Very interesting information, about transgenderism

Words of Caution about this material. This comes from Lisa Renee whose group Energetic Synthesis I was a member of for 3 years. During that time many things happened that made me question whether this group and Lisa may be part of a black ops collaboration between aliens and human technology. She may be a targeted individual herself judging from the horrific experiences she endured during her "kundalini rising" and transformation. She became very ill, lost her hair and was covered with sores.

Just my personal impression - Lisa may not be involved in black op's, per say, such as an alphabet group but there are indications in your descriptions of her - that her "assorted practices" have left her "wide open for parasitic invasion" that's stripping her "of life-force".

I don't want to get too deep into a discussion on Kundalini, other then to caution - it's nothing to play with! If it's meant to be part of your experience, it will come about "naturally", in it's own time and under the proper conditions. To force a Kundalini experience - without "a true aim and purpose" that encases a higher selfless Spiritual endeavor - and without proper guidance and personal instruction - you risk interfering with your own chosen life-path and devolving (back stepping) into a different or parallel timeline. You lose - Grace (learned or mastered achievements).


Lisa speaks in great detail and knowledge about Black Magic and how it works on the planet.

Her guided meditations are repetitive rituals that begin with calling in the 4 directions in a relaxed state, then calling in higher dimensional beings.

I don't sense any degree "of Spiritual" in her practices, she borders more on self-aggrandizement. The repetitive mediations, as such, might be workings to enable the individual - to become "an empty container" prone to degrees of possession?
 
I was fascinated with transgenderism during my early teen years. I’m glad I’ve stayed away from experimentation and indulging this part of my experience.

One thing of note was that I was fascinated prior to the emergence of internet porn in the 90s as far back as 10 years old in 1993. Back then the most I’ve witnessed for porn was playboy and hustler magazine. I also never seen a transgender person back then either. It was always this perverse phenomena that emerged out of my imagination.

I believe that this phenomena ive experienced wasn’t natural, or at least originating from within my natural biology. I couldn’t help but associate the ordeal with the supernatural, or something perversely demonic, so I abstained from talking about it with my parental figures.
 
Its good to get others impressions on this work and Lisa. It would be a relief to know she's only a regular old con artist and I could fully dismiss a certain paranoia I've had for years around the topic. That paranoia has waned considerably in the last few years fortunately but talking about it like this has brought up fears again which are quickly dissipating.:-) She certainly seems to believe her stories are true from my perspective anyway.

I don't sense any degree "of Spiritual" in her practices, she borders more on self-aggrandizement. The repetitive mediations, as such, might be workings to enable the individual - to become "an empty container" prone to degrees of possession?
Well, I took my experience to be an attempt at possession for sure. Practicing ritual to bring in spirits could be very unhealthy psychic hygiene especially for her "pupils" who I'm sure knew nothing about such things.
 
I noticed some people that are gay (or look gay) have characteristics that are recognizable... Like a wide mouth, or lispy speech, and are kind of dainty. And I mention this because - perhaps - they are afflicted with a condition akin to Downs Syndrome, in that their looks and mannerisms are recognizable and distinct, but are a shade closer to normal than a more handicapped person. And as such, they identify with females, as they are intensively cared for by the mother. And so they emulate female attributes. And males will avoid them, and they never bond with male types. And so they are branded with a gay stigma, but more accurately, they have mild birth defects. But they are normal enough to not be treated like a handicapped person, and so assume sexual attitudes attributed to them.
 
I noticed some people that are gay (or look gay) have characteristics that are recognizable... Like a wide mouth, or lispy speech, and are kind of dainty. And I mention this because - perhaps - they are afflicted with a condition akin to Downs Syndrome, in that their looks and mannerisms are recognizable and distinct, but are a shade closer to normal than a more handicapped person. And as such, they identify with females, as they are intensively cared for by the mother. And so they emulate female attributes. And males will avoid them, and they never bond with male types. And so they are branded with a gay stigma, but more accurately, they have mild birth defects. But they are normal enough to not be treated like a handicapped person, and so assume sexual attitudes attributed to them.

