Session 22 March 2014

Perceval said:
thorbiorn said:
Foxx said:
Very interesting session. Thanks for sharing!

Laura said:
Q: (Perceval) What about the "five years to go" thing?

A: What do you mean? You is there! Do you not SEE it?

I wonder why they said "is" instead of "are".

I would venture to guess it is because the group at the chateau consists of colliniear souls which though distributed in different bodies act in unison as one.

The impression I had was that they were just being funny and/or emphasizing the fact that it already IS happening, as in right now, all around.




I agree, that was the impression I interpreted. They were being humorous and referring to their group as one. These 6th density advisors have shown to always have a sense of humor. I've always thought that was fascinating, even through all the dark and disturbing information the C's have conveyed(which of course was completely necessary). It's not all love and light, but we must have humor through our trials and tribulations of lesson learning.
 
Thank you so much for sharing the session!

Approaching Infinity said:
Re: Flight 370, here are what I consider two very relevant articles by John Keel, with these quotes in mind:

A: There is likely to be a bit of interdimensional blackmail going on.

A: Being in another time/space "space" is not out of reach of electronic signals, plus there is the time anomaly.

First: "Are UFOs Blackmailing Earth"

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24395037/Are-Extraterrestrials-Blackmailing-Earth-by-John-A-Keel

Second: "Mysterious Voices From Space" (adapted in chapter 14 of Our Haunted Planet)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20300713/Mysterious-Voices-From-Space-by-John-A-Keel

In the first, he discusses his blackmail theory, tracing the UFO phenomena from the '40s to the 70s (major overflights, outmaneuvering, buzzing atomic sites, cattle mutilations, human mutilations, abductions) and its interaction with world power structures. In the second, possible EM signals from 'others' that can be picked up with radio technology.

Thank you for those links Approaching Infinity. I haven't read those before and was quite interesting.
 
Perceval said:
silos said:
Psalehesost said:
silos said:
I need some explanation. Did the PTB in any way create the bleedthrough and deliberately "take" the plane in order to show the US Gov (psychopats in power) they should not take aggressive military actions against/in Ukraine or Russia?

It sounds like the idea is that it happened naturally, but the "advisors" took credit for it and issued threats.

Thanks, Psalehesost. If you have more thoughts about it, please share.

Q: (L) You mean they had plans to be more aggressive and “in-their-faces”, and they... (Perceval) Why would the disappearance of the plane make them scared or make them back down? Was it "comedown", was that what was said? Like a retreat. So, basically the PTB backed down on Crimea and Russia and that whole situation because the plane disappeared and they were worried about...? (Pierre) So, if you lie too much, if you create too much chaos, like unjustified war, you might increase such a bleedthrough?

A: They have "advisors" and "interpretors" of such things.

So, if you might increase such a bleedthrough with an ongoing lying and manipulation, something else could "fall in" in such a bleedthrough and that could be a bigger problem in sense of resolving such a problem for media for an average Joe?

The way we were thinking about it was that the "bleedthrough" was a natural result of the flagrant infringing of free will that the US was perhaps planning in response to Russian actions in Crimea. That perhaps there is some mechanism where if the overt PTB push their psychopathic agenda too far that it destabilizes our reality and leads to such bleedthroughs. The overt ptb have "advisors' that are aware of a 'higher power' to some extent and what they can do and are afraid of it. The plane event was interpreted by the advisors as being a signal that their plans were too aggressive and that they better back off or they could lose control of things. It's not that they knew exactly what it meant or if it was done on purpose, but that as a general rule, when something like that happens, its a good idea to err on the side of caution.

This sounds to me that if MOSSAD as one of the the highest up and in contact with the 4D STS is influencing an interpretation leading to err on the side of caution, as you said, reflects the ideas that the C's described over the years;
The PTB/STS forces pushing things so that it will all eventually blow up in their face, eventually resulting something that is 'bad' for <them>. As in portents of the Lizzies' agenda falling apart before they will be able to put it into effect, now trying to brake and slipping but probably too little - too late, kind of thing.

Perceval said:
The impression I had was that they were just being funny and/or emphasizing the fact that it already IS happening, as in right now, all around.

Got the same feeling, as the overall tone of the session was rather relaxed and conducted in a very casual language (like the Caesar 'getting around' :D ), maybe there is no point in overanalyzing every slightly odd sounding phrase especially as this is an accepted colloquialism.
 
Thank you for sharing the session.


Approaching Infinity said:
Also, in order to actualize the "best possibilities" available, it seems to me that you would have to be so placed as to have a wide sphere of influence, i.e., in politics. Caesar had the constitution (intelligence, conscience, will) and the right conditions to make him ideally suited to get things done. Looks like Putin has similar possibilities available to him, even if he might not be as ideally suited as Caesar was. Also makes me wonder: if Putin is simply the best on the market, is it even possible for someone better to be in a similar set of circumstances (i.e., some kind of world leader)? Or is he also the best option possible, given the current state of the world and possible conditions hindering another Caesar getting things done?

Perhaps Putin is here on earth to pave the way and show by example (You can stand up to psychopaths at a global scale.) for the next 'perfect' Caesar.
 
Thanks for sharing.


One question: If the passengers of the flight are locked in space/time, can they get out of it by the natural process of dying-going to 5th dimension? I remember reading something like that in the Wave (suspended animation I think?)

They said that dying would look like taking million of years from their perception in that state. I would rather choose to crash in the ocean and be done with it asap.

