UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack (and others)

Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

SocietyoftheSpectacle said:
There are so many other topics and agendas that get Passed over during events like this.

The whole arguement that Ariane grande is providing a positive Role Model for young girls , for example.

That topic I guess is off limits now,
and in Fact from the above post has been spun , along with every other Angle,

Katie hopkins asking for more Power for the Govt that already had the power to stop this , is just one contradiction ,
that isnt aired.

c.a. article said:
Rolling Stone writes that “misogyny was deeply woven into this attack.”

c.a. article said:
“These were precocious girls on their way to becoming Dangerous Women. Exactly the kind of women ISIS hates.”


Isn't the emotional/psychological programming interesting. At least that is what it looks like to me. The media being used to turn psychological trauma into a misogyny connection to ISIS looks like an intellectual think tank activity. Almost a deep-state flavor to it I think. It's like programming for the masses.
But whoa, I'm sounding paranoid about it aren't I? :huh:
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Adaryn said:
From the Voltaire Network:

http://www.voltairenet.org/article196455.html

Manchester Attack as MI6 Blowback
25 MAY 2017

According to Scotland Yard, the attack on the crowd leaving the Ariana Grande concert at Manchester Arena, 22 May, has been perpetrated by Salman Abedi. A bankcard has been conveniently found in the pocket of the mutilated corpse of the ‘terrorist’.

This attack is generally interpreted as proof that the United Kingdom is not implicated in international terrorism and that, on the contrary, it is a victim of it.

Salman Abedi was born in the UK of a family of Libyan immigrants. He has travelled to Libya several times in the last couple of months, with or without his father.

His father Ramadan Abedi, with whom Salman lived, is a former officer in [Gaddafi’s] Libyan Intelligence Services. He specialised in the surveillance of the Islamist movement, but two decades later has failed to notice that his son has joined Daesh (IS).

In 1992, Ramadan Abedi was sent back to Libya by Britain’s MI6 and was involved in a British-devised plot to assassinate Muammar Gaddafi. The operation having been readily exposed, he was exfiltrated by MI6 and transferred back to the UK where he obtained political asylum. He moved in 1999 to Whalley Range (south of Manchester) where there was already resident a small Libyan Islamist community.

In 1994, Ramadan Abedi returned again to Libya under MI6’s direction. In late 1995 he is involved in the creation of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), a local branch of Al-Qaeda, in conjunction with Abdelhakim Belhadj. The LIFG was then employed by MI6 again to assassinate Gaddafi, for a payoff of £100,000. This operation, which also failed, provoked heated exchanges within British Intelligence, leading to the resignation of one David Shayler.

<snip>

Adaryn,

I think this is a bombshell for bringing to light the grooming of Salman Abedi who is Ramadan Abedi's son. I always wonder what military/intelligence background these terrorists are hatched from. This one prime example of the preparation that goes into creating the terrorists/psychopaths.

I think it is a bit naive to think the UK intelligence agencies don't know what these guys are up to before they pull off an operation killing innocent people. This deep-state activity is sickening to watch.

Having a father who was part of Libyan Islamic Fighting Group would have to have the attention of the UK intelligence community long in advance of this horrific event.

I doubt we will see hardly a mention of these connections in Western MSM.

Thanks for posting this.
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

A lesson in Western propaganda: "Libyan rebels" suddenly turned into "terrorists" in these articles from the Guardian, respectively pre (2011) and post-Manchester attack:

18664276_1299198480176897_2312678209887735508_n.jpg
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Adaryn said:
From the Voltaire Network:

http://www.voltairenet.org/article196455.html

Manchester Attack as MI6 Blowback
25 MAY 2017

According to Scotland Yard, the attack on the crowd leaving the Ariana Grande concert at Manchester Arena, 22 May, has been perpetrated by Salman Abedi. A bankcard has been conveniently found in the pocket of the mutilated corpse of the ‘terrorist’.

This attack is generally interpreted as proof that the United Kingdom is not implicated in international terrorism and that, on the contrary, it is a victim of it.

Salman Abedi was born in the UK of a family of Libyan immigrants. He has travelled to Libya several times in the last couple of months, with or without his father.

His father Ramadan Abedi, with whom Salman lived, is a former officer in [Gaddafi’s] Libyan Intelligence Services. He specialised in the surveillance of the Islamist movement, but two decades later has failed to notice that his son has joined Daesh (IS).

