Session 28 February 2026

I remember seeing this pic of the Red Shoe Club before, probably via Vigilant Citizen as I used to read their stuff a lot. I'm doubtful the shoes are made of skin, but it I could be dead wrong - according to a majorly conspiracy theory website (that I'll reference and identify further down this post):
I think they are made of human skin given what we know about these "people."
 
And then there was precious little Madeline McCann. It was very strongly believed that John and Tony Podesta abducted Madeline as they were dead ringers for the police drawings that were composed and circulated.
Madeleine McCann's father is actually in the first row on the right with the crimson tide. So, basically, he sacrificed his first born which I think might be a thing in these circles.
 
They cannot notice what they don't have (emotions), or reflect on the same. However, they will often pursue behaviours which produces sensations. The two very real people who I think informed my perspective on psychopaths, one of them avoided pain at all costs (but very much enjoyed inflicting it on others - and the process of getting away with it), the other (the young bloke) appeared not to mind the sensation of having it inflicted on him. So, this is a difference in the sensations they were seeking. Sadistic versus masochistic. There were also multiple other differences between them including age and drug use. However, the one thing they have in common is lack of ability to feel emotions. Sensations, yes, but not emotions or empathy. This was completely beyond their ability.
Yes, but you've encountered a contrast that's easy to define. You're operating on two people, both of whom are quite open towards you. The problem is that there are so many people, they can always have different traits. Simply, you're doing a case study. But defining the entire issue on this basis would be a mistake in my opinion, although there may be similarities. It is always a certain prism.
What can I say? What if I met someone who had both traits? They enjoyed being hurt and loved inflicting it? And yet, they only hurt select people because they were able to refrain from inflicting it on others, which, incidentally, gave them a sense of self-control?
Or people who inflicted suffering only on those hostile to the pack? A bit like Dexter. Some physically, literally, while others, in fact, only in a general sense, based on intellectual terror?
What about people who have acted or still act like psychopaths for other reasons? And they don't necessarily even belong to the dark triad?
There are simply so many things possible, even psychology distinguishes types of psychopathy, not to mention the traits of a given personality.

If you have a look at what Dr Ramani has posted on YouTube, she talks about how people who are narcissists have disregulated and out of control emotions.
Okay. Sorry, but I'm not into looking it up on YT rn, I'm a bit fed up with video media. Then thanks for explaining.
Generally speaking, I don't know. If you're developing such a theory, you have to back it up with something. For now, you're constructing a thesis. I'd stick to the point that a given ideology or opportunity might be useful to them, but they would easily give up if it proved unhelpful.
I don't want to talk about her, because I don't know her, and I won't hold to a single statement, even from the Cassiopaeans. But I think of politicians who are sometimes in one faction, sometimes in another, sometimes even opposite ones. They easily fade into the background and operate there, or they don't emerge from the shadows. Or they do something else, moving to a different lobby. To me, it sounds more like adaptation and maneuvering, always taking advantage of opportunities and sort of finding themselves in a center of events. The difference between programming and this is probably a calculation of benefits. That is, it's probably not about loyalty to a given social group or ideology in the strict sense, but rather a calculation of benefits and losses while simultaneously allowing oneself more than the average person. But I'm just theorizing.
It's also important to remember that she's a woman in a political world dominated primarily by men. To find her place in this world, she needs to play along. However drastic it sounds in its context, the stronger wins.
 
I think that idea has been sown by the normalised distortion of all these Saturday night entertainment programmes, talk shows, trash TV and film culture, etc., generally carried over into other areas; in other words, the trivialisation and acceptance – the rest we already know... you wake up and, like CK, you have no freedom and you may end up betrayed by a horde of psychopaths.

I understand that Kirk began to wake up, and that was one of the reasons he was eliminated because he started to be a nuisance. Of course, the issue was covered up with the typical left-right conflict. Moreover, this conflict remains ingrained in the brains of many people to this day, replacing their way of thinking. Of course, many people are fascinated by psychopathy. For some reason, they cite psychopaths from movies as heroes. They admire their strength, their ability to get out of trouble, and so on. Previously, it was a bit different – movies portrayed the villain as a villain. The other thing is that he usually lost and compensated these people for their reality. Good prevailed, and so on.

For now, I see people very familiar with war in their own way. We're so bombarded with negative emotions that, on the one hand, it's unbearable, but on the other, it crosses all psychological boundaries. Furthermore, a lot of psychopathy appears as normal, not only in crime series but also, as I've seen lately, in family dramas. Psychopathic behavior is interesting for storytelling because it always creates action and conflict. But kidnapping or murder are slowly being incorporated into shows about drinking tea and dating as normal. As a result, commercials and shows like Show are easier to watch because they allow people to compensate for stress with stupidity. And they create a virtual reality of fun that is an aberration from the psychopathic norm.
 
