Vaccines

I think it's kind of like grabbing the wrong end of the stick. Whilst it maybe a worthy legal argument, viruses do exist. It's just that vaccines cannot be proven to be safe and effective (or even necessary for that matter i.e. Scarlet Fever which seemed to behave exactly like all the other viruses and never had a vaccine produced). Also manufacturers and government agencies cannot be proven to be free of financial or scientific corruption or collusion.

Still there is enormous resistance out there against challenging the 'worshipful sanctity of the needle' especially amongst sheep.

I had an amusing encounter lately when the After Hours Co-Ordinator (who takes the position of the Director of Nursing out of hours) sailed up to the desk on a ward of a major metropolitan hospital to discuss the problem of staffing with the Nurse In Charge. There was literally no-one to cover nursing vacancies over night, and because I work in another major metropolitan hospitals, I knew it wasn't an isolated problem.

The After Hours Co-Ordinator said she couldn't understand it because because the 'flu season' was over and most people have been vaccinated. I piped up that: "The flu vaccination was the biggest scam out."

The Nurse In Charge shouted: "NO IT'S NOT!". I guess conversation just stopped at that point, lol. I could have discussed logical and scientific issues with the flu vax with her, but she was adamant. She later asked me if I wanted to work a double shift because they had no staff. She also had a headache, and was sick like so many of the staff who had that stupid injection. I said "no".

So far I've resisted the urge to reply to emails from Executive Management exhorting us all to have this vaccine, by calling them all idiots. It's been tough, but so far, so good. Discretion has prevailed, but not by much, haha.
 
nicklebleu said:
Hello H2O said:
There is an article on SOTT about this?

https://www.sott.net/article/340948-Biologist-wins-Supreme-Court-case-proving-that-the-measles-virus-does-not-exist

I'm not saying that the measles virus doesn't exist - I haven't studied this particular matter enough to make an informed decision. The only thing I am saying is that the gist of the article saying that the German OLG confirmed that the "measle virus doesn't exist" is misleading. They actually confirmed that the measle virus DOES exist, but that the parameters for the payout (proof of the measle virus AND it's diameter in a SINGLE publication) was not met.

Read the court publication (which is very tedious reading - and only available in German) if you can and let me know if you come to a different conclusion.

It may well be that the defendent is right about the non-existence of the measle virus, but that is not my point here.

Hi nicklebleu

I just referenced the SOTT article so that the original poster may glean some additional information on the story.

I should have referenced the original posting more clearly. Sorry for the confusion.
 
For anyone who's interested. Personally, I think all information both pro and con vaccines, as well as the science behind them, should be a topic of interest to everyone. Plus they have advertised this series as free, which is very helpful.

https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/?a_aid=58b71e2649e8d&a_bid=9dd5b084
 
There is a petition at the White House calling for a 5-year moratorium on childhood vaccines.

Trump's Five Year Moratorium on Childhood Vaccines and Destruction of Pharma Control of Media

This petition asks the President to support Citizen's Petition, FDA-2017-P-4500, a five year moratorium on all childhood vaccines on the ground of inadequate information for parents to make an informed consent to the procedure, as well as the government's failure to perform adequate pre or post safety testing of vaccinated and un-vaccinated populations.

We ask the White House to:

ONE: Impose a five year moratorium on all childhood vaccines from birth to age eighteen.

TWO: Repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and return vaccines to the traditional civil justice system.

THREE: Perform large scale studies of vaccinated and un-vaccinated children.

FOUR: Ban direct pharmaceutical advertising to consumers and allow such advertising only to medical professionals.

I signed it. It has 6,876 signatures so far and needs 100,000. Unfortunately, the deadline is tomorrow.
 
Menrva said:
There is a petition at the White House calling for a 5-year moratorium on childhood vaccines.

