Vincent Bridges, Jay Weidner and Gang - Web Pathology

[Zadius Sky]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

I have noticed the comments on Laura's review on Amazon which are stated as the following:
http://www.amazon.com/review/R2PBY8BKLPAR94/ref=cm_cr_dp_cmt/103-6541574-7429435?%5Fencoding=UTF8&ASIN=0914732145

Jay C. Weidner says:
Laura Knight-Jadczyk takes most of her information for this review
from the book I co-authored Mysteries of the Great Cross of Hendaye:
Alchemy and the End of Time and then ends the review with an
advertisment for a book on Fulcanelli by Patrick Riverie that she
has self-published through her own company Red Pill Press. I
wouldn't mind so much that she takes most of her information from my
book without credit but she then has the temerity to attack me and
call me names on her website. I think her review should be removed
because it is just a way for her to get free advertising on Amazon.

And, Shar posted a response:

Shar says:
I read Laura Knight-Jadczyk' s review several times and I don't see any "advertisment" in there. Patrick Riviere is a student of Eug'ne Canseliet, who is a student of Fulcanlli, and a mention of Riviere's book is an equal important for this discussion of Fulcanelli.

In addition, Laura has published her full e-mail correspondence with your co-author, Vincent Bridges, on this site:
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters1.htm
The email exhanges occurred during the time that Mr. Bridges wrote "Mysteries of the Great Cross of Hendaye." A question comes to mind: "who plagiarized whom?"

Then, Jay responded:

Jay C. Weidner says:

Hi Shar

I have read the letters between Laura Knight-Jadczyk and my co-author and the first thing that jumps out at me is that she clearly says that she has never read Mystery of the Cathedrals by Fulcanelli. Since our first book was already written by the time of her letter how can I come to any conclusion but that she knew nothing of the main subject of our book which was Fulcanelli. It was an easy book to get and she could have read it any point in her life but she had not read it at the time of the correspondence with Mr. Bridges. That above any other factoid shows that Ms. Jadczyk is waxing hyperbolic.

 

[Zadius Sky]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

Updated:

One reader posted a reply to Jay's posting last night:

C. MacCallum says:
"[...]she has never read Mystery of the Cathedrals by Fulcanelli."

This a somewhat disingenuous comment Mr. Weidner. The date of the review is April 2006, which is more than plenty of time for Ms. Jadczyk to read the book in question (Le Mystere) and come to her own conclusions. As can be seen from the exchange mentioned by Shar , Ms. Jadczyk had already done considerable personal research on similar subjects. One can even detect a certain amount of "pumping for information" on Mr. Bridges part as the correspondence continued. While the exchange may have been somewhat helpful to her at the time, there is no reason to believe she would not have eventually come to her own conclusions, which of course she did. These are detailed in The Secret History of the World (available on Amazon) and vary immensely from your book. Further, the correspondence dates from 1999, and includes the comment at the end (apparently you did not read that far?) that:"Fulcanelli is hard to find, but Brotherhood of Light has now published both Mystery and Dwellings of the Philosophers in English." (quote VB) I can attest to this as I had to order my copy through the internet from an obscure bookstore in Florida, and pay a rather exorbitant price for it.

As Shar has noted, the mention of Patrick Riverie's writings, whom one could properly say is a living link to Fulcanelli, is perfectly in keeping with providing further resources for those studying this fascinating man.

And, today. Jay then responded to C. :

Jay C. Weidner says:
Hi C

You have made a huge mistake in your comments. Anyone who has eyes can see that I was refering to the 1999 correspondence where Laura Knight-Jadczyk says that she had not read a copy of Mystery of the Cathedrals. It was a comment about Shar's comment. You need to read more carefully next time before you post a comment. In her comment Shar says that our research is stolen from Laura. This is libelous and plainly untrue and can be proven by the correspondence that Shar uses as evidence. Our book was already written at the time that Laura Knight-Jadczyk says that she had not read Mystery of the Cathedrals (1999). So how could we have stolen her ideas when she had not even read the source material at the time? What good would it do for Mr. Bridges to be 'pumping' Ms. Jadczyk for information when the book was already finished? Ms. Jadczyk had never written about Fulcanelli or alchemy until after she had read our books. Like any good researcher she saw a good story and ran after it. Now she is back dating her own research to make it appear that we stole everything from her. As soon as she read our book she began attacking us and calling us names. She then moved to France and declared herself to be an expert on Fulcanelli. Now that is disingenuous. As for her other books, I have never read them and do not intend to. And I have never said that she stole any of our research for her books, only for the review of Mystery of the Cathedrals. The entire Hendaye section from her review is taken from our research. Laura Knight-Jadczyk has already written to me saying how unhappy she is with my comments here. Instead of sending in surrogates in to do battle with me why doesn't Laura Knight-Jadczyk show up here to have a debate on the matter?

 

[Laura]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

I have posted a response to Jay Weidner on amazon:

Laura Knight-Jadczyk says:

Mr. Weidner,

You write:
<<<You have made a huge mistake in your comments. Anyone who has eyes can see that I was refering to the 1999 correspondence where Laura Knight-Jadczyk says that she had not read a copy of Mystery of the Cathedrals.>>>

Indeed, I had not read "Mystery of the Cathedrals" in 1999. However, I HAD read about Fulcanelli including Kenneth Rayner Johnson's "The Fulcanelli Phenomenon" (1980) Additionally, I had been researching alchemy for many years and the Cassiopaean sessions are full of questions about alchemy that were asked long before I encountered your "co-author," Vincent Bridges. In fact, if you will read the first email he wrote to me it was in reference to my comments on Elizabeth Van Buren's, "Refuge of the Apocalypse: Doorway into other Dimensions".

