I think a good aim is to be a good obyvatel, to use G's term for a 'good householder'. You don't need to be a Zen master, and you don't need to be perfect, just take care of your own life as best as you can, based on whatever goals you set for yourself, which looks like making good choices in setting about reaching those goals. Negative emotions like excessive anger, guilt, jealousy, etc., tend to create a lot of problems in life, and often are a result of occult hostile forces, 4D STS, hijacking our systems in order to turn us into food - kinda like the humans in pods in the Matrix. But it's possible to unplug from negative feeding dynamics and awaken to goodness, beauty and truth.
Sounds fair
As the C's said on Sept 28, 2002:
I understand, though as for now I rather choose to cease. It's also 'karmic', in a normal understanding of consequences, as for emotional etc. But despite me, lately (?) Cs mentioned of those being in 4D creating new worlds for 3D etc. It's like neverending story with neverending consequences of promises and individual choices, with everything life has to offer, including suffering, growth and experience of learning. I became resigned also because I didn't take my chances. But as far as I can see, there can be always a chance. I guess that's what it is about
Positive thinking does work, but there are nuances to it. You might enjoy Laura's Course in Knowledge and Being, which gives a great example of how to use positive intent without falling into the trap of expecting the universe to fulfill your desires.
Again, something to get more into, thanks
It's not easy to see because the negative feeding tube is hyperdimensional. I think this image below from a the Dr. Strange comic shows what a feeding tube looks like, particularly the bottom centre panel and bottom right panel. From
this post.
View attachment 90129
I'm not sure if it really tells me anything other than some feeding tube being picturized. There are two things: one, the positively thinking people were trying to invent instead of hate. It wasn't through the Chat AIs; it was a more invisible mechanism for creating reaches in social media. The hate was replaced by positive assessments, which were again devoid of criticism. Generally speaking, it was said that the higher STS beings feed on the energy that comes from fear and suffering. If you think about it, this is how haters and generally people who prey on someone's fear, failure, gossip, judgment, humiliation, etc. live. Maybe in some way creating a gateway for higher STS densities. It would seem that when people think positively and suppress haters, they do not join it. However, due to human nature or some law of evolution, there was usually a reality check that created drama and made it clear that these people were full of sh*t, etc. The side effect was a lot of acrimony, hatred and fear. At this point, I'm talking about 10–20 years of the modern Internet, in which overt artificial intelligence is a few years earlier, and the less visible one, created based on the neurological mechanisms of humans, in the background is over a decade
In the case of AI chats and other tools, the fact that we are talking about some kind of interdimensional or interdensity device is what always catches my attention—how accurate the answers are. Perhaps it doesn't necessarily matter whether it's positive or negative, although the negative ones are more noticeable, but it can always suggest some kind of 'hooking up' at one's own request. That is, de facto consistent with free will, although perhaps unconsciously. And let's remember that earlier we talked about aliens implanting people with implants that could synchronize our actions with machines before they reached the appropriate level of transdensity
Another thing is that this is human nature. The OUIJA board has always been something people have been warned against. People used a speech aid instead or accidentally received a signal on loudspeakers, a voice recorder or a telephone. And if so, you don't need much convincing for whatever deus ex machina
In the old days, older people complained that tractors and electricity were destroying the agrarian culture. Work was hard, but tools made the work easier. In retrospect, it turned out globally that these older people were right in many respects. Maybe the same will happen with AI. But you can't expect people not to take advantage of it. Since the beginning of time, taking into account the biblical myth and the tree of knowledge, it has always ended the same, and it will be the same this time. So the question is not whether it is going to happen, but what the consequences are going to be
Technological progress is also a part of evolution, and what the Cs warned us about most, while presenting it as inevitable, is that this progress can destroy us. The same applied to all concerns about nuclear energy and the vision of a Cold War comparable to the Apocalypse. As if certain things were frozen to avoid this
As Murphy used to say, if something can go wrong, it's gonna, and it often slips out of our hands. Especially lately
Why would 'ease of finding information' be a good thing? The saying goes that there is no free lunch. As Laura wrote in The Wave, Life gives back exactly what you put into it. Easy information comes with a heavy price. One price is the insertion of a negative feeding tube. In other words, if you expect a free lunch, you end up being lunch.
I was thinking about it. In the past, despite being a good student, I had complexes; some of my peers were even better at memorizing, or they instinctively understood things that I couldn't understand in such a complex way as I thought they required, so I preferred not to take up the task. In other words, it's about learning, the effort devoted to it, developing individuals, and allowing me to be spontaneously right in many situations, which people questioned and later admitted I was right. If we use search engines and AI without really thinking, we will see a world of constant destruction that we will not be able to stop because we are not developed enough. I think that to some extent this is what is now happening, especially since we are even more connected with phones, AI, the Internet, etc. than before, e.g., with television, because we co-create it, and at least we could still keep some distance from radio and TV
At the same time, it sounds a bit like superstition. I don't deny what you say. Nevertheless, AI can help me connect the puzzles of quite complex knowledge that I have no idea about, at the risk of misleading me, especially if, due to ignorance, I formulate the question incorrectly. Sometimes, however, it would require research that I would never undertake, even using Google, but it makes it easier for me to learn something. Where you need to put your effort into asking further questions and, above all, understanding the answers. At least that's how it should be, if it weren't for this cosmic circusRecently, AI is said to have discovered something that humans couldn't. Maybe some physical calculations will lead to conclusions that we would never discover, or biological 'computational thoughts' can make us understand something. However, a) people may not be ready, b) they may use forces that we would not like to develop, 3D-wise. This is rather obvious if anyone has ever wondered about computerization and AI
But again. Cs warned this group about not using Internet. Do books, they said, network individually, they said. Now we are talking on Internet. That's just human nature
If all the answers were there, readily available, what does that do to life? In my mind, it flattens it out, empties it of something very important to the Soull - challenge, struggle, the quest for the truth, danger, adventure. It's an affliction of modern life that things are increasingly set up to make sure that there's no more ennobling hero's journey, just a few sleepy clicks of the mouse. We are being entrained to touch screens to prevent us from getting in touch with our souls, each other, and the real world.
And even with those easy answers, there's another issue, which you mentioned above - AI doesn't provide accurate information. It is convinced of anthropogenic global warming, for instance. It's spreading outright lies. However, it is billed as being this all-powerful arbiter of knowledge, something like a god, when in reality it is more akin to a demon or a trickster in the old stories who makes promises to share secrets, but this is just a lure to trap the unwary.
I don't want to sound like Paulo Coelho, but it seems you don't notice that sometimes answers aren't as important as the questions. You won't ever get answers without asking questions, and it always takes your seeking, thoughtfulness and some insight or knowledge
By the way, many people see this overlay of political correctness, but there is no way to avoid it. It's a bit like school where you're not allowed to ask controversial questions
Well, let's leave it at that, eventually the Russians will hack this chat and open their version (only not for a while, because due to the conflict the world has divided into two again)
A good question, and there are no easy answers. I think 'getting stuck in mechanisms beyond your control' is one of the key lessons here. What do we do? Give up? Try to force the situation to meet our own personal demands? Neither of those is a very loving option, IMO. I think there's a third way, which is to pay very close attention to what's happening, to really work to see and then accept the reality of it, in all its darkness and its light. With clear seeing, something might reveal itself where we can make a change, and have a positive influence. It may be a kind word of support, the act of listening to someone, offering to help in some way, or cutting a pathological individual out of our lives. Other than that, surrender the rest unto the Divine Cosmic Mind, and have faith that the universe knows what its doing.
Seems fair
The information about the sun's twin is in The Wave - have you read that series? It's available for free online here:
cassiopaea.org
I read it some time ago, but the information about the two Suns escaped me: I have quite a vivid imagination and it was easier for me to go into the concept of density and dimensions, and paradoxically less into something more anchored in third density