Trump's Five Year Moratorium on Childhood Vaccines and Destruction of Pharma Control of Media

This petition asks the President to support Citizen's Petition, FDA-2017-P-4500, a five year moratorium on all childhood vaccines on the ground of inadequate information for parents to make an informed consent to the procedure, as well as the government's failure to perform adequate pre or post safety testing of vaccinated and un-vaccinated populations.

We ask the White House to:

ONE: Impose a five year moratorium on all childhood vaccines from birth to age eighteen.

TWO: Repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and return vaccines to the traditional civil justice system.

THREE: Perform large scale studies of vaccinated and un-vaccinated children.

FOUR: Ban direct pharmaceutical advertising to consumers and allow such advertising only to medical professionals.

I signed it. It has 6,876 signatures so far and needs 100,000. Unfortunately, the deadline is tomorrow.

Signed, shared and retwitted
 
Menrva said:
There is a petition at the White House calling for a 5-year moratorium on childhood vaccines.

Trump's Five Year Moratorium on Childhood Vaccines and Destruction of Pharma Control of Media

This petition asks the President to support Citizen's Petition, FDA-2017-P-4500, a five year moratorium on all childhood vaccines on the ground of inadequate information for parents to make an informed consent to the procedure, as well as the government's failure to perform adequate pre or post safety testing of vaccinated and un-vaccinated populations.

We ask the White House to:

ONE: Impose a five year moratorium on all childhood vaccines from birth to age eighteen.

TWO: Repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and return vaccines to the traditional civil justice system.

THREE: Perform large scale studies of vaccinated and un-vaccinated children.

FOUR: Ban direct pharmaceutical advertising to consumers and allow such advertising only to medical professionals.

I signed it. It has 6,876 signatures so far and needs 100,000. Unfortunately, the deadline is tomorrow.

For all we know, a million people may have signed the petition, and the deep state hacked the numbers to display whatever number they want.
 
Menrva said:
There is a petition at the White House calling for a 5-year moratorium on childhood vaccines.

Trump's Five Year Moratorium on Childhood Vaccines and Destruction of Pharma Control of Media

This petition asks the President to support Citizen's Petition, FDA-2017-P-4500, a five year moratorium on all childhood vaccines on the ground of inadequate information for parents to make an informed consent to the procedure, as well as the government's failure to perform adequate pre or post safety testing of vaccinated and un-vaccinated populations.

We ask the White House to:

ONE: Impose a five year moratorium on all childhood vaccines from birth to age eighteen.

TWO: Repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and return vaccines to the traditional civil justice system.

THREE: Perform large scale studies of vaccinated and un-vaccinated children.

FOUR: Ban direct pharmaceutical advertising to consumers and allow such advertising only to medical professionals.

I signed it. It has 6,876 signatures so far and needs 100,000. Unfortunately, the deadline is tomorrow.


Unfortunately it's been archived now as it didn't reach the required minimum. :(
 
Ant22 said:
Unfortunately it's been archived now as it didn't reach the required minimum. :(

Most likely because no one knew about it, or it wasn't promoted.
 
Ruth said:
Ant22 said:
Unfortunately it's been archived now as it didn't reach the required minimum. :(

Most likely because no one knew about it, or it wasn't promoted.

Darn. I didn't notice it on Kennedy's World Mercury Project site either.

Kennedy has a fairly new article up (notwithstanding hyperlinks and photos): https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/fast-tracking-mandatory-vaccination-government-media-muzzle-scientists/

AUGUST 29, 2017

Fast-Tracking Mandatory Vaccination While Government and Media Muzzle Scientists

By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Turning their backs on the human rights principle of voluntary informed consent memorialized in the Nuremberg Code after World War II, health authorities in France and Italy are fast-tracking involuntary vaccine mandates for school-age children. In Italy, millions of Italians have been demonstrating since June, protesting the infringements to parental rights. On July 28, industry-beholden Italian legislators voted 296-92 to pass a one-size-fits-all law that mandates multiple doses of ten vaccines for preschoolers through teenagers, imposing steep fines for parents who do not comply. Mainstream media outlets in both Italy and the US ignored the record protests against medical coercion.