<<<Jay Weidner writes: "In her comment Shar says that our research is stolen from Laura. This is libelous and plainly untrue and can be proven by the correspondence that Shar uses as evidence.">>>

Sorry, Mr. Weidner, but there is much material in your book that is plainly based on the material I had given to Mr. Bridges in answer to his questions. This material has nothing to do with Fulcanelli but rather with cyclic catastrophes. I can also document my researches in this area going back as far as 1985.

<<<Jay Weidner writes Our book was already written at the time that Laura Knight-Jadczyk says that she had not read Mystery of the Cathedrals (1999).>>>

Indeed, I had not read Mystery of the Cathedrals, but that is irrelevant. As mentioned above, I already knew a great deal about Fulcanelli. You need to re-read the correspondence between myself and Mr. Bridges more carefully. This began in May of 1999. You will see clearly that he repeatedly talks about the fact that he is writing the book during that period and that I should please keep sending him anything that comes to mind. Mr. Bridges sent me a copy of the first, self-printed edition in September of 1999, (it arrived on the 17th, and this is also documented in the emails), and it shortly afterward that I realized that the material I had gladly given, the questions I had answered regarding cyclic catastrophe, which again, I reiterate, I can document as having been my particular area of research since 1985, had been twisted and used in a way that was completely contradictory to the context in which they were given.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: So how could we have stolen her ideas when she had not even read the source material at the time? >>>

See above. The material at issue is that which concerns cyclic catastrophes. As for Fulcanelli himself, I would say that, even not having read Mystery of the Cathedrals, I probably knew as much about him at that point as either of you did.

Regarding your interpretations of Mystery of the Cathedrals, that is a non-issue as far as I am concerned. What you consider to be "your research" is your interpretation of the message of the "Cross at Hendaye" and your identification of Fulcanelli. I rejected both of these conclusions from the beginning. I knew that the Cross at Hendaye did not "point" to Cuzco, Peru, as you write in your book, nor was Fulcanelli who you described. At the time, since I was not familiar with Mystery of the Cathedrals text, I could not offer an opinion about what you claimed to be the third book of Fulcanelli, "The Architecture of Nature". In the 8 years since then, after much more research, and having many discussions with Patrick Riviere, a student of Eugene Canseliet, I presented this new material in my book with full attribution to M. Riviere.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: "What good would it do for Mr. Bridges to be 'pumping' Ms. Jadczyk for information when the book was already finished?">>>

See above, it wasn't, and this fact is documented in the emails between Vincent Bridges and myself.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: Ms. Jadczyk had never written about Fulcanelli or alchemy until after she had read our books. >>>

Unfortunately, that is not correct. As I mentioned above, I had been researching alchemy for many years and the first email to me from Vincent Bridges was in response to a series of comments I had made in an online discussion group about the work of Elizabeth van Buren. I can also point out to the documented work in my unpublished book, "The Noah Syndrome," which refers to alchemy extensively, and which was written in 1985.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: Like any good researcher she saw a good story and ran after it. Now she is back dating her own research to make it appear that we stole everything from her. >>>

I don't have to back-date anything. I have documented evidence of what I have written and done, going back many years.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: As soon as she read our book she began attacking us and calling us names. >>>

That is complete paranoid nonsense. When I read your book, all I felt was an overwhelming sense of disappointment that someone who proclaimed himself to be an expert, a real researcher, was, after all, nothing more than a puffer full of hot air. And, more than that, someone who took the ideas of others and twisted them out of recognition and context, making them so absurd as to be unrecognizable as honest research. Allow me to quote Patrick Riviere who decided, as a favor to me, to read your book and comment on it in his book on Fulcanelli.

Patrick Riviere writes: "A Monument to Subjectivity

The book Monument to the End of Time, subtitled Alchemy, Fulcanelli, and the Great Cross, by the American team of Jay Weidner and Vincent Bridges, presents a different problem. Weidner and Bridges, unlike Mme Dubois, have the insight to realize that Fulcanelli was a real person, and their enthusiasm indicates that they understand that his work is important. Unfortunately, they do not appear to quite understand what that work is. This could be due to the fact that they do not have access to the broader research that is only available in French.

As an example of whether they understand what the great Alchemist really meant, they go so far as to suggest that the work The Architecture of Nature, published in 1943 during the height of the Second World War, could be the third volume by Fulcanelli, Finis Gloriae mundi! In it, they smell "a whiff of the authentic voice, the Fulcanelli of Le Mystere". (p.25-26) Why do they specify Le Mystere? Because they have been 'disappointed' by the Master's second tome, Dwellings of the Philosophers, a book they say "is uneven, without the internal coherence and brilliant symbolic by-play found in Le Mystere... The voice that seemed to know so much in Le Mystere is here hesitant and unclear." (p. 25)

The problem with symbols is that they offer different interpretations to different viewers depending on what is within the viewer. We suggest a simple explanation for the disappointment sprung from the apparent discrepancy: that if they believe the symbolism of the two works is so different and utterly lacking in the second book, perhaps our two American friends have completely misunderstood the symbolism of the first volume, the one they praise so highly. Their decoding of the Cross at Hendaye illustrates this point, for one would be stretching symbolic interpretation to the point of pure subjectivity to claim any references in Fulcanelli to the Cube of Space! They end up rejecting one book, Dwellings, that is known to be by the Adept and associate him with a book with which he had nothing to do! True alchemists recognize in Dwellings of the Philosophers a book rich in its descriptions of the Great Work.

