I suppose that true scientists will have their own peculiar concept of what time is, and that they find themselves in difficulties because there are things that do not work well, when they want to go beyond.
In this opportunity to exchange with you, I invite you to take part in this search, which has as its main tool, imagination, with a subsequent analysis of what is imagined.
To be more specific, the method would be:
Pretend that we know something, and that we are telling it to someone.
As that someone is fictitious, there is no risk of harming anyone, and therefore we can write with total freedom what we imagine about the subject in question, as if we knew.
Then, we submit what we have written to a demanding analysis. We are willing to remove, change the place of something, substitute something for something that fits better, etc., looking for a coherence worthy of being considered as a possibility.
Of course, the effort to write coherent things must be there from the beginning, even if we are using our imagination.
Otherwise, at the moment of analyzing what is written in the first instance, we will find a lot of useless stupidities that are not worth analyzing.
In my personal searches, I have seen myself doing this on several occasions, and by the results obtained, I could consider it another method of searching, or if you will, of finding.
I have an idea, which requires the participation of others to make it work.
I think it could be interesting, and I am fighting with myself not to fall into anticipation, which reduces so much the potential of things.
In principle the proposal is as follows:
I have written some things from a short time ago, which are a search for what Time might be.
In a session, I don't know the date but not long ago, Ark asked some questions that combined with the answers, made me think a lot.
To organize myself a bit, I started to write down what I was imagining, with the intention of analyzing it later, even during the development of the sketch.
Taking advantage of the fact that I have not yet analyzed it in depth, being then a first imaginative sketch, I will put it as it is, so that the demanding analysis will be that of all those who are interested in it, which will surely be much richer than what I can achieve alone.
Remember that I spoke of making all the necessary modifications so that it has a worthy coherence, and it doesn't matter that from what I said, only the title survives.
Time
I do not know how scientists consider time, but if we keep dividing a chosen pulse, even if we do it millions and millions of times, we will not achieve much, because thought is too restless to stay still to be measured. And much less with approximation resources, which are very useful but for other things, such as organizing our tasks.
Perhaps some thoughts take pity on us, who walk with clocks and centimeters in our hands, and slow down their speed, enough to condense in, and with light, forming matter, and then we make little clay dolls, and we measure them all over, we shape them into little balls and make them roll down the slope running alongside with a stopwatch, etc., etc., etc. Who knows how it all works.
What is clear is that we have to find out what real time is.
For that we could use, among other things, all the curiosities and characteristics that linear time possesses.
We already have something very important, when we see linear time behaving metrically constant, independent or disconnected from conscious life, as something alien to experience.
Then we already have to imagine something that differs from that.
For example, it will not be something independent of souls.
Instead of seconds, or multiples and submultiples thereof, it will have a kind of milestones that will be determined by moments of relevance in experience.
Why moments of relevance? I will have to expand a bit to explain.
The soul, experiencing life, permanently registers information of all kinds, which is stored in its memory.
The soul dwells in an ocean of opportunities to exercise free will, and does so.
Although it acts in its present, all the events of the past, which are recorded, are references and/or influences for its decisions. With this fact alone, we can already hesitate to label something as Past.
Moreover, from a linear view of time, we see the events that have already occurred in a chronological order, one before, one after, etc., but in reality this order has no importance in the memory box except for those that must be seen as one because of the other, remaining together as one and the same event.
The memory box does not need to have its elements ordered in linear time, because the entity will remember this or that particular event by the relation it has to what it is experiencing in its present, and not because it touches this one that is first in the list or row.
In other words, the events will not be reviewed in order of arrival in the memory box. Thank goodness for that!
When the entity remembers some event things happen. Sometimes they are relevant and sometimes they are not. When it learns a lesson, there is an imprint or milestone that marks a moment in its path. And every time it learns a lesson, the footprint will remain.
This path traveled by the soul now already has strong marks, references, which can serve as units or modules, ranging from footprint to footprint or from lesson learned to lesson learned. This could be seen as the seconds of linear time.
Although the delay from second to second is always the same, and in this other case is determined by the activity of consciousness, it still serves us to make comparisons, in this moment of sketching imagination, if such a word exists.
In this grotesque sketch of real time, I will avoid as much as possible that it contains linear time, for the following reason:
Question: do we need a second dimension of time?
Answer: Yes.
Question: Do we need the third dimension of time?
Answer: No.
It seems to me that here, the idea of needing a second dimension of time, is in the sense of another! dimension of time, and not a second dimension of time starting from the first or including it.
To understand each other, I am putting linear time as that first dimension, which will not be part of the other one we are trying to dimension.
This is suggested to me by Ark's celebration, when the Cas answered No, to the need for the third dimension of time.
Clearly Ark gained something important at that moment, because his joy was infectious.
As for me, it made me imagine a lot of things, which I keep telling you about. Apparently, we will have to gradually abandon linear time, even if we are fond of it.
I continue.
Just as all the divisions we make to the second would be its content, in this other case the content between lesson learned and lesson learned, would be all the information in the memory box, that is, the study material to learn lessons.
Everything happens in the present tense
When an event occurs it does so in the present tense; its recording occurs in unison, as does its appearance in the memory box. And, because it is now part of the memory box, it remains in the present, because the memory box is a resource of the present like a library, but more fun.
In this study material, I think that's where the time loops occur.
I don't quite know what they mean by time loops, but I visualize something that maybe they are the famous loops.
Whether they are or not, what I see is located in this study material, and it's a lot of movement in the events every time they are looked at again.
In order not to complicate and go in parts, I will not involve the interaction between entities for now.
When the entity remembers an event, that event becomes the center of attention, but it will move from there, because the entity remembered another event which will move to the center, displacing the previous one, and so on generating a rotational movement, and perhaps with reversal and all.
This could also be seen as one who is reading his personal diary or even a library book, and moving forward in his reading he turns the pages forward, but returning at times to earlier pages, tying up, becoming aware of something, becoming conscious.
When the entity accomplishes this an alchemy takes place. Things happen to the events involved in an awareness. For example: Something that was experienced as something frightening, painful, unfair, that one did not deserve, that is, negative, is transformed into something positive, due to a good connection and understanding of the facts.
This is one of the relevant events mentioned above as milestones.
However, this is still in the orbit of information.
The entity does not expand just by knowing something else.
What it does increase with this is its free will, with its corresponding burden of responsibility.
If the individual in his daily life applies in a constructive way what he now knows, hallelujah! He will be able to generate events that by appropriate decisions will have direct positive results.
These events, which will also be in the memory box, will not only be material for study, but will also be material for consultation, as beacons that will guide the entity, who will be encouraged to continue making good decisions, affirming more and more his path of progress in consciousness.
This, indeed, is expanding.
With respect to the events that have not yet been understood, I see them as small blockages of time or loops, which are on the way back to being understood and thus transformed, because of an eventual wiser look.
Gradually the path of the individual will lose its linear or narrow appearance, and will widen until it becomes a circle.
This circle is bounded by what the entity can encompass with his individual consciousness.
As its consciousness grows, the area of the circle grows, which of course is part of the information field.
In other words, access to the information field is proportional to the consciousness of the individual.
This dynamic imagined here could be extended to encompass all densities.
In linear time, as we know, the sum of seconds form minutes, the sum of these form hours, the sum of these form days, weeks, months, years, centuries, etc., etc., etc.
The sum, which can be used as a mathematical resource or tool, which is its true function, is often used as a weapon of mass manipulation, by falsely attributing to the sum, properties of development, progress and more things, which in reality are due to the combination, and not to the sum.
Unfortunately the masses are human, people with feelings, and that being in an infantile stage, STS of 4D commits child abuse.
Sorry. I got carried away by the rage it still causes me.
I continue.
Returning to the idea, I was saying that the accumulation or illusory sum of linear time, also of illusory nature, generates stages, units, modules, that we call them days, months, years etc.
In real or true Time, the development of consciousness is what generates the different stages of Creation.
Just as we saw the progress of an entity generating modules, or units determined by what has been learned, the different Densities, would be modules or units of greater Time.
The abysmal difference is that the modules or units of linear time are the result of sums, when in the case of true Time, the modules or units of time are the result of the combination and interaction of experiences, leaving the sum of experiences in the realm of illusion.
For now the question that arises for me with all this is:
In real terms, are Time and Path the same thing?
So much for the first instance sketch, to which I did not want to include the interaction between entities, until I had a simple base, but resistant to an increase in complexity.
I hope that someone has been interested in the proposal, and will add a little of his light to this subject, which seems important to me, because both Cas and Ra, use the term Time. They even make distinctions between Time/Space and Space/Time.
I have the feeling that when the Cas said categorically that time does not exist, they were referring strictly to linear time, and in the same act, they were making us participants in a greater reality, something like the first stages of a fusion.
Thank you very much
A hug
