(Joe) It just seems to be a lot of those types. They're quite negative and supposedly there's an equal number of 4D STS and 4D STO, right? I'm just wondering, where do they all come from? How do you get an equal number?
Although I don't know the reason, there seems to be an UNEQUAL number of 4D STS and STO entities depending on the AR material:
January 25, 1981
7.
15 Questioner: What is the density of the Orion group?
Ra: I am Ra. Like the Confederation, the densities of the mass consciousnesses which comprise that group are varied. There are a very few third density, a larger number of fourth density, a similarly large number of fifth density, and very few sixth-density entities comprising this organization.
Their numbers are perhaps one-tenth ours at any point in the space/time continuum as the problem of spiritual entropy causes them to experience constant disintegration of their social memory complexes.
Their power is the same as ours. The Law of One blinks neither at the light or the darkness, but is available for service to others and service to self. However, service to others results in service to self, thus preserving and further harmonizing the distortions of those entities seeking intelligent infinity through these disciplines.
Those seeking intelligent infinity through the use of service to self create the same amount of power but, as we said, have constant difficulty because of the concept of separation which is implicit in the manifestations of the service to self which involve power over others. This weakens and eventually disintegrates the energy collected by such mind/body/spirit complexes who call the Orion group and the social memory complexes which comprise the Orion group.
It should be noted, carefully pondered, and accepted, that the Law of One
is available to any social memory complex which has decided to strive together for any seeking of purpose, be it service to others or service to self. The laws, which are the primal distortions of the Law of One, then are placed into operation and the illusion of space/time is used as a medium for the development of the results of those choices freely made. Thus all entities learn, no matter what they seek. All learn the same, some rapidly, some slowly.
Perhaps it is the case that although in terms of balance the power of both groups is more or less the same (I think the last two blackened sentences refer to the use of different means to "get to God" by anyone other than meaning that their level of power is the same, although from other statements if there would be a balance of power between both sides) there would apparently be less STS-oriented individuals... if this is true, perhaps it is due to the pyramidal hierarchical configuration and the massive power supply from 3rd density individuals, so it wouldn't take as many STS individuals to balance against the STO forces, I think maybe this will open the door for there to be STS individuals that concentrate a lot of power in comparison to STO individuals and that the latter are partly forced to work together just to deal with one of these types.
I thought Crossfit was intensity oriented training (with some weight lifting)? Don't really know myself, as I have only seen "Crossfit" stuff on YouTube vids. May I suggest looking at workout programs from
Online Workout Programs & Routines for Men & Women | ATHLEAN-X. I personally use the athlean xero program regularly (it's a program meant to be used at home with only/mostly body weight exercises, and it's challenging). There are other workout programs on the site that use weightlifting and seem to be pretty intense IMHO.
Or maybe just a plain gym workout schedule that hits all the major muscle groups throughout the week, requiring actual heavy-heavy weights, is enough? (like plain ol' squats, bench presses, deadlifts, etc...)
In any event, thank you for another amazing session.
nidO and anyone who reads this, please do not listen to that man, look for some other channel of information regarding these issues like those already suggested by some members, it is not that everything he says is wrong, but that guy is a living meme in the fitness community despite its popularity, I wouldn't make this comment if the issue wasn't really serious, look for example Greg Doucette, one of the top 5 powerlifters and watch any of his videos associated with ATHLEAN-X in which he destroys him in terms of mistakes he makes in each of his videos, I saw some in which he makes mistakes in all of them, I have observed that once they run out of content many people tend to "fill up" without much concern since in the " fitness" there is no police, in the case of Jeff he proposes many potentially harmful "invented" exercises, nothing happens to him because he only shows them and practices them in the videos, plus most do not do them and because some take time to generate damage and of course not all people have the same level of training so that from which he is saved, someone might not.
So there is a difference between high intesity training (h.i.t) and high intesity interval training (h.i.i.t).
The former espoused by Arthur Jones an Mike Mentzer centers around taking 1 exercise/movement to mechanical failure. Whereas h.i.i.t, where you have several exercises with minimal rest periods and do several sets of said exercises. There is significant overlap between h.i.i.t and crossfit, but h.i.i.t is a broader generalization.