As to the identity of the Adept, their forensic expertise leads them to speculate that he may have been "an immortal or very long lived individual" (p. 242) perhaps living for two hundred years, because "an in depth textual analysis of Le Mystere des Cathedrals reveals evidence that Fulcanelli was born and educated in the 18th century"! (p. 237) We leave the reader to follow the implications of such an in-depth analysis and consider what this might suggest about the validity of the rest of their interpretation.

Before returning to our own investigation, we cannot let pass their characterization of the faithful student, Eugene Canseliet, as "a young occult upstart"! (p. 21)

Nevertheless, again we note their insight and enthusiasm for Fulcanelli which is encouraging. But, t0 use an American phrase to describe the end result: "With friends like this, who needs enemies?" (end quote from Patrick Riviere's book " Fulcanelli")

<<<Jay Weidner writes: She then moved to France and declared herself to be an expert on Fulcanelli. >>>

I have never declared myself to be an "expert on Fulcanelli." I have presented the work of Patrick Riviere who IS an expert on Fulcanelli, who is a friend of mine, and whose labor has been properly credited in everything I have written.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: As for her other books, I have never read them and do not intend to. >>>

Too bad; you might learn something, including the fact that the conclusions I have drawn about Fulcanelli and cyclic catastrophes are quite different from yours. I find it amazing that you can't understand this fact, that you do not own Fulcanelli and your ideas about him and his work are not the "last and final and definitive word" on the subject. Other people do have different ideas and are entitled to them.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: And I have never said that she stole any of our research for her books, >>>

Yes you did, more than once.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: only for the review of Mystery of the Cathedrals. The entire Hendaye section from her review is taken from our research. >>>

No, it isn't. Notice that very little is said about the Hendaye chapter in the review. The review was actually written in collaboration with Patrick Riviere. Regarding my work on the Hendaye section in "The Secret History of the World," it is composed of quotes from the Hendaye chapter with my own interpretations. That's what research writers do: they read, quote, interpret. In case you haven't noticed, my interpretations are completely different from yours. What's more, you don't own "Mystery of the Cathedrals" and you don't own the available facts about Fulcanelli. Other people CAN quote the same material and write different opinions about it, you know.

<<<Jay Weidner writes: "Laura Knight-Jadczyk has already written to me saying how unhappy she is with my comments here. Instead of sending in surrogates in to do battle with me why doesn't Laura Knight-Jadczyk show up here to have a debate on the matter?">>>

I do not intend to debate the matter. There is nothing to debate. You wrote a book about Fulcanelli and cyclic catastrophes. I do not agree with what you wrote. I wrote a book about cyclic catastrophes and alchemy among many other subjects. Your book is somewhere around 300 pages. (The first edition was somewhat shorter, so you must have added material after 1999.) My book is almost 900 pages. The section in my book that is devoted to the subject of alchemy in particular is 18 pages long and discusses Johann Friedrich Schweitzer, Jan Baptiste van Helmont, Isaac Newton, Nicolas Flamel, Count Saint Germain, Helena Blavatsky, Richard Chanfray, Franz Tausend, Adolf Hitler, Count Ludendorff, and so on. I come back to Fulcanelli on several occasions throughout the book but again, as I noted above, my conclusions, the inferences I draw from the material are so far and away different from your own that there is no comparison. And again, I point out, you don't own "Mystery of the Cathedrals" and you don't own the available facts about Fulcanelli. As I wrote to you, I am ready to host a full text copy of your book on the internet as well as my own so that the reader can read both of them and draw their own conclusions. But, perhaps you ought to read my book yourself first so you will stop making yourself look like an idiot in public. As one person wrote about your silly and childish rants on the subject, "Jay and Vinnie at least seem to have two talents: relentless stupidity and putting their foot in their mouths."

Why don't you grow up, Mr. Weidner? Other people can write books about Fulcanelli too.

I say "enough" of this silliness. The man is clearly delusional. His main beef seems to be that I dared to comment on the Hendaye chapter of "The Mystery of the Cathedrals" and he thinks he owns that chapter and is the only one entitled to comment on it.

 

[Russ]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

This Jay Weidner person seems to be in this for the money, rather than trying to help anyone. All he seems to care about is his profit margin. He should be pleased that you have a book out, if he is genuine.

 

[Laura]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

This Jay Weidner person seems to be in this for the money, rather than trying to help anyone. All he seems to care about is his profit margin. He should be pleased that you have a book out, if he is genuine.

That's pretty much it: he's after making money. He's obviously not interested in really learning anything or sharing information which is sad because I share and did so from the beginning. But to people like that, I was just being stupid for being so gullible. I will make one caveat which is that I dealt with his "partner", Vincent Bridges, and not with Jay until quite a bit later. But Jay tells so many lies and played so many games that I quickly learned not to trust him as far as I can spit either.

 

[ScioAgapeOmnis]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

Well you know, the apple does not fall far from.. er.. well the other apples.

 

[Zadius Sky]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

I thought I would check out the comments on Amazon again.

Here's what Jay responded to Laura's reply:

Jay C. Weidner says:

Well at Ms. Jadczyk has finally decided to defend herself instead of sending her hordes of cult followers in to do it for her.

Let me get this straight Ms. Jadczyk, on one hand you say that we wrote a book on Fulcanelli and you claim that it is a silly book and that all of the information is wrong, but on the other hand you also say that we got all of the information from you?

I think that is called a contradiction.

But it is just the beginning of many contradictions that you make. You must have supernatural talent to be able to tell us important information about Mystery of the Cathedrals by Fulcanelli when you had not even read the volume. Well yes I guess you do have help from the supernatural because you have received most of your information by channeling aliens from the constellation of cassiopaea, which you have forgotten to mention.

