I agree, they must have been through a lot, seen a lot of things they were not allowed to talk about.There is another possibility. They may have seen things on the Moon, including alien space craft (remember the C's have said there are the remains of Atlantean structures on the Moon and the Greys occupy it) and because of their military code of secrecy and training to follow orders, they cannot say anything about it. If Armstrong and Aldrin did have an encounter with large alien craft on the Moon, this would certainly have shaken them up.
The claim that the two astronauts saw alien craft on the Moon and reported the fact on a closed radio link with NASA, which they used for medical reporting, is highly controversial. According to former NASA employee, Ken Johnston though: “While Neil and Buzz were on the Lunar surface, Neil switched to the medical channel, and spoke directly with the chief medical officer saying, they’re here, they’re parked on the side of the crater, they’re watching us.”
I attach a link to an article (there are numerous similar articles on the net) that covers the alleged alien sighting - see: Neil Armstrong Said Aliens Were on the Moon: “They’re Parked on The Side of the Crater – They’re Watching Us!”
I appreciate that the comments below come from Steven Greer, who to Laura's annoyance promotes the idea that aliens are are our benefactors and only want the best for us, but this does not of itself automatically mean that what he says here is palpably false:
Neil Armstrong became somewhat of a recluse after the moon landing, and rarely spoke of the historic event. His friends and family have told me that this is because he was a man of such integrity that he simply did not want to be put in a position to lie to the public about such a momentous encounter. How tragic that our heroes have been placed in this untenable situation!
When we were organizing The Disclosure Project a few years ago, I asked one of Neil Armstrong’s friends if Armstrong would come to Washington to brief members of Congress at the 1997 Congressional briefing we organized in April of that year. I was told that Armstrong wished he could – but that if he spoke about what really happened during the moon landing, that Neil Armstrong, his wife, and children would all be killed. It was put to me this bluntly.
If true, this might explain why they seemed so sullen and reluctant to speak about what they saw whilst on the Moon. I guess at the end of the day, it is a question of what one is prepared to believe here. I believe the Moon landings were genuine but much surrounding the landings was faked (photographs etc.) not so much to cover up that the astronauts never went there but to conceal instead what they found when they got there. Don't forget that NASA had obtained a report from the Brookings Institute only a few years before the landing, which dealt, inter alia, with the likely impact on the general public if their probes or manned missions were to discover evidence of alien life or artefacts. The report had advocated concealing such evidence from the public so as to avoid widespread panic and the collapse of religions and the economic order etc. If Armstrong and Aldrin had found such evidence in spades, then it makes sense that NASA would have implemented the Brookings Report's* recommendations and sworn the astronauts to secrecy. Military men are used to following orders but for men of integrity, who hated the idea of pulling the wool over people's eyes, this would have been a bitter pill to swallow. Moreover, if your families' lives had been threatened, what would you do?
*For more on the Brookings Report see: Brookings Report - Wikipedia
The report has become noted for one short section entitled "The implications of a discovery of extraterrestrial life", which examines the potential implications of such a discovery on public attitudes and values. The section briefly considers possible public reactions to some possible scenarios for the discovery of extra-terrestrial life, stressing a need for further research in this area. It recommended continuing studies to determine the likely social impact of such a discovery and its effects on public attitudes, including study of the question of how leadership should handle information about such a discovery and under what circumstances leaders might or might not find it advisable to withhold such information from the public.
I am relaxed either way whether people want to believe the Moon landings were genuine or whether they were faked. I only raise this alleged alien sighting theory as another possible explanation for why the astronauts appeared so sullen in the press briefing and in photos.
All the undergrounders look Aryan?(Approaching Infinity) In the last session, the C's said that the number of undergrounders operating on the surface varied between two and 2.5 million. What is the total population of undergrounders, both underground and on the surface?
A: 4.6 mil
Q: (J) What or who - is the "Nation of the Third Eye?"
A: Terran civilization under the surface.
Q: (L) Now, wait a minute. I remember that when they said the Aryans were brought from Kantek, and that they were "sturdier," or something like that, and I remarked that it seemed that they would be less sturdy - and the C's answered "on the surface." Now, that has always bothered me. I don't think they meant "surface appearances." Have the Aryans been glorified as the "master race" because they are more suited to living underground?
A: Close. All types there are "Aryan."
I agree, they must have been through a lot, seen a lot of things they were not allowed to talk about.
Maybe they couldn't get a live feed of the landing at the time, they have filmed it in the studio with a lot of mistakes, so many people came to the conclusion that the landing never happened.
I came across two videos from Apollo 20 about a huge spacecraft on the moon.
I can't confirm the authenticity of these videos, but with the help of our forum members we can surely get closer to the truth.
(Pierre) Laser.
A: Yes
Q: (L) All right, next LQB's asking this one:
(L) The spiral, yes. All right. We have a whole slew of questions. We better stop messing around. Oh Lord. Okay. Two-tents, and I don't know who this Two-tents is, but they submitted a question:
(Two-tents) What was the cause of the recent fire that destroyed the town of Lahaina on Maui Island in Hawaii?
A: Beam weapons.
Q: (L) What kind of beam? Does anybody know?
Q: (L) So many of 'em are doing all this stuff to stay in power - and of course that means getting money because money is power - and that is being manipulated by a higher agenda. In other words, their greed, and their power hunger is being used by 4D STS.
(Joe) Did any of the people in Lahaina notice the effects of this beam weapon?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Is that why 60 people were found a week later sheltering in a house in Lahaina?
(L) Because they were noticing the effects?
(Joe) Because they were terrified and didn't want to leave the house up to a week later.
(L) Oh, is that why? Was there something really scary going on?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) More than just fire passing through.
(L) It could have had some kind of psychological effects even...
(Niall) Did the police in Lahaina deliberately send them back into the fire because they were instructed to do so?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) To increase the terror, I guess.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Very nasty people.
(L) They're evil.
Indeed. They intend to eliminate the survivors. Or so it seems.Lahaina
With over thousands of available rentals, overpriced, and remaining empty, the state and county are looking for other methods to remove victims out of hotels so their counts could go down.
Long story short. NOTHING HAS CHANGED, and Green keeps pushing back the inevitable outcome, which makes him look ridiculous, especially when he, in a suttle tone, tries to bribe the victims with a million dollar settlement. Now to quickly change the subject, let's talk about Red Hill
Q: (Joe) Is there a mold problem in this house that's negatively affecting our health?
A: To some extent, yes.
Q: (Andromeda) Is taking the Pau d'Arco helping with that?
A: Yes. Mold affects almost everyone. It is ubiquitous.
I can highly recommend the book. I'm halfway through it and it's been a real eye-opener. It's like a history of relentless greed, psychopathy and how modern history still covers it and romanticizes the "cradle" of the Western civilization.Regarding 'Jubilee", there has been a recent discussion of M. Hudson's new book "collapse of antiquity" here: Origins of debt: Michael Hudson's "The Collapse of Antiquity" and his work is centered around debt and debt cancellations (jubilees).
October will not be just interesting, but very interesting. Let's hope it's an enjoyable show while still prepared for the worst.
After thought, I very often notice an attractiveness towards long curly hair, both from myself towards it + hearing strangers' remarks towards other people having it, or my own.A: Jubilee of Cassiopaea. Hair is important for tuning.
Q: (L) So why do you say hair is important for tuning?
A: Andromeda wants to wash hers.
Q: (L) Well I washed mine this afternoon.
A: Yes. Very receptive/perceptive of you!
(Andromeda) I was joking when I said I needed to wash my hair, but now that you mention it...
Q: (L) Yeah, now that you mention it... Yeah. Receptive. Are you saying my hair is receptive, perceptive?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Even with my curls?
A: Yes
(Uperios) Are the various CO2 sequestration plans that the PTB want to implement part of a terraforming process for a different species to inhabit the planet, their makeup being affected by CO2 in the atmosphere?
(L) So is this a part of terraforming?
A: Not exactly, more like making the planet uninhabitable for humans.
Q: (L) So all of this stuff about shutting down farms, clear-cutting forests, shutting down fuel, killing off cattle because they contribute to the CO2, all of that is basically about depopulation?
A: Yes
I watched an interview with Momčilo Milinović, a retired engineer and professor at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade. He is an expert in the field of rocket technology.(Niall) Was the Russian rocket to the moon sabotaged?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) Why?
A: Keep Russia down and embarrassed!
Q: (Joe) How was it done?
A: Remote activated EM pulse.
Oh PERLOU, how silly. Obviously Odysseus asked a passing alien to help with the selfie!(The man holding the camera is probably a descendant of the cameraman left behind by the Apollo crew. ♂)