. These bubbles are universes. Some bubbles are small and they die very soon, and some bubbles are big and have enough energy and organization like our universe. We are one of the big bubbles. Is it an approximately correct idea?
Q: (Joe) No bubbles.
(Andromeda) No soup.
A: Based on Darwinism.
Q: (L) In other words, random selection.
(Ark) This eliminates a number of planned questions. [laughter] Alright... Like a year ago...
A: Consciousness and information are foundational. There is no place for either in "boiling" and random emergence.
Q: (Ark) Yeah, alright. Now I want to ask: A year or two ago there was a Nobel Prize given for the detection of a gravitational wave. Since then, most of the people accept it, but there are some dissidents that call it a big fraud...
Q: (Ark) Oh, okay. Now, one of the guys who called it a big fraud is my old kind of friend by the name of Dimi Chakalov.
(L) I remember Dimi.
(Ark) We were discussing things years ago. Now, he is of course he doesn't spare words, calling it a fraud and blah blah blah. He gives arguments. But on the other hand, recently I downloaded a bunch of his recent papers. He is working on his idea of a platonic world. His platonic world is where all these ideas are being formed. Should I really study his ideas because he's onto something? Can I gain something from studying his crazy papers?
A: Briefly and selectively.
Q: (Ark) That was about Dimi. Last question: I would like to know if there is some most important law that governs all of the creation. We know conservation of energy is an important law. You can think about conservation of information. Maybe there is such a law? This John Archibald Wheeler who we quoted several times, he added his own law which is kind of timeless which says that it's pure geometric boundary which says boundary is zero. Another possible law is: As above, so below. Okay. Is there any kind of a fundamental physical law? Well, not physical... Some fundamental law of creation?
A: Free will.
Q: (Pierre) For the information field, does all information already exist or is information added through the experience of creatures?
(L) I didn't understand that.
(Joe) His question is does all information already exist, or is new information created and added by individuals through their experiences?
(Ark) Well, for me, time does not apply. So things like conservation of information doesn't make much sense in the information world. It may make sense when the information starts to interact with matter, but only then.
(Pierre) Would you say then that the information field contains already ALL possible information?
A model of spacetime where points are represented by nodes on a graph, connected by links that can be on or off, indicating whether the two points are directly connected as if next to each other in spacetime.
Would you say then that the information field contains already ALL possible information?
It would have been even more assertive and acceptable to ask Russia for more data (which has already been willing to cooperate), after all it is assumed that we were all on the brink of death and the sooner the vaccine to get us out of this misery the better, but From that to going directly to discrediting it and not saying anything else is laughable ... by the way, Russia has predicted to start mass vaccination in a month, so they have time to create a second wave.The question/answer about the Russian vaccine is very interesting. For months, the bought media has been pushing he narrative that a vaccine was an urgent matter, that it's the only 100% safe thing in the universe, and that the sooner we have one the better. As soon as the Russian vaccine was announced, the narrative changed and now vaccines are not safe and they need testing and blah blah. It looks like Sputnik took them by surprise.