Session 7 September 2013

[Don Diego]

Thank you all again for your hard Work, a REAL gift.

 

[Silveryblue]

Session Date: September 7th 2013

Laura, Ark, Belibaste, Perceval, Andromeda, Kniall, PoB, Atriedes, Ailen, Mr. Scott


Q: (Mr. Scott) Except things change every five minutes, so that doesn't mean much. (L) Yeah. (Perceval)Yeah, it's ongoing. (L) Okay, what are our last few questions? Belibaste? (Belibaste)We had an assumption that industrial plumes could be attractors for cometary discharges? Is this a valid assumption?

A: Yes

Q: (Belibaste)Is it because the plume is electrically charged?

A: Yes

Q: (Belibaste)Is the charge of the plume more negative than the charge of the incoming body?

A: Yes

Q: (Belibaste)Whoa, that's cool. What is the main cause of the eleven year solar cycle?

A: Reverberations due to passes of companion.

Q: (Perceval)So the companion passes every eleven years?

A: Resonance.

Q: (L) No, it doesn’t pass every eleven years. It's because when it does pass, it sets up some kind of resonance. (Belibaste)Talking about the companion, how far is it from the earth? (Ailen) No dice!

A: No dice!

Q: (L) You know better than that, Belibaste. (Ark) He was trying to get an answer quickly... (L) Hurry, get yours while supplies last! {laughter} (Belibaste)About the geomagnetic field of the Earth, I assume that there are three causes: remnant magnetism in the iron-rich crust, the magnetic field induced by the jetstreams, and the core that the C's mentioned previously. Are these three valid causes for the geomagnetic field?

A: Not the main ones.

Q: (Belibaste)What's the main one?

A: Electric flow.

Q: (Belibaste)About the main cause for the geomagnetic field, it's electric flow between what and what?

A: Sun and cosmic environment.

Q: (Andromeda) If there's a geomagnetic reversal, does it cause really big explosions like this guy talks about in the Magnetic Reversal book?

A: It can.

Q: (Andromeda) So if we go through this geomagnetic reversal, this supposedly happened several times before in a cycle... Does it cause mutations in humans and other living things?

A: It can.

I am not much of a scientist. This seems to be saying that the companion passes and sets up a reverberation that keeps diminishing (as echoes do) until the next pass.
Is it reasonable to assume that the 11 year cycle represents the reverberation time for this echo in our cosmic "room"? If it is, then could the slowing of the rotations of the planets be a direct effect of this?

In my mind I see a companion passing by & juicing up the planets (electric flow?), then departing - sort of like winding up a series of spinning tops. While they are spinning fast you don't notice a gradual slowing. When they are winding down they start to wobble and you can pretty much tell which one will stop first. By the time it's nearly out of energy it is very erratic.

Our magnetic poles have been moving quite rapidly in the recent years and Earths' rotation is slowing down and "opening up" according to the Cs.

If this is a plausible "wobble", does anyone know if there is any data on the slowing rotations of the planets that might indicate a path?

 

[dreamer]

Thank you for the session.

 

[Pierre]

I am not much of a scientist. This seems to be saying that the companion passes and sets up a reverberation that keeps diminishing (as echoes do) until the next pass.

I'm not sure it's working exactly like that since, apparently, the companion is approaching but the solar cycles are getting weaker. There seem to be a positive correlation between cycle length and Solar activity (during the Maunder minimum the sun was very quite and the cycles were long): link

Is it reasonable to assume that the 11 year cycle represents the reverberation time for this echo in our cosmic "room"?

That's the way I understood the Cs answer but many parameters still have to be identified in particular what is being reverberated, and why the cycle are not getting shorter although the companion is supposed to be approaching.

If it is, then could the slowing of the rotations of the planets be a direct effect of this?

There seems to be a link between solar activity and earth's spinning frequency. We hypothesized that the approaching companion grounds the Sun hence its reduced activity. Therefore the Earth's is exposed to a lesser electric field and like an electric motor, less electricity means less spinning.

does anyone know if there is any data on the slowing rotations of the planets that might indicate a path?

It seems that since 2003 the Earth slow down is accelerating. In addition, Other planets are also slowing down.

The reduced solar activity and the increased cometary activity both contribute to the Earth's slow down. Yet according to mainstream science the Earth's slowdown is exclusively due to tidal effects exerted by the moon on the Earth's ocean.

