Smoking is... good?

  • Thread starter Thread starter morgan
  • Start date Start date
After teaching many cancer reasearch scientists for years, as an english teacher to spanish students,I would like to mention what they told me, that if you smoke it will have consequences to your health, these consequences really start to have an effect when a person starts to smoke more than 5-6 cigarettes a day, however this depends on tobacco type and obviously there are exceptions. I think that there is a problem with the idea that if you smoke you are a bad person. However I would like to say that YOU all of us have what it takes to be truly happy and at peace without depending on external stimulants.
 
Alright, I'm gonna smoke. What's the best plan of attack?

Where you live in Canada can affect what kind of tobacco products are available to you. If you live in a small community I would guess your choices are limited. I live in Montreal and American Spirits are very easy to find, either at smoke stores or at certain high end Couche Tard depanneurs (A chain of convinience stores in Qu
 
Smokers' Obstacles

Hi all,

There is something that is bothering me about smoking. Reading the comment C's
made in response to Laura regarding which if any brands of cigarettes are better, they
in a sense said it does not matter that is, cigarette smoking does not cause cancer, only
the (pre)programmed mind does. Am I reading this right?

In many threads regarding cigarettes, I think we call came away thinking that cigarettes
are "reprocessed tobacco" that is, other "ingredients" are added. I recall there are at
times over 100+ different kinds of "stuff" added in. Some say it is to enhance addiction,
is a "preservative", or "aromatics", and so on. I guess we can all agree on fact: "stuff is
added" to the tobacco plant.

There is even a subject during the "war against the tobacco companies" that it was said
that the tobacco plant itself was "genetically modified", i.e. they created a plant that
produced seeds incorporating the same genes. Sheesh. So if you wanted "natural
tobacco", then you either have to trust your sources or grow it yourself and in
uncontaminated soil to know for sure it was not tampered with? Is there a law preventing
anyone from growing their own tobacco? Wonder where I can find unadultered seeds?

What really bothers me is nothing was discussed about "natural tobacco" as to whether
or not is has better properties over that of cigarettes. Perhaps the C's message is: "it
does not matter what tobacco products you choose, so as long as you do not believe it
produces cancer and you will be fine" ??? Even if cigarettes are pumped full of rat poison
or even cynanide? I have a very hard time with this concept.

I could for all purposes put myself in lead-smeltering factory that has its air permeated with
lead fumes or put myself into a gas chamber with deadly cynanide gas, but then again we
are talking about cigarette smoking which is not the same thing?

I do recall a smoking chimp that lived to "long age". I wonder what s/he died of? Well, I guess
the devil is in the details.

I may sound like an anti-smoker, but I am not. In fact I smoked a pipe for 15 years. I avoided
cigarettes for the very reason of added "stuff". I still would love to smoke my pipe but I found
that if I smoke too much I would get vertigo very bad that I'd have to hit the floor and hug it
very tight. This was a physical effect, not mental as far as I can tell! So, I learned to smoke
less but eventually I gave up smoking due to financial reasons. Tabacco is very expensive for
me especially due to all that tax!

Dan
 
Smokers' Obstacles

dant said:
What really bothers me is nothing was discussed about "natural tobacco" as to whether
or not is has better properties over that of cigarettes. Perhaps the C's message is: "it
does not matter what tobacco products you choose, so as long as you do not believe it
produces cancer and you will be fine" ??? Even if cigarettes are pumped full of rat poison
or even cynanide? I have a very hard time with this concept.

Dan
The C's aren't talking about cigarette's with cyanide or rat poison.

Ultimately, it'll depend upon you and your body, which tobacco works best for you. If I smoke tobacco that is "too strong" for me, then I feel it in my lungs. If I don't, then I am fine. But what is too strong for me may be fine for someone else.

I love smoking a pipe, but I haven't found a tobacco that doesn't stuff up my head after a few days.