In 1992, Ramadan Abedi was sent back to Libya by Britain’s MI6 and was involved in a British-devised plot to assassinate Muammar Gaddafi. The operation having been readily exposed, he was exfiltrated by MI6 and transferred back to the UK where he obtained political asylum. He moved in 1999 to Whalley Range (south of Manchester) where there was already resident a small Libyan Islamist community.

In 1994, Ramadan Abedi returned again to Libya under MI6’s direction. In late 1995 he is involved in the creation of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), a local branch of Al-Qaeda, in conjunction with Abdelhakim Belhadj. The LIFG was then employed by MI6 again to assassinate Gaddafi, for a payoff of £100,000. This operation, which also failed, provoked heated exchanges within British Intelligence, leading to the resignation of one David Shayler.

Other former members of the LIFG have also lived at Whalley Range, including Abedi’s friend Abd al-Baset-Azzouz. In 2009, this last joined Al-Qaeda in Pakistan and became a close associate of its chief, Ayman al-Zawahiri. In 2011, al-Baset-Azzouz is active on the ground with the NATO operation against Libya. On 11 September 2012, he directs the operation against the US Ambassador in Libya, Christopher Stevens, assassinated at Benghazi. He is arrested in Turkey and extradited to the US in December 2014, his trial still pending.

Nobody pays attention to the fact that Ramadan Abedi has linked LIFG members to the formation of Al-Qaeda in Iraq and, in 2011, he takes part in MI6’s ‘Arab Spring’ operations, and in LIFG’s role on the ground in support of NATO. In any event, Abedi returned to Libya after the fall of Gaddafi and moves his family there, leaving his older children in the family home at Whalley Range.

[...]
Daesh has claimed responsibility for the Manchester attack, but without describing Salman Abedi as a ‘martyr’. After the assassination, Ramadan Abedi has declared his opposition to jihad in a telephone conversation with journalists. He has also claimed that his son had intended to spend the month of Ramadan [beginning 26 May] with him in Libya and that he is convinced of his innocence.

Very interesting article. Thanks for Posting this Adaryn.

While reading, I was getting flash-backs to the Boston Bombing and wonder if a similar pattern is being used here?

Salman Abedi is 22 and I don't know the name and age of the older Brother that was just arrested? Tamerlan Tsarnaev was 26 and his younger brother, Dzhokhar, 19 at the time of the Boston bombing. It mimics, one Brother dead and the other one in custody.

Salman Abedi was born in the UK of a family of Libyan immigrants. He has travelled to Libya several times in the last couple of months, with or without his father.

- Salman Abedi would travel from the U.K. to Libya to see his Father (Ramadan Abedi). Ramadan Abedi has MI6 connections.

According to CNN, Tamerlan was born in 1986 from an ethnically Chechen family in Kyrgyzstan. In 2002 his parents immigrated to the United States, leaving Tamerlan in Kazakhstan with an uncle, said a relative in Canada to reporters this week. In July 2003, 16-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev moves to the United States. The Tsarnaev family were all granted refugee status and settled in Cambridge.
_http://heavy.com/news/2013/04/tamerlan-tsarnaev-dzhokhar-boston-marathon-bombings-suspect-number-one/

- Tamerian Tsarnaev travelled from Boston to South Dagestan, Russia to see his Father (Anzor Tsarnaev). Tamerian's Uncle Ruslan had CIA connections.

British police have said they believe the bomber, who returned to Manchester just a few days before the attack, was part of a network and have arrested six people including Abedi's older brother since Monday.

On Wednesday, authorities in Tripoli said that Abedi's younger brother and father, who had resettled in Libya after the revolution, had also been arrested on suspicion of links to the Islamic State (IS) group, which claimed responsibility for Monday's attack.

https://www.sott.net/article/351999-British-Libyan-terrorists-MI5-gave-us-free-passage-to-fight-Gaddafi


The father of the suspected perpetrator of the deadly Manchester terror attack was detained Wednesday in Libya’s capital while he was recording a television interview, media reported.

Father of Manchester Attack's Suspected Perpetrator Detained in Libya
https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201705251053958289-father-manchester-bomber-detained/

The father of the suspected attacker, 22-year-old Salman Abedi, was detained by masked armed men, the ITV broadcaster reported, citing eyewitnesses. According to the channel, a total of seven people were detain in connection to the investigation of the terror attack.


