Session 22 July 2010

A: Yes. We have mentioned a 5D city on a hill.


Could it be that the "5D city on a hill" is Paris?

Some remarks, "coincidences", that could be further developed...

1) Paris intra-muros would have 13 hills (generally rendered by the toponymic name "mont " in French (mount)), this figure drops to 5 when we retain the 100 meter limit, which would usually be used to define a hill: these 5 hills are all located on the right bank; moreover, the Sainte-Geneviève mountain (strangely named Montagne whereas it only peaks at 61m) is a hill located on the left bank, it takes up most of the 5th district of Paris and the Latin quarter.

2) Paris, the character of Greek mythology was abandoned as a child on "Mont/Mount" Ida; as an adult, he kidnapped Hèlène and launched the Trojan War which, according to Iman Wilkens, did not take place in what is now Turkey, but in "ancient Egypt" which would appear in northwestern Europe, the original Nile would therefore be the Seine; In addition, Menelaus built a funeral "mound" at the confluence of the Epte and the Seine between Paris and the English Channel: once again, Paris is linked to a "mont/mount/mound";

3) Paris is today the "theatre", the "forum" of the yellow vest demonstrations; however, this movement started with a protest on the rise of oil, this can be correlated by what the Cassiopeans say in this session: "Oil is not enough to explain this. But people will only see the oil cause and turn against the elite for triggering such a disaster.
Today, this movement, this "revolutionary revolt", has broadened its demands towards the elite and could be linked to the prediction read by Arc in the session of 29 December 2009, relating to France, where it is mentioned that "a referendum similar to that of Switzerland will be organised" and which strangely recalls the RIC.


Ps: During this session, it was Rochiana of the Cassiopeans who was present, this first name is very close to the term "Roche/rocher" in French and recalls the idea of "funeral mound" or "tumulus" which when it consists of a pile of stones/rocks is called "Cairn" or "montjoie": another "mont"/mount !
It is interesting to note its etymology where the hill makes an appearance again :) but also the "ancient Egypt":

Wikipedia says:
The word comes from the pre-celtic and Celtic *karn and beyond the proto-Indo-European *kar ("stone, rock").
The Celtic word has given the Scottish word càrn, which has a much broader meaning: it can refer to several types of "hills" as well as natural heaps of stones.
Breton has the word karn3, which is found in toponymy, where there are dolmenic cairns: Carn Island, Pors Carn, Carnac, Carnoët...

Carnac would be the original Karnak... and here again is an allusion to "Ancient Egypt";)

Wipedia says:
Cairns have several functions:
  • mark out a path crossing rocky or arid ground, or crossing a glacier;
  • identify/spot a particular point such as the top of a mountain or pass, the presence of a cave or some of its accesses or internal passages;
  • mark a burial site or celebrate the dead;
  • serve as a support for religious practices such as prayer flags in the Himalayas and Tibet.
In addition, cairns were used to commemorate all kinds of events: a battle site, a place where a wagon was knocked down, etc.

Would Rochiana and the Cassiopeans "mark out the path" for us so that we could "identify/spot" the "summit of the mountain", the "battle site", the revolution discussed in this session, just like the Trojan War?)
 

Attachments

  • carte-topographique-paris.png
    carte-topographique-paris.png
    686.8 KB · Views: 6
Last edited by a moderator:
While reading Coronavirus epidemic in China: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story? Laura mentioned this thread including:
In Session 22 July 2010
A: Cassiopaea. Now listen rightly.
Q: (L) We are listening rightly.
A: You have questions about the Gulf Stream. Recall the astrological reading you did for The Dot Connector Magazine?
Q: (L) Yes.
A: Well, it was closer than you realize and the Gulf Stream clue is the missing piece.
Q: (L) Okay, so what's going to happen? Is the Gulf Stream breaking up, and is that going to bring on an ice age?
A: It is, it will.
Q: (L) Is that like imminent?
A: The cause is more than the oil. But the people will only see the oil reason and turn against the elite for bringing on such a disaster. Also note that the nonlinear effects will take some time to develop fully.
Q: (L) Okay, so are you saying that there are going to be some people who are very aware sooner than others, and then it's going to spread?
A: Yes.
In Shutdown of thermohaline circulation - Wikipedia they say that
A shutdown or slowdown of the thermohaline circulation is a hypothesized effect of global warming on a major ocean circulation.

A 2015 study suggested that the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) has weakened by 15-20% in 200 years.[1]
Would The Extinction Rebellion, Climate Emergency, Fridays for Future etc who organized protests in many countries across the world include people who had some awareness, but who perhaps were mislead?
 
The Cs responded to the following regarding the influence of earl childhood experiences by giving a reference to Political Ponerology. As I could not find the text from the book had been cited, I copied it out from the Kindle version to provide context for anyone revisiting the thread.
(L) That's true because most of us when we're growing up only understand what someone else is going through if we understand it ourselves. You see someone else cut their finger and you know what it feels like because you cut your finger. It's like a physical thing that you get in your body. Then you do something that hurts somebody else and maybe you're too young to understand intellectually the seriousness of it, but then you get a smack on the butt and you understand in a kind of genetic or physiological way that you did something that hurt somebody else and you got a smack. Later on when you're older it's explained, but you have a foundation on which that explanation can make sense. If you've never had anything physical happen to you as a consequence or repercussion of anything you've ever done, and then all of a sudden when you're ten years old and your cognitive facilities start to kick in and somebody starts explaining things to you, you will not understand. You will not understand what pain or suffering really is because you've never had anything, no consequence.
Next comes the part where the Cs refer to the Ponerology book:
A: Very close. Remember the woman described in Ponerology as a characteropath?

Q: (L) The one with the brothers where they defended everything she said and everything she did. She never had to have any consequences for anything she ever did. But then wasn't that supposed to be some kind of brain damage?

A: The same can result from indulgence.

Q: (Galaxia) Does being an only child cause some of them to be missing something in their brain because they didn't have any siblings? Do they have brain damage or something?

A: Sometimes, yes. The important thing about discipline for children is activation of brain chemistry mixes at certain windows of imprinting. The human organism is largely a product of evolutionary pressures. To act as if there are no dangers in the environment, to raise a child without exposure to the natural consequences of growing in a hostile environment, is to deprive the child of many systemic cascades of brain activity necessary for proper growth and development.
From Lobaczewski, Andrew M.. Political Ponerology (A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes) . Red Pill Press. Kindle Edition. Around 32-33% I only included one paragraph extra as an introduction, hoping it will be sufficient to understand what Lobaczewski refers to in following paragraphs.
Such “Stalinistic characters” traumatize and actively spellbind others, and their influence finds it exceptionally easy to bypass the controls of common sense. A large proportion of people tend to credit such individuals with special powers, thereby succumbing to their egotistic beliefs. If a parent manifests such a defect, no matter how minimal, all the children in the family evidence anomalies in personality development.

The author studied an entire generation of older, educated, people wherein the source of such influence was the eldest sister who suffered perinatal damage of the frontal centers. From early childhood, her four younger brothers were exposed to and assimilated pathologically altered psychological material, including their sister’s growing component of hysteria. They retained well into their sixties the deformities of personality and world view, as well as the hysterical features thus caused, whose intensity diminished in proportion to the greater difference in age.

Subconscious selection of information made it impossible for these men to apprehend any critical comments regarding their sister’s character; also, any such comments were considered to be an offense to the family honor. The brothers accepted as real their sister’s pathological delusions and complaints about her “bad” husband (who was actually a decent person) and her son, in whom she found a scapegoat to avenge her failures. They thereby participated in a world of vengeful emotions, considering their sister a completely normal person whom they were prepared to defend by the most unsavory methods, if need be, against any suggestion of her abnormality. They thought normal women were insipid and naive, good for nothing but sexual conquest. Not one among the brothers ever created a healthy family or developed even average wisdom of life.

The character development of these people also included many other factors that were dependent upon the time and place in which they were reared: the turn of the century, with a patriotic Polish father and German mother who obeyed contemporary custom by formally accepting her husband’s nationality, but who still remained an advocate of the militarism, and customary acceptance of the intensified hysteria which covered Europe at the time. That was the Europe of the three Emperors: the splendor of three people with limited intelligence, two of whom revealed pathological traits. The concept of “honor” sanctified triumph. Staring at someone too long was sufficient pretext for a duel. These brothers were thus raised to be valiant duelists covered with saber-scars; however, the slashes they inflicted upon their opponents were more frequent and much worse.

When people with a humanistic education pondered the personalities of this family, they concluded that the causes for this formation should be sought in contemporary time and customs. If, however, the sister had not suffered brain damage and the pathological factor had not existed (exclusionary hypothesis), their personalities would have developed more normally even during those times. They would have become more critical and more amenable to the values of healthy reasoning and humanistic contents. They would have founded better families and received more sensible advice from wives more wisely chosen. As for the evil they sowed too liberally during their lives, it would either not have existed at all, or else would have been reduced to a scope conditioned by more remote pathological factors.
This session is probably the most intensive regarding the upbringing of children and early childhood.
 
This morning I was reading some tweets about the situation that is being generated in some countries like Peru, Lebanon, Greece, Sri Lanka and this session came to mind and when talking about the global Revolution prior to the Ice Age, Laura mentioned the Gulf Stream breaking as the cause and the Cs said:
A: The cause is more than the oil. But the people will only see the oil reason and turn against the elite for bringing on such a disaster. Also note that the nonlinear effects will take some time to develop fully.

Q: (L) Well, it just seems like psychopaths have really screwed things up.

A: It is actually a bad time for them.

Q: (L) It's a bad time for them? What do you mean?

A: They will get all the blame!

Q: (Andromeda) That's an interesting... (L) Way to look at it. (Burma Jones) So then back to what Galaxia was wanting to know, is there going to be a revolution? Are people actually going to wake up and start... (Galaxia) And do something about it?

A: Oh indeed!

Q: (Galaxia) Now that's what I like to hear! (Andromeda) Is it going to be a very bloody revolution?

A: Yes.

Q: (Galaxia) On both sides?

A: Yes.

Q: (Galaxia) More for the evil side, or more for the good side?

A: Wait and see.

Q: (Perceval) Is it gonna be more concentrated in one particular area of the globe, for example in the US, as opposed to world-wide?

A: Yes. We have mentioned a 5D city on a hill.
12 years have passed and other events have been added and it seems that we are approaching that point of the global revolution

 
Back
Top Bottom