Session 25 February 2023

@Stoneboss I think those artefacts in Google Streetview are just lens flares; see: Lens flare - Wikipedia
And the "red top" is probably specific to the Google Streetview hardware they are using.
It seems so, because that image is still there at the address on his page (looking north), but if you go another street up and look south, it isn't there. I also tried it from the other directions and it seems that this was a local high noon event but no other tops in the images.

Of course, it takes time for the car to drive around those roads so maybe it was there at one moment and not when the car got to other areas. It is a strange shape.
 
Just FYI, I did check a few dozen other places in and around where I live. Most of those images are shot near high noon local time but I didn't see a single one that had this anomaly.
 
Image from Lumberton.
OK, there are just way too many of these in that area and the positioning and glare are not a lens thing unless (UNLESS) there is a problem on the lens that produces the kind of resolution that Stoneboss posted. I don't know what it is, but I am not going with flare and lighting issues unless the only reason we can see it is because of a unique lighting situation that exposed whatever it is.

1680144030151.png
 
Last edited:
After re-reading that session Sunday night, it reminded me about something I saw on google 'street view' in Dulce, New Mexico. I think it would have been around 2009, and for some reason I knew about there being an underground base in Dulce, New Mexico at that time. I decided then to check the place out on Google Earth and see if I could locate the base. I'm pretty sure I found it, it's just a few miles west of Dulce. But the interesting thing is that while "street viewing" the town of Dulce (it's a very small desert town), I viewed "up" into the sky and saw something really strange. It kind of looked like the upper half of a spinning top, and mostly orange in colour, and I would of guessed about 1000 feet in altitude. I then showed it to several people that I associated with in those days, and no one wanted to even comment about it, they just didn't know what it could be and that was it. Except for one guy, who said: "It looks like a UFO, but there's no such thing as a UFO, so it's probably a reflection of a dash compass of the Google van". So maybe that's all it was, but at the time I couldn't see how it could be a reflection of a dash compass when the street view camera is mounted on the top of the Google vehicle.

Anyway, some time later, I went back to "street view" Dulce to see if I could find that image again but it was gone. I also noticed at the time that the date of the pictures of the town had been recently updated, so I guess Google street view did a refresh of Dulce, New Mexico. I've also gone back to it many times in the years since.

So, after re-reading that session a couple of nights ago, I decided to "street view" Dulce, just for kicks. I picked a street that I think was the same one that I looked at in 2009, or at least the same general area. And when I viewed up into the sky, lo and behold, there it was. It's the same object, but this time there's a lot of weird stuff around it. And this time, I took some screen shots of it (shown below). Maybe it is a reflection of something like a dash compass, I don't know.

Anyway, here they are:

View attachment 72841
View attachment 72842
View attachment 72843

I then went to a different area of the town, a saw this:

View attachment 72844
View attachment 72845
These images kind of remind one of what Bob Lazar claimed with regard to the ships he said had the ability to move by producing a gravity wave of sorts.
 
It seems just a lens flare or a glare effect by the lens. Perhaps those cameras from the google maps vehicles have this effect when pointing to an area where the sun light is close by or a source with strong light.
 
It seems just a lens flare or a glare effect by the lens. Perhaps those cameras from the google maps vehicles have this effect when pointing to an area where the sun light is close by or a source with strong light.
Some are in the darker areas and partially obscured by clouds.

But to your point, this sort of phenomena should appear in other places if it is an equipment problem. And, a lens flare doesn't produce the resolution on some of the images. And, all of the ones I found can only be seen looking back toward Dulce.
 
Last edited:
@Stoneboss I think those artefacts in Google Streetview are just lens flares; see: Lens flare - Wikipedia
And the "red top" is probably specific to the Google Streetview hardware they are using.

It seems just a lens flare or a glare effect by the lens. Perhaps those cameras from the google maps vehicles have this effect when pointing to an area where the sun light is close by or a source with strong light.

I looked at several other areas in the New Mexico region and found more of the same thing, or at least very similar, just not as conspicuous. So yeah, probably lens flare.
 