The publication of leaked images of the Manchester Arena crime scene and evidence collected there could threaten the integrity of the UK’s active counterterrorism investigation into the horrific suicide bombing attack outside an Ariana Grande concert on Monday night, British police said.

Manchester Attack: New York Times ‘Undermines’ Counter Terror Investigation
https://sputniknews.com/europe/201705251053957911-manchester-attack-newyorktimes-undermines-terror/

On Wednesday, the New York Times published photographs taken by law enforcement of the Manchester Arena attack aftermath, including the explosive’s potential detonator, shrapnel and power source. The US media has also already published the name of the suspected bomber, despite the objections of UK police. UK officials are "furious" about the photo leak, the Independent reported, and the anger appears to reach the highest levels of government. Several British newspapers say UK Prime Minister Theresa May will confront US President Donald Trump about the leaks at the NATO summit on Thursday.

The UK home secretary, Amber Rudd, made "very clear" to US authorities only hours before the latest leak that they were not to release information on the investigation to the media, the Telegraph pointed out. "This issue is being raised at every relevant level by the British authorities with their US counterparts," Rudd said Wednesday, admitting the premature publication of suspect Salman Abedi’s name left her "irritated."

Trump himself has expressed outrage at the "LEAKERS" in his own government.


Relations between British and US intelligence agencies are under strain after the New York Times published photographs of the Manchester terror attack in what appears to be a leak from within US intelligence services - the second such leak since the explosion, May 22.

Five Eyes Alliance in Turmoil as Britain and US Fall Out Over Manchester Intel
Five Eyes Alliance in Turmoil as Britain and US Fall Out Over Manchester Intel

There has always been close cooperation between British and US intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Both are founder members of the Five Eyes alliance — along with Canada, Australia and New Zealand — which share sensitive information with each other.

The Five Eyes alliance — formed in the aftermath of World War II — is an agreement to share intelligence between the nations. Britain — for its part — relies upon intelligence from the GCHQ communications agency in Cheltenham, which analyzes communication data, including emails, telephones and other electronic information.

The other agencies — MI5 and MI6 — as well as the military and police also share intelligence with their US counterparts, which include the National Security Agency (NSA), the FBI, the CIA and others. There are also very strong links as political and diplomatic level, which underline the "special relationship" between London and Washington.

The fact that the US leaked the name of the attacker — 22-year-old Salman Ramadan Abedi — and now photographs of the debris left in the aftermath of the attack has spooked the UK authorities, who believe there is a breakdown in trust.

The leak of his name put the investigation at serious risk, because it alerted Abedi's family and associates that the police were on to them before raids could be arranged, which meant they could potentially escape from police and the army. UK Prime Minister Theresa May is set to discuss the matter urgently when she meets US President Donald Trump, May 25, in Brussels.


Why is the Five Eyes Alliance in turmoil - they just had a secret meeting on April 22nd? Another big secret meeting is schedule for June 1-4 by the
Bilderberg's? There's like "3 weeks" between the Five Eyes Alliance meeting - then the Arianna Grand Manchester Attack - and about "3 weeks" until the Bilderberg meeting? Do these "secret meetings" have anything to do with the Manchester attack?

Five Eyes spying alliance reportedly gather in NZ for secret surveillance conference
https://www.rt.com/viral/385722-five-eyes-spying-alliance/

Bilderberg 2017 bigger and more bad ass than ever
_https://www.intellihub.com/bilderberg-2017-bigger-and-more-bad-ass-than-ever/

CHANTILLY, Virginia — Bilderberg 2017 is going to be bigger and more bad ass than ever as 120 of the world’s most powerful elite meet in secrecy at their privately rented and heavily secured Westfield’s Marriott confab only to be confronted by thousands of protesters over the four-day span.