Cosmetic & personal care items, cooking ware, cleaning products; these disrupt hormonal development.

Lack of male role models or proper fathers appears to disrupt important personality traits too (to both males and females).

I have to disagree that the handicaps I pointed out just now are at all similar to that of the handicaps those with Downs Syndrome suffer. DNS can be very debilitating in comparison to those with gender confusions that can be exacerbated by hormone imbalances or lack of a male parent during early development.



"Down syndrome is caused by a random error in cell division that results in the presence of an extra copy of chromosome 21.

The type of error is called nondisjunction (pronounced non-dis-JUHNGK-shuhn). Usually when one cell divides in two, pairs of chromosomes are split so that one of the pair goes to one cell, and the other from the pair goes to the other cell. In nondisjunction, something goes wrong and both chromosomes from one pair go into one cell and no chromosomes for that pair go into the other cell."
 
Last edited:
I have to disagree that the handicaps I pointed out just now are at all similar to that of the handicaps those with Downs Syndrome suffer. DNS can be very debilitating in comparison to those with gender confusions that can be exacerbated by hormone imbalances or lack of a male parent during early development.
Thanks for the info. I wasn't sure but I notice the characteristics and DNS was the best comparison I could think of. I guess FAS could be another comparison in visible traits, but, just some mild form of handicap that isn't severe enough for diagnosis but still enough to be detected in traits.
 
Thinking about the "Girl Fixer" from "Hostage to the Devil" - so basically, Rita/Roger got in touch with his own feminine energy in nature and he felt connected to everything. He was primed by pressure from his father to be more masculine, but given his nature experience he preferred the feminine energy, however, his thinking about how to capture and experience that more often was totally screwed up. In addition he also mistook 'gender' for 'sex'. From 'Hostage to the Devil', I'm taking this to mean that gender is his own inherent balance of masculine/feminine energies and his biology, and sex is - well the sexual act.

So it was his screwed up thinking and his obsession with possessing a certain felt connection that opened him up to possession?

I'm not sure that I'm entirely clear on that.
 
Thinking about the "Girl Fixer" from "Hostage to the Devil" - so basically, Rita/Roger got in touch with his own feminine energy in nature and he felt connected to everything. He was primed by pressure from his father to be more masculine, but given his nature experience he preferred the feminine energy, however, his thinking about how to capture and experience that more often was totally screwed up. In addition he also mistook 'gender' for 'sex'. From 'Hostage to the Devil', I'm taking this to mean that gender is his own inherent balance of masculine/feminine energies and his biology, and sex is - well the sexual act.

So it was his screwed up thinking and his obsession with possessing a certain felt connection that opened him up to possession?

I'm not sure that I'm entirely clear on that.

Sounds about right to me; that's it in a nutshell.
 
Back in the 80's I had a friend who always told me she was a man inside. That really messed my head up. Knowing people who preferred same gender relations were one thing, but this concept of being born in the "wrong" body was perplexing to me. Before overwhelming attitudes of religiosity existed in my community persons who did have same gender relations were accepted and participated in all levels of society and were respected (consenting adults). Many in the community knew their partners/companions.

I know effeminate men who were not "gay". There are women who dress like men but they are not "lesbian". And there are folks who are asexual. I lost track of my friend, but the last time I saw her she talked about removing her breasts as she hated them. Whoa! I could not understand how one could hate their body so that you would remove a part of yourself. Like where did that concept come from? It's not like the body part is a cancerous tumor or something. Maybe that is what she/he feels. I don't know.

If people can be born with both male and female genitalia, then I guess people can feel the same way inside? Again I have no clue. Where did the idea of roles for female and male come from? I mean if we are human beings why is gender assignment necessary? I also know people in same gender relationships who do not engage in intimate sexual acts, they just happen to love their companion/partner. I don't know how that works either. Plus it's none of my business.