Some are in the darker areas and partially obscured by clouds.

But to your point, this sort of phenomena should appear in other places if it is an equipment problem. And, a lens flare doesn't produce the resolution on some of the images. And, all of the ones I found can only be seen looking back toward Dulce.
I also saw a few of them where there was a lot of cloud cover. What do you mean by "can only be seen looking back toward Dulce"?
 
I also saw a few of them where there was a lot of cloud cover. What do you mean by "can only be seen looking back toward Dulce"?
There may be other views, but the ones I found were looking toward Dulce and one of them in Dulce seemed to be right under it. IOW, the images I posted that are the the east of Dulce appeared when I was looking west. I think that's what I did, but I could be wrong.
 
My dog routinely attempts to trade.. she'll bring me a piece of half-chewed rawhide doggy treat, drop it at my feet, sit down in her best good-girl pose, and look meaningfully at the slice of roast pig I'm about to eat :D If the transaction is accepted, she'll gobble down that pork and nose me in a "pleasure doing business with you" kind of a way, then saunter off (leaving me the rawhide of course - she's no scammer)
Guys, you just flashbacked me with your pets.
That experiment still makes me LOL and simultaneously ironic how not far away humanity went from 2d. Just a nature💁‍♂️ Perfectly shows how simply PTB can manipulate herd. 🤦‍♂️


Experiment on the introduction of "labor" relations in a flock of capuchins


Two scientists from Yale University (an economist and a psychologist) decided to teach monkeys how to use money.
And they did it.
The idea of money, as it turned out, can be assimilated by creatures with tiny brains and needs limited to food, sleep and sex.
The capuchins on which the experiment was conducted are considered by zoologists to be one of the stupidest primates.

"At first glance, and in truth it may seem that they don't need anything else in life. You can feed them sweets all day and they will go and come, go and come for them constantly. It may seem that capuchins are walking stomachs," scientists say.
American ethologists conducted an experiment on the introduction of "labor" relations in a flock of capuchins.
They came up with a "job" and a "universal equivalent" in the aviary – money.
The job was to pull the lever with an effort of 8 kilograms.
Significant effort for small monkeys
This is a real unpleasant coward for them.
For each swing of the lever, the monkey began to receive a branch of grapes.
As soon as the Capuchins learned the simple rule "work = reward", they were immediately introduced an intermediate agent – colorful plastic circles.
Instead of grapes, they began to receive tokens of different "denominations".
For a white token, you could buy one branch of grapes from people, two for a blue one, a glass of soda for a red one, and so on.

Soon the monkey society was stratified.
The same types of behavior emerged in it as in the human community.
There were workaholics and loafers, bandits and hoarders.
One monkey managed to lift the lever 185 times in 10 minutes!
She really wanted to earn money.
Someone preferred racketeering to work and took away from others.
But the main thing that the experimenters noted was that the monkeys showed those character traits that had not been noticeable before – greed, cruelty and rage in defending their money, suspicion of each other.
In continuation of the study of economic behavior, the monkeys were given other "money" in the form of silver disks with a hole in the middle.
After a few weeks, the Capuchins learned that you can get food for these coins.
The experimenter, who was fond of Marxism in his youth, did not check whether labor really turns a monkey into a man.
He just gave the monkeys these coins and taught them how to use them to buy fruit.
Before that, we found out who likes what in order to set their own preference scale for each of the monkeys.
At first, the fee was the same – for a sour apple and a brush of sweet grapes, they asked for the same amount of coins.
Naturally, apples were not a success, and grape stocks were melting.
But the picture changed dramatically when the price of apples halved.