The meeting takes place June 1-4.
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Manchester Evening News May 25 2017
_http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/

Manchester Evening News
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester_Evening_News
Type Daily newspaper
Format Tabloid
Owner(s) Trinity Mirror
Editor Rob Irvine
Founded 1868
Political alignment Labour
Headquarters Chadderton, Greater Manchester, England
Circulation 52,158 [1]
Website ManchesterEveningNews.co.uk

Trinity Mirror
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Mirror
Trinity Mirror.svg
Type Public
Traded as LSE: TNI
Industry Publishing
Founded 1903
Headquarters One Canada Square Canary Wharf, London, England
Key people David Grigson (Chairman of the board), Simon Fox (CEO)
Products National and regional newspapers, magazines
Revenue £636.3 million (2014)
Operating income £98.6 million (2014)
Profit £81.6 million (2014)
Number of employees 3,900 (2015)[1]
Subsidiaries Local World
Website _www.trinitymirror.com

Phone hacking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Mirror#Phone_hacking
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

I have a very deep connection to Manchester. I was born and raised there as were my parents and ancestors. I left Manchester 30 years ago but I am still a Mancunian. This horrific act has left me devastated. But I am under no illusions about the possible players behind this cowardly, self serving act. Adaryn thank you for posting the Voltaire article. It is extremely interesting.

There was a vigil in St Anne's Square a couple of days ago, where a poet Tony Walsh recited a very moving tribute to Manchester and it's people.

 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Adaryn said:
From the Voltaire Network:

http://www.voltairenet.org/article196455.html

Manchester Attack as MI6 Blowback
25 MAY 2017
According to the former Spanish Prime Minister José Maria Aznar, Abdelhakim Belhadj was involved in the assassinations in Madrid of 11 March 2004.

This is the Same AZNAR who claimed in the Hours after the Madrid Bombing that it was the work of ETA,
the basque seperatist movement.

A stupid mistake that many feel lost him credibility and the Election,
along with his desire to Join america and britain in a War Crime,

The spanish people wisely Voted him OUT of office.

Incidentally , the papers in spain alwways depict Aznar as Darth vader.
C10nJ5MWIAAUYcw.jpg
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Manchester, Berlin, Paris, Nice, London, New York: Passports and IDs Mysteriously Discovered in the Wake of Terror Attacks
Global Research, May 27, 2017 By Prof Michel Chossudovsky (Via http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/05/27/mystery-ever-present-terrorist-passport/)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/manchester-berlin-paris-nice-london-new-york-passports-and-ids-mysteriously-discovered-in-the-wake-of-terror-attacks/5592063
Best viewed via the link:
[size=8pt]
This article reviews the “mysterious” phenomenon of IDs and Passports of terror suspects routinely discovered (often in the rubble) in the wake of a terrorist attack.

In most cases the alleged suspect was known to the authorities.

Is there a pattern? The ID papers of the suspect are often left behind, discovered by police in the wake of a terrorist attack.

According to government and media reports, the suspects are without exception linked to an Al Qaeda affiliated entity.

None of these terror suspects survived. Dead men do not talk.

In the case of the tragic events in Manchester, the bankcard of the alleged suicide bomber Salman Abedi was found in his pocket in the wake of the explosion.

Legitimacy of the official stories? The UK is both a “victim of terrorism” as well as a “State sponsor of terrorism”. Without exception, the governments of the Western countries victims of terror attacks, have supported, directly or indirectly, the Al Qaeda group of terrorist organizations including the Islamic State (ISIS), which are allegedly responsible for waging these terror attacks. Amply documented Al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA.

Below is a review of the circumstances and evidence pertaining to passports and IDs discovered in the wake of selected terror attacks, with links to Global Research articles and media reports (2001-2017). (This list is by no means exhaustive)

“A bankcard has been conveniently found in the pocket of the … Daesh has claimed responsibility for the Manchester attack, but without …”
Screen-Shot-2017-05-26-at-12.11.21-768x458.png


No image of the alleged bankcard is available.

Ironically, the suspect Abedi was first identified by Washington rather than UK police and security. How did they know who was the culprit 3 hours after the explosion? According to Graham Vanbergen:

In the early hours of the morning of the 23rd May – approximately 02.35BST NDTV via the Washington Post stated quite categorically that:

“U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, identified the assailant as Salman Abedi. They did not provide information about his age or nationality, and British officials declined to comment on the suspect’s identity.”

This was published at a time when British police and security services were refusing to make any statements as to who they thought the perpetrators were because at the time, they were dealing with the immediate aftermath of the event.
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

If you look back to operation Gladio in Italy, the number of terrorism incidents would increase as the poll numbers of the Italian Communist Party (PCI) were raising. So historically, it's nothing new. You provoke fear in the population so that they won't choose a different option.

I was also thinking that maybe the PTB are not sure they can swing the vote this time, so thus the Manchester attack.
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Anthony said:
If you look back to operation Gladio in Italy, the number of terrorism incidents would increase as the poll numbers of the Italian Communist Party (PCI) were raising. So historically, it's nothing new. You provoke fear in the population so that they won't choose a different option.