Vaccines are big business, and the new vaccine mandate ensures the continued flow of profits to the $32 billion industry despite steady erosion of public confidence in vaccine safety.
Why Italy? And why now? Italy’s pharmaceutical sector is one of the largest in the world. Vaccines are big business, and the new vaccine mandate ensures the continued flow of profits to the $32 billion industry despite steady erosion of public confidence in vaccine safety. A recent survey found widespread doubts among Italian and French citizens about the importance and safety of vaccines. A cascade of recent scientific studies have described the emergence of new vaccine-related autoimmune illnesses and the inferior health status of vaccinated compared to unvaccinated children. Furthermore, a slate of films, news reports and government investigations have exposed widespread corruption among vaccine regulators, government efforts to hide serious vaccine-related adverse reactions and intimidation of scientists who publish data contrary to the orthodoxy that all vaccines are always safe for all children.

Kill the Messenger

One important study, published in early 2017 in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination by two highly regarded Italian scientists, raises alarming new questions about quality control by vaccine manufacturers with implications for the vaccine safety debate. (The World Mercury Project previously summarized the study here.) Coauthored by physicist Antonietta Gatti and pharmacist Stefano Montanari, the study uncovered the nearly universal presence in vaccines of “micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized inorganic foreign bodies” and “debris”—ingredients not declared in the package inserts.

In every human vaccine, Gatti and Montanari found wide-ranging contamination, including minute particles of lead or stainless steel in all of the vaccine samples analyzed; chromium in over half (25/44); tungsten in almost a fifth (8/44); and many other varieties of metallic particles.

In a reasonable world, the startling finding that vaccines are widely contaminated with heavy metal particulates would be front-page news, and the two researchers who discovered the contamination would be hailed as diligent scientists dedicated to improving vaccine safety. Instead, Drs. Gatti and Montanari have become targets for violent threats on Facebook. Accusers denounce their meticulous laboratory work as “pseudoscience” and call for the two scientists to be “beaten until they bleed,” “punched,” “kicked” and “taken out of commission” so as to make them “understand that they need to remain silent.”

An army of pharmaceutical industry trolls and bloggers have pressured the badly shaken journal editor to “unpublish” the study, which was published after a rigorous peer review process. Although these tactics have succeeded in rattling the editor, the article stands. Gatti and Montanari believe so strongly in the integrity of their findings that they have made known that they will sue if the journal takes down the paper.

Despite the passion of their attacks, industry bloggers have been hard pressed to find substantive fault with Gatti/Montanari’s methodologies. An industry flack, Guido Silvestri, working at a vaccine center in Atlanta, took a bungling shot at the Gatti-Montanari study on Italian Facebook by misapplying a nineteenth-century law of chemistry called Avogadro’s number. Silvestri misinterpreted Avogadro’s law, which applies only to gases and cannot calculate nanoparticle concentrations. According to Drs. Gatti and Montanari, the medical doctor “erred by 13 orders of magnitude but did not even understand his own mistake.”

Gatti and Montanari believe that the immune system is permanently damaged by these composite particles, which constitute “a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects,” including both immediate and deferred autoimmune problems.

Why the Vaccine Contaminant Study is Important

Gatti and Montanari work in the emerging fields of nanopathology and nanotoxicology. The two researchers coined the term “nanopathology” in the early 2000s after finding that nanoparticles (particles less than 100 nanometers in size) “induce far more severe [health] effects” than larger particles. As they explain, the minute size makes it “extremely easy” for the particles to infiltrate the body’s tissues.