After quite a long time of confusion, the monkeys decided to spend almost all of their coins on apples.
And only occasionally allowed themselves to eat grapes.
One day, when all the experimental animals in the common cage already knew that some items were more expensive and others cheaper, one of the monkeys got into the compartment where the communal cash register was stored and appropriated all the coins to herself, fighting off people who tried to take away her metal prey.
SO THE MONKEYS COMMITTED THE FIRST "BANK ROBBERY".
A few more days passed and THE CAPUCHINS DISCOVERED THE PHENOMENON OF PROSTITUTION.
The young male gave a coin to the female.
Scientists thought he fell in love and made a gift.
But no, the "girl" entered into sexual intercourse with the gentleman for money, and then went to the window, behind which the scientists were on duty, and bought some grapes from them.
Everyone was satisfied: both monkeys and scientists
Monkeys have mastered liberal–capitalist relations, and scientists have defended their doctoral degree.

 
Guys, you just flashbacked me with your pets.
That experiment still makes me LOL and simultaneously ironic how not far away humanity went from 2d. Just a nature💁‍♂️ Perfectly shows how simply PTB can manipulate herd. 🤦‍♂️


Experiment on the introduction of "labor" relations in a flock of capuchins


Two scientists from Yale University (an economist and a psychologist) decided to teach monkeys how to use money.
And they did it.
The idea of money, as it turned out, can be assimilated by creatures with tiny brains and needs limited to food, sleep and sex.
The capuchins on which the experiment was conducted are considered by zoologists to be one of the stupidest primates.

"At first glance, and in truth it may seem that they don't need anything else in life. You can feed them sweets all day and they will go and come, go and come for them constantly. It may seem that capuchins are walking stomachs," scientists say.
American ethologists conducted an experiment on the introduction of "labor" relations in a flock of capuchins.
They came up with a "job" and a "universal equivalent" in the aviary – money.
The job was to pull the lever with an effort of 8 kilograms.
Significant effort for small monkeys
This is a real unpleasant coward for them.
For each swing of the lever, the monkey began to receive a branch of grapes.
As soon as the Capuchins learned the simple rule "work = reward", they were immediately introduced an intermediate agent – colorful plastic circles.
Instead of grapes, they began to receive tokens of different "denominations".
For a white token, you could buy one branch of grapes from people, two for a blue one, a glass of soda for a red one, and so on.

Soon the monkey society was stratified.
The same types of behavior emerged in it as in the human community.
There were workaholics and loafers, bandits and hoarders.
One monkey managed to lift the lever 185 times in 10 minutes!
She really wanted to earn money.
Someone preferred racketeering to work and took away from others.
But the main thing that the experimenters noted was that the monkeys showed those character traits that had not been noticeable before – greed, cruelty and rage in defending their money, suspicion of each other.
In continuation of the study of economic behavior, the monkeys were given other "money" in the form of silver disks with a hole in the middle.
After a few weeks, the Capuchins learned that you can get food for these coins.
The experimenter, who was fond of Marxism in his youth, did not check whether labor really turns a monkey into a man.
He just gave the monkeys these coins and taught them how to use them to buy fruit.
Before that, we found out who likes what in order to set their own preference scale for each of the monkeys.
At first, the fee was the same – for a sour apple and a brush of sweet grapes, they asked for the same amount of coins.
Naturally, apples were not a success, and grape stocks were melting.
But the picture changed dramatically when the price of apples halved.

After quite a long time of confusion, the monkeys decided to spend almost all of their coins on apples.
And only occasionally allowed themselves to eat grapes.
One day, when all the experimental animals in the common cage already knew that some items were more expensive and others cheaper, one of the monkeys got into the compartment where the communal cash register was stored and appropriated all the coins to herself, fighting off people who tried to take away her metal prey.
SO THE MONKEYS COMMITTED THE FIRST "BANK ROBBERY".
A few more days passed and THE CAPUCHINS DISCOVERED THE PHENOMENON OF PROSTITUTION.
The young male gave a coin to the female.
Scientists thought he fell in love and made a gift.
But no, the "girl" entered into sexual intercourse with the gentleman for money, and then went to the window, behind which the scientists were on duty, and bought some grapes from them.
Everyone was satisfied: both monkeys and scientists
Monkeys have mastered liberal–capitalist relations, and scientists have defended their doctoral degree.

This is probably the way some 4D denizens view us, as their lab monkeys.
 
Back
Top Bottom