Here is a video on transgender regrets. Much of the issue seems to be lack of positive self esteem. If male and female were created strictly for reproductive reasons, what would the reason for people who don't have the capability to procreate? Why is who loves you and who you love is anybody's business anyhow (consenting adults)? Does knowing this information make our world any better? Is sexual assignment equal to sexual preference?
 
Cosmetic & personal care items, cooking ware, cleaning products; these disrupt hormonal development.
I recently find out that laundry powder can contain endocrine disruptors. More than 10 years ago I had skin irritation if too much laundry powder was used. I tried to buy laundry powder with Aloe Vera or "for sensitive sikn". Now I buy laundry powder for newborn infant.


Top selling brand name detergents have been found to contain high levels of petrochemicals which are endocrine disruptors – they disrupt your body’s creation of its own hormones, use of those hormones and elimination of excess hormones. They introduce estrogen-mimicking synthetic hormones into your blood stream through skin contact that can undo all of your best efforts with your diet. These synthetic estrogens create estrogen dominance in the body – a root cause of all of the hormonal imbalance symptoms I mentioned above.

An independent research group, Women’s Voices for the Earth, discovered that twenty of the most popular products we use to keep our homes and clothes clean contain reproductive toxins such as toluene and phthalates as well as a hormone disrupting synthetic musk, amongst other toxic chemicals. Many of these substances are not even listed on the product labels, because there is no law requiring that the company do this, keeping even the most informed of us in the dark. Anything that has been shown to cause “pregnancy complications” or “cancer” will also cause hormone disruption.

Research shows that many of the chemicals found in everyday house-cleaning products are bio-accumulative and very toxic, which means that once in your system, they actually stay in your system and allow for increased free radical damage, which makes you more vulnerable to autoimmune diseases and cancers.

When chemicals and toxins are drawn in through your skin, they enter the lymphatic system, where they are passed to the bloodstream and taken through the rest of your body before arriving at their final destination of the liver and kidneys.
[...]
Endocrine Disruptors
Your endocrine system produces and regulates various hormones within your body, such as the thyroid, pineal, pituitary, ovaries and testes, pancreas, and adrenals — just to name a few.

An endocrine disruptor is any compound or substance that affects the normal operation of this system.

Chemicals that are endocrine disruptors can impact any and every aspect of your health, from fertility issues and immune system suppression, to mood disorders such as depression and fatigue. One of the most common endocrine disruptors found in laundry detergents are NPEs.

NPE, or Nonylphenol Ethoxylate, is known as the ‘Gender Bender’. This inexpensive nonionic surfactant mimics estrogen in your body, leading to hormonal imbalance and, for some, cancer.

When this chemical is absorbed into your skin, kidney damage, liver damage, decreased testicular growth and sperm count, disrupted growth, and lowered metabolism can result.

A particularly disturbing side effect of NPEs in our water supply is that some fish respond by becoming part male and part female. A U.S. Geological Survey study found metabolites of NPEs in more than 61 percent of tested streams in the U.S. NPEs have been banned in Canada and Europe, and even Walmart has listed NPEs as one of three chemicals they’re requesting their supplier’s phase out of use.
 
Renee is another one of those cosmic COINTELPRO types who presents some truth wrapped in a larger lie. I thought the transgenderism article was good and moved on to her explanation of the Negative Alien Agenda (NAA) which I thought was ok. As I further explored her wiki, it got less and less interesting. Her cosmology seems to be an amalgamation of pretty much every major channeled group in the last 40 years. We've got Sirian guardians, Lyran Wars, Orion conspiracies, various "orders" dedicated to defending the universe, (she gives them different names like amethyst, emerald, and gold which makes me visualize a New Age version of Power Rangers) and a proliferation of esoteric buzzwords aggregated from many different belief systems which will confuse anyone who is not familiar with the lingo and requires inferring a lot of one's own meaning into it even if you are familiar. I'm not convinced she even knows what she's talking about and is just BSing people into thinking she's smart because she can use all of these terms in a somewhat coherent sentence. It tastes like Blavatsky with a more love and lighty flavor. When I got to the entry about Jesus Christ being a Sirian Blue humanoid who was not crucifed but taken back to the homeworld on a mothership to continue his work I just couldn't take it any more and had to stop.

