I agree with this and would like to expand on this subject. Recognizing that the game is rigged and then just sitting back and saying "well, we're seeing objective reality and being externally considerate and because all there is is lessons, it's all going to ok" is kind of like saying "all you need is love and light" except you're doing it with the intellectual center more than the emotional center. While it may be "ok," some realities are objectively better than others, and I believe you have to fight for the one you want in some form or fashion or you get "recycled."Bjorn said:We have to win. I don't know how, but we have to. If we don't, we can only beg for planetary destruction. And it seems this will be the fate for many in the times to come.
Nevertheless, I do see some value in this stoic perspective if you can put it in its greater context. What is key here, I believe, is how we perceive and define winning or losing. I was immediately reminded of this session:
This then ties into this oft quoted session:session990828 said:Q: (L) There were several dark streaks seen in the sky at the time of the recent solar eclipse. There has been a great deal of comment about this at various sites on the internet including some of the 'hard science' astronomical ones, yet there is no general consensus as to what they were. There were also strange lights and objects seen around the sun, and later, crossing the surface of the moon. There is also an ongoing discussion about some sort of 'Incoming Object' as though there is an anomalous object in our solar system that is creating this effect. Now, I realize that you said before that we ought to watch for something AFTER Comet Lee, the exact words being ' Now, you need to know the composition of this comet... And any other closely following same. We have alluded to the increased cometary activity before. Oort, and that which cyclically disturbs it.' So, it does seem that what you were alluding to is transpiring at the present. I mean, 'closely following' probably means close in terms of time, also. And you did say that such comets as have been disturbed would approach in a 'scatter pattern,' which would mean from any and all directions. Can you comment on these current events?
A: Not yet.
Q: Why? Is there something we should be watching for?
A: Best to keep watching....
Q: Anything in particular we should be watching for?
A: No. Be open to all possibilities.
Q: Are we on the verge of a) an alien invasion; b) a cometary impact; c) the appearance of a twin sun, a death star in our solar system?
A: Wait and see.
Q: I don't want to wait and see! (A) Wait and see! When it hits us, we will know! (L) Let me ask this....
A: What a glorious transition to 4th density STO. With maybe a quick stopover in 5th just to pick up a few things for the trip!
Q: Are you saying that we are getting ready for the Big Kahuna?
A: Only Don Ho knows for sure.
Q: What?!
A: Well, you did say "Kaahuna," yes?
Q: Okay, you have repeatedly, in the past year, alluded to something that we are supposed to be watching for, that we are supposed to 'enjoy the show,' and all that sort of thing. Now you have
made this remark about 5th density, where 3rd density goes at death. Are you suggesting that a lot of folks are going to check out?
A: Maybe we were trying to Lighten things up a bit!
Q: That's all fine and good, but I just want one word here, a clue about what is coming down in the near future that you are making all these hints about... just a one word clue?
A: KABOOM!
Q: Now wait a minute! You can't DO that! What do you mean 'kaboom?' I changed my mind, I want two words! One more word!
A: SPLAT!
A simplistically linear way of looking at "winning the game" is the wave comes, we rise up against 4DSTS, kick their butts, and they go away and leave us alone. I don't think that's quite how it works. At this point, it looks like the Deluge of Fire followed by some kind of reset that starts the whole vicious cycle over again is pretty much predestined. As the Cassiopaeans so bluntly described it, the future is "Kaboom, splat!" A 3D alien sitting in a 3D spacecraft would see the planet essentially get blown up, and nothing anyone did mattered in the end. However, the Cassiopaeans said that the proper perspective is not 3D. It looks like a lot of people are going to die and stopover in 5D to "pick up a few things for the trip." This would seem like a loss from a 3D perspective, but may not be in the end. Furthermore, there seems to be a certain "seed stock" of people required to fully ride out the turmoil and tunnel out of and split off a new reality. As long as that critical mass survives to anchor the new frequency, physical survival may not be that important in individual cases; another thing that would seem like a loss from a 3D perspective. It does seem like the people who survive through the whole thing will get the most interesting lessons and the most exhilarating ride, but survival may not be appropriate in every specific circumstance. At some point even those who would survive would seem to disappear from the 3D reality by some means unknown to us, but would be presumed dead to an outside observer. Thus it would look like it was all for nought to an outside observer, when that was not actually the case.session941016 said:Q: (L) Well, do you have any suggestions?
A: World will soon have nothing but credit and debit have you not heard of this new visa debit cards this is the future of money as controlled by the world banking system i.e. the brotherhood i.e. Lizards i.e. antichrist.
Q: (L) If I don't have a credit card then I don't have to belong to this system?
A: No. You will have no choices: belong or starve.
Q: (L) What happened to free will?
A: Brotherhood AKA Lizards AKA antichrist has interfered with free will for 309000 years. They are getting desperate as we near the change.
Q: (V) It has always been my nature to rebel against that which I did not feel was good for me. Is rebellion against this system possible?
A: If you are willing to leave the body.
Q: (L) Leave the body as in death, croak, kick the bucket?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) If we were to move...
A: Changes will follow turmoil be patient.
Q: (L) We would like to move into the country. Will it be possible to get along without this credit/debit card leading that kind of life?
A: No.
Q: (L) Are they going to have the kind of capability of controlling everything and everybody no matter where they are?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Even if we moved to Guyana and built a log hut in the rain forest and didn't bother anybody, we'd still get sucked into this thing?
A: Laura you will feel the effect of the Lizard beings desperate push for total control no matter where you go.
Q: (L) That is inexpressibly depressing. Do you understand?
A: Why? Change will follow.
Q: (L) Will it follow soon?
A: You are slipping a bit. Refer to Literature "Bringers of the Dawn". Challenge will be ecstasy if viewed with proper perspective which is not, we repeat: not of third level reality, understand?
Q: (L) In the reference cited, Joan of Arc is described as feeling ecstatic while burning at the stake. Is that what you mean?
A: Sort of, but you need not burn at the stake.
Q: (L) That's small comfort. There's other ways to die.
A: We are not speaking of death, Laura. If you listen to those who are firmly rooted in 3rd level this is when you run the risk of slipping in your knowledge learned no matter how good the
intentions i.e. LM.
Q: (L) What do you mean about LM?
A: Guyana.
Q: (L) What do you mean "Challenge will be ecstasy"? What sort of challenge?
A: Living through the turmoil ahead.
My hunch on my own incarnation is that it is merely arriving at a crossroads and deciding which way to go. All of the decades of this process represent a couple of seconds to a minute at most of "spiritual time" where all that happens is a decision is made. No matter what I choose, I will still die, and likely in some awful world, but the difference is in the lessons learned which creates possibilities for new realities. In this session, the Cassiopaeans have said that it is fine to visualize and devote energy to one's ideal world, but not focus on how it gets there. We take care of the what and the universe takes care of the how, and the choosing is very important, even though it in itself is a rather long and complicated process.
In summation, the stoic ideal works if you have this very broad picture view where you can see that the game board is not flat, but three dimensional (or more) and internalize and ground that understanding; if not, it seems to me more like escapism. If the lessons are learned that you want to learn and the potentials for learning are enhanced for the next incarnation, then that is a "win"; if the lessons are not learned that is a "loss." Reincarnating into some type of tyrannical Borg reality is not a loss I will tolerate, and I think there is a pathway offered to avoid that and win, even if it is pretty much impossible to predict and fully comprehend most of the time.