I presented by work on Fulcanelli dozens of times on my own radio program as well as Laura Lee's national show, and many others throughout the late 1980's and early 1990's. I presented my findings to John Anthony West, Robert Bauval, Graham Hancock, Joscelyn Godwin, Robert Lawlor and many other scholars long before I had ever met Mr. Bridges or heard of your channeling aliens.

And you are right. You have the right to write any book on any subject that you desire, as I do. What you do not have the right to do is to play childish games which you choose to do constantly. You brush over this by calling it nonsense. Really? But go look for yourself. Over and over on your website you refer to myself as a psychopath. Are you a psychiatrist? Do you have a degree in psychology? What evidence do you present to make this diagnosis? You have no evidence. You self-published a book on psychopaths and that makes you an expert? You have nothing but your limited imagination to present as concrete evidence.

What you constantly do on your site is refer to anyone who disagrees with you as a "psychopath". Fred Irland, the first person that you channeled the cassiopaeans with, is a psychopath, your husband Lewis Martin is a psychopath, people who argue with you on your forums are labeled a psychopath and then are immediately banned so that they cannot defend themselves.

On your web site you make the astonishing claim that myself and Val Valerian wrote the infamous Paris 4 documents. What evidence do you present? Oh that's right - we both live in Washington State! Never mind the fact that I have never met Mr. Valerian, or that we live over one hundred miles apart. We both live in Washington and, damn it, that is enough evidence to make your absurd suggestion.

You also refer to myself as a "cointelpro" agent for the US government. Again what evidence do you have to support such an outrageous claim? If you have evidence how come you never present it? The point is that you have done everything you can to tear us down while also presenting your work as the only legitimate expression of Fulcanelli's work. This is all being done on purpose by you. It is a concerted effort to destroy is while promoting yourself and your cult.

You say that Mr. Bridges and myself were involved in a "Magical Mystery Scam". What evidence do you present? The only thing that you could come up with is that Mr. Bridges was taking a $50 processing fee for the promised tour, a standard business practice. I am not even involved in his business but you decided to lump us all together and then declare that we both are involved in some kind of criminal activity.

If this is the kind of research that you are doing then it is no wonder that you have resorted to name calling and character assassination.

And if we respond by defending ourselves and counter-attacking you then use that as your excuse to go on attacking.

I have had many disagreements with Mr. Bridges but I have also apologized and gone on with my life. I suggest that you do the same. You began the attacks, you put up on the web private emails and did everything you could do promote a war between Mr. Bridges and myself. A conspiracy theorist might think that it is you who are the "cointelpro" agent as this is the standard operating principle of that famed FBI program .i.e. to cause as much chaos as possible and destroy one's enemies thereby.

If you are truly interested in acting like an adult I suggest that you follow my example. I suggest that you take down every attack on Mr. Bridges or myself on your web site. Even though I have had no contact with Mr. Bridges for four years I am sure that he will respond in kind. Everything can go down including the phony house raffle that you engineered, your husband's past working for DARPA and all of the other shady doings that you have attempted to cover up.

As for me, you will find nothing concerning you on any of the websites that I control.

Well folks let us see if Ms. Jadzcyk is interested in peace or in continuing her attacks. If the past is any example for the future, she will escalate the attacks. Why? Because she is driven to destroy us by forces that most of us cannot even begin to fathom. Jealousy, anger and retribution are her only qualities.

The one thing is unmistakably clear: he will never stop playing his game.

 

[Redrock12]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

In a psychopath's mind, isn't their version of events the only true version? So if Jay says that Laura plagiarized his book, that Ark was working for DARPA, there was a phony house raffle etc. etc., then in his twisted mind, these events actually happened that way, simply because he said they did. And if later on he wants to add to or modify these events, then does not the modified version becomes the new reality? Truly bizarre!

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

Due to circumstances wholly outside of my control, and having their source in the mind of one Jay Weidner in all its monochromatic emanations, I feel I must stray from my usual manner of posting (and hte manner in which most replies are posted in this forum), and do the following: title my post. Yes, here it is:

Jay Weidner: A Monument to Not Only Subjectivity, but Pure Mind-Numbing Stupidity and Myopic Egocentrism

Having said that, please permit me a few responses to Jay's illogical-to-a-pathological-degree reasoning. I almost feel sorry for him, realizing that he probably has absolutely no conception of how completely brain-dead he must appear to any perceptive reader. So to begin, here is Jay's first response to Laura's review of Fulcanelli's first work:

Laura Knight-Jadczyk takes most of her information for this review
from the book I co-authored Mysteries of the Great Cross of Hendaye...

This much will suffice. Oh Jay, if you only had the commonly-held ability for forethought (held by the vast majority of even those without the gift of a "high" intelligence), you might have never posted this in the first place! For, take a look at Laura's review. Here it is, minus the quoted material from P. Riviere. In fact, I will exclude all material relating to Riviere, as Weidner (besides disagreeing with Riviere's research and conclusions) has obviously not read his book (it was only published in English years after Weidner's book):

The book (whose full title was Le Mystere des Cathedrales et l'interpretation esoterique des symboles hermetiques du Grand Oeuvre), is lavishly interspersed with thirty-six illustrations - two of which are in colour, and one that is the original title-page by the artist Jean-Julien Champagne - and is curiously dedicated to the "Freres d'Heliopolis".

<snip>

Interestingly, the last chapter, which was dedicated to the cyclic cross of Hendaye, was not included in the first edition of The Mystery of the Cathedrals.

