Thanks msante, that was interesting. I like facts and figures when it comes to topics that have been obscured by propaganda, such as this one. What I learn from the data above is that the government was spending more on social programs than it could afford - apparently in not very efficient ways, which resulted in waste and corruption - but that it in fact did manage to reduce poverty overall. This doesn't look like it was a long-term sustainable model - at least not the way it was done - so it can logically be concluded that the 'socialist mismanagement' is in part to blame for the crisis.
On this point, I do think the US has had a lot to do with the social decomposition in Venezuela. If you haven't read it already, check out this article:
La creación de Juan Guaidó: Cómo el Laboratorio de Cambio de Régimen de Estados Unidos creó al líder golpista venezolano
The Making of Juan Guaidó: How The US Regime Change Laboratory Created Venezuela's Coup Leader
It hasn't been the sanctions and the economic warfare only. The US has been pumping money to the worst of the opposition, which was trained abroad in fomenting revolutions back home. Included in the funding were the infamous guarimbas, which are the equivalent of the crazy yihadists in the ME, and in which Guaidó himself took part.
As for the question of how Venezuela would look like if it had been left alone (no economic warfare, no funding of social conflict), we can only speculate. But I'll say probably something like Cuba, except more prosperous, since Venezuela has not been - and still isn't - fully socialist, and it would have been able to profit properly of its oil, the largest reserve in the world.
The social decomposition we see today in Venezuela, IMHO, is not at all a direct product of US intervention, but of a social dynamic and political practices imposed by the Bolivarian Revolution from the beginning.
On this point, I do think the US has had a lot to do with the social decomposition in Venezuela. If you haven't read it already, check out this article:
La creación de Juan Guaidó: Cómo el Laboratorio de Cambio de Régimen de Estados Unidos creó al líder golpista venezolano
The Making of Juan Guaidó: How The US Regime Change Laboratory Created Venezuela's Coup Leader
It hasn't been the sanctions and the economic warfare only. The US has been pumping money to the worst of the opposition, which was trained abroad in fomenting revolutions back home. Included in the funding were the infamous guarimbas, which are the equivalent of the crazy yihadists in the ME, and in which Guaidó himself took part.
As for the question of how Venezuela would look like if it had been left alone (no economic warfare, no funding of social conflict), we can only speculate. But I'll say probably something like Cuba, except more prosperous, since Venezuela has not been - and still isn't - fully socialist, and it would have been able to profit properly of its oil, the largest reserve in the world.