The best advice, I think, is to listen to your body, and that is probably what the C's are saying. :)
 
Smokers' Obstacles

Hi all,

I think I found the answer to my questions:

From: http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/diet.htm
======================
A: We did not suggest that smoking was advisable per se, the response was in regard to a personal inquiry about difficulty in achieving weight loss on the part of Laura. And, we did not say that this was a permanent solution.
Q: Well, you DID say that it enhances resistance to disease and that it did other beneficial things.
A: Yes, but, it is best accomplished with pure tobacco products, not the corrupted variety available on the mass market.
======================
Note: See the part: "pure tobacco products, not the corrupted variety"

So now, I will have to ask of anyone here - where can I get the PURE
tobacco products from a TRUSTED source? Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks!
Dan
 
Smokers' Obstacles

You could grow it. Lots of neo-shaman types do so they can make those Amazon style cigars. I never have myself since I don't smoke but I hear it's an easy backyard garden type of plant. Probably won't taste as good, though ;).

Everyone seems to like American Spirit for a pure commercial brand.
 
Smokers' Obstacles

dant said:
So now, I will have to ask of anyone here - where can I get the PURE tobacco products from a TRUSTED source? Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks!
Dan
In my area we have a large Indian reservation near by, and they have a lot of little smoke shops all around the city. There is usually a much bigger choice of products available, including pure tobacco. If you have any near you, check one out.
 
Clinic offers stop-smoking regimen that scares doctors

Clinic offers stop-smoking regimen that scares doctors
Couple say their experience backs experts' worries


Candy Pope said a treatment advertised as a sure way to quit smoking had serious side effects for her including hallucinations. It involves drugs that are FDA-approved but not for smoking cessation. PHOTOS BY JOHN PARTIPILO / THE TENNESSEAN

By CLAUDIA PINTO
Staff Writer

Published: Sunday, 07/02/06
A $400 treatment touted as a sure way to quit smoking is being offered at a Nashville doctor's office, even though medical experts say there's no valid proof it's effective - and can be dangerous.

Advertised on the radio and offered at Covenant Family Practice on Dickerson Pike, the treatment includes injections of three drugs that are FDA- approved, but not for smoking cessation. The medications in the shot can cause hallucinations, heart palpitations, paranoia and other serious side effects, including coma, experts say.

"It's just incredible to me that they're doing this," said Dr. Christopher Holstege, one of the nation's top toxicologists and the University of Virginia Health System's director of the division of medical toxicology. "It just doesn't make sense.

"I don't know of any literature that says this is effective for quitting smoking. These drugs can cause hallucinations. They can make your heart beat so fast that if you have heart problems it can cause you to have a heart attack."

Dr. Robert A. Wilson, who administers the shots at Covenant Family Practice, did not return three phone calls seeking comment. Through a receptionist, he referred all questions to officials at a Tampa, Fla.-based company called Welplex - which has franchise agreements with doctors to offer the treatment at 23 clinics in 11 states, including the Nashville clinic that began offering the treatment in January.

Kendahl Maxwell, Wel-
plex's administrator in Florida, said the treatment is safe and effective.

Listeners to the radio advertisements are guided to the Welplex Web site, where they can make appointments for treatment.

The site boasts "a better than 8-out-of-10 chance of succeeding," and lists an array of medical "references" supporting its claim.

But medical experts with the American Medical Association, the University of Virginia Health System and Vanderbilt University Medical Center who reviewed the Web site for The Tennessean found its claims dubious.

Dr. Ronald M. Davis, president-elect of the American Medical Association, said he finds an eight-out-of-10 success rate "highly improbable."

"The most effective smoking cessation programs typically achieve 1-year success rates of between 20 and 35 percent," he said.

Welplex provided additional "research" to The Tennessean to support its claims. But independent medical experts found this equally questionable.

Shots, then hallucinations

Candy Pope, of Shelbyville, says when she heard an ad on the radio recently that a simple treatment could help her quit smoking she decided to try it. She persuaded her husband, Jim, to try it too.

The 58-year-old woman, who smokes more than a pack a day, went to the Web site to learn more and then called a number listed to set up an appointment.

Within days, Welplex officials sent the Popes a letter confirming a June 13 appointment and assuring them that "Patients will leave the clinic a nonsmoker."

The only drawback mentioned is that they would "be a little lightheaded for five to six hours following treatment." And the Popes were advised to bring a designated driver. Their friend, Judith Moore, a retired doctor, wanted them to quit smoking, and Moore said she was happy to oblige.

At the Covenant clinic, the Popes each received three injections and were given a supply of pills to take over the next two weeks.

Candy Pope said that on the drive home from the doctor's office, she became disoriented, agitated, and tried to jump out of the back seat of the moving car.