<snip>

I will also humbly suggest my own book which has extensive sections on Fulcanelli and alchemy: The Secret History of the World and How to Get Out Alive.

I am sure the reader will be as wide-eyed as me when they realize the abject horrors of Ms. Knight-Jadczyk's plagiarism! For surely, from the indications of said Jay, Weidner must have included any of the following in his book on the cross of Hendaye! The following gems of wisdom are surely intellectual property, to be guarded with all the powers that accompany Freedom.

1) The book's full title was Le Mystere des Cathedrales et l'interpretation esoterique des symboles hermetiques du Grand Oeuvre

Oh, horror! Such secrets must only be held by the most learned of scholars!

2) It is lavishly interspersed with thirty-six illustrations - two of which are in colour, and one that is the original title-page by the artist Jean-Julien Champagne - and is curiously dedicated to the "Freres d'Heliopolis".

Oh, horror of horrors!! Each offense multiplies the previous to an exponential degree of effrontery!

3) The last chapter, which was dedicated to the cyclic cross of Hendaye, was not included in the first edition of The Mystery of the Cathedrals.

My God, will the crimes against humanity never cease?! Surely a lawsuit must be brewing, and rightly so!

Now, in the spirit of fairness and good conscience, there is an indication that Ms. Knight-Jadczyk had originally written a 20 page review, which was edited down to what is now published online, but I see no indication that Mr. Weidner is responding to said draft, as his response is from a mere 3 weeks ago. I, personally, would enjoy reading such a review, if only to eradicate from my field of consciousness the odious presence of Jay Weidner's mind refuse.

 

[anart]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

Hmmm, methinks that, perhaps, amazon is aching for this addition to the review list....

;)

 

[Laura]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

My response:

Laura Knight-Jadczyk says:
<<<Jay Weidner wrote: Let me get this straight Ms. Jadczyk, on one hand you say that we wrote a book on Fulcanelli and you claim that it is a silly book and that all of the information is wrong, but on the other hand you also say that we got all of the information from you?

I think that is called a contradiction. >>>

You don't read very well, do you Mr. Weidner? For example, where I wrote in my response above::

"The material at issue is that which concerns cyclic catastrophes. ...the material I had gladly given, the questions I had answered regarding cyclic catastrophe, which again, I reiterate, I can document as having been my particular area of research since 1985, had been twisted and used in a way that was completely contradictory to the context in which they were given. ...someone who took the ideas of others and twisted them out of recognition and context, making them so absurd as to be unrecognizable as honest research"

<<<Jay Weidner wrote: But it is just the beginning of many contradictions that you make. You must have supernatural talent to be able to tell us important information about Mystery of the Cathedrals by Fulcanelli when you had not even read the volume. >>>

Again, you don't seem to read very well. As I noted, in 1999 I had not read the book since it was difficult to obtain. However, I have read it numerous times in the 8 years since then and the above review was written fully 7 years after the first reading. But that's irrelevant because no one ever said I was telling you important information about Mystery of the Cathedrals. You are just making stuff up. Reality does not exist by Jay Weidner's fiat, you know. You have to cite text exactly and source it. But then, you never did that in your book, so why start now?

<<<Jay Weidner wrote: I presented by work on Fulcanelli dozens of times on my own radio program as well as Laura Lee's national show, and many others throughout the late 1980's and early 1990's. >>>

Cite your evidence, please; source, dates, time. Here is some evidence: In an email to me on Sun, 9 Dec 2001, you (Jay Weidner) wrote:

"I researched the book A Monument to the End of Time for ten years before Vincent Bridges came on board to help me write the finished product. Other than that we wrote one article "Innocent Murdered" and that is it. I have also written vast amounts of catalog copy, articles, film scripts, books and instructional videos without Vincent. To equate someone, who once helped me write, as my 'partner' is a misnomer. Vincent is someone who helped me, on occasion, because of my very busy schedule." (http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley3.htm)

In other words, if you were researching for ten years before Vincent Bridges came along, that means you began in about 1988 or 1989. Are you saying that you were an expert on the subject in a matter of months and that you had time to do "dozens" of radio shows on the subject in the last year of the 80s? As an "expert"? That's an amazing claim and requires documentation. Please provide it.

<<<Jay Weidner wrote: I presented my findings to John Anthony West, Robert Bauval, Graham Hancock, Joscelyn Godwin, Robert Lawlor and many other scholars long before I had ever met Mr. Bridges or heard of your channeling aliens. >>?

Perhaps you can persuade the above "scholars" to join you in attacking me as you did, without provocation, on Wed, 8 Aug 2001, defaming me? (http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley3.htm)

<<<Jay Weidner wrote:. Over and over on your website you refer to myself as a psychopath. >>>

Cite the page url, please. We already know we cannot rely on either your memory or your claimed "facts".

<<<Jay Weidner wrote: You self-published a book on psychopaths and that makes you an expert?>>>

Wrong again. I did not "self publish" a book on psychopaths. The Canadian Publishing Company, Red Pill Press published a scholarly work on psychopathy written by Polish clinical psychologist, Andzrej Lobaczewski and I was invited to assist in editing this book and write a forward due to my extensive work on psychopathy which is widely known on the internet and acknowledged by other psychologists. Additionally, our research group includes scholars, physicians, grad students in neuro-psychology, and other related fields of research. When I present findings, it is material based on collaborative research.

<<<Jay Weidner wrote: What you constantly do on your site is refer to anyone who disagrees with you as a "psychopath". >>>

Cite specific text and related page urls, please. We already know we cannot rely on either your memory or your claimed "facts".