Drs. Gatti and Montanari used cutting-edge electron microscope technology to physically examine inorganic, particulate contaminants in vaccines and identify their chemical composition. They assessed 44 vaccines manufactured in Italy and France (43 human vaccines and one veterinary vaccine), taking pains to include different types, batches and years of production. In every human vaccine, Gatti and Montanari found wide-ranging contamination, including minute particles of lead or stainless steel in all of the vaccine samples analyzed; chromium in over half (25/44); tungsten in almost a fifth (8/44); and many other varieties of metallic particles.

Ironically, the single veterinary vaccine tested as “clean,” proving that it is possible to manufacture a debris-free vaccine. Gatti and Montanari believe that the pristine hog vaccine is a homage to ham, a sacred culinary and agricultural product in Italy. Hog farmers, aware that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines harm their meat, had enough clout to successfully lobby for uncontaminated veterinary vaccines.

One of the study’s most sobering findings was the detection of “organic-inorganic composites” that represent a “nano-bio-interaction” between the inorganic particulate matter and the organic (protein) vaccine components. Gatti and Montanari believe that the immune system is permanently damaged by these composite particles, which constitute “a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects,” including both immediate and deferred autoimmune problems.

The Questions We Should Be Asking

Dr. Gatti has considered several hypotheses about the origins of the vaccine contamination, including shoddy line protocols in the manufacturing process. According to Gatti, “The facilities need to be really clean to ensure that dust and pollutants do not find their way into the vaccines. If the labs do not have proper filtration, then this kind of contamination is very possible. And unfortunately, there are no regulations requiring manufacturers to do this kind of quality control, even though the manufacturers know that there is something wrong.” In short, the manufacturers “see no need to spend more money on quality control.”

Gatti and Montanari see an urgent need for more studies of the association between the debris and vaccine-related adverse events. “We still don’t know whether the kinds of adverse events that result from vaccines are the result of the aluminum adjuvants or the nano-bio interactions or something else. That is why it is so important to study the effects of the nano-bio materials inside the blood and body.”

Exposure via injection is known to induce toxicity reactions as compared to inhalation or ingestion. A study in mice found that exposure route was a crucial factor influencing toxicity and that orally administered compounds exhibited a “decrease of toxicity…as compared with injection route.” Scientists agree that “engineered metal-based nanoparticles can translocate to tissues,” and, in Gatti’s and Montanari’s view, when they enter the body via injection, “they stay there forever.”

Another point is that the barrage of toxic adjuvants and ingredients in vaccines (including aluminum and thimerosal, formaldehyde, antibiotics and “adjuvant systems” involving squalene and polysorbate 80) “have a synergistic action, thus…enhancing their aggressive potential.” Toxicologists know that, with toxins, one plus one rarely equals two but, in Dr. Gatti’s words, “always a higher number.”

Finally, Dr. Gatti observes that “the contaminants might not be homogenously distributed within a given batch of vaccines. For example, the bottom of the batch might be more contaminated than the top, which could explain why some people don’t have reactions and other people do.”

Drs. Gatti and Montanari outline a number of research topics that should form the basis of serious efforts to improve vaccine safety:


  • Meaningfully study the adverse health effects of aluminum adjuvants
  • Analyze the brains of infants who die immediately following vaccination
  • Continue to monitor micro- and nanoparticle contamination in new and existing vaccines
  • Conduct animal model studies to assess the effects of micro- and nanoparticle contamination
  • Assess the injection process itself, given the use of metallic syringes polished with tungsten carbide that may leave some metallic residue

…the barrage of toxic adjuvants and ingredients in vaccines (including aluminum and thimerosal, formaldehyde, antibiotics and “adjuvant systems” involving squalene and polysorbate 80) “have a synergistic action, thus. . .enhancing their aggressive potential.”