Thank you for the session.
Q: (L) And what were they referenced to?

A: Jerky was penises of infants and young children.

Q: (Niall) Is this code commonly understood as such around the world, among elites?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And I suppose pizza was anatomically… what was… vagina maybe?

A: Bloody genitalia.

Q: (seek10) Laura, may I ask one question? Are they killing that many children?

A: Yes

Q: (seek10) Oh God...
Some people asked what is meant by ‘that many’. In my view, it is simple.

In the context of cattle mutation, Cs said 4d sts don’t want to upset people by making more people disappear. In this case, why they are killing so many children? and this is for little piece of meat and it didn't made sense to me, even if it is sexual organ. Probably this mechanism is used to ‘hook’ and control all their 3D minions to their bidding. Other wise how can we explain all the insanity ( that needed consent of so many bureaucrats, military and elected people across many nations) went on for the last 25 years - suicidal wars, end less false flag attacks, gender nonsense, vaccination and so on.

These parties going on in big cities all the time with large number of people. If 100 people expected for a gathering, they have LOT more children has to be available. From the ‘supply chain’ ( or from ‘farm to table’ ) point of view, it is extremely difficult to manage that many children at the time of need. For mammals, offspring is very important and parents tend to be very protective and children are highly delicate. True, one can butcher them some where and bring in the meat, but there are claims of children in the parties in some cases. If 4D STS wants Energy, they can do it in secrecy, doesn’t need to be in these parties. It is highly unlikely 4d sts shares their vat grown to the 3d minions.

I felt that, it is difficult to that much supply in countries like USA where law and order is prompt for common man. India and China has large population, but despite their own challenges of corruption and so on, it will be very difficult the manage that many children without even considering ocean journey. When I was a child, there was a news item where 3 children escaped from abductors few hundred miles from their place of abduction. It shook the entire state and even the country. So it is not an common or easy thing in India, though lot of things can happen under the carpet in the name of dysfunctionality and I am not convinced that to this level.
(seek10) We would like to ask how many children are getting killed each year. This Epstein‑related activity is more of a Western phenomenon. Are these victims supposed to be Western children?

A: Not just Western children!! Aliens like vegetarian children the most.

Q: (seek10) Does the recent rise in illegal immigration to the West relate to this need for more children?

A: Yes!

These illegal migrations are perfect avenue. Their answer reminded me videos of some activists who embedded among illegal migrants while video documenting the extremely dangerous journey - going through jungles, swimming in waters, crossing fences, hiding in empty goods trains, walking for days in empty lands, dealing with mafia gangs, crossing country borders, bribing their way to reach USA.

There were reports that these immigrants register themselves in some app for guidance in the journey. i.e. they are putting how people are migrating, ages etc. and these Soros gang facilitated this and paid thousands of dollars during the journey at least for some. No body has suspected that this registration info is used for monitoring their journey and laying traps for child abductions. Of course, they can be used for many purposes - voting, cheap labor, embedding criminals, inciting violence and so on.

Why there is so much 4D STS obsession with infants and children? C's said they like it. why? Probably that is related to concentration of information like that in seeds, eggs, milk (Growth harmone for young) mentioned in the May 18th 2024 session?. This reminded of Castaneda's description of Coating.
Carlos Castaneda describes a metaphysical concept in which human beings are born with a glowing coat of awareness—a luminous energy layer surrounding their energy cocoon. This radiant coating is the predator's primary food source.

According to Don Juan Matus, the predators—referred to as "Flyers" or "cosmic predators"—consume this glowing coat, reducing it over time to a narrow fringe that extends from the ground to the top of the toes. This remnant is all that remains of the original awareness and is sufficient only to sustain life.

The predators maintain control by exploiting this remaining awareness, particularly through self-reflection. They provoke "inane problems" that trigger flares of awareness, which they then consume. This creates a cycle of anxiety, fear, and pseudo-concerns—what Castaneda calls "food anxiety"—that keeps humans in a state of perpetual energetic feeding.

Sorcerers break this cycle through disciplined practices that make the glowing coat unpalatable to the predators. By pushing the predators away, they allow the awareness to grow beyond the toes, eventually restoring it to its natural, full size. This process is likened to a tree growing without pruning.

“The sorcerers of ancient Mexico used to say that the glowing coat of awareness is like a tree. If it is not pruned, it grows to its natural size and volume.”
But this is not new (if they are feeding for 309,000 years), though we humans never had that cognizance of it. Making 3D minions do it, is like recuriting, weeding and training them to be their puppets.
 
Back
Top Bottom