<<<Jay Weidner wrote: On your web site you make the astonishing claim that myself and Val Valerian wrote the infamous Paris 4 documents. >>>

Cite specific test and the page url, please. We already know we cannot rely on either your memory or your claimed "facts".

<<<Jay Weidner wrote: You also refer to myself as a "cointelpro" agent for the US government.>>>

Cite specific text and the page url, please. We already know we cannot rely on either your memory or your claimed "facts".

<<<Jay Weidner wrote: You say that Mr. Bridges and myself were involved in a "Magical Mystery Scam". >>>

We already know we cannot rely on either your memory or your claimed "facts". See: http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/maynerd-most-scam.htm

For more details on the life and doings of the Weidner - Bridges duo, start here:

http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/most.htm:

For the entire Bridges correspondence:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/julyletters5.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters2.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters3.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters4.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters5.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters6.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters7.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters8.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/mostletters9.htm

For the Jay Weidner correspondence ("Alvin Wiley" is a pseudonym for Jay Weidner)

http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley2.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley3.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley3a.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley3b.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley3b2.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley3c.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley4.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley5.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley5a.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley6.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley6a.htm
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/wiley6b.htm

As I said, I do not intend to debate nor do I intend to be intimidated into removing factual data from the internet that would serve to warn others about cyber-predators such as Jay Weidner and Vincent Bridges. That is obviously the goal of Mr. Weidner's rants here. He also seems to be seriously offended that anyone would write a review of a book he considers to be his private domain, or that the person writing said review would dare to suggest a related book by an acknowledged expert on the subject. But then, maybe that was just a ruse to use the amazon website as a venue for defaming me, personally, which seems to be the sum and substance of Mr. Weidner's efforts.

 

[Youngfox]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

Mr. W. seems quite willing to engage in these insect politics from now till the end of all illusion.
His “debating” skills seem to be contradictory at best as he accuses you of defamation then goes on to refer to your study group as a “cult”.

Your responses have been to the point and backed by reams of documentation.
His responses have been name calling and other various flavours of leaking brain pudding.

I seem to sniff the foul odour of envy emanating from the man as his “work” is buried by the shifting sands of time while many eagerly anticipate your next work.

He has not said anything about you or QFG that has not been said repeatedly in previous attack pieces, so I am left to conclude that his latest stab at “calling you out onto the floor” has been a minor success in that he has managed to waste some of your time and momentarily keep you from working on or concentrating on your website, next highly anticipated tome or the nasty renovation job that your house seems to be.

Mr. W. seems to be a rancid fart on the winds of history and although you know it will blow by eventually it is very hard to ignore when you catch a whiff of it.

This little spat has probably been the most publicity Mr. W. has received in an awful long time.
Your content heavy responses have acquitted you well in the eyes of anybody bothering to follow this fellow’s latest smear attempts.
If he has nothing new or substantive to offer to his little recycled “attack”, I think that you should not bother giving this angry, parasitic little troll another second of your valued attention.

 

[Laura]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

I agree. And all he succeeded in accomplishing was getting the links to all his hijinx published. He should be satisfied!

I am.

 

[Ruth]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

Jay C. Weidner says:

Well at Ms. Jadczyk has finally decided to defend herself instead of sending her hordes of cult followers in to do it for her.

Oh my God! How funny! This guy is hilarious.

And bless his cotton socks.... I think he actually wants to have hordes of 'cult followers' pursuing him and a grand angry debate in the middle of the Amazon. What a hoot.

It would be a mistake to leap into this obvoius trap, imo. But it rates quite high on the amusement rickter scale.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Jay Weidner - Plagiarist

Anders and Jay have been so kind as to provide us all with a stunning of example of that characteristic tenacity of those individuals so well described by Lobaczewski. Here are their latest paranoid ramblings and transparent hooks and manipulations. Pitiful? Hilarious? You decide.

I have saved and reproduced all comments below for future use.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 25, 2007 8:32 AM PDT
Jay C. Weidner says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
As usual Laura has it backwards again. First off the correspondence between her and Mr. Bridges took place after the book was written so it boggles the mind that she thinks the material was taken from her.

When that is pointed out she changes her story and says that the information on cyclic catastrophes was taken from her. Wrong once more Laura. That information was taken from Dr. Paul LaViolette and his two books which were written and published long before anyone had ever heard of you and your not-so-friendly aliens.

I wrote and directed a feature documentary film on Laviolette's book Earth Under Fire in 1998, a full year before you began writing to Vincent and asking him all of your questions.

How could I have made a film on cyclic catastrophes two years before you told us all of your valuable information? Maybe I heard from you in the future?

By the way I never claimed to be an expert on cyclic catostrophes, I believe that you are making this claim. I am making the claim that Dr. Laviollete is an expert and we cite him in our books.

After you eagerly read our book and posted your good review of it on your site (now taken down) you then turned on us and began your campaign of attack and character assassination which continues to this moment. After you had decided to destroy us you wrote a nasty little piece claiming that the good doctor Laviolette had possibly been involved in a murder. I have the letters from you where I am begging you to take down such a horrible insinuation. Finally (thank goodness) you did take it down. I mean that was too absurd even for you.

(by the way all of her attacks on Laviolette are expunged from the Wiley letters. For good reason. Unfortunately for Laura I have all of the letters and will post them, if I have to, with her very important deletions added back in.

Included in these expunged remarks are Laura telling me that I am the "world's expert on Fulcanelli" etc. All a load of hooey of course but you get the picture of who we are dealing with here).