"I could have died," she said. "Judy was able to lock the doors so that I couldn't jump out."

Jim Pope said about 20 minutes after he got the shots in his neck and behind both ears, he too started experiencing strange sensations. The 68-year-old man, with high blood pressure, said he remembers his heart beating "like a drum" and trying to talk, but not being able to speak.

Once he got home, he said, hallucinations began. He said he saw things crawling on the ceiling and other things that didn't exist.

"In my bedroom, I could see my dog that passed away two years ago," Jim Pope said. "I reached out to him, but he wasn't there."

Moore, who is a retired family physician, said in all her years as a doctor she's never seen patients act like this. The couple, she said, was "really out of it" - talking gibberish and displaying bizarre behavior.

None of them had any idea what was in the shots. And Moore said Welplex offered no emergency number to call.

"I was scared enough to stay the night with them," Moore said.

And Moore is relieved she did, because sometime after midnight Jim Pope decided to take a drive.

"He picked up the car keys and headed for the door," Moore said. "I said, 'Where are you going?' And he said, 'I'm going to the store to get my medication.' Well, of course, the drugstore was closed at that hour. If he had gotten out there, there's no telling what he would have done."

Within a couple of days, Candy and Jim Pope were both smoking again, and they feel conned by Welplex and the doctor who gave them the shots.

"We've been brought up to trust doctors. To do what doctors say," Candy Pope said. "There was nothing in the literature about hallucinations. If I had known, I never would have taken the stuff."

Even small doses called risky

Dr. Glenn Catalano, chief of mental health at the James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital in Tampa, said he's not surprised by what happened to the Popes. He co-wrote a paper that was published in the Annals of Clinical Psychiatry in 2004 about how smoking-cessation shots can cause people to experience a temporary mental break.

He said the paper was inspired by a 59-year-old man who received the shots and started hearing the voices of family members' saying they were going to kill him for his "fortune." As the voices become more frequent, he contemplated suicide and had "homicidal" urges towards his wife for her "betrayal."

"We've seen at least three other patients who have come in with this since then," Catalano said.

Catalano and other medical experts said the bottom line is that these drugs can be dangerous, even in small doses. Tolerance depends on several factors, including weight and genetic predisposition.

"If you are seeing things and you go out to drive or cook dinner, that's not safe," he said.

Still, Welplex insists the treatment is safe and effective.

The patented treatment includes three drugs - atropine, scopolamine and chlorpromazine - that act "to block the central nicotine receptors in the brain," according to documents sent to The Tennessean by Welplex's Maxwell.

She said in an e-mail that the documentation should be "self evident to one skilled in the art of pharmacology and toxicology." She said in a subsequent interview that any doctor who disagreed "needs to go back for further training because they are really missing the boat on knowledge that they obviously don't have."

Maxwell also sent The Tennessean a paper titled "Retrospective Study for Anticholinergic Blockade in Smoking Cessation," by Dr. Ronald E. Perry. Perry says in this paper that 200 randomly selected patients who had been through the Welplex treatment were contacted. Of these, he reported 88 percent were smoke-free after 60 days and 56 percent were smoke-free at one year.

However, both the AMA's Davis and Dr. David DiPersio, a clinical pharmacist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center's medical intensive care unit, found this paper of questionable value.

"The retrospective study described in the paper by Dr. Perry does not provide valid evidence on the effectiveness of the treatment," Davis said. "To establish the efficacy of a treatment, randomized controlled clinical trials are generally necessary. ... The study described in the paper by Dr. Perry falls short of that, is subject to methodological biases, and would probably not be accepted for publication in good peer-reviewed journals."

DiPersio said: "Retrospective studies cannot demonstrate proof. I can't imagine anyone with a medical degree agreeing to the premise of this treatment."

Dr. Tony George, an associate professor of psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine and the director for the Program for Research in Smokers with Mental Illness at Connecticut Mental Health Center in New Haven, said the underlying premise of the Welplex treatment is a mystery to him.

"Atropine and scopolamine ... really do not bind to nicotintic acetylcholine receptor subtypes, so this claim is very puzzling to me," George said. "As a clinical pharmacologist and tobacco treatment person, I ... am just beside myself when I hear about folks that are just exploiting smokers to make a buck with untested and irrational treatments."

Vanderbilt's DiPersio warns the elderly are especially at risk.

"Older people tend to be highly sensitive to this. It can make them crazy," DiPersio said. He noted that the elderly population typically takes other medications that might not mix well with atropine, scopolamine and chlorpromazine.

Atropine is typically used to dilate the eyes, scopolamine for motion sickness and chlorpromazine for psychiatric illness.

"These drugs are never used in combination for anything," DiPersio said.


Published: Sunday, 07/02/06

http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?Date=20060702&Category=NEWS07&ArtNo=607020349&SectionCat=&Template=printart
 
On smoking, cancer, nicotine and big pharma

I found a very interesting article via ranprieur.com about smoking and the causes of cancer. According to the article, smokers contract cancer because of the radioactive polonium particles which enrich on tobacco plants due to fertilization with phosphates. Read yourself:

http://www.lenntech.com/Periodic-chart-elements/Po-en.htm

Here is an interesting bit from the article:

"... the National Cancer Institute, with an annual budget of $500 million, has no active
funding for research of radiation from smoking or residential radon as a cause of
lung cancer, presumably, to protect the public from undue fears of radiation."

I stopped smoking about 10 years ago, but if what the article says is true I'm screwed anyway because my lungs would be "covered with a radioactive lining" :-(


Second thing, due to my readings on this site, I decided to get myself some nicotine. Without having read the article referred to above, I thought it irresponsible to induce people to /smoke/. I stopped smoking because I was so debilitated by the two packs I smoked daily, that I was not able to ascend the stairs to my 3rd floor flat w/o pausing. And, frankly, it smells awful. I think that anybody who can should stop smoking.

Ok, back to nicotine after that rant. What I got myself is called "nicorette microtab" made by pfizer. the package of 105 tablets a 2mg cost me 31 euros. they are small sublingual tablets which come in a dispenser with a daisywheel which looks like antipregnancy pills. I bought this because it was the only nicotine product available w/o those artificial sweeteners from hell. still, they have two very weird excipients. One of them is "Betadex" into which the nicotine is apparently bound. The other weird substance is "Crospovidon". Apart from that, the tablets consist of Megnesium Stearate and Silicium Dioxide.

"Betadex" is beta-cyclodextrine, and is described as a "sequestrant", a molecule used to carry other molecules. "Crospovidon" is "Polyplasdone Crospovidone" or N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone, described as a polymere. From my very limited understanding of what I read up on this one, it might be used to retard the release of nicotine. I found test protocols for both substances detailing tests with mice, rats, monkeys and dogs IIRC (sorry, too tired to look up the links now). From what I understood from reading these test protocols, in the case of both substances, I fail to understand how any of them could have been deemed "safe" for human/pharmaceutic use. The list of what the test animals suffer and what their necropsies reveal is long.

Without adjudicating extreme greed, irresponsibility and premeditated malice there is IMO no way to understand why big pharma can't make things right, make safe drugs, not dangerous and ridden with "side effects". In the case of the nicotine tabs I made an exception to my normal aversion to taking medicine. I am one of those "weirdos" who actually read the paper which comes in the pill packages. What you can read there allows to conclude that Big Pharma could as well commit genocide by use of what they call "medicine" with the added "benefit" of plausible deniability (isn't that what they are doing to the american and european elderly anyway ?)

So, what did nicotine do to me ? First 48 hours I was pretty much zonked in a state of total euphoria which I had never had when used to smoke, also, I had definite problems of eye-hand coordination and motoric control in general. After about 2 weeks of the stuff (6-8 mg/day) I seem to be more alert, less irritable, I sweat lots more than before even taking in account the hot summer. I'll continue with this but will look for another source of nicotine.
 
On smoking, cancer, nicotine and big pharma

This is interesting. The wife and I were what they used to call "moderate" or "light" smokers (half-pack a day or less) and we both gave up in our forties. Within five years we both got ulcers. She managed to get IBS on top of it.

An old MD, the kind that are almost extinct, had told us that if you smoke for years and you're OK with it, just adjust the dose and keep on. Go to 2 or 3 smokes a day but never quite, your body won't forgive you. He was right as far as we can see. But I've seen how cigs cost now and figure, the heck with it.

