anart
A Disturbance in the Force
Laura said:Session 9 April 2011
A: What do you think about the ”new” explosion 3 to 4 billion light years away? They think, that is.
{Here it seems the Cs are referring to recent news of an explosion that is going on in the center of a small galaxy said to be 3.8 billion light-years away. See:
http://www.tgdaily.com/space-features/55258-bizarre-cosmic-explosion-observed
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Cosmic-Fireworks-Erupt-When-Black-Hole-in-Dragons-Belly-Swallows-Star-72239.html
“Astronomers say they have never seen anything this bright, long-lasting and variable before. Usually gamma-ray bursts mark the end of a massive star and emission from these events never lasts more than a few hours. But radiation from the blast continues to brighten and fade from the location a week after the explosion.”
And: “Rather than the short-lived gamma-ray bursts typically associated with the death of a massive star -- most last no more than a few hours -- this explosion continues more than a week later to emanate pulses of high-energy cosmic radiation for an effect that's brighter, longer lasting, and more variable than scientists have ever seen.”}
Q: (L) Are you saying that it’s not as far away as they’re saying it is?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is it representing? What is it doing?
A: The wave has begun in earnest!
Q: (L) What do you mean?
A: Energy is pouring into your universe from higher densities.
Q: (L) Was there any connection between our neighbor’s death and our dog’s deteriorating health? Is it concentrated beaming or cosmic influences?
A: See all of the above.
Just want to note that this article - http://www.sott.net/articles/show/230020-Scientists-record-death-rattle-of-star-hitting-black-hole says that, "This burst produced a tremendous amount of energy over a fairly long period of time, and the event is still going on more than 2 1/2 months later." So, the energy flowing into our Universe wasn't a one time (or extended) 'pulse', it's ongoing, which matches what the C's seem to be saying.
I find that very interesting. The article itself is pretty pitiful with the explanations of what is going on (even though they admit they don't know what's going on, they invariably explain it as if they do) - but - that little tidbit that it is ongoing caught my eye, since I got the impression from the initial article that it was a 'burst', not ongoing. fwiw.