As for my appearances on many shows in the 1980's and 1990's I suggest you write to Laura lee at _www.lauralee.com and ask her if this is true. She has archives of all of her shows and you can even listen to me speaking about cyclic catastrophes years before you began channeling aliens.

Please note that Laura Knight-Jadczyk does not wish to tone down the disagreement. She cannot afford to. She has gone to far to back out now.

She knows that I have substantial evidence that she defrauded thousands of people when she presented a phony house raffle on her web site in 2002 and 2003. She sold thousands of raffle tickets at $50 a pop and then had her friend "win" the house. Funny thing is though, her friend then gave the house back to Laura and her husband Ark Jadczyk and then they sold it on the open market.

There was no winner. It was all a fraud.

This can be found at _http://www.survivingthefall.net/laura_knight_jadczyk_%20grand_master_channel.html

I quote from Ms. Johnston and that site:
"Former members that wish to remain anonymous, also claim they were scammed out of large sums of money when the Jadczyk's suddenly uprooted the Perseus Foundation from New Port Richey, Florida and moved it to France leaving many a bewildered cult member feeling emotionally raped by their experience and financially taken advantage of.
"The Jadczyk's raised well over $100,000.00 to $150,000.00 from a bogus raffle to sell their home (AKA the Perseus Foundation) via PayPal then split with the money, leaving an unverified winner unknown to members but close to Laura. According to 2003 documents the home is still up for sale and a former devoted member lives there as caretaker showing the property. Laura is in legal trouble with fraud and embezzlement if she returns to the USA. Many members would sue her if they could get her back here."

Laura and her husband Ark Jadczyk escaped to France with thousands of dollars gained through fraud. That is the real reason that she stays away from the USA. If she shows up here she will be arrested.

By the way if the above is not true Laura can sue me. I am here waiting to see you in court. Laura won't sue me because everything I am saying is true.

The house raffle fraud is a great example of how Laura's mind works. She sees nothing wrong with this type of behavior. Perhaps that is why she is obsessed with psychopaths?

Here is Laura again:

_http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/maynerd-most-scam.htm

"LKJ: Well, Rense is a cipher to me, too. I only recently learned that he is a close pal of Jay Weidner and that he and Jay and Vincent Bridges used to be members of Ray Flowers group. The C's pretty clearly indicated Flowers as a COINTELPRO handler."

More evidence of Laura's poor research habits. I was never a member of Ray Flowers group nor have I ever met him. And what evidence does she present that Ray Flowers is "cointelpro"? As usual, with Laura Knight-Jadczyk, not one thing, only her opinion which is based on faulty assumptions.

Speaking of faulty assumptions and bad research here are the places where she attacks me.

Here is her attack article claiming that i am involved in a "Magical Mystery Tour Scam" Read this one for yourself and tell me where the "scam" is, where the fraud is?

_http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/vincent-bridges-scam.htm

Here she is calling me a plagiarist and psychopath
(under title "psychopaths at work, home and in the garden"
_http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=7398

Saying that i wrote the paris 4 letters with Valerian
_http://www.world-mysteries.com/PhilipGardiner/forbidden_letters_20.htm

It is possible that Laura doesn't know that she is lying? She makes the claim in the above comment that my memory is faulty and therefore what I am saying is wrong. Yet all I did was google the words and there they were. Why doesn't she remember that she said these things? And if her memory is so faulty then how can we trust her when she says that I stole all of my research from her?

If she cannot remember what she said in the past, if she would commit a crime involving the phony house raffle, steal hundreds of thousands of dollars and get away to France, then what else is she capable of doing?

So I make the charge that Laura is saying that I am a cointelpro agent without offering any evidence.

I make the charge that Laura is claiming that I am a psychopath even though she has less than a year at a community college, no degree in psychiatry or psychology.

I make the charge that she held a house raffle that was a fraud and stole thousands of dollars from many innocent people.

Here is the real rub. Laura has hundreds of "cult" followers. Many of them have written on these pages. People who follow cult leaders are known for their mental instability. When she is declaring that I am a "cointelpro psychopath" how can she be so sure that one of those followers will not take action and do something to stop me? How can she be so sure of the mental stability of her cult followers? How does she know that one of them won't come and try to hurt me or my family? She is already suspected of a very serious felony, so why wouldn't she take this all the way?

It is grossly irresponsible of Laura to pass around false information to people she may not even know. What she needs to do is to take down everything from her site. My two web sites have nothing concerning her up at all. Before something regrettable occurs I think she should take action now and do the right thing. Take down your attacks on me and Mr. Bridges and I will do everything possible to make sure that the same thing happens for her.

What gain is there in this?

Followed by two deleted comments:

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 25, 2007 8:33 AM PDT
Jay C. Weidner says:
[Deleted by the author on Oct 25, 2007 8:35 AM PDT]
In reply to an earlier post on Oct 25, 2007 8:33 AM PDT
Jay C. Weidner says:
[Deleted by the author on Oct 25, 2007 8:36 AM PDT]

Enter Anders, stage left:

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:21 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Lemme see here Ken, how can 'Ken' have read Jay Weidner's comments? Because it seems to me that Laura has had her gang come along here to Amazon and give attaboys to each others' posts, whilst all voting for Jay's posts as being 'unhelpful' to the discussion at hand!

So 'Ken' turns up late to the party, as the dutiful patsy he is, and comments on Jay's responses, that were removed before 'Ken' Even turned up!!!

LMAO!

'Ken' must be psychic - and yes 'Ken@ - please don't bleat that you read Jay's comments embedded withing Laura's dribbling, because those are selected comments taken out of context.

Get it 'Ken'???

What a laugh!!! You Cassiopaea minions plumb new depths of hypocrisy on these pages.