I was also thinking that maybe the PTB are not sure they can swing the vote this time, so thus the Manchester attack.

I'd bet that the whole mess back fire's on them and that Corbin, (like Trump), come's in at the finish gate by a nose, (if "they" dont do another voter manipulation scheme).

Obviously, May has always shown her true color's and alliance for the deep state.

May 27, 2017
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=86
The Independent
Theresa May stretches lead in new poll after Manchester bomb May 27 2017
Exclusive: ComRes poll for The Independent puts the Conservatives 12 points ahead of Labour, despite growing support for Jeremy Corbyn over social care
_http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-poll-lead-manchester-bomb-jeremy-corbyn-labour-election-latest-a7758896.html
Snippet:
c1.png

The Prime Minister’s ratings have fallen on everything except being “best to represent Britain on the world stage”, unchanged on 49 per cent, while Mr Corbyn’s ratings have risen since two weeks ago on all statements tested, including representing Britain, on 21 per cent, up four. Mr Corbyn now holds a 13-point lead, up 10 points, over Ms May on being “best to look after the interests of hard-working families”, and has drawn level on “most likely to raise school standards”.

In a straight choice (below) Mr Corbyn and Labour are seen by 42 per cent to have “the best policies for people like me and my family”, just five points ahead of Ms May and the Conservatives on 37 per cent.
Sipping Down:
Strikingly, Mr Corbyn holds the biggest lead on being “most likely to protect the interests of older people who are becoming more dependent on the social care system”. This is a new question asked after the row over the Tory manifesto pledge to withdraw free care visits to pensioners who own their own homes. Mr Corbyn is seen as most likely to protect older people by 43 per cent, and Ms May by 20 per cent.

The other policy on which Mr Corbyn is favoured is that 41 per cent say he is “most likely to deliver improvements to the NHS”, against 25 per cent for Ms May. Ms May is also considered best to lead Britain’s negotiations over Brexit by 48 per cent to 18 per cent for Mr Corbyn, and “most likely to reduce net migration to the UK” by 33 per cent to 11 per cent for Mr Corbyn and 21 per cent for Paul Nuttall, leader of Ukip.
c2.png
5-27-17
General election 2017: Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn face-off over security
(8 hours ago) From the section Election 2017
_http://www.bbc.com/news/election-2017-40072251
Snippets:
'Enough is enough'
The party has not released full details of how it will work but has promised it will be a statutory body with "proper teeth and a clear remit".

Mrs May said: "Our enjoyment of Britain's diversity must not prevent us from confronting the menace of extremism, even if that is sometimes embarrassing or difficult to do.

"Extremism, especially Islamist extremism, strips some people of the freedoms they should enjoy, undermines the cohesion of our society, and can fuel violence. And it can be especially bad for women.

"There is clearly a role for government in tackling extremism where it involves behaviour that is or ought to be criminal.

But there is also a role for government to help people and build up organisations in society to promote and defend Britain's pluralistic values, and stand up to the extremists who want to undermine our values and impose their twisted beliefs onto the rest of us."

She added: "Enough is enough. We need to be stronger and more resolute in standing up to these people."

'Collective safety'
Mr Corbyn, meanwhile, will repeat Labour's pledge to reverse cuts to police and emergency services staff he says have been carried out by the Conservatives.

Labour say they would recruit an extra 10,000 police officers, 3,000 more firefighters, 3,000 more prison officers, 1,000 more security and intelligence agency staff and 500 more border guards if Labour wins the general election, he says.

He is also promising extra staff for the security and intelligence agencies - GCHQ, MI6 and MI5 - in order "to better ensure our collective safety".

He added: "As well as full funding for our frontline and first response services, Labour will properly resource the partner agencies in other frontline public services, including schools and colleges, and local authorities.

"These agencies are charged with a duty to identify those individuals vulnerable to violent extremism but under the current government they have been held back and barely been able to provide their own core services.

"Only Labour is serious about properly resourcing our security and frontline services."

The Conservatives hit back at Labour's promises, with Home Secretary Amber Rudd saying: "Jeremy Corbyn can promise what he likes, but can't deliver anything because his sums don't add up and he isn't up to the job of keeping Britain safe."

In Autumn 2015, the then Chancellor, George Osborne, promised to spend £3.4bn extra on counter-terrorism - an increase of 30% - over the following five years.


Note: I have a hunch that this supposed bombing was a contoured EMPulse attack.
Missing People:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/manchester-bombing-what-we-dont-know/5591844
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Right on the money about the Conservatives using the latest terrorist attack in Manchester to portray Corbyn as a weak leader. They went a step further in their recent Twitter election campaign ad IMO and put together a video consisting of out of context sentences (or even chunks of sentences) that portray Corbyn as a leader who opposes fighting terror: https://twitter.com/Conservatives/status/868217762027536384/video/1

Some quotes from the video:

"I’ve been opposing anti-terror legislation ever since 1983"

"I’m not happy with the ‘shoot to kill policy’"

"Fight all their cuts except for those in the armed forces where we want to see a few more cuts taking place - and no more nuclear weapons"

"(...) our friends from Hezbollah, friends from Hamas (...)"

The Sky News interview where Corbyn was asked to "unequivocally condemn the IRA" but he condemned "all killing done by all parties" instead was quoted too. Here's an article from SOTT which mentions that interview: https://www.sott.net/article/351763-Political-Timing-of-Manchester-Terror-Attack-is-Suspicious#

Like it was mention on SOTT radio last night, it's pretty ambitious of the Conservative Party to say that Corbyn is a threat when the recent Westminster attack and the Manchester attack took place while the Conservatives are still in power. If they couldn't prevent those attacks, how can they claim they can prevent others whilst Corbyn cannot? (This is me paraphrasing it, not a quote from the radio show :) )

https://www.sott.net/article/352300-Behind-the-Headlines-Terrorism-as-Population-Control
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Ant22 said:
Right on the money about the Conservatives using the latest terrorist attack in Manchester to portray Corbyn as a weak leader. They went a step further in their recent Twitter election campaign ad IMO and put together a video consisting of out of context sentences (or even chunks of sentences) that portray Corbyn as a leader who opposes fighting terror: https://twitter.com/Conservatives/status/868217762027536384/video/1

Yes, but notice the replies to the twitt are mostly against it. I think people are really in the mood for voting Corbyn into power. Whether 'they' let him in is another story; the election might be rigged.

I've made a point of following TM and the Conservatives on Twitter (as well as others) for the sole purpose of replying to their BS and doing a bit of 'trolling'. ;) I don't ever expect a reply from them but at least I'm having fun!
 
Re: UK election surprise: Manchester terror attack

Windmill knight said:
Ant22 said:
Right on the money about the Conservatives using the latest terrorist attack in Manchester to portray Corbyn as a weak leader. They went a step further in their recent Twitter election campaign ad IMO and put together a video consisting of out of context sentences (or even chunks of sentences) that portray Corbyn as a leader who opposes fighting terror: https://twitter.com/Conservatives/status/868217762027536384/video/1

Yes, but notice the replies to the twitt are mostly against it. I think people are really in the mood for voting Corbyn into power. Whether 'they' let him in is another story; the election might be rigged.

(...)

Good point Windmill knight, it's pretty much a trend that all the Conservative 'broadcasting' against Corbyn mostly attracts negative comments about their own failures. I hear more and more people "coming out" as either wanting to vote for Labour or simply against the Conservatives - hence for Corbyn as the lesser of two evils.

I find it very interesting since I was told numerous times in the past that it is rude, inappropriate or simply faux pas to talk about politics and religion in the UK and recent events seem to have changed that quite a bit.

This is anecdotal evidence but just to give an example, I've worked for my current employer for over 5 years and it was a recent discovery that my boss, who in my head ticks boxes for a Conservative voter, actually has very strong feelings against the Tories and intends to vote Labour - as he did in the past. And that came from someone who repeatedly told me off for even a slight political hint in the past!

Such strong attitudes do make me wonder if - and by how much - the 2015 general elections were rigged. Surely such views couldn't have developed overnight? It could be just my localised social circle but I doubt that since the negative comments under the twitter video show that it's quite a popular viewpoint.

(...) I've made a point of following TM and the Conservatives on Twitter (as well as others) for the sole purpose of replying to their BS and doing a bit of 'trolling'. ;) I don't ever expect a reply from them but at least I'm having fun!

Sounds like fun indeed :) And just like yourself, a lot of people do check out the comments to see what other people's views are so I guess it's worth ensuring the comments are a useful read!
 
Back
Top Bottom