The wife and I aren't unique. My dad smoked 4 cigars a day all his life and quit at 80. At 85 he had gallbladder trouble, glaucoma and a whole raft of troubles he hadn't had with his dose of tobacco every day. Was it just old age? Probably not in his case, he's 90 now and still misses his smoke. But he's in a "no smoking" elder-care home where they get paid to torture oldsters anyway, seems like, so there's no way to find out if he'd be better off with his stogies or not. You know, one of those places where they rig the smoke detectors to go off if someone lights up?
 
On smoking, cancer, nicotine and big pharma

There seems to be an alternative available. Not too sure of it's composition, maybe similar to nicotine tabs.


Here is the product site:

http://www.nichonica.com/


A few articles:

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060724/nicotine_drink_canada_060724/20060724?hub=Health

http://www.jointogether.org/news/headlines/inthenews/2006/nicotine-drink-marketed-as.html
 
On smoking, cancer, nicotine and big pharma

"I'll continue with this but will look for another source of nicotine."

Name, would you consider taking up smoking again? I smoke 'American Spirit' - allegedly 100% chemical and additive free...
 
On smoking, cancer, nicotine and big pharma

I got a bit suspicious when i saw the name 'pfizer'. Pfizer is a legal pharmaceutical company, which means, not in all cases, that its an arm of the ptb. Now, the thing is, i tend not to go in the direction of products/drugs recommended by the ptb.
Think about it......the mass disinfo campaign and 'war' on smoking seemed to be losing 'steam' or is proving ineffective so to say, so big pharma, an arm of the ptb, decided on a different approach. "if we can't beat the smokers, let's just give them some of our 'drugs' to supply them with nicotine".
The funny thing is, i might not even be right in assuming their agenda. Because remember the use of double and triple reverse psychology.

Remember what the C's said to laura in her interactions:

laura said:
10-28-94
Q: (L) Is smoking detrimental to any of our bodies?
A: Not if mild. Not if mind is in right mode.
Q: (L) Does smoking enhance psychic abilities?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is it true that the government program to stamp out smoking is inspired by the Lizzies?
A: Yes because they know it may heighten psychic abilities.
Q: (L) What is causing the lung cancer they are attributing to smoking?
A: Mental conditioning and subliminal programming to expect it.
Q: (L) So, it only happens if you are convinced that it can and must happen?
A: Correct.
Q: (L) Is there any particular brand of cigarettes to smoke?
A: No.

///////////
Q: What other things does nicotine do?
A: Raises immunological defences.
Q: Anything else?
A: Excites neurotransmitters. You require less sleep.
Q: Is this true for everyone?
A: No.
Q: (A) How much nicotine is necessary?
A: 100 mg per day.
Q: (A) Can it be in pill form? [Ark is CLEARLY unhappy with the idea of me smoking!]
A: Cigarettes infuse it to brain tissues most effectively.
Q: Well, I am certainly relieved! Now I know that I do not have a 'smoking demon' possessing me! I was really getting worried! [While I had quit, I was constantly and incessantly plagued with the urge to smoke. I had become convinced that it was a spirit attachment or some sort of "control mechanism" that would not let me go!]
A: Those who fit this profile find it nearly impossible to "quit" completely.
Q: So, there are people who are actually benefitted by smoking?
A: Genetics will offer proof of this.
Q: You mean that one can see changes in DNA before and after smoking?
A: Close
Q: Is this also true for Frank?
A: Yes.
Q: Why us?
A: It is simply part of your "profiles."
Q: Is that also why I have been having more stomach problems than usual? [I could barely eat anything without having an upset stomach.]
A: Yes.
Q: Well, I always noticed that smoking could settle my stomach. It also stimulated my digestive tract... (F) Yes.
A: (A) What is serious here is the number. How many milligrams... (L) How many cigarettes does this number of 100 milligrams translate into?
A: 20.
Q: Well, I never smoked that much! Only about 15...
A: No.
Q: Well, I told myself 15!
A: It was not. [They were right.]
Q: Ark doesn't need to smoke, does he?
A: No. He does not fit the profile. He actually had to "work" to start smoking.
Q: (L) Did you? (A) Yeah, probably. (L) Well, then why did you? (A) Well, it was somewhat self-annihilating. (L) Ark is NOT happy with this explanation you guys have given. [And he STILL isn't, though he tolerates my smoking, and I DO feel enormously better having resumed without carrying all the guilt that our society is attempting to impose on cigarette smoking.]
A: Life contains unhappy explanations at 3rd density, sometimes.
Q: Well, I was really beginning to think I was possessed...
A: No.
Some time later, a reader wrote to me about this subject:

