I read somewhere on Twitter yesterday that one of the reasons Trump wants to change the name is because Biden passed a law making it illegal for the US to drill for oil and natural gas in the 'Gulf of Mexico', so by changing it to 'Gulf of America' they could circumvent the restrictions without having to change the law.
Q: (Fallen_735) Why does the US in recent years let Mexico get away with certain things/make compromises that strengthens Mexico's international position (water treaty in the rio grande, deer park oil refinery, attempts to include Cuba and Venezuela in international summits)?
A: Mexico is in kahoots!
Isla Bermeja is a ghost island. It is marked on several maps and historical documents that locate it more than 100 kilometers from the northwestern tip of the Yucatan Peninsula, in the territorial sea of Mexico. It was located at 22 degrees, 33 minutes north latitude and 91 degrees, 22 minutes west longitude. However, recent research already officialized by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), of Mexico, clearly shows that the island in question did not exist and that it was simply a cartographic error. Wikipedia
Had it existed, Bermeja Island would have generated a larger maritime space in favor of Mexico than the one it received with the signing of the Clinton-Zedillo Treaty, in which Mexico and the United States agreed on their maritime borders in the Gulf of Mexico, which was embodied in a ceremony held in Washington on June 9, 2000. Wikipedia
Trump posts clip of prof calling Netanyahu ‘obsessive’ about getting US to fight Iran
US president-elect shares without comment a video on Truth Social of Columbia’s Jeffrey Sachs calling PM a ‘deep, dark son of a bitch’ and saying he’s gotten US into ‘endless wars’
(This comment was taken from the Tucker Carlson interview which is embedded in the article, or can be found on the Tucker Carson thread)
“And the guy [Netanyahu] is nothing if not obsessive, and he is still trying to get us to fight Iran to this day,” he claimed. “He is a deep, dark son of a bitch, sorry to tell you.”
"In interviews for a book about his Middle East peace efforts, Trump, according to its author, used an expletive to describe the embattled prime minister — “Fuck him,” he reportedly said — and accused Netanyahu of disloyalty."
I'm also going to post a short (6 minute) video from Vantage with Palki Sharma where she discusses "why does DT seem to be turning against Netanyahu?" And goes on to discuss the taking of Greenland and that Europe had better watch it's back. She tells the European leaders that are going to be meeting with Trump later this month on the subject called "A show of unity". To which she says "Good luck with that".
From The Times of Israel:
And from Vantage with Palki Sharma:
Right. But then I go on X and I see this:Trump stirring up stuff world wide. Netanyahu has cancelled plans to attend the inauguration. The reporter says maybe Trump didn't know what was in the video he posted on Truth Social disparaging Netanyahu only reading the headlines. If all else fails, claim Trump is a stupid air head .![]()
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 9, 2025
I was wondering why the cover includes a photo of Jane Austen. Strange. According to EN.HABERLER.COM
I was wondering why the cover includes a photo of Jane Austen. Strange. According to EN.HABERLER.COM
It is about:
THE RISE OF THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT
"The fact that we have removed women from public life is due solely to our willingness to give them back their essential dignity. It is not that we do not respect women enough, but that we respect them too much to keep them in contact with the miasmas of parliamentary democracy." German women in the Third Reich
For Hitler, world order and politics was a man's business. He made sure that women could not share positions in the party leadership. At most they could be partners in the struggle. But only in lower-level positions. Although subordinate to men, German women were given a fundamental role in society: that of mothers. The role of women in the Nazi regime: how Hitler used them
"Do you want to lose your life savings because we put a weak and foolish woman in the White House?" Trump reiterates his remarks on protecting women, ramps up attacks on Harris
“I believe that women have to be protected. Men have to be, children, everybody. Women have to be protected when they’re at home in suburbia,” Trump said. He added that aides had told him it was “a rough statement” — but, he said, when he asked another crowd if anyone was offended, only one woman raised her hand. Trump reiterates his remarks on protecting women, ramps up attacks on Harris
The Frenchman Gobineau and the Englishman Chamberlain were inspired by our concept of a new order-a new order, I tell you, or if you prefer, an ideological glimpse into history in accordance with the basic principle of the blood. We do not judge by merely artistic or military standards or even by purely scientific ones. We judge by the spiritual energy which a people is capable of putting forth, which will enable it in ten years to recapture what it has lost in a thousand years of warfare. I intend to set up a thousand year Reich and anyone who supports me in battle is a fellow-fighter for a unique spiritual-I would almost say divine-creation. At the decisive moment the decisive factor is not the ratio of strength but the spiritual force employed. Betrayal of the For Trump, America lost its status as well.nation is possible even when no crime has been committed, in other words when a historical mission has not been fulfilled. Hitler's Racial Ideology: Content and Occult Sources
The MAGA movement...was founded on the belief that the United States was once a “great” country but has lost this status owing to foreign influence, both within its borders (via immigration and multiculturalism) and without (via globalization, or the increased integration of multiple national economies). MAGA members think that this fall from grace can be reversed through “America first” policies... MAGA movement
Ian Carroll posted an excellent response to this video from Musk, which ended up with 10x more likes and retweets than the original post. Not holding my breath, but if Elon is serious about gaining a deeper understanding about what he is "missing", hopefully he will watch the video and follow up on some of the sources listed within (10 minutes).Right. But then I go on X and I see this:
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 9, 2025
Not very encouraging.
By Zeitgeist I mean the set of ideas that were captured on the cover, conservatism, ultra-nationalism, extreme right and authoritarianism. In my opinion, I don't think the world is heading towards a resurgence of feminism, at least not the radical and woke feminism but a more conservative, romantic/idealist and mystical feminism like in the Georgian era. Here is what I think of Jane Austen in The Economist cover.
Now, it is interesting to make a comparison between what Adolf Hitler thought of women in politics and the fate of Germany and what is nowadays identified as MAGA
● The essential dignity of a woman is to be a mother, not a politician.
● Women must be protected because they are housewives in suburbs
In both cases, the role of women is of utmost importance as the pillar of the family (not in politics) that will allow the nation to regain its greatness. There is a mission/destiny to be fulfilled.
For Hitler, 10 years were enough to recover what was lost and form a thousand-year Reich.
For Trump, it is the duty of every American to regain the status America lost under Globalism
Geoff Layton identified three dominant themes in Nazi propaganda:
1) The Führer cult. Hitler was portrayed as a messiah-type figure, who could offer strong authoritarian leadership and a vision for Nazi Germany's future.
2) The Volksgemeinschaft (national community). To appeal to the people for the development of a unifying idea, regardless of class.
3) German nationalism. To play on German nationalism and to exploit the discontent since the First World War. To make Germany great again.
View attachment 104888
Hitler and Trump: Common Slogans?
More and more people are starting to call for keeping a critical mind. Here is an example:
View attachment 104890
View attachment 104891
Most importantly, I never tire of repeating how our view of history depends on our own internal make-up, of our own development and experience. It is not a dry, abstract affair; history is deeply connected to our minds, and is intelligible only from the perspective of a human being who knows viscerally the patterns defining the human condition he can then discern. This works in the other direction, too: the more we learn about history, the better our mind becomes—a mind that can only be understood in history, as part of history, as history itself. R.G. Collingwood had figured this out, and I encourage you to read his work.21
And so, the truth shall set us free, above all, perhaps, historical truth: if we gain the maturity to have at it from multiple angles at once, while getting over ourselves.
The best strategy for a collectivist group like the Jews for destroying Europeans therefore is to convince the Europeans of their own moral bankruptcy.
A major theme of CofC is that this is exactly what Jewish intellectual movements have done. They have presented Judaism as morally superior to European civilization and European civilization as morally bankrupt and the proper target of altruistic punishment [AKA the punishment of freeloaders and I would add degenerates - MacDonald says this is a uniquely Western trait]. The consequence is that once Europeans are convinced of their own moral depravity, they will destroy their own people in a fit of altruistic punishment.
The general dismantling of the culture of the West and eventually its demise as anything resembling an ethnic entity will occur as a result of a moral onslaught triggering a paroxysm of altruistic punishment.
That should be the framework for analysis, IMO - not the simplistic 'Trump is Hitler'.
In Mexico this not only had resonance in the right wing, but also played a founding role in the National Action Party (PAN) in whose bosom always coexisted both Christian Democrats and followers of fascism and Nazism, such as Gómez Morín himself, whose Nazi sympathy in the magazine La Reacción (?) was documented by Rafael Barajas. As in Spain, in Mexico the fascist imprint survived in ideological niches close to exacerbated Catholicism and anti-communism, where it found some identification. Why are there neo-Nazis in Mexico?
Tho I think migrants would be the scapegoats in the USA, not Jews. That's another difference between Trump and Hitler - he's not outspoken about Jewish power in the USA.
Considering the number of illegal immigrants in the US over the recent years, how is stopping that a bad thing or even remotely comparable to a genocide?For Hitler the problem was Jewish and the final solution was genocide, for Trump the problem is illegal migration -one of the factors preventing America from being great again- and the solution is mass deportation.
Considering the number of illegal immigrants in the US over the recent years, how is stopping that a bad thing or even remotely comparable to a genocide?
Usually there's an external enemy or internal enemy to be eradicated.
You may also want to look more deeply at the history of WW2 - it is not even clear whether there was a Jewish genocide or who was actually responsible for the war.
If Hitler had won WW2, the world would be such a better place than it is today. pic.twitter.com/z1QYtZnWCl
— Next Wave America 🇺🇸 (@NextWaveAmerica) January 2, 2025
This whole forum is based on "revisitionist ideas" on every possible topic. It is good to question everything, without jumping into the opposite extreme such as "Hitler was right" or "Hitler did nothing wrong". Some people indeed do that.Yes, the reality of 6 million murdered Jews has already been questioned and it is precisely this revisionist idea that is fueling the rediscovery of Hitler among the youngest, "Hitler was right" "Hitler was not evil" they often say.