Personally i would not recommend h.i.i.t, crossfit or any training regime that sacrifices correct form for reps.
Weighlifting, in general, has many benefits if used in a correct way. Since i began teaing on a regular basis i have noticed many health benefits but mainly the feeling of being more robust.
One main aspect i have noticed that for me contributes heavily is the abdominal bracing during lifting. The deep abdominal breathing combined with muscular exertion does give me an increased feeling of awakeness, which i personally attribute to increasing oxygen uptake. But that is just my experience. I do not recommend this to everyone.
For more info on H.I.T look up any of mike mentzers videos on youtube.
Yes, since in the session the term was associated with weight training, it would refer to what is known as strength training in which high intensity is achieved as a result of high loads; normally the ones where the weight allows you to perform a maximum of 5 reps... now of course I am aware that there are many safety considerations to take into account and not everyone can perform this type of training, so I will explain some general things and I'll give some alternatives in some cases... the first thing is that strength training due to stimulating mechanoreceptors sufficiently is the only type of training that has been shown to efficiently enough stop and reverse osteoporosis and with it the loss of bone, it is in this that many stem cells of the mesenchymal or stromal type, together with progenitor cells, meet and respond to these stimuli that cause greater communication between both types of stem cells, in the muscle the type Mesenchymal cells that respond to similar mechanical stimuli would not create new fibers, but would release growth factors that would stimulate other cells to create new fibers.
Despite the fact that I said that the repetition ranges from 1 to 5 in terms of intensity stimulate more strength gain (mainly through nervous adaptations and through the thickening and increase in the coordination of certain muscle fibers, which is known as sarcomeric hypertrophy due to Because the sarcomere is the smallest functional unit of the muscle fiber), these gains are a continuum and can be achieved with higher rep ranges, up to 8-10, ranges beyond these numbers start to lose even more effectiveness if The objective is to maintain a high intensity, and it begins to be more of a training focused on the other type of hypertrophy that exists, sarcoplasmic (more fatigue is generated because the energy pathways that the body uses are other and therefore the body responds by increasing glycogen deposits and increasing the amount of sarcoplasm, a liquid similar to cell plasma, but in this case between the sarcomeres and containing high concentrations of myoglobin and calcium ions necessary for more prolonged muscle contractions, all this causes a bulkier muscular appearance typical associated with bodybuilders), this type of training is not wasted in any case and it is advisable to do it during a period of adaptation before moving on to strength training, in these there are usually much fewer muscle injuries due to their short duration, but be careful, they are very dependent on the technique, if you do not perfect it beforehand with, let's say, lighter loads, doing a movement with higher weights wrong, as is usually used in these training sessions, can generate a much more serious injury, neither I recommend to no one that you reach muscle failure in these training sessions mainly for safety, because if you don't have safety supports in certain exercises you can be crushed or suffer some other mishap and because reaching muscle failure is unnecessary because although here you don't feel a great muscular fatigue, the impact on the nervous system is notable if you approach failure and it can hinder your programming and develop more activities in your day to day, I said that this type of training is carried out around weights that allow you to perform maximum 5 repetitions, but doing half (that is, doing about 3 repetitions and saving 2) is enough to generate a positive stimulus and get away from exhaustion of the nervous system, perform series of 5x5 or 6x5 per exercise (saving 2 repetitions or 1 maximum ).
Also say that these workouts should be done maximum twice a week per muscle group due to the intensity and that a greater amount will only generate loss of performance in most cases (especially in older people who take longer to recover). ooh! and start with sections of 2x5 or 3x5 the first two weeks per exercise, since no matter how much an adaptation period has been done, the body will not be adapted to this other form of training and the muscle and joint pain can be enormous, either This type of training is recommended so intensely if you have pressure problems and especially now that many have some damage from the covid... although if it is dosed well and starts with less intensity in terms of weight, it is certainly beneficial in the most cases.
To know the weight with which they must work to achieve a maximum of five repetitions without having to calculate their RM in a real way and without exposing yourself to danger ( RM = maximum load, the maximum weight that they can lift in a single repetition without being able to do another one) you can use this Epley equation:
(0.0333 × Number of repetitions × Weight) + Weight =
example: (0.0333 x 12 x 98k ) + 98k = 137 k
The results are not exact and the formula works worse as the number of repetitions increases, but even so the values are very close. If someone wants to do it, warm up beforehand and incidentally say that it is also essential to warm up for strength training itself.... 80% of the RM is equivalent to the weight to be used to perform 5 repetitions in a specific exercise more or less, in the example it would be 109.6 k
Prioritize multi-joint exercises for greater stability and that mobilize a large amount of muscle mass, such as barbell military presses, squats, bench presses, certain rows, but be careful with some exercises, such as pendlay rows, Romanian deadlifts, and conventional deadlifts. They are exercises that require a lot of technique and despite their massive promotion in recent times, they can bring problems to the lower back, and by this I mean herniated discs (partly depends on genetics and the shape of the disc), I do not want to demonize it Since due to the high intensity that can be achieved in this exercise, it serves the objective we are looking for a lot, but even respecting the technique, there is often some discomfort in that area and over time an adverse event can occur, try to move away from failure muscle for at least two repetitions, if you still want to perform this exercise, be it any of the two types of hypertrophy already described that you are working on, the body will tend to generate spinal flexion during its execution since in this way the load is lighter due to more efficient levers (which facilitates anterior compression of the lumbar spine and has expanded the space in the posterior area, which facilitates the possible exit of discs in that direction), to avoid this, look in a mirror and think when going down that there is a wall behind you and your objective will be to take your rear end to that wall, in this way magic is done and the spine adopts a safer extension posture, many may not take advantage of it due to weakness of the grip and must use straps (strings for the hands that are tied to the bar) or use alternate grip (be careful to flex the biceps a lot in the hand that faces forward), of the other two dangerous exercises, I also left two Suggestions for someone who can't deadlift and wants to train the hamstrings:
In the example an elastic band is used, although it is better than nothing, it is not the most suitable since it generates force only during part of the exercise and almost nothing in the excentric phase (negative - elongation) so the The stimulus is very little, a weighted pulley would be better, but since this is somewhat difficult for many, I propose this other alternative for those who do not have material:
The technique consists of never dropping the hips, pushing with the heels and using a sliding surface such as a towel or a piece of cardboard, it can be further complicated by having the body slide instead of the heels, or even more difficult. sliding the heels to one leg.
For more exercises and considerations I leave it in your hands, ask me if any point is not clear enough, if there is any doubt or if you want to make me any correction.
@Konstantin You can adjust exercises that suit you and that you can perform without any pain. For example, I can't do a flat bench press because I always hurt my shoulder with that exercise, while it is much better if I do a decline bench press. It is less stressful to the shoulder joint and puts much more pressure on the pectoral muscles. That works for me.
Yes, the pectoral is activated more since its lower part is the most powerful and the angle is better in that position to focus on that part, but more than that the shoulders are a little more externally rotated, maybe you could try a couple of things in the flat bench press and see if the discomfort in the shoulder decreases, push out some of the chest without forcing this gesture at the level that the shoulder blades come together and descend (it is somewhat uncomfortable, difficult to maintain, it makes it difficult for us to remove the bar due to the rotation that the shoulders acquire and it does not serve the purpose of stimulating the pectoral to the maximum), to do this just lie down on the bench without putting your chest out yet, then just lift your buttocks a little, the chest will protrude a little and the shoulders They will rotate externally, lower your rear without losing the position of your chest, here is a short video from minute 3, activate the subtitle translator.
Another thing is to perform a gesture of breaking the bar, this helps to maintain the external rotation:
And finally, and this is what causes the most problems for the shoulder, is that in the part where we raise the bar, due to biomechanical advantages, in the final part near the block, we tend to rotate the shoulder internally, see if you do this action even in the decline press.
The guy in the image does it well in the first and in the second his shoulder is forward and his chest is no longer in the position it should be:
The arms tend to go close to 90 degrees between the heaviest lifters, but it's okay if the elbows hang a little to the sides of the body at some point if we want the bar to come down to the nipples, which is where you should go.
Ps: in case anyone thinks about it, the decline press is not highly recommended to be worked on in ranges of strength because it is somewhat unstable, but the range of intensity that you are using, your Konstantin, is very good.