Cyre2067 said:
A second read through seemed apropos, so here's what stood out:
It is very well known from biological laboratory experiments that if you can blast a cell with UV light so that 99 per cent of the cell, including its DNA, is destroyed, you can almost entirely repair the damage in a single day just by illuminating the cell with the same wavelength of a very weak intensity.
Is there a source cited for this? Also, interesting that we see the same pattern in homeopathy.
Hmm, I was thinking of a different mechanism as the one that is hypothesized for homeopathy.
As to the source, I don’t have any reference, but I do remember such to be the case.
Cyre2067 said:
In quantum physics, quantum coherence means that subatomic particles are able to cooperate. These subatomic waves or particles not only know about each other, but also are highly interlinked by bands of common electromagnetic fields, so that they can communicate together. They are like a multitude of tuning forks that all begin resonating together. As the waves get into phase or synch, they begin acting like one giant wave and one giant subatomic particle. It becomes difficult to tell them apart. Many of the weird quantum effects seen in a single wave apply to the whole. Something done to one of them will affect the others.
Coherence establishes communication. It's like a subatomic telephone network. 'The better the coherence, the finer the telephone network and the more refined wave patterns have a telephone. The end result is also a bit like a large orchestra. All the photons are playing together but as individual instruments that are able to carry on playing individual parts. Nevertheless, when you are listening, it's difficult to pick out any one instrument.
This part seems very in line with what we're trying to do, by working on ourselves we're attempting to tune ourselves to the frequency of truth, a la STO.
Yes. And all it asks for is a certain extra sensitivity, one that every body can learn maybe, if only we could cast aside those nefarious assumptions (… and there’s also those that relate to the ‘official’ body of science).
The way I have come to see it tough, is that the STS part of the universe also “uses” this field, but in a form that continuously impoverishes the richness that can be resonated with. There are two reasons I see for this impoverishment: the lack of seeing and/or listening of what is REALly there, and the consistent DRIVE towards control and manipulation, and this based on false information because of absence of it (see the first mentioned) and the continuous making of assumptions (to calculate while trying to get a ‘better’ ‘position’ in the STS hierarchy).
So, the way I have come to see it is that such must necessarily lead to a ‘field’ which is monochromatic if present at all (or unsupportive of life).
Cyre2067 said:
A particularly gifted student of his talked him into trying an experiment. It is known that when you apply a chemical called ethidium bromide to samples of DNA, the chemical squeezes itself into the middle of the base pairs of the double helix and causes it to unwind. The student suggested that, after applying the chemical, he and Popp try measuring the light coming off the sample. Popp discovered that the more he increased the concentration of the chemical, the more the DNA unwound, but also the stronger the intensity of light. The less he put in, the lower the light emission., He also found that DNA was capable of sending out a large range of frequencies and that some frequencies seemed linked to certain functions. If DNA were storing this light, it would naturally emit more light once it was unwound.
I've actually done this before. We use ethidium bromide to label DNA. It's a nasty carcinogen, so you have to be very careful with it. The idea is that you label DNA with it, and then you chop up the DNA and run it out on a gel in a process called electrophoresis. (… one sentence skipped) In order to see your DNA on the gel, you hit it with UV light and it glows. Now, we've always been told that it glows because the EtBr is UV Reactive, from the above it seems equally possible that the UV light is reacting to the opened DNA.
Hey Cyre, you are (or were) active in the same field as I am.
Indeed, the ETBr is UV reactive, very much so actually. And it is a strong mutagen that causes so called frame shift mutations.
On a short side track, the idea is that the ET Br intercalates within the stack of basepairs along the DNA helix which causes the polymerase to ‘slip over’ thereby adding an additional nucleotide so that the reading of the frame for each amino acid is totally screwed (info: each next 3 nucleotides along the DNA sequence of a gene determines which amino acid has to be build in next while forming a protein).
That is why I don’t see much value in the experiment they have performed, at least not in the sense that it would prove that the opening of DNA would create more light to escape the coherence, and become counted by the photo multiplier detectors.
If ET Br intercalates within the righted handed DNA helix, it will 'open up' the DNA helix or create less turns along the helix, thereby forcing the remains of the DNA to 'close down' instead of 'opening up'. What really is happening is that because DNA is topologically constrained, the local 'unwinding' of the DNA because of ET Br intercalation will result in 'overwinding' somewhere else along the DNA.
It could very well be that the ET Br molecule once intercalated within the DNA-helix is simply hit by photons present within the DNA (as solitons or polarons or whatever), and then re-emit a photon that is no longer part of the coherent ‘symphony’.
There are also other ways to play with the opening of DNA. If there would be funding for such, many experiments are on the waiting list :
DMSO is one of them (reference to MSM), and there’s gyrases, and topoisomerases, and polyamines such as spermine and spermidine (which every single organism synthesizes itself) that have an influence on the negative superhelicity (which most live chromosomes possess) as they induce formation of a different DNA-helix (Z-DNA) that has left-handed turns, thereby forcing the remains of the topologically constraint (right handed) DNA to accommodate for more negative superhelicity, i.e. opening of the DNA, or the formation of cruciform structures that are stabilized with HMG1 (a protein that recently has passed the revue of SOTT as implicated in the purported effect of gold and its so-called effect in attenuating the symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis.)
Cyre2067 said:
An experiment just came to mind: record EtBr's signature with the equipment they've already discussed, and play it back at DNA. If the DNA glows, then you can certify the cause as it being opened and not a function of the EtBr molecules jammed inside it.
See above. I don’t see what such could possibly prove.
But apart from that, which is only a disagreement within the ‘field’ :) we are engaged in (and I can be wrong also), I agree on all the other avenues you mentioned. Amazing insights seem possible with so many doors opened, isn’t it?
For years already, I think these were all major creative shifts or possible breakthroughs in seemingly separate domains (fields :) ). Still, after all these years, I keep on thinking that the cross-fertilization those various fields could experience, are of MAJOR potential.
If no terrible accident happens to me, for sure, more will follow
