Thank you for the session, amazing information as always! On the topic of bubble universes / multiverse - it's amazing what they can claim to exist to avoid having to bring consciousness into the picture - it's like they're so terrified of the concept! Same as Darwinism, they will accept the most impossibly improbable, and tie it into there being almost an infinite number of universes where life doesn't exist and we just so happen to be in one where it does. So you can have a crazy amount of universes just floating around, with laws of physics and "cosmological constants" and forces being randomly "selected" somehow, with bazillions of "broken" universes where nothing much happens because the physics wouldn't work, and ours is some kind of needle in this insane chaotic haystack of mostly useless garbage, and this is fine. Nevermind that physics doesn't work out in ours as well, so they add dark matter/energy to "pad" them anyway. Anyway, somehow this doesn't upset anyone. But mention consciousness as an alternative explanation for how impossible/incredibly improbable can exist, and it's like kryptonite. It just MUST be Darwinian!
What is really so scary about consciousness to science? Is it because it opens a can of worms - that science itself would have to fundamentally change and re-evaluate everything it thinks it knows from square one? Is it embarrassing or something? Is it just too overwhelming? Is is terrifying that it's quite possible that some things cannot be measured or "predicted" or turned into technology because free will and non-physicality is at its root? And along the same token - maybe there are things that our 3d physical minds literally CANNOT ever understand, simply because they're not equipped for it, no matter how hard we try? I'm not sure the scientific ego can handle this possibility - that if consciousness is at the root of existence, its complexity and intricacy and level of awareness is such that 3d humans are simply not equipped to fully unlock its secrets - not without a fundamental change in our own consciousness and awareness. Admitting that we can't do or understand the true nature of the universe no matter how hard we try, as long as we remain human, is apparently impossible for science. Because then they'd have to also admit that we need to change our consciousness in a fundamental way as well, not simply be "smarter humans" like enhance our brains with computers or whatever. It would make any futurist or "posthumanist"/materialist rather uncomfortable I'd imagine. So they're in a collective denial.