How is it possible to reconcile the mainstream theory with the fact that the slowdown of Venus and Saturn has been extensively recognized, while Venus has no moon whatsoever? This "anomaly" was summarized as follow:

Interestingly, the Earth's rotation is also slowing down, but scientists attribute this to tidal acceleration, frictional "drag" caused by the Moon's gravitational pull. This explanation cannot apply to Venus' slowing spin, however, because Venus has no moon of its own.

If Venus, which has no moon whatsoever, is also slowing down, it means that the moon tidal force while being one possible cause for the Earth's slowdown is not the only cause.

The concomitant slowdown of Saturn, Venus and Earth is consistent with the Electric Universe hypotheses where the Sun electric activity drives planets' spin and where, therefore, a reduced solar activity induces a slowdown of the planets in the Solar system, including Venus, Saturn and the Earth.

The slowdown of the Earth has been acknowledged a long time ago. But, as depicted in the chart below, this slowdown is not constant at all, several forces seem to be at work. The chart below encompasses the 1960-2012 period. It shows the deviation between the theoretical constant 24 hours day length (represented by the horizontal yellow straight line) and the measured day length (the green curve). As you can see the measured day length (jagged purple curve) is almost systematically longer than the theoretical day length by up to 4 milliseconds/day (ms).
The red curve shows the cumulated time difference between the theoretical day duration and the observed day duration (+25 seconds between 1970 and 2010).

Note also that since 2003 the average measured day length has been getting longer and longer (blue ascending line on the right of the chart), from an average of +0.3 ms per day in 2003 to an average of +1.0 ms per day in 2011. Since 2003 the Earth slowdown seems to be accelerating.

© Sott.net (adapted from US Naval observatory)

Theoretical day length VS observed day length

A day lengthening of 1 ms per day leads to an actual year that is 0.365 second longer than the theoretical one. Some adjustments are therefore required to avoid a wider and wider drift and having eventually to celebrate Christmas in the middle of summer.

Since 1972, an extra second, also known as a leap second, is added about once a year. This extra second was initially added because the duration of one mean solar day is slightly longer than the UTC day which counts 24 hours, i.e. 86400 SI seconds.

Moreover the Earth’s slowdown requires the addition of an ever greater number of leap seconds , since nowadays, leap seconds have to compensate for the UTC day that is already too short and in addition it has to compensate for actual day that are getting longer and longer.

 

[Lamp of Orion]

Q: (Andromeda) According to something this guy says in this book, pigs and humans popped onto the scene at the same time...

A: Yes

Q: (Andromeda) Is this a mutation that happened side-by-side, or... I don't know exactly what I'm trying to ask... Are we primate and pig hybrids?

A: No.

Q: (Andromeda) So it was a mutation?

A: Yes

Q: (Andromeda) That happened at the same time for humans and pigs?

A: Yes. Viral.

If this is the case, I would like to bring into light the concept of human endogenous retroviruses. From Wikipedia (_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endogenous_retrovirus#Human_endogenous_retroviruses):

Human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) proviruses comprise a significant part of the human genome, with approximately 98,000 ERV elements and fragments making up nearly 8%.[30] According to a study published in 2005, no HERVs capable of replication had been identified; all appeared to be defective, containing major deletions or nonsense mutations. This is because most HERVs are merely traces of original viruses, having first integrated millions of years ago. However, one family of viruses has been active since the divergence of humans and chimpanzees. This family, termed HERV-K (HML2), makes up less than 1% of HERV elements but is one of the most studied. There are indications it has even been active in the past few hundred thousand years, e.g., some human individuals carry more copies of the virus family than others.[31] Traditionally, age estimates of HERVs are performed by comparing the 5' and 3' LTR of a HERV; however, this method is only relevant for full-length HERVs. A recent method, called cross-sectional dating,[32] uses variations within a single LTR to estimate the ages of HERV insertions. This method is more precise in estimating HERV ages and can be used for any HERV insertions. Cross-sectional dating has been used to suggest that two members of HERV-K(HML2), HERV-K106 and HERV-K116, were active in the last 800,000 years and that HERV-K106 may have infected modern humans 150,000 years ago.[33] However, the absence of known infectious members of the HERV-K(HML2) family, and the lack of elements with a full coding potential within the published human genome sequence, suggests to some that the family is less likely to be active at present. In 2006 and 2007, researchers working independently in France and the USA recreated functional versions of HERV-K(HML2).[34][35]

Immunological studies have shown some evidence for T cell immune responses against HERVs in HIV-infected individuals.[36] The hypothesis that HIV induces HERV expression in HIV-infected cells led to the proposal that a vaccine targeting HERV antigens could specifically eliminate HIV-infected cells. The potential advantage of this novel approach is that, by using HERV antigens as surrogate markers of HIV-infected cells, it could circumvent the difficulty inherent in directly targeting notoriously diverse and fast-mutating HIV antigens.

