Session 18 December 2021

[Turgon]

Altair) What additions can be made to our vaccination protocol to better handle mRNA vaccines?

(L) Well, we just got one suggestion: heat would be very useful. I suppose there are other ways to apply heat than far infrared. Is heat in general beneficial?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So it's not just infrared. Okay. We can do some research on that. That's...

A: Take more melatonin.

Q: (L) Take more melatonin?

(Gaby) It's an antiviral.

(L) Don't take too much, but you can take more.

And here's the latest Mercola article that's been posted on SOTT talking about how melatonin is kind of a miraculous addition to any Covid protocol if you're sick with the virus.

Melatonin linked to significantly reduced COVID-19 mortality

Melatonin is a hormone synthesized in your pineal gland and several other organs,1 indeed in most cells, including human lung monocytes and macrophages, as it is actually synthesized in your mitochondria.2 While most well-known as a natural sleep...

www.sott.net

 

[Aeneas]

Thank you for another interesting session and already 4 weeks have gone by. Also a big thank you for answering my questions which a few of us had thought of, while putting our heads together. It leads to more questions when a bit of time has passed to research a bit and network.

As for the Swiss election:

(Niall) Does the Swiss referendum result of 28 November, in which two thirds of those who voted supported the government's Covid control measures, broadly reflect the people's wishes?

A: The usual election tactics were used.

Officially 38% voted no and 62% yes. Some of the tactics used:
1) The wording of the text for the referendum was deliberately confusing so it was difficult for people who were against to know whether a yes meant no to the initiative or whether it was a no which did it.
2) The media was heavily at it, framing the choice and nudging the voters in the 'right' direction using amongst other tactic fear. A leaked video has since surfaced with the CEO of the biggest Swiss media group Ringier, saying to staff not to question the government on Corona or their health advice. In other words only the government line was accepted. A link to an article in German with that leak is here. Ringier Group
3) Circumstantial evidence: A work colleague of my wife has a friend who works for the Swiss Post. She said that they had been told to open the postal votes and if it was a 'NO' vote, then to destroy them. That is hard to believe in a country like Switzerland that it could happen, but it does not mean that it didn't happen in some places. One would counter by saying that this couldn't happen as it would be leaked, yet the way things are, most people would not believe such people or simply claim that such people are conspiracy theorists. The mass psychosis is still too entrenched at this point.
4) Circumstantial evidence: A few people remarked how they heard a lot of sirens from ambulance in the time up to the election but a noticeably drop afterwards. Whether this is in fact the case is hard to verify. Sirens can work in producing fear and to remind people that the 'pandemic' is real.

So the usual tactics sounds about right. This vote was another one of those which was too important to actually reflect reality.

 

[growunselfish]

There is nothing wrong with speaking the truth, especially if someone feels that it is the right thing to do. Andromeda did nothing wrong. It takes a lot of courage to do what is right. People are really good at finding excuses why not to do something. They are also very good at taking others for granted, forgetting that any day can be the last one for us to live.

 

[AllFreq]

Thank you for another interesting session and already 4 weeks have gone by. Also a big thank you for answering my questions which a few of us had thought of, while putting our heads together. It leads to more questions when a bit of time has passed to research a bit and network.

As for the Swiss election:

Officially 38% voted no and 62% yes. Some of the tactics used:
1) The wording of the text for the referendum was deliberately confusing so it was difficult for people who were against to know whether a yes meant no to the initiative or whether it was a no which did it.
2) The media was heavily at it, framing the choice and nudging the voters in the 'right' direction using amongst other tactic fear. A leaked video has since surfaced with the CEO of the biggest Swiss media group Ringier, saying to staff not to question the government on Corona or their health advice. In other words only the government line was accepted. A link to an article in German with that leak is here. Ringier Group
3) Circumstantial evidence: A work colleague of my wife has a friend who works for the Swiss Post. She said that they had been told to open the postal votes and if it was a 'NO' vote, then to destroy them. That is hard to believe in a country like Switzerland that it could happen, but it does not mean that it didn't happen in some places. One would counter by saying that this couldn't happen as it would be leaked, yet the way things are, most people would not believe such people or simply claim that such people are conspiracy theorists. The mass psychosis is still too entrenched at this point.
4) Circumstantial evidence: A few people remarked how they heard a lot of sirens from ambulance in the time up to the election but a noticeably drop afterwards. Whether this is in fact the case is hard to verify. Sirens can work in producing fear and to remind people that the 'pandemic' is real.

So the usual tactics sounds about right. This vote was another one of those which was too important to actually reflect reality.

Hello, thanks for your question. I would also like to ask some but I am not fluent in English. I would be grateful if maybe you could transfer my questions in a future session.

I would like to ask about this new omicron variant. In the session of March 21 it was said: "The virus did not appear first in China. There were experiments at Fort Detrick regarding the creation of a vaccine that would make humans more controllable. This vaccine had unexpected effects and in some cases did the opposite of what was intended. The strain escaped into a population and further mutated. Indeed it was carried to China by US soldiers. China soon knew the type and origin and launched a massive campaign to control the situation. This was seen by Western powers as a good model to follow with additional add-on factors. In the meantime further mutations have occurred, some engineered via STO forces by virtue of the virus taking hold in certain persons whose spiritual force was able to direct the progression. At this point, there are two major strains. The elite need to stop the spread of that which they "created"." Q: Omicron is the strain that the elite created and they need to stop its spread since it is a danger to their plans?

Many years ago it was asked about the state of Hitler and was answered that he was in a suspended state. I would like to know the update of this question. Q: What is the state of Hitler?

Greetings

 

[AllFreq]

Hello, thanks for your question. I would also like to ask some but I am not fluent in English. I would be grateful if maybe you could transfer my questions in a future session.

I would like to ask about this new omicron variant. In the session of March 21 it was said: "The virus did not appear first in China. There were experiments at Fort Detrick regarding the creation of a vaccine that would make humans more controllable. This vaccine had unexpected effects and in some cases did the opposite of what was intended. The strain escaped into a population and further mutated. Indeed it was carried to China by US soldiers. China soon knew the type and origin and launched a massive campaign to control the situation. This was seen by Western powers as a good model to follow with additional add-on factors. In the meantime further mutations have occurred, some engineered via STO forces by virtue of the virus taking hold in certain persons whose spiritual force was able to direct the progression. At this point, there are two major strains. The elite need to stop the spread of that which they "created"." Q: Omicron is the strain that the elite created and they need to stop its spread since it is a danger to their plans?

Many years ago it was asked about the state of Hitler and was answered that he was in a suspended state. I would like to know the update of this question. Q: What is the state of Hitler?

Greetings

About the second question I found this:

Q: What is Hitler doing right now? Planning on coming back and trying to do it again? [Laughter] Seriously, what is Hitler doing now?

A: Soul in transit.

Q: To where? Does that mean he isn't at 5th density?

A: No.

Q: He's already been there?

A: Floater.

Q: What's a floater?

A: Returnee.

Q: He is floating around and waiting to come into a body?

A: Yes.

Q: You mean he's already done 5th density and is ready to incarnate again?

A: Yes.

Q: Well, that's a scary thought! Just so we know, does it happen to be here on earth?

A: Wait and see.

 

[Mike]

Q: Omicron is the strain that the elite created and they need to stop its spread since it is a danger to their plans?

Since the session is from about two years ago, it looks like Omicron is a further mutation of the virus referred to in this session. It may be that the Omicron mutation is still a danger to their plans, but the original mutation talked about in this session is what looks to be the danger that was reacted to back then.

 

[thorbiorn]

From Session 20 August 2001

Q: What is the best way to remove or undo programming?
A: Awareness and resistance.

One can ask, what comes first, awareness or resistance? Whatever the answer, it would explain why a serious pushback against politicians and governments might not be imminent:

Q: (L) [...] Next:

(primeaddict) Which nation will be the first to rise up against the government and attack the politicians and health advisers?

[laughter]

(L) You should know better than to ask that question!

(Andromeda) That's a good one! [laughter]

(Niall) The nation of Texas!

A: Might be spontaneous in several places at once. But not yet imminent in any serious way.

 

[Lee.T]

A big, heartfelt thank you for another very enlightening session. Wow, amazing to see so many Fomites taking part.
Thanks, Laura and the Ladies of the board as per usual, you are stars
Many items to ponder going into 2022.

 

[Indiken]

Q: (L) Okay. We have a lot of questions here, so I guess we might as well get to the first one. Mike has some questions about Bitcoin.

(Mike) In general, who is the person (or people) that created Bitcoin?

A: CIA.

Q: (L) Well, alright.

(Mike) For what purpose did they initially create Bitcoin?

A: Bridge to nowhere.

Q: (L) What do you mean, "Bridge to nowhere"?

A: Digitize, and then deprive common man of resource.

