Huummmm, this is interesting.
Sort of like the EPA with its air quality measurements in East Palestine.
Is there any cheese left between all those holes ?!The whole Global Warming narrative is like a Swiss cheese - filled with many holes.
“Australia exports 2.5 times more carbon in fossil fuels than it emits from burning them, the most recent analysis of the nation’s carbon stocks shows. The CSIRO study is the first full carbon budget yet completed for Australia and is part of a global project to better track carbon emissions.” - (ABC, 2013)
In 2013 the ABC reported that Australia had already reached net zero two and a half times over.
Since then Australia has reduced its CO2 emissions from over 600 million tonnes to less than 500 million tonnes. So we are closer to absorbing four times more CO2 than we emit.
It’s worth noting that the CO2 absorbed by phytoplankton in our oceans aren’t even counted.
Yet when one clicks on the link to the CSIRO report in the ABC article it is no longer there. See link below.
I asked the CSIRO in estimates why the link was removed. They aren’t trying to hide how much CO2 is taken up by Australia’s natural environment are they?
Surely if Australia is already at net zero multiple times over there is no need to build renewables which are expensive and bad for the environment right?
Audit tallies Australia's carbon budget › News in Science (ABC Science)
The work shows the Australian landscape has soaked up one-third of the carbon emitted by fossil fuels in Australia over the past 20 years. On average about 2.2 billion tonnes of carbon is taken up by plants each year.
Across Australia, grassy vegetation (dominant in dry and savanna regions) accounts for 56 per cent of carbon uptake while woody vegetation accounts for 44 per cent.
But critically the study finds the amount of carbon plants 'breathe in' during periods of high growth in wet years is countered by the carbon released during periods of drought.
"For Australia as a whole, increased carbon dioxide has caused a 15 per cent increase in plant production over the past two decades, relative to pre-industrial times," she says.
The analysis shows that during these high-growth periods the Australian biosphere 'breathes in' more than the total human-induced greenhouse gas emissions.
However, she says in dry years, the biosphere 'breathes out' a nearly equal amount of carbon to the atmosphere.
Haverd says the data helps in understanding how carbon stored in the Australian landscape responds to the swings between drought and flood.
"It is important to know that carbon stored in the land during periods of high plant growth may disappear again during the next drought," Haverd says.
The work also shows fire contributes about 1.3 times as much carbon to the atmosphere as fossil fuel emissions. But Harverd says the net impact, which takes into account the carbon the plants would have respired and the regrowth that then takes up carbon, is about one-quarter of fossil fuel emissions.
Oof! I meant rigorous of course. Though vigorous sort of works too....vigorous
...Liberals won’t say how much Volkswagen battery plant is costing us
Volkswagen has chosen St. Thomas, Ontario as the site of its first North American electric vehicle battery plant. The federal and provincial governments haven’t said what they had to pay to make this deal happen, though the Financial Times reported that Volkswagen put plans for a European battery plant on hold because the company claimed it could get $15 billion in subsidies for a North American plant.
[...]
Berlin’s March 26th Climate Referendum…
By P Gosselin on 12. March 2023
Berlin Leaders Could Have Immediate Dictatorial Powers
The road to tyranny begins in Berlin as climate gets framed as a state of emergency
A new, radical climate amendment that will be voted on on March 26th in a referendum that could change Berlin’s climate targets to enforceable obligations, thus clearing the way for radical CO2 reduction measures by an unelected council.
If Berliners think protesters obstructing traffic by gluing themselves to the streets are a nuisance, just wait until what could be the case after March 26, when Berliners vote on climate referendum.
Draft amendment: carbon neutrality already by 2030 instead of 2045!
If the climate referendum is successful, a radical amendment to the current climate protection and energy transition law will be enacted. The online German Pleiteticker.de exclusively has an internal paper and reports of an “empowerment paragraph” in the proposed amended law.
The aim of the referendum is to amend the existing Climate Protection and Energy Transition Act (EWG Bln) in order to force the city of Berlin to achieve climate neutrality by 2030 instead of 2045.
The vote will be binding, which means that if the referendum is successful, the amendment will be enacted into law. The amendment is being pushed by the Green Party and radical groups like Fridays for Future and Extinction Rebellion.
Targets would become legal obligations
The amendment would be so radical that even Berlin SPD socialists consider it dangerous and speak of an “empowerment paragraph” in the law that would transfer immense power to a small group of unelected people, namely a Climate Protection Council appointed by the Berlin Senate.
Concerning paragraph 6 of the new amendment, “Immediate program in the event of non-fulfillment of obligations”, the SPD explicitly warns that climate targets have been changed to “obligations”, which would mean the Berlin Senate probably would have to implement immediate radical measures to achieve the obligations, even by court order.
Paragraph 14 provides for a “Climate Protection Council” to monitor compliance. It would be appointed by the Berlin Senate and not made up by democratically elected officials.
Good bye to cars in Berlin?
“There is a danger that the possibility of immediate measures – which, according to the SPD, are not democratically legitimized – will be used excessively”, Pleiteticker warns. “If the climate referendum is successfully implemented, it will therefore not only be expensive for Berliners, but there will be many more restrictions on freedom than under the previous the Socialist-Green Senate – Berliners may then have to say goodbye to their cars completely.”
Reducing flights at Berlin’s BER airport?
According to paragraph 3 on “Climate Protection Obligations”, CO2 reduction should be 70 percent by 2025 and 95 percent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels! “The previous regulation has been changed so that the time periods are dramatically shortened,”
According to Clause 2, even the Berlin airport would be a part of the climate budget. Pleiteticker warns: “So there is a risk that an immediate measure for emissions reduction could be to reduce the number of flights.”
Property owners would be forced to make major renovations
The amendment also calls on the mandatory energy refurbishment of all public buildings by 2030 and the entire state administration would have to be CO2-neutral by 2030.
“Where the money is to come from remains a mystery once again,” Pleiteticker comments.
Paragraph 19, “Use of Renewable Energy”, could also mean the mandatory installation of solar panels for all homeowners. Again, no one knows how all of this would be paid for. Owning a home and property would certainly become unaffordable for many private owners.
Looking at it from a different angle, Berlin could serve as a pilot that would in all likelihood expose the shear folly of rapid climate neutrality once and for all. Maybe a “successful” referendum would be a good lesson for the rest of the world.
Plus, it is the Faculty of Theology of the University of Helsinki who conferred a honorary doctorate on Greta Thunberg. Climate change is a religion, and Greta Thunberg is high priestess.It’s really something to watch some of this stuff. This is perhaps the embodiment of the ultimate participation trophy. Greta Thunberg gets an honary Doctorate degree for sitting on her butt and pouting.