Want further sources?

"Demystified . . . Human endogenous retroviruses": _http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1187282/

"Paleovirology—Modern Consequences of Ancient Viruses": _http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000301

"Human Genetics and the Image of God": _http://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/CIS/Finlay/pdf/Finlay_lecture.pdf

 

[Muxel]

Hallo lovely people
Many thanks for posting yet another session, zero new year is not just yet..
What i am struggeling with now is
A : what is inside is so infantile that it can see beyond the self
The outward consideration thing has the seed of manipulation or even anticipation in it,
as opposed to spontaneous sharing of impressions, leveling.
¨I¨ know ¨I¨ should only consider merit, in or externally, maybe i fail at that,
or the other is very skilled in her game and i notice only the
emotionally centered, anxiety driven, abusive neurotic?
How does one know what is in anothers head, maybe i could brake through
the trauma induced narcissisme, reach past the pity-program (and level).
To just cut the crap?
The abuse is much less since i now use force to stop it, but doing that hurts me, too.
It feels like giving up on somebody to apply external consideration?

Hey Cope,
The way you wrote it, you could have been describing my own problem!
I'd love if you could elaborate more on it over at the Newbies Board so others can pitch in and help you out.

 

[Muxel]

I like this gif of a binary star system orbit from wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Orbit5.gif
You see how they speed up at the "mutual periapsis"

This way, our solar system may be "slowed" but we're moving faster as a single whole mass.

 

[seek10]

Thank you Shijing, my only concern was playing games which I've seen happen and experienced in other social networks like twitter. reaching towards the truth and straightforwardness is something I'd like to see and as much avoidance of paranoia as possible. I hope that said individuals were notified. honesty is the goal.

If Laura and team thinks that it is safe to put the names or share the information, they surely will do it. Those people who regularly participate and read can make out some of the names. So I don't think there is any hiding or games. I think your projection of your elsewhere experiences is not relevant in this case.

 

[Lindenlea]

Thank you for another great session, totally unexpected but most quickly read, and to be re-read again later to absorb all.

 

[KTC]

thanks xx

 

[Anthony]

Does anyone remember how Douglas Reed described American presidents when they were
about to retire after serving the Zionist aka psychopath agenda most of their lives?

 

[Leonarda]

Another intriguing session. Thanks for sharing it.

Putin is an interesting character to say the least. He seems a bit of an enigma. He was a product of the KGBand his authoritarian approach to democracy had fuelled much criticism. And yet, during his leadership, wages increased, and unemployment and poverty dropped. The C's statement that he is not so heartless adds to the puzzle.

This confuses me because the C's said that there has been one world government for a while. Can Putin go against the agenda?

If the agenda is to have a war to distract the people from what really matters, then he isn't going against it, he is playing the part of the 'good guy' vs the bad guys, at least for some people. You have to have a convincing enemy to have a really good 'war', don't ya know!

Oh now I get it! At first I thought Putin was a rebel to the system

 

[Yozilla]

The Best Excuse ever!

Please refrain from posting one-liners that add nothing to the thread. This is also rude. Let me guess, you were "just trying to be funny" again? It's not.

You are wright Nienna - i tend to overdo with "humor"... Will pay more attention to this on forum...
I respect your reminders.

Y

 

[SeekinTruth]

Does anyone remember how Douglas Reed described American presidents when they were
about to retire after serving the Zionist aka psychopath agenda most of their lives?

Yeah, that's what I thought of too reading that part of the discussion.

 

[Laura]

Does anyone remember how Douglas Reed described American presidents when they were
about to retire after serving the Zionist aka psychopath agenda most of their lives?

Yeah, that's what I thought of too reading that part of the discussion.

I vaguely remember it too. Can somebody find the passage? I think those images of Bush and Blair were utterly shocking. Funny that the same drastic decline does not seem to have happened to Putin. He's aged some, naturally, but he seems to have aged quite well.