Aeneas said:
moonfly said:
Windmill knight said:
Sorry. I meant that CHANI could be something other than a channeled source, and the author could create their predictions and material by taking ideas from other sources on the web, such as this forum or Cliff's webbot. I hear that the CHANI stuff was 'channeled' years back and published in 2011. But was it really? Did anyone actually read it back in 2011, and were the predictions published before the webbot's? Or were we just told that was the case?
I'd never seen the CHANI stuff till a week ago. The bot project is based on linguistics picked up on the net. That project has been going on a little over 10 years. You can of course go and read the intro on the CHANI thing and see when then the data was collected..etc., but I've already posted that stuff here, so wont repeat it. Point is not if they picked it up from Cassiopeans. Seems that clif high dismisses all channeled stuff outright I think, and CHANI predictions carried more date and data specifics, just no year attached to it. So maybe CHANI picked up something that was channeled by the C's to Laura and combed from the written scripts? I don't have any idea at all.
Moonfly, something has been bothering me and it could just be me. You have made 27 post, all of them in this thread, with the first post on the 7th of April and then with the second post on the 10th after which the floodgates much have given way ;) Yet no introduction. In 16+ post have you mentioned about CHANI and keep harping on about it, though
you allegedly only saw their site one week ago according to what you wrote on the 11th of April (your 3rd post):
moonfly said:
In just the last few days I have stumbled into the CHANI project, and it is very interesting.
Windmill Knight made a valid point namely that this garbled socalled channelling could very well be just someone (even you perhaps) who has read a little of the C's and some from the Cliff webbot project and then made up a little site with a concoction of predictions to gather a little following. (I would say that to predict that a lot of old leaders are going to die before May and not specifying the year will have a pretty good success rate as time goes by.) And to increase the following what better way than to hook up with a genuine site that has a big following and then to peddle this other site. In other words fishing for new followers, while creating noise here. It has happened before! This could be what you are up to or you could be genuine about your search, but just fumbling about a bit.
Anart asked you if you had read the whole of the wave series to which you answered:
moonfly said:
As for the Wave series, no, I've only gotten in two books at this point. I'm about 5 chapters in the Adventures of Cassiopaea, the struggle with Frank, some older transcripts as well. I've listened to about 6 of Laura's interviews, and some EE dietary reading. So I am working on the homework. :)
And yet this is what you wrote in your first post:
moonfly said:
I've spent hours here just barely scratching the surface of many posts and threads, a few chapters of Wave, some posts on the comets of course, ponerology, OP's, soulless humans, some RV stuff, psychopaths, (several of the books I have read I see are on your recommended reading list, and that was validating!) ~~~ and~~~ many of the C's transcripts, ...
So is the true answer more like a few pages/chapters of the Wave and a bit here and there? As you have had time to write 26 post in between that initial post and probably have been following the CHANI site and their forum, then I doubt the amount read would have changed that much. There is nothing wrong in not having read much here as one has to make a start some time. It takes time to read and reflect on new material, but being new to any site, then it is good to read and listen some more instead of what appears to be a hijacking of a thread and peddling some tiresome predictions from another site.
I could well be mistaken, in which case I suggest that you write an intro in the newbie section and take your time in familiarizing yourself with the material available here.
Hi there.
Well first I do read a lot in many places and when I find something interesting I tend to try and follow it a ways to see if it's worth the time. So, I have bounced around from area to area, but I have read and viewed what I said I did. I didn't make up Chani, and if you noticed in the thread, I was trying to clarify the same thing many times, at least I tried to. I didn't make up a website. Good heavens. I was just trying to get a read on what you guys thing CHANI is, since some of the information aligned. As did webbots. I read the threads about clif high, and it sounds like you guys thing he may be disinfo as well. So accusations made here that those two projects borrow from here, may have legs, I don't know, but I was just trying to respond to questions that I'd already addressed.
Okay?
Now, no, I haven't read it all, and have bumped into numerous posts to newbies about posting about themselves and reading the entire wave series. I understand your request. If you noticed I did ask if I could ask a question about the CHANI thing at the beginning, as I didn't want to break house rules here. Answer yes. Reason I asked about CHANI, is that I bumped into it elsewhere, after I started reading this particular session and found some points in common I thought were interesting and then wanted to know what you guys thought of it, or if you had heard of it. I'm darn sorry to have caused so much contention.
When you guys heard it was posted at Nexus, it didn't seem to me much time was spent actually reading the CHANI text, as it was dismissed out of hand as being disinfo. Fine, my question was about the text itself, since it aligned with much of C's. I thought it was interesting... that's all. Now I've spent too much time defending something here and now feeling accused of mischief. Read my posts, see who I was responding to.
As for getting back to the virgins and the oil, to me, the work needed to unravel the mass of disinfo and perhaps inner work, is apparently to this project, better suited when you network. So I asked a question and now sorry I did. Maybe the answer to that is in the Wave chapters. I hope so.
I have been reading, I said so.
Both the wave and the adventures. And listened to several 6 or more now of Laura's vids.
Also NUMEROUS articles on pathology, psychopaths and ponerolgy, of which I am deeply interested having survived a psychopath myself. So, here I see there a forum to talk about it too, so I've read through a lot of that, shaking my head up and down, feeling validated.
I guess it would have been nice if someone said, hey, do not speak until you have finished the entire WAVE series. You haven't earned the right. That would've been crystal clear. I still would've gone about my reading my way, and then settled in on the WAVE totally before posting anything.
But thanks for clearing it up. And more.
Sorry for causing you deep concern.