Session 7 September 2013

Leonarda said:
Gonzo said:
Another intriguing session. Thanks for sharing it.

The manufactured Syrian crisis has been occupying an awful lot of my thinking lately and I've been curious about the leaders who are standing firm (so far) against the rush to blame and attack. Putin is an interesting character to say the least. He seems a bit of an enigma. He was a product of the KGBand his authoritarian approach to democracy had fuelled much criticism. And yet, during his leadership, wages increased, and unemployment and poverty dropped. The C's statement that he is not so heartless adds to the puzzle.

This confuses me because the C's said that there has been one world government for a while. Can Putin go against the agenda? :huh:

If the agenda is to have a war to distract the people from what really matters, then he isn't going against it, he is playing the part of the 'good guy' vs the bad guys, at least for some people. You have to have a convincing enemy to have a really good 'war', don't ya know!
 
Laura said:
hesperides said:
Laura, this part obviously refers to me, isn´t it?

Actually, no. Have you recently been taken in by a con-man?

Yes, when taking in account your comments about Victor Manuel Gómez as a con-man, I actually think it could be the case. After all, I´ve spent many years reading his books and also belonged to one of his gnostic group. That plus the threads about J.Caesar and the question I wanted you to ask to the Cas led me to think so.

Besides, questions and answers are describing perfectly my own situation, so that I´ll take it as if it were me the Cas were referring to and make a point of opening myself in other threads. I spent the whole day thinking how I may have crystallized on the wrong foundation in relation to my mother, or at least -now that I know you/Cas were not pointing at me- how daydreaming and withdrawal as a form of coping with my mother´s negligence and aggressivity have had a self-limiting effect on me and that it´s time I start sharing whatever goes in my mind.
 
Thanks for sharing the new session. It is very strange to see the physical degeneration of these political puppets. You would think that they'd be the picture of health with all of the life force they are draining from humanity but it's good to see that it doesn't work that way. Bill Clinton is looking haggard and Dick Cheney needed a heart transplant. I'm surprised his body hasn't rejected it yet.
 
Hallo lovely people
Many thanks for posting yet another session, zero new year is not just yet..
What i am struggeling with now is
A : what is inside is so infantile that it can see beyond the self
The outward consideration thing has the seed of manipulation or even anticipation in it,
as opposed to spontaneous sharing of impressions, leveling.
¨I¨ know ¨I¨ should only consider merit, in or externally, maybe i fail at that,
or the other is very skilled in her game and i notice only the
emotionally centered, anxiety driven, abusive neurotic?
How does one know what is in anothers head, maybe i could brake through
the trauma induced narcissisme, reach past the pity-program (and level).
To just cut the crap?
The abuse is much less since i now use force to stop it, but doing that hurts me, too.
It feels like giving up on somebody to apply external consideration?
 
Thanks for sharing the new session. It is very strange to see the physical degeneration of these political puppets. You would think that they'd be the picture of health with all of the life force they are draining from humanity but it's good to see that it doesn't work that way. Bill Clinton is looking haggard and Dick Cheney needed a heart transplant. I'm surprised his body hasn't rejected it yet.
Maybe because 4D sucks through them?




Edit=Quote
 
cope said:
Thanks for sharing the new session. It is very strange to see the physical degeneration of these political puppets. You would think that they'd be the picture of health with all of the life force they are draining from humanity but it's good to see that it doesn't work that way. Bill Clinton is looking haggard and Dick Cheney needed a heart transplant. I'm surprised his body hasn't rejected it yet.
Maybe because 4D sucks through them?

Good point. Forgot about that.
 
cope said:
Hallo lovely people
Many thanks for posting yet another session, zero new year is not just yet..
What i am struggeling with now is
A : what is inside is so infantile that it can see beyond the self
The outward consideration thing has the seed of manipulation or even anticipation in it,
as opposed to spontaneous sharing of impressions, leveling.
¨I¨ know ¨I¨ should only consider merit, in or externally, maybe i fail at that,
or the other is very skilled in her game and i notice only the
emotionally centered, anxiety driven, abusive neurotic?
How does one know what is in anothers head, maybe i could brake through
the trauma induced narcissisme, reach past the pity-program (and level).
To just cut the crap?
The abuse is much less since i now use force to stop it, but doing that hurts me, too.
It feels like giving up on somebody to apply external consideration?

It's hard to tell you cope, because we don't know the particulars of the person you are talking about, the situation, your relationship with her. What you say say here, sounds worrisome: "The abuse is much less since i now use force to stop it, but doing that hurts me, too."

Since I noticed that you haven't made a formal introductory post to our forum yet, maybe you can start a new thread here and tell us a bit about yourself, how you found this forum, and whatever else you'd like to share? And having your own thread you can also talk a bit more about the person/situation to which you refer above. If you want to.
 
excuse me for not introducing. i put it off before because of the many I s i could not choose from..
hoped that would clear up soon, it did not yet.I will make it a priority now that you ask.
heavy situation indeed, but also chance to grow.. Thank you alana for your concern
 
Thanks for the session! When I read it the first time I was a little put out about some of the personal stuff up front (as in "oh no, Laura is going to run out of time and not make it to the juicy stuff!"), but on a second read I get it.

Anyway, this line just mentioned is great: "A: Close. What is inside is so infantile it cannot see beyond the self." As has been discussed elsewhere, it helps tremendously to take a step back to remember this when surrounded by narcissistic family and coworkers, because they are relentless. And in a way, this could be seen as part of that 'proxy war' on normal people, that we are entangled and distracted by these types on a daily basis.
 
Yozilla said:
The Best Excuse ever!

Please refrain from posting one-liners that add nothing to the thread. This is also rude. Let me guess, you were "just trying to be funny" again? It's not.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom