Q: (L) And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea. Moving to Leo soon.
Q: (L) Is the moving to Leo a signifier of some other potential event that would be noticed by us here on Earth?
A: Yes. Possible Supernova. Will stupendously improve reception of our messages.
Q: (L) Why is that? Cosmic waves?
A: Will affect your DNA as well as the DNA of those that are ready.
Q: (L) We’re assuming that this is a positive affect?
A: Yes! Refer to transcripts.
[…] {discussion about Julian Assange and Wikileaks}
Q: (L) And what is the objective of this Sideshow?
A: You guessed it this afternoon; preparation to accept global control. Or so it is planned.
Q: (L) I guess that means it may or may not turn out the way they expect?
A: It will get close. But remember the ”X” factor.
Q: (L) What is the X factor?
A: Earth changes.
[…]
Q: (L) Is it true as he speculates that when the Solar System approaches this companion of ours, that it will have a psychic effect?
A: Yes. You are already feeling its approach.
Q: (L) Well, that’s one thing that this guy James Mccanney said. He said that this last solar cycle – the maximum - was so long, so intense that it was evidence that something really big, had entered the solar capacitor. It was discharging the sun. And, if that’s the case, there’s probably a current flow and that means that it’s possible that at some point the Earth and maybe the moon and several other astronomical bodies, will line up along the line of this flow that’s going on between the Sun and its companion. And if that’s the case, could that be a little problematical?
A: Oh indeed! Yes, it is happening already. Do you not see the evidence all around the globe?
Q: (L) Well, on that point, McCanney says that when the Earth gets into this kind of situation where there’s a discharge thing going on, between the sun and another body and the earth gets involved in it, that the earth itself becomes comet like during that time and it begins also to attract what he calls pollution events. It starts picking up all kinds of dust and stuff from outer space – and even the water volume on the planet gets increased because of this precipitating, because the planet’s picking stuff up from space. It’s growing from accumulating stuff, from acquiring stuff. And if that’s the case, we could be attracting dust loading in the upper atmosphere-regardless of whether or not we pass through cometary dust clouds. All these things that we’ve been noticing going on in the upper atmosphere – strange clouds, long-lasting contrails, extreme cooling - could be exactly as he described. There could also be atmospheric effects of these electric sheets, because he says that there are different kinds of ways of currents and layers of currents. He’s got like a five layer model of how the electromagnetic field of the planet goes, and he says that it’s the cause of El Niño, it’s the cause of Earthquakes, volcanoes , storms, changing of the Jet Stream, and just a whole host of things: it’s all electrical phenomena. He says that the electricity from the sun creates and drives hurricanes and that it is not the temperature of the water. Because he said that if it had to do with the temperatures of the water, one hurricane comes along, sucks all the heat out – then it would be impossible for another hurricane to form for a period of time. And yet you see very often, hurricane after hurricane. So, is he on to something with this theory?
A: Oh you bet!
Q: (Ark) Is the axis of the Solar System Wobbling?
A: Not enough to make a difference. But the Galaxy is
(Discussion about the Galaxy and Solar System)
Q: (Ark) That means that the companion star is in the ecliptic plane?
A: Yes. Part of the capacitor.
Q: (Ark) There are two theories of gravity mainly, one which is based on flat normal, space, time with perfect geometry. And gravity is thought of as a kind of field, which is in the background of this idea of space. This theory is not the mainstream theory. It’s a theory for strange people who are against Einstein. There is Einstein’s theory that there is no such thing as a nice background that gravity should be thought as not disturbing something… We don’t know what it is, really. But, this Einstein theory cannot be explained by such things as inertia. So, now my question is: Which is the better approach? That of one of the opposers of Einstein? Or one of the followers of Einstein?
A: Einstein was wrong… More than once.
Q: (Ark) Long ago, years ago, we were talking here about magnetic monopoles, and there was kind of a confirmation that they exist, but we didn’t go further into the subject. Now, there are three theories about magnetic monopoles concerning their speed. First: they are slower than light. Second: they have the speed of light. Third: they are faster than light. Which is true?
A: 3.
Q: (REL) I would like to know what that metallic crash Andromeda, Burma Jones and I heard in the vitamin room?
(Discussion about metallic crash)
A: Thin veil. The crash was elsewhere and bled through. Expect more such phenomena.
Q: (REL) What caused it and why did we all hear it?
A: Combined energies enhanced senses.
Q: (L) I’ve been thinking that it might soon be time for us to cease all of our extreme activities, and just run the forum in a careful way. It doesn’t seem that anything is going to change anything very much. Is that useful thought to follow?
A: Not yet, but yes eventually. It will be time to devote yourselves to helping those who have made the choice to be ready for the changes.