Liliea
The Living Force
It is not as simple as finding a definition for it, but just for the sake of approximating the concept, it could be a combination of many characteristics that you mention and, in a certain way, an act of free will on the part of the individual in question. As I understand it, they are real Agents (Smith :+)) of flesh and blood, in-carnated, Sargon, although sometimes they are hybrids, as in the case of Nefertiti-Helen-Sara.
I base my answer on the sessions, in which they are agents who have been prepared to “rise” and impose the interests of their agendas.
There is one of them called “awakening,” led by the group already known among us as “Pantheon of Thor,”:
" An army of Aryan psychic projectors."which influences culture in such a way that they reinforce, inspire, or distort history. One must remember that thought ‘creates’ and add that 4D also has technology to “travel through time.”
August 17, 2003
With this mixture of reality and fantasy that J.Maxwell talks about (I don't know if his name and surname are real?), I link it to a concept from the Bringers of the Dawn called “Holographic Insertions,” which are a type of holographic camera (ST) where a drama that seems real is created and inserted into our reality through portals, also done for the purpose of draining energy. I don't know the nuts and bolts of the matter, but there are easily verifiable facts from religion (Jewish, Hindu, Mormon, almost any) that could be explained by a type of technology and environment that overwhelmed the participants and convinced are inspired them of the misnamed gods. Another comparable case of inspiration may be that of Jonathan Swift, the “mad priest” of Dublin (whom Frexeido, also a priest, Jesuit, mentions in one of his casuistic works) claims that "Gulliver" obtained his astronomical data from individuals who crewed a flying, round, and shining island, governed at will by its crew using magnetism, and they informed “Gulliver” of the existence of two satellites orbiting Mars. (1726)
We could also talk about the novelist Jules Verne or Constantine the Great, the latter of whom I suspect could be a historical holographic incursion. Non-historical fact.
July 26, 1997
Some say that Napoleon was one of the Buena parte (good part) the question would be for whom.
Personally (and I may be rambling a bit), Napoleon reminds me of that concern in the first decade of this century "to elevate" the Comic as an artistic category solely to have more visual resources ($) and influence with them, as you say, inspiring figures worthy of emulation.
I recently attended an retrospective exhibition of Jacques-Louis David's work and was surprised to learn that he was a fanatical admirer of Napoleon (a fan with his thumb up) and that, for reasons of fate, his head and his work were miraculously saved from the guillotine. Then, after Napoleon's exile to “St. Helen”, (a change of scenery, perhaps, or a return to his “origins”?), David became depolarized and completely changed his political views. The wind changed. I am simply saying that it was thanks to his genius, his fervor, and his soul that the figure of Napoleon was sustained—and continues to be sustained—as an icon in history who served as propaganda to inspire Spanish American heroes libertarios who were inspired by that grandiloquent, contradictory, hyperbolical, and iconic image projected to generate the very brilliance that was needed to end the monarchies in Spanish America and consolidate the influences of the Bank of London, French Freemasonry, the Catholic Church, and Jesuitism.
Art like comics, works.
In any case—and I should start with this—my response is only an opinion, and Cassiopea's substack has done a tremendous and great job, explored the topic in greater depth and more objectively, with bibliography and comments on the subject.
The Undergrounders Part 1