Follow the Money

Unfortunately, in Italy, as in the United States, serious studies of vaccine safety face practically insurmountable headwinds. Italy’s Minister of Health, Beatrice Lorenzin, has explicitly “forbidden” any research on nanoparticles in vaccines. Lorenzin aggressively pushed passage of the law mandating children’s vaccines. Lorenzin, a former journalist, has no formal education beyond ordinary high school. Gatti and Montanari point out that she has “no knowledge of chemistry or biology.” They add, “If you mention the nanoparticle research to her, she gets mad.” According to the two researchers, Lorenzin “does not understand science, but she understands money” and relies for guidance on Dr. Ranieri Guerra, the Ministry of Health’s Director General for Prevention. Guerra served on the board of Italy’s Smith Kline Foundation. The Smith Kline Foundation receives financial support from founding partner GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Consumer advocacy organizations and legislators in Italy have harshly criticized Guerra for conflicts of interest

A year before the passage of the new vaccine mandate, an April 2016 news report indicated that GSK-Italy was “doubling down” on its vaccine portfolio and “betting 1 billion euros on Italy.” The drug company is beefing up a vaccine research and development hub in Siena and a vaccine manufacturing plant in Rosia. The article quoted the global president of GSK Vaccines, who characterized GSK’s vaccine branch as a “motor of innovation” and guarantor of the company’s long-term sustainability. The same GSK executive described Italy’s pivotal role as a vaccine research and production hub as “a not insignificant step” toward further “progress” in the vaccine marketplace.

Italian officials have historically been important supporters of aggressive vaccine policies. In 2009–2010, the Italian government (via the taxpayers) purchased 24 million bird flu vaccines that were never used. The unused vaccines were thrown away but, says Dr. Montanari, “the companies made a lot of money.” Referring to this situation as a “flop,” the Italian newspaper La Repubblica reported that the country was left holding the bag for the cost of the unused vaccines while the apparent “pandemic” evaporated into thin air.

Dr. Montanari views the new vaccine law as both a social and medical experiment: “The government and the pharmaceutical industry want to see what happens when 60 million people are forced to be vaccinated.”
 
Oh, and it's also available for free again, on the 25th of January this year, if anyone wants to see it. All you have to do is register.

https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/?a_aid=1591129&a_bid=ae3563aa
 
They are ramping up the threats to vaccine safety spokes people. Specifically at the moment, Suzanne Humphries and the autism group she is associated with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjb0_w_MYys&feature=youtu.be
 
For anyone who's interested there's a 7 part series at The World Mercury Project talking about 'The Vaccine Program' and the issues with it.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/
 
Ruth said:
For anyone who's interested there's a 7 part series at The World Mercury Project talking about 'The Vaccine Program' and the issues with it.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

The World Mercury Project Team has a new article out on tobacco-based vaccine production. One deep concern (on my part) is that DARPA is fully invested in this project? I'm also wondering, if the heavy taxation on tobacco products in the last few years, claiming that the extra proceeds would go towards repairing local roads and bridges was just an excuse and money was actually funneled to DARPA instead, to enhance this program?

DARPA views potential pandemics and biodefense as matters of national security and—guided by its strategic objective of “harnessing biology as technology”—has sought to acquire capability for quick, on-demand production of vaccines to “enable [an] agile, robust, and rapid surge response.” After launching an Accelerated Manufacturing of Pharmaceuticals program in 2005 to begin studying plants as a vaccine manufacturing platform, DARPA began pouring additional millions into these efforts in 2009 when the H1N1 influenza virus appeared on the scene.

Smokin’ New Technology to Produce Flu Vaccines
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/smokin-new-technology-to-produce-flu-vaccines/

WMP NOTE: After the recent media uproar about the CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald’s resignation, which focused on the inappropriateness of her ownership in tobacco stock, the WMP team decided to investigate further. What we uncovered is new technology that utilizes tobacco leaves to produce vaccines in a much shorter time frame and clinical trials are already underway using this new technology to produce flu vaccines here in the US. So maybe Fitzgerald’s stocks had nothing to do with smoking tobacco cessation and everything to do with vaccine production? (Article continues.)
 
Back
Top Bottom