It seems that flight got attention it usually would not because media was fast enough to inform about it and US PTB did not expect that it could have gone to another dimension probably thinking it was crash or something other so now they have very bad cover up.

Also makes me wonder: if Putin is simply the best on the market, is it even possible for someone better to be in a similar set of circumstances (i.e., some kind of world leader)? Or is he also the best option possible, given the current state of the world and possible conditions hindering another Caesar getting things done?

If assuming there is even someone better and would not we already know about him?

The way we were thinking about it was that the "bleedthrough" was a natural result of the flagrant infringing of free will that the US was perhaps planning in response to Russian actions in Crimea. That perhaps there is some mechanism where if the overt PTB push their psychopathic agenda too far that it destabilizes our reality and leads to such bleedthroughs. The overt ptb have "advisors' that are aware of a 'higher power' to some extent and what they can do and are afraid of it. The plane event was interpreted by the advisors as being a signal that their plans were too aggressive and that they better back off or they could lose control of things. It's not that they knew exactly what it meant or if it was done on purpose, but that as a general rule, when something like that happens, its a good idea to err on the side of caution.

Under higher power you mean higher 3d sts levels or 4D sts, or both because it seems they are at the top very colinear and from session it seemed like the word was about 4D sts because they mentioned interdimensional blackmail so it would suggest there was some kind of contact with 4D even if they were not responsible for that plane?
 
Thank you for the session. It's always fascinating

Perceval said:
The way we were thinking about it was that the "bleedthrough" was a natural result of the flagrant infringing of free will that the US was perhaps planning in response to Russian actions in Crimea. That perhaps there is some mechanism where if the overt PTB push their psychopathic agenda too far that it destabilizes our reality and leads to such bleedthroughs. The overt ptb have "advisors' that are aware of a 'higher power' to some extent and what they can do and are afraid of it. The plane event was interpreted by the advisors as being a signal that their plans were too aggressive and that they better back off or they could lose control of things. It's not that they knew exactly what it meant or if it was done on purpose, but that as a general rule, when something like that happens, its a good idea to err on the side of caution.
Thank for detailing, as I was thinking to ask for the origin of bleed through in the first place.
Q: (Perceval) What about the "five years to go" thing?
A: What do you mean? You is there! Do you not SEE it?
Q: (Perceval) Well, sure, yeah. (Pierre) About Year Zero? (Perceval) So, you were talking it being the beginning of the end.
A: Just as earthquakes can begin with one that then begins an "unzipping" process, so does the changing of realms. In fact, the two have a lot in common.
Thank you for explaining it, as I was planning to ask more about origins of bleed through at first place.
Not sure what to make out of it. Sounded like step by step process than drop dead date type of thing.

Q: (Pierre) And how many descendants of Caesar are in this room? (L) Oh, that's a tricky question!
A: All of you! Caesar "got around!"
Did you guys do any genealogy testing or some thing like that?. Not sure of this "got around" and exclamations in this response.
 
Interesting session, thanks a lot. Also interesting about the axis of the earth. Will we see the same thing in our times ?

(Pierre) Did the catastrophic events that occurred around 2300 BC modify the axial tilt of our planet?
A: Yes.
Q: (Pierre) How many degrees?
A: 20. Not in an "instant" but quickly enough taking scale into account.

I've found this series of books by M M Mandelkehr ; The 2300 Bc Event: Mythology -the Eyewitness Accounts

_http://www.amazon.fr/M-M-Mandelkehr/e/B00J6HGG0G/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1

So there was an impact ( see http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/meteors.htm ) PLUS the effects of the change of axis.


About Russia, in a previous session :

(Belibaste) We wanted to know the percentage of psychopaths geographically speaking, like in the US, Israel, UK.

(L) Alright, let's take them one at a time.

(Belibaste) USA?

A: 23 percent.

Q: (Belibaste) United Kingdom?

A: 14 percent.

Q: (L) That's because they all went to America. (laughter)

(Ailén) Israel?

A: 42 percent.

Q: (Belibaste) France?

A: 10 percent.

Q: (Burma Jones) Russia?

A: 17
 
seek10 said:
Q: (Pierre) And how many descendants of Caesar are in this room? (L) Oh, that's a tricky question!
A: All of you! Caesar "got around!"
Did you guys do any genealogy testing or some thing like that?. Not sure of this "got around" and exclamations in this response.
Regular genealogy or testing wouldn't determine anything like that at this point. Which is why I think they asked the Cs. "Getting around" is a colloquialism for having sex with a lot of people. :D
 
Perceval said:
The impression I had was that they were just being funny and/or emphasizing the fact that it already IS happening, as in right now, all around.

Thanks Perceval! :)
 
Corvinus said:
Also makes me wonder: if Putin is simply the best on the market, is it even possible for someone better to be in a similar set of circumstances (i.e., some kind of world leader)? Or is he also the best option possible, given the current state of the world and possible conditions hindering another Caesar getting things done?

If assuming there is even someone better and would not we already know about him?

Hard to say. Dag Hammarkjold, whom I consider to be one of the the finest statesmen (and human beings) ever, was a relative 'nobody' until he was picked for SG of the UN. The major powers thought they were choosing a pushover bureaucrat, but he surprised everybody by becoming a force to be reckoned with, remarkably intelligent, politically savvy, and morally rock solid. Of course, that was in the '50s, and times have changed. (Needless to say, DH died in a 'mysterious plane accident'.)
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom