So, the market. To fully understand this, you will have to calculate/quantify a few examples for me.
Everything in life is a market and everyone is 'selling' and 'buying' themselves (job skills and services, relationship responsibilities and services...), it is a simple truth of life and it is the reason why capitalist system works best (it's based on the free market being the king, but ofc. it's hijacked by the governments).
So the term market of life is a metaphor to describe the natural flows of energy exchange( e.g. service, money, work, time) amongsts the participants of the market, that in ideal conditions are free of outside interference/rigging the market and it's rules (by adding artiticial rules) in order to forcefully take energy from some participants and give it to other (be it to government or to western women), that's why the term free. And because it is based on free will (the first law of the universe). And it's also respects the rules of energy exchange, which is another principle of the universe (e.g. in simple terms there is no free lunch, the balance of energy exchange, you give and you receive).
Hoe_math understands that concept and that's why I shared those two videos of his which are based on that idea in general and how it applies to the situation with men and women in the west.
I will give some examples to best of my understanding in respect to this topic.
Without the interference of the overeaching beast system government we have today (taking money from men to give to women and the 'oppressed', creating useless jobs that taxpayers pay so that more women can join the workforce and need men less, brainwashing campaigns that target women, and men too, divorce courts biased towards women, and sexual abuse courts often times too...) the market of life would on it's own manifest the reality that is free from the infection from the outside source (hyperdimensional interference via government), the reality that is based on the true natures and true wants and needs of the participants, the humans, men and women.
Men would naturally go out and work and be providers and protectors and have to be strong again and women would naturally lean on men for it and choose to not work (I realize that that option has currently been taken out by the parasitic monetary system and by women joining the workforce) and instead be a family wife taking care of the home and the children. Men would be men, women would be women. Men would fight/protect/sacrifice for such women. And women would fight/compete/love/respect for such men (on the male female natural market of life). I realize it's very simplified. And it's all messed up now in the west.
Some specific examples..
Antichrist system of foreign interference:
Woman is given power (by the government) to choose if she feels like it to divorce a man and attempt to get half or more of his resources and the children and the child support from a man and by force(from government law). It's not about who is 'bad' or who is 'good' in that marriage, it is who has more power over whom and can abuse that power if she feels oppressed (which she is urged to always do by the antichrist ideology). Then in this example she wins in court and steals the resource from the man, and takes the children (who may then grow up without a father and turn into a mess) and takes child support on top of all that. Then she goes to find another sucker to get more from. There are cases like this. Men lose, women lose (in the end they do), children lose, family loses, life itself loses.
Free market of life:
Woman has no outside control system unfair power given to her (to cheat consequences of life and choices/free will). If she decides to divorce a man she will face the consequences of life and of the free market of life (and people around her and her value would be lowered in the market because of the natural consequences of her choices). In the first place that will motivate a woman to choose wisely a man to marrry (which in turn makes her select a good dependable family man) and will motivate her to be a good woman to keep such a man (e.g. consider what that kind of man wants and what she can give to him to keep him) and especially if there is no antichrist brainwashing campaigns going on like feminism etc. Men win, women win, children win, family wins, life itself wins.
Similar is true with the example of artificial government created useless job positions thar tax payers pay and many of which are promoting the anti life antichrist system and anti men ideologies that make women believe they don't need men, that give women money (from an artificial anti life system job) so that they end up not needing a man and not respecting men (who in reality are the ones who most pay for such jobs). So the woman can have the illussion of being an 'independant' woman, but only in an artificial/experiment system of the modernity of the west. Make the system collapse and the illussion will collapse with it, as all illussions tend to do. And the reality of the market of life will kick in, and that reality is that women need men to survive. And yes we need each other to truly thrive in life.
If there are no such artificial jobs that are paid by taxpayer money via the government, then the market of life itself would decide which jobs and services are needed (by the sum of its participants) and those places and jobs and services would create themselves. It would result in much less women having a job at all, because (in the ideal, brainwashing free conditions) women would choose family (and men too) and be kind of a women that family men want. Of course there would be some women working or part time working (but they would work less for jobs and more for families) the kind of jobs that are naturally filled by women and naturally demanded by the free market itself.
In short my point is that this system is hijacking the natural free (will) energy exchange/flow and thus is an antilife system, compared to the natural (free of interference) 'free market of life' system that respects the laws of life, the laws of energy exchange based on supply and demand (true need/nature) of it's participants.