Session 28 February 2026

[candasiri]

I remember seeing this pic of the Red Shoe Club before, probably via Vigilant Citizen as I used to read their stuff a lot. I'm doubtful the shoes are made of skin, but it I could be dead wrong - according to a majorly conspiracy theory website (that I'll reference and identify further down this post):

I think they are made of human skin given what we know about these "people."

 

[candasiri]

And then there was precious little Madeline McCann. It was very strongly believed that John and Tony Podesta abducted Madeline as they were dead ringers for the police drawings that were composed and circulated.

Madeleine McCann's father is actually in the first row on the right with the crimson tide. So, basically, he sacrificed his first born which I think might be a thing in these circles.

 

[Professor Chaos]

They cannot notice what they don't have (emotions), or reflect on the same. However, they will often pursue behaviours which produces sensations. The two very real people who I think informed my perspective on psychopaths, one of them avoided pain at all costs (but very much enjoyed inflicting it on others - and the process of getting away with it), the other (the young bloke) appeared not to mind the sensation of having it inflicted on him. So, this is a difference in the sensations they were seeking. Sadistic versus masochistic. There were also multiple other differences between them including age and drug use. However, the one thing they have in common is lack of ability to feel emotions. Sensations, yes, but not emotions or empathy. This was completely beyond their ability.

Yes, but you've encountered a contrast that's easy to define. You're operating on two people, both of whom are quite open towards you. The problem is that there are so many people, they can always have different traits. Simply, you're doing a case study. But defining the entire issue on this basis would be a mistake in my opinion, although there may be similarities. It is always a certain prism.
What can I say? What if I met someone who had both traits? They enjoyed being hurt and loved inflicting it? And yet, they only hurt select people because they were able to refrain from inflicting it on others, which, incidentally, gave them a sense of self-control?
Or people who inflicted suffering only on those hostile to the pack? A bit like Dexter. Some physically, literally, while others, in fact, only in a general sense, based on intellectual terror?
What about people who have acted or still act like psychopaths for other reasons? And they don't necessarily even belong to the dark triad?
There are simply so many things possible, even psychology distinguishes types of psychopathy, not to mention the traits of a given personality.

If you have a look at what Dr Ramani has posted on YouTube, she talks about how people who are narcissists have disregulated and out of control emotions.

Okay. Sorry, but I'm not into looking it up on YT rn, I'm a bit fed up with video media. Then thanks for explaining.
Generally speaking, I don't know. If you're developing such a theory, you have to back it up with something. For now, you're constructing a thesis. I'd stick to the point that a given ideology or opportunity might be useful to them, but they would easily give up if it proved unhelpful.
I don't want to talk about her, because I don't know her, and I won't hold to a single statement, even from the Cassiopaeans. But I think of politicians who are sometimes in one faction, sometimes in another, sometimes even opposite ones. They easily fade into the background and operate there, or they don't emerge from the shadows. Or they do something else, moving to a different lobby. To me, it sounds more like adaptation and maneuvering, always taking advantage of opportunities and sort of finding themselves in a center of events. The difference between programming and this is probably a calculation of benefits. That is, it's probably not about loyalty to a given social group or ideology in the strict sense, but rather a calculation of benefits and losses while simultaneously allowing oneself more than the average person. But I'm just theorizing.
It's also important to remember that she's a woman in a political world dominated primarily by men. To find her place in this world, she needs to play along. However drastic it sounds in its context, the stronger wins.

 

[Professor Chaos]

I think that idea has been sown by the normalised distortion of all these Saturday night entertainment programmes, talk shows, trash TV and film culture, etc., generally carried over into other areas; in other words, the trivialisation and acceptance – the rest we already know... you wake up and, like CK, you have no freedom and you may end up betrayed by a horde of psychopaths.

I understand that Kirk began to wake up, and that was one of the reasons he was eliminated because he started to be a nuisance. Of course, the issue was covered up with the typical left-right conflict. Moreover, this conflict remains ingrained in the brains of many people to this day, replacing their way of thinking. Of course, many people are fascinated by psychopathy. For some reason, they cite psychopaths from movies as heroes. They admire their strength, their ability to get out of trouble, and so on. Previously, it was a bit different – movies portrayed the villain as a villain. The other thing is that he usually lost and compensated these people for their reality. Good prevailed, and so on.

For now, I see people very familiar with war in their own way. We're so bombarded with negative emotions that, on the one hand, it's unbearable, but on the other, it crosses all psychological boundaries. Furthermore, a lot of psychopathy appears as normal, not only in crime series but also, as I've seen lately, in family dramas. Psychopathic behavior is interesting for storytelling because it always creates action and conflict. But kidnapping or murder are slowly being incorporated into shows about drinking tea and dating as normal. As a result, commercials and shows like Show are easier to watch because they allow people to compensate for stress with stupidity. And they create a virtual reality of fun that is an aberration from the psychopathic norm.