I started studying the technical details of blockchain and cryptocurrencies and it do not seem to be something very special. I mean, it does not look that you need CIA to make it, a one good specialist can make it, given the information available in public. Could someone elaborate on this, or are you just throwing questions without doing serious research ?

(L) Well, we just got one suggestion: heat would be very useful. I suppose there are other ways to apply heat than far infrared. Is heat in general beneficial?

A: Yes.

From what I research with TCM, it looks like heat accumulates Qi and cold disperses Qi. Could anyone comment on this ?

 

[Chad]

I started studying the technical details of blockchain and cryptocurrencies and it do not seem to be something very special. I mean, it does not look that you need CIA to make it, a one good specialist can make it, given the information available in public. Could someone elaborate on this, or are you just throwing questions without doing serious research ?

Maybe one wouldn't need the CIA to make it, but for Bitcoin to remain in circulation - i.e. not to be outlawed by the authorities - it would probably need approval from the government/deep state. That probably also explains why it gets as much mainstream publicity and hype that it does. Which is also probably why it's so popular.

Indiken, just so you know, your comment:

are you just throwing questions without doing serious research ?

comes across as quite presumptious and a little rude.

Is it is perhaps an issue with language/translation? Or were you genuinely annoyed and that was expressed in your comment?

 

[Joe]

I started studying the technical details of blockchain and cryptocurrencies and it do not seem to be something very special. I mean, it does not look that you need CIA to make it, a one good specialist can make it, given the information available in public. Could someone elaborate on this, or are you just throwing questions without doing serious research ?

Who "made" Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general is not as important as who is promoting them and what the goal is. The answer in the session appears to be pointing out something rather obvious: that cryptocurrencies are a bridge to a 'cashless society' which obviously deprives people of independence and agency. Based on my close observation of how this world has developed over the past 20 years, I suspect that some kind of a major financial crisis may occur in the near future, after which the global economy will be 'rebuilt' on the basis of cryptos.

 

[Alejo]

Who "made" Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general is not as important as who is promoting them and what the goal is. The answer in the session appears to be pointing out something rather obvious: that cryptocurrencies are a bridge to a 'cashless society' which obviously deprives people of independence and agency. Based on my close observation of how this world has developed over the past 20 years, I suspect that some kind of a major financial crisis may occur in the near future, after which the global economy will be 'rebuilt' on the basis of cryptos.

Whilst also being sold to people as a bridge towards independence from the system and the banking industries. A lot of the people I know in my daily life who are into crypto seem rather enthusiastic about the idea that "oh, it's decentralized money so it's not beholden to any government or banking institution, it's financial freedom".

But as Joe pointed out, it actually seems to be its exact opposite, it's a probably more centralized form of exchange of money and goods (or human energy) being disguised as the promise of financial freedom. I remember I started to grow rather suspicious of it when I saw signs at my laundromat for a bitcoin vending machine, right after hearing that Google had dedicated large computational resources to the goal of mining bitcoin.

 

[Joe]

A lot of the people I know in my daily life who are into crypto seem rather enthusiastic about the idea that "oh, it's decentralized money so it's not beholden to any government or banking institution, it's financial freedom".

Yeah, except such people have little or no understanding of just how psychologically and emotionally beholden THEY are to government and its dictates. Give a mind-programmed slave the tools to break his shackles and rather than break them, he'll try and sell them to another slave.

 

[Joe]

Don't get me wrong, if you can profit from cryptos in the short term and turn that profit into something tangible and useful, then more power to you. Just don't do the opposite.

 

[Indiken]

Maybe one wouldn't need the CIA to make it, but for Bitcoin to remain in circulation - i.e. not to be outlawed by the authorities - it would probably need approval from the government/deep state. That probably also explains why it gets as much mainstream publicity and hype that it does. Which is also probably why it's so popular.

Indiken, just so you know, your comment:

comes across as quite presumptious and a little rude.

Is it is perhaps an issue with language/translation? Or were you genuinely annoyed and that was expressed in your comment?

I was in a bad mood. When a person is in a bad mood, he wants pain to happen, to clear the bad mood. So I was more rude, than I am normally. I did write honestly what I think. To me, the answer of "Digitize, and then deprive common man of resource." is only invitation for you to ask more, about how this whole system works, but you stop and are happy to hear only that Bitcoin is evil.

It does not matter if it is evil or good, only what matters how it works and how can you use it to your needs.

Knowledge protects.


Does it ?