I read her bio which says absolutely nothing about her other than she received some kind of kundalini starseed awakening and receives some sort of inspiration and biological upgrades from Lyran-Sirians, Melchizedek Ur, and Aurora Guardians. Translation: A nobody who is being marketed by someone or something to be a spiritual guru out of nowhere.

Well in this day and age, we cannot know for sure anymore, whats cointelpro and what information is highly distorted. I read pretty much the material of ashayeane deane and lisa renee. I find it interesting. Do i take everything that is written for fact? No i never do with any kind of material.

The fact that they both speak about the negative alien agenda, and the advanced info they give out in how far the manipulation goes. Sounds interesting to me. I think its a perhaps possible fact in reality, that is happening to people. Some info sounds like a word salad to me... and when any source of esoteric information speaks about jezus and connects this to aliens and spaceships.... with elvis... it gets to funny.... and i do not take it serious.

I always encounter people who are in they ”paranoid” state... and question every piece of material out there.
I do not take such individuals serious, Heck even the C’s have been accused of being hijacked by darker service to self forces.

Anyone can speak there mind in what they think about certain types of info. But when paranoia strikes.... everything that feels legit gets a high rate of distortion. ( for that person)

And i simply do not ride that slide 😂.
Paranoia is a ego thing. Trying to be as neutral as possible. Whatever lisa renee ashayeane deane or laura, are hijacked by service to self cointel pro or whatever... is simply a personal opinion. And personal paranoia has no base fact in my reality. I think the wave material, and laura’s books are fantastic and give so much insight. Just as some parts of lisa renee and ashayan. All is material wich is very interesting to build up knowledge. And many other sources of information.

If i present something here on this forum. I’m doing it because i find it very interesting. And i’m curious what other people think. I’m not here to know if something is factual or is infiltrated by the dark service to self forces. I was not born yesterday and have done more then 20 years of study into different topics, i can decide things for my self.

And lets be honest people, none of you have the complete answer to anything. Neither have i. I don’t do Personal Paranoia.
 
I noticed some people that are gay (or look gay) have characteristics that are recognizable... Like a wide mouth, or lispy speech, and are kind of dainty. And I mention this because - perhaps - they are afflicted with a condition akin to Downs Syndrome, in that their looks and mannerisms are recognizable and distinct, but are a shade closer to normal than a more handicapped person. And as such, they identify with females, as they are intensively cared for by the mother. And so they emulate female attributes. And males will avoid them, and they never bond with male types. And so they are branded with a gay stigma, but more accurately, they have mild birth defects. But they are normal enough to not be treated like a handicapped person, and so assume sexual attitudes attributed to them.
Birth defects? And the gay connection? Sounds really like bs to me. Comparing being gay with down syndrome? Is the same thing as seeing a flock of cows fly. Anything but realistic.
 
I noticed some people that are gay (or look gay) have characteristics that are recognizable... Like a wide mouth, or lispy speech, and are kind of dainty. And I mention this because - perhaps - they are afflicted with a condition akin to Downs Syndrome, in that their looks and mannerisms are recognizable and distinct, but are a shade closer to normal than a more handicapped person. And as such, they identify with females, as they are intensively cared for by the mother. And so they emulate female attributes. And males will avoid them, and they never bond with male types. And so they are branded with a gay stigma, but more accurately, they have mild birth defects. But they are normal enough to not be treated like a handicapped person, and so assume sexual attitudes attributed to them.

The problem here is that there are plenty of heterosexual people who have "a wide mouth, or lispy speech, and are kind of dainty". My impression is that homosexuality is mostly a result of imprinting at an early age. While I understand that homosexuals prefer to believe that it is "genetic", mainly because that avoids any suggestion that it can be 'cured', I think the idea that such early imprinting can be 'cured' is as outlandish as suggesting that the ANY early imprinting can or should be 'cured'.
 
Back
Top Bottom