As we come to terms with what's been developing on such a grand scale, and how we are choosing to respond to it (both individually and as part of this community), I thought the following blog post to be quite insightful, and affirming, of how we are to think of how positive change will occur:
"Archbishop Vigano (of the Roman Catholic Church) has made
a characteristically incisive intervention concerning the nature and reality of the 2020 global totalitarian
coup, led by the demonic powers of evil.
I value Vigano, because I know of nobody in public life who has done a better job of diagnosing the heart of that corruption which has so rapidly accelerated to cover the world; with the compliance of large masses of the populace.
Yet, when it comes to describing what those who agree with his diagnosis ought to do about it; the Archbishop's recommendations are inadequate.
For a start; he envisages an 'anti-globalist alliance' as the basis for future opposition.
But this would not be a positively-motivated movement. Instead Vigano proposes a '
double-negative' basis for alliance - i.e. a grouping of those who are Against Evil.
Such a movement (and there are many already) would certainly be weak because [they are] diversely and feebly motivated. At best an anti-evil alliance could only
slow the advance of evil;
because it offers no a superior alternative basis of life.
Exactly so. We are here because we have chosen to see ourselves and the world as objectively as possible, and while we might rant or rave from time to time about the malevolence and injustice we perceive or experience, the stance we take is to be proactive and constructive; aligning ourselves - body, mind and soul with what's highest - and not railing against and directly engaging the powers and the principalities that have already rigged the game. And while its true that a few of us are here and there wrangling with elements of the bureaucracy, for the most part the above can be said to be true.
Evil is itself oppositional - oppositional to God/ the good/ divine creation - and ultimately oppositional [to] Christianity with its offer to all Mankind of eternal life in Heaven. A Christian alternative to evil should not itself be oppositional!
Christianity has the inestimable advantage of offering positive good - and this ought to be reflected in its aims.
It could be said that this community, here, is offering a positive good; the information, modalities, tools, knowledge and love on offer are ours for the taking, sharing and giving - but are only of true value to us to the extent that they're being well utilized.
Knowledge utilization = light generation.
How well are we utilizing these resources - and what holds us back from, perhaps, utilizing them even better?
These are questions we do well to ask ourselves, I think.
What is needed, therefore, is an alliance of those who are
positively For God, good/ divine creation and salvation. In other words a Christian alliance.
In the past this would have suggested A Church - or perhaps an alliance of Churches. However, our problem is that the churches are - overall, but decisively -
on the side of the powers of evil;
they fail to recognize, discern, and reject global totalitarianism - and indeed all major 'Christian' churches embraces more than one of the
core strategic instruments of evil.
(See: The sinister convergence of Klaus Schwab's Great Reset with the Vatican and Liberation Theology)
This means that before any putative Alliance of Good could get off-the-ground and achieve anything; it would first need to reform and turn-around the major Christian churches. But this is not happening -
and instead the churches are getting worse, more evil, by the month.
Anyone Christian who hoped to join a church and fight totalitarian evil by the means of offering a positive and transcendent alternative; would
immediately find himself confronted by an organization that
already served exactly that evil he intended to oppose!
Before opposing global evil, that person would need to embark on a fight against institutional evil; when the institution was embedded in an already evil world; and its evil qualities were being supported by all powers in the global totalitarianism - laws, officialdom, police, the media etc.
Anyone Christian who wanted to fight
for good would be faced by inevitable - and probably prolonged - delay; before he could even begin:
If he did so
via a church!
(On the other hand, if [a] Christian found a small but uncorrupt church; a church who recognized the coup and opposed global evil - he would instead be faced by the immediate problem of growing that church to such a size that it could exert effective socio-political power.)
This greatly reminds me of Gurdjieff's idea that it requires 200 co-linear people to effect positive macro change. Along these same lines we have also heard it said by the C's that it takes a relatively small group of co-linear individuals to do the same - but that, at the time of that particular session, we here weren't there yet. This begs the question: when and how are we going to get that point? The answer, as suggested earlier, is in greater utilizing the knowledge provided here. And what that means for each of us for whom this work holds great meaning.
So what does an individual who agrees with Vigano's diagnosis actually do?
To my mind, any generally proposed solution should be possible for any person, anywhere; and, given the fact that failure to resist evil leads to more and greater evil -
the answer needs to be one which every individual can start to act-upon immediately.
This rules-out institutional (including church) solutions, since all these regard the individual
first trying to persuade other people - and we don't have time for that;
nor can we afford to delay beginning our own opposition.
If we wait until
after we have attained a local majority of sufficient size, until
after we have achieved sufficient institutional reform; if we put-off our own active opposition until
after we can persuade enough 'other people' to join with us in some kind of significant 'movement' - then
nothing will happen.
Indeed. By now it is quite clear to all that 'Trump 2024', the 'White Hats' (whoever they are) or even a giant like Putin - do not have the power to effect global institutional reform. No, if anything is to happen at all it is up to each of us to help it along to the best of our ability - by helping ourselves and each other, right here.
Most of us are isolated, surrounded, outnumbered - thus nearly-everybody will end-up
waiting for some other people to start something that they can then 'join' - so... nothing will happen.
This group has long ago since been started. And the answer would seem to be that if we could each strengthen ourselves and work to strengthen our own individual signals (and working with others here to do the same) - we might very well 'get there'. We simply don't know how close we are to a sort of tipping point to effect positive change. But we do know that it will require the sincere and consistent efforts of a number of us to accomplish it. So please do not underestimate your own ability to help things along.
Once we have ruled-out what we cannot or should-not do; the answer to what we should do becomes obvious:
We should do what we personally can - starting now, not waiting for anybody else; and relying upon divine providence to amplify and organize individual activities into something greater.
The linked essay above is an excellent explication of this. Using the LOTR series, the author shows how the Divine sometimes truly works in mysterious ways!
After all; if we are doing the right thing, then God will be on our side; and God is the creator - therefore God can
and will use whatever we personally do to advance His agenda.
Just replace "divine providence" or "God" with the Divine Cosmic Mind or the Universe - and its clear that the author has a good grasp of what's going on that agrees with our own understanding.
We really must do the positively-right things Now - so far as we are able -
and trust in God to deal with strategic considerations.
Such a personally-focused attitude can be made to sound feeble and ineffectual compared with daydreams of a large international anti-evil alliance clashing head-to-head with the demon-controlled corporations and governments...
But the difference is that the one Will happen, starting
instantly; insofar as any individual person
wants it to happen...
Whereas the other is purely "aspirational."
The author clearly demonstrates great faith in the Universe to lend a helping hand, but faith requires taking the action to demonstrate that faith; what practices/actions/knowledge acquisitions and utilizations can each of us further take to support the Universe in supporting us? A question each of us who wishes to have a part in the future might ask.