09-19-98
Q: Here is a note from M__. He writes: "Laura, I was very dismayed to read your post on Diet and Nutrition on the Web Page. The C's are saying that Love is enough and that sex is a pure physical craving and that orgasm energy feeds the 4th D STS buggers. Then, they go on to say that you should smoke, and consume x mg of nicotine, because you need it. Those 2 ideas seem contrary to me, since smoking is also a 'physical craving.' Yes, people gain weight after they quit smoking, but the metabolism does settle down after a year or so. Are you sure of the source of this message? Could STSers be getting through and are getting you and others to try to kill yourself slowly? Covering ones lungs with ash cannot be good for you, regardless of what the ash is made of. Even wood smoke causes breathing disorders. I felt sick when I read that part. It didn't fit into my world view of the C's." Could you comment on his remarks?
A: We did not suggest that smoking was advisable per se, the response was in regard to a personal inquiry about difficulty in achieving weight loss on the part of Laura. And, we did not say that this was a permanent solution.
Q: Well, you DID say that it enhances resistance to disease and that it did other beneficial things.
A: Yes, but, it is best accomplished with pure tobacco products, not the corrupted variety available on the mass market.
You can get the transcript in its entirety on this link:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/diet.htm

Note what is said about lung cancer.

A: Mental conditioning and subliminal programming to expect it.
Q: (L) So, it only happens if you are convinced that it can and must happen?
A: Correct.

Think about it. All dangerous street drugs like coke, crystal meth etc don't even have a warning label. But their effects are detrimental. But with tobacco, the 'health police' and their commander, the 'surgeon general' go all out to 'warn' smokers about the 'dangers' of tobacco and nicotine.
Unless you grow your own tobacco, or get it directly from a farm, i think you will agree with me in saying that the no-smoking campaign is heavy in its marketing and campaigning, with its not so subtle "Smoking Kills" and other slogans on most if not all tobacco products.

I'd be so skeptical about even approaching big pharma for a nicotine replacement.

name said:
"Betadex" is beta-cyclodextrine, and is described as a "sequestrant", a molecule used to carry other molecules. "Crospovidon" is "Polyplasdone Crospovidone" or N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone, described as a polymere. From my very limited understanding of what I read up on this one, it might be used to retard the release of nicotine. I found test protocols for both substances detailing tests with mice, rats, monkeys and dogs IIRC (sorry, too tired to look up the links now). From what I understood from reading these test protocols, in the case of both substances, I fail to understand how any of them could have been deemed "safe" for human/pharmaceutic use. The list of what the test animals suffer and what their necropsies reveal is long.
You have your doubts also. So, my question is, why all these chemicals like betadex and crospovidon? Why not just a simple dosage of nicotine? I wonder what's pfizer's hidden agenda is?
 
On smoking, cancer, nicotine and big pharma

When a smoker becomes "hooked" on ciggarettes the nicotine does something. The nicotine basically kicks the vitamin B3 out of you're body and takes its place. The vitamin B3 also known as Niacin, Niacinamide or Nicotinic Acid is usually craved for when in cigarette form containing a derivitive-nicotine. Many people are not getting enough nutrition through what they consume and B3 is one of those essentials. Naturally if you are lacking or not getting enough and do try smoking, chances are you will probably continue. After all you just found a source of Niacin, ahem, nicotine;)

If someone really wants to quit and TRULY has the want and will, try taking vitamin B3. Hold on now...Niacin should not be taken if you have heart problems(I believe) or high blood pressure, simply because it stimulates you're circulatory system (amoung many other great things!) It will make you flushed in the face and sometimes all over. Tingling sensations may be experienced.
Niacinamide does not have the side effect of making you flushed.
Sometimes giving your body what it needs after it hasn't had it (nicotine), can suffice cravings with that wonderful B3.

Hey nicotine is also a diuretic!! Gotta go...
 
Smokers' Obstacles

Heard of this book, Cigarettes Are Sublime, over ten years ago and was just prompted to remember it and look it up. Anyone read it? http://www(dot)amazon.com/Cigarettes-Are-Sublime/dp/0822314010
Quite philosophical, I hear.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom