Theory supported by this statement from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent today:Another plausible theory for Trump's trade tariffs:
Schasfoort pieces together comments (and articles/papers) by those advisors closest to Trump (Bessent & Miran).
The theory is that the current 'tariffs chaos' is a means of creating negotiating leverage with which to attract 'most-favored nations' into a 'new club' in which they agree to pegging their currency to the dollar in return for US military protection.
This, the US hopes, will ensure that the USD remains, de facto, global reserve currency. This end-goal would also formally define all participating countries as tribute-paying vassals of the US.
So, same dynamic as before under the 'neo-liberal order', just henceforth 'explicitly locked-in'. Or, "you're either with us, or you're with China!"
They're trying to 'lock in' as much of the world as possible to 'stop China from taking our place' as global hegemon. It's a 'coalition of the willing' to defend the American Way of Life™.US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned that countries considering closer economic ties with China amid Washington’s recent draconian tariff policies “would be cutting [their] own throat.” The official expressed confidence that the US would eventually secure deals with allies, and then “approach China as a group.”
The Americans are really chuffed with themselves!
I doubt the post-1971 Neoliberal Order can be so simply 'reset' by a big bluff and '75 countries accepting the new rules', but I've been surprised in the past by Americans' ability to 'will' things into reality.
Stock market now in green.life is good again
It is indeed "one of the most extraordinary Truth posts of Trump's presidency" in the sheer level of gaslighting at play: he's trying to make one of the biggest and clearest humiliations in US history look like a win.
But there's no amount of lipstick that can disguise this pig. What happened is remarkably similar to the 2022 Liz Truss fiasco in the UK: Trump came out with a remarkably foolish and terribly executed policy that created a market panic—including in the bonds market—and he had to walk it back.
But unlike the British system that—for better or worse—can get rid of woefully incompetent Prime Ministers (that is, more incompetent than the average), the U.S. is stuck with Trump.
And unlike Liz Truss, Trump remains insulated by a circle of sycophants like Lutnick who reframe humiliating capitulations as 'extraordinary' triumphs, and a voter base that interprets even his most flagrant policy failures as masterful 4D chess moves.
Fact is, even after this retreat, the U.S. is in a far worse position than it used to be.
Contrary to what Lutnick and Trump are saying, what this episode proved beyond doubt is that the world is NOT ready "to work with President Trump to fix global trade". In fact, besides Israel's Netanyahu, I haven't seen a single country on earth come out publicly to support Trump's plan.
Sure, a couple of weaker countries who are heavily dependent on trade have reluctantly come forward to find a way to mitigate the damage Trump would do to their economies but to conflate this with enthusiastic cooperation is pure fantasy.
What we're witnessing instead is damage control by nations caught in the crossfire of his insane economic policies. And you can be sure that the long-term strategy of these countries will now be to reduce dependencies and trading links to the U.S. in order to avoid being caught in a similar situation in the future.
More importantly, the countries that together make up about 50% of trade with the U.S.—namely Canada, the EU and China—have all announced retaliatory tariffs and measures, which a) means that Trump's claim that countries other than China "aren't retaliating in any way, shape, or form against the United States" is a complete lie and b) shows that his approach has accomplished the remarkable feat of uniting geopolitical rivals in opposition to him.
Which is undoubtedly why his new approach seems to be to single-handedly focus on China, with a retreat to the good old U.S. strategy of trying to get others to help them contain China.This has zero chance of working either, for 2 main reasons.
The first one is that if Trump has demonstrated one thing in the past 3 months, it's that he's fundamentally unstable and unreliable, and so is the United States. His chaotic governance sends a clear message to the world: America's word means nothing beyond the next Truth Social post.
If the notion that a country would take the risk of putting all its eggs in the American basket was already delusional before his presidency; it is now beyond absurd. What he's done is transform America from a cornerstone of global trade into a risk factor that must be hedged against.
The second one is that the "deal" on the table for these countries is absolutely repugnant, from their standpoint.I mean, think about it: the "deal" would presumably be for these nations to abandon or significantly reduce their economic relationship with China—their largest trading partner in many cases—in exchange for a trading relationship with the U.S. that is worse than it used to be, with 10% additional tariffs. In effect it's asking countries to sacrifice their economic sovereignty and strategic flexibility for a lesser punishment.
It's a lose-lose proposition that might play well on Truth Social, but will get you laughed out of the room in the world of international relations. Unless you're say a tiny country that has the misfortune of being too weak and dependent on the American market.
But even in this latter case, these countries might amuse Trump in the short-term but they'll undoubtedly put in place long-term strategies to de-hitch themselves from the US crazy train as fast as possible in the medium term.
So all in all, what we're looking at here is not a strategic masterstroke but the desperate flailing of an administration that didn't anticipate how markets and trading partners would respond to economic coercion.
Trump is "teaching the world a lesson" all right: he taught them that America is now the biggest threat they face for their prosperity and the result of this won't be to "work with him", but to hedge themselves as much as they can from the American madness he's unleashed.
History will remember this not as an "extraordinary" moment of American strength, but as the point when the world concluded that diversifying away from the American market was no longer just economically prudent but existentially necessary for their own economic security.
I read the article, and didn't see a quote from Trump admitting he acted because of the bond market.Trump has admitted that the bond market response spurred him to climb down with his "90-day pause."
Can we find out when he said that? Did he say it in response to Trump's tariffs?The war continues with China which he won't be able to bring to its knees so easily. Even Putin remarked that the U.S. efforts to curb China's rise are futile, comparing it to trying to stop the sun from rising, and suggesting that America is "15 years too late" in its attempts to hinder China's economic ascent.
I read the article, and didn't see a quote from Trump admitting he acted because of the bond market.
President Donald Trump has admitted that his decision to delay further tariff hikes was driven in part by a sharp downturn in US financial markets, saying he was closely monitoring investor sentiment as people grew too “yippy” and “afraid” before announcing a 90-day freeze.
On Wednesday morning, Trump urged Americans to “be cool” and told investors that “this is a great time to buy,” after US markets lost more than $1.5 trillion in capitalization the day before. The sell-off came ahead of the implementation of a 104% tariff on Chinese imports and sweeping new levies on dozens of other countries.
Just hours later, the president announced his decision to keep most tariffs at a “baseline” 10 percent – except for China, which saw its rate raised even further to 125 percent. Speaking to reporters later that day, Trump said he had been tracking the markets closely before taking action.
“I was watching the bond market. The bond market is very tricky. I was watching it. But if you look at it now, it’s... it’s beautiful,” he said. “But, yeah, I saw last night where people were getting a little queasy. I thought that people were jumping a little bit out of line. They were getting yippy, you know? They were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit… afraid."
I read the article, and didn't see a quote from Trump admitting he acted because of the bond market.
There is no definitive evidence to confirm an exact amount of wealth transferred from the retirement accounts of working-class people to the ultra-wealthy due to Trump’s actions over the last week.
Market fluctuations have indeed occurred recently, with reports indicating significant stock market declines following Trump’s tariff announcements. For instance, the S&P 500 dropped nearly 10.5% in the days following, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell over 2,200 points on April 4, 2025. Such declines would naturally impact retirement accounts like 401(k)s, which are heavily invested in stocks.
Economic analyses suggest that tariffs and resulting market volatility can disproportionately affect working-class retirement savings while potentially benefiting wealthier investors who can hedge or capitalize on such conditions. For example, wealthy individuals and institutions might profit from short-term market movements or have the resources to adapt, whereas working-class individuals with 401(k)s tied to broader market indices may see losses.
The S&P 500 Index jumped the most since 2008 following Trump’s surprise mid-day announcement, reversing steep losses over the past few days and boosting the fortunes of the world’s 500 richest people by an average 3.5 per cent. The Nasdaq Composite Index also rebounded, climbing the most in more than 24 years
The largest individual gainer Wednesday was Tesla Inc. CEO Elon Musk, who added $36 billion to his fortune as the EV manufacturer’s stock jumped 23%, followed by Meta Platforms Inc.’s Mark Zuckerberg, who gained almost $26 billion. Nvidia Corp.’s Jensen Huang saw his wealth rise $15.5 billion as the chipmaker’s shares rebounded 19%, nearly offsetting its 13% decline in the week to Tuesday’s close.
The $304B gain on April 9 is legit—financial reports confirm it, tied to a market surge after tariff pauses, with Musk alone gaining $36B. Wild swings!
Billionaires lost ~$536B over 2 days (April 3-4, 2025) due to a market crash from Trump’s tariffs.
Reports indicate that the market crash was severe, with Wall Street losing approximately $8 trillion in market value since Trump’s return to office, including nearly $6 trillion lost in just two trading sessions following the tariff announcement. Specifically, on Thursday, April 3, 2025, the world’s 500 richest people collectively lost $208 billion, marking the fourth-largest single-day decline in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index’s 13-year history and the most significant since the 2020 COVID-19 downturn. The following day, Friday, April 4, 2025, saw an additional $329 billion erased from the markets, the largest single-day reduction since the COVID-19 crisis. Together, these two days (April 3 and 4) resulted in a combined loss of $536 billion for the top 500 billionaires, as noted in posts on X and financial analyses.