Richard said:
The constitution and constitutional court has been effective in controlling the government, the government has been effective in controlling the banks.
All the 'control' you see is designed for public consumption – it's a front designed specifically to fool you into thinking that there is 'control' of a kind beneficial to the normal human population.
Richard said:
We've been lucky that the aim of tightening the screws on credit institutions to protect the poor from predatory lending practices also served to shelter us from the worst of the global financial crunch.
Psychopaths really enjoy creating misery for normal humans. It's about the only thing they're good at. Perhaps there's something nasty waiting around the corner?
Richard said:
There is a strict consumer protection act in place that puts the onus on businesses to behave themselves.
OK. But do the big corporations who have offices in SA behave
themselves? Big corporations will spend untold millions to hide their crimes against humanity.
Richard said:
Not all officials have been corrupted.
If you were to consider that this is for appearances only, that it suits the pathocrats at the present time in SA for the public to believe that not all officials have been corrupted, what conclusions would you draw?
It's well known that people will base their assessment of politicians, and 'officials', on how the person looks – handsome, ugly, well or poorly dressed, etc., - rather than any kind of objective assessment of the 'official's' actions.
Many years ago, through careful observation of the difference between what politicians say, and the results of their actions, it became clear to me that everything politicians say and do is a lie, and only heaps more misery on the heads of the normal human population.
Richard said:
Despite all the things wrong in this country there is still a lot of good. The biggest danger is the naivety of South Africans. It seems to be impossible for them to comprehend the real state of affairs in the rest of the world and to consider it could (will) impact them. Because of this naivety we have allowed ALEC companies, Goldman Sachs and others to open shop here. Big mistake. South Africa has few institutions that can run amok except for basic atrocious management, because each major area has ombudsmen which zealously follow their mandate to ensure fair dealings, and the ombudsmen have to answer when perceived to be erring in their work.
If you consider that there is really only one world government and has been for a very long time, and that each country is used by this 'government' for specific purposes of which the local population is unaware and are never informed, what conclusions could you draw?
Richard said:
Maybe then, we can start to live and interact in a true STO way, where all our claims and wishes to force "God" become obsolete.
Precisely. But we live 3D STS....the choice is not ours to make. Until mankind is able to transition to STO there will always be a need of systems to stop the abuse of each other. Even were we to live as the most STO people I know, the bushmen, we would find as they do, that a system of rules is the only way for a society to function.
While I agree with you that such systems are needed in a world ruled by STS, they should be in place to protect normal human populations from the predations of pathologically deviant individuals. Such systems, however, and the acceptance of them, can easily be a back door for acceptance of the schizoid declaration:
Lobaczewski said:
Human nature is so bad that order in human society can only be maintained by a strong power created by highly qualified individuals in the name of some higher idea.
And the choice
is ours to make – every moment of every day it is up to us to choose: STO or STS, to the best of our ability. I know that in our current environment this will only lead us at best to become STO candidates, but it's either
choose that, or fall into the default which is STS. So the choice
is ours.