goyacobol said:Elohir said:Concerning history, the concern about dates reminds me the recentism theory whose Fomenko is a symbol. Some historic facts appear to be faked or missed. Of course, we know that it's easier to manipulate mankind if it doesn't know its own history and origin.
Elohir,
Is the above quote referring to Anatoly Fomenko? I think some of his claims may be questionable in regards to Historical revisionism and dendrochronology as mentioned in this Wikipedia description:
Anatoly Fomenko
Historical revisionism
Fomenko is a supporter of drastically revising historical chronology. He has created his own revision called New Chronology, based on statistical correlations, dating of zodiacs, and by examining the mathematics and astronomy involved in chronology. Fomenko claims that he has discovered that many historical events do not correspond mathematically with the dates they are supposed to have occurred on. He asserts from this that all of ancient history (including the history of Greece, Rome, and Egypt) is just a reflection of events that occurred in the Middle Ages and that all of Chinese and Arab history are fabrications of 17th and 18th century Jesuits.
He also claims that Jesus lived in the 12th century A.D. and was crucified on Joshua's Hill; that the Trojan War and the Crusades were the same historical event; and that Genghis Khan and the Mongols were actually Russians. As well as disputing written chronologies, Fomenko also disputes more objective dating techniques such as dendrochronology and radiocarbon dating (see here for an examination of the latter criticism). His books include Empirico-statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and Its Applications and History: Fiction or Science?.
Most Russian scientists and worldwide historians considered Fomenko's historical works to be pseudoscientific.
If you consider the session transcripts and the Cs remarks is this session they are in contradiction as far as "dendrochronology":
Q: (Pierre) They said "AD", not "years ago".
A: Check tree ring data for signal.
I have not read his books but I gather he thinks "aliens" are primarily benevolent. I don't think that is necessarily true. That is not to say he doesn't have other ideas to contribute.
Also there is a thread on Book List for "The Golden Age, Psychopathy and the Sixth Extinction" and Laura has and excellent article on SOTT that includes Fomenko and his contribution to the historical study by the same title "The Golden Age, Psychopathy and the Sixth Extinction"
I never said that I believed all that he defends and I never read one of his books but, like you, I made some research about it and I think that his theory is pretty interesting and I respect all the work he has done about that. Nevertheless I'm convinced that our history is faked at some points and many people also think and make reasearch about that fact. Let's remember what we know for sure : "history is written by winners"...
Thank you for the links.