And BTW 'Ken' (and the same goes for all you L'Ark sycophants), I do like your 5 star reviews of 3 of Laura's other tomes!!!

Oh no, Laura's fans have backed her up! The horror! Maybe Anders just doesn't get normal human feelings and social bonds?

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:25 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Shar - another Laura/Cassiopaeia sycophant with 2 reviews - one on Dolan (who would have guessed? One of Laura's must reads!!!) and one on Laura's High Strangeness.

Another minion.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:27 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Another Laura minion sent ovr by Laura to attack Jay and have him censored and his posts reviewed.

Like Switzer and others only has one Amazon review to his name!!!

LMAO!!!

And who did he review???

Read on...

A Must-Read for Any Seeker, February 5, 2006
I have just finished reading The Secret History of the World and How to Get Out Alive by Laura Knight-Jadczyk. The is THE book for anyone who has been searching for the answer to the "splinter in their mind", about what is wrong with this world

Her inquiry, guided, but not dictated by the information gained in the Cassiopean Experiment, ranges across time, space, history (mundane and occult), the Grail Matter, alchemy, DNA, brain chemistry and much more. Ms. Jadczyk's clear plain language removes the veil of occult blinds set in place for centuries. These are the true Keys To Ascension. If that is your goal, this is your book.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:28 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
And yet another pathetic sycophant with only one Amazon review to his name crawls out from under a rock.

11 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
This was a Reality-Changing experience!, February 5, 2006
It was not only the mind boggling information in this book but the way in which it was all presented that did it for me. Lots of books and authors pretend to be illuminating, but this one is for real! This will give any reader a totally different view of the world they live in and it will never, ever seem the same again. As I see it, this is a good thing. It appears we all need to know what is so very well said in Secret History! Now I know why the 'real history' has been covered up for so long...
Comment | Permalink

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:30 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Duley - same as Switzer and the gangbangers here - only one review to his name at Amazon.

You guys really MUST cover your tracks a little better!!!

LOL!

8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
Ever Wondered Why?, March 14, 2006
Yes you understand that Iraq is a mess. You know that Bush and Blair are liars. You understand the pain and suffering in Pallestine. You feel the whole world is going to hell in handbasket. You get sad, depressed, angry as you see the type of world being left for your children.

It is time you asked why.
Why is the world like it is?
Read this book and you may find out.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:31 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Axel - yet another pathetic coward like his fellow kultists from France.

Only 1 revie at Amazon!!!

This is getting rather old isn't it!!!


signs-of-the-times.org/
Availability: Sign up to be notified when this item becomes available.


Visit "Signs Of The Times" and you will understand the 5 stars rating, February 8, 2007
Signs of the Times is what we usually call an Alternative Website.

Actually it is much more than that.

Most alternative Websites propose alternative news that are just different from mainstream media news.

Though the editorial fundamentals of the "Signs of the Times" are not about looking for sensational stories, controversial topics or conspiracy hysteria.

The aim of The Signs of the Times site is to reach OBJECTIVITY. Controversial or not, sensational or not, conspirational or not.

In a modern world where mediatic powers are closely intervowen with financial and political powers, it is blessing to still have access to an objective source of information.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:33 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Frer-Jaques has 3 reviews to his name!

This little minion is KEEN!!!

Availability: Sign up to be notified when this item becomes available.


The newspaper for the truth's seeker, February 6, 2007
I have been reading that site for many months now and it is one of the best site to have and find the truth. They want to inform us about what is going on in the world but just with facts and truth.
Comment | Permalink

Reviewer's Tags: alternative news


The Wave Vol 1 - The Red Book (The Wave, Volume 1)
Availability: Currently unavailable


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
Welcome to the Wave, January 31, 2007
As soon as i began to read that book, it was very difficult to stop reading it. Very interesting and there is a lot to discover. It helped me to understand what is going on and what is coming. Another book that every one should read. So good, that i decided to buy the other volume.
Comment | Permalink


The Secret History of the World and How to Get Out Alive
by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Edition: Paperback
Availability: Currently unavailable
3 used & new from $39.95

17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
A wake up book., January 31, 2007
Ms. Knight-Jadczyk has done a wonderful job with that book. She was able to see the reality which has been kept secret for so many years. It is a book that everyone should read. You will not see the world the same manner after reading her book.
Comment | Permalink

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:35 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Susan - yet another disingenuous gangbanger from Castleopaeia!!!

My my my - it is wonderful to see how you gang rapists circle like hyenas to have Jay's comments removed!!!

ing to understand why our world is controlled by sociopaths and how evil flourishes in every society. This is the first book I've ever seen that studies evil in a scientific manner. For anyone who cares about the future of the planet and wants to stop the endless wars and suffering manufactured by the power elite, I highly recommend this book.
Comment | Permalink


The Secret History of the World and How to Get Out Alive
by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Edition: Paperback
Availability: Currently unavailable
3 used & new from $39.95

15 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
An amazing eye opener! , March 20, 2007
This book contains an amazing amount of information - extremely well researched, and really gives the reader an accurate picture of our true history. I found it fascinating and learned so much from it. I highly recommend this book, its one of those rare books that really does open your eyes to the truth.
Comment | Permalink

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:39 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Talking about getting a life, here we have YET ANOTHER Laura/Ark Kultist obeying her masters.

Way to go Lynne!!!

9/11 The Ultimate Truth
by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Edition: Paperback
Availability: Currently unavailable


8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
Totally Awesome, May 2, 2007
If you want to know the TRUTH about 9/11, here it is.

The amount of research that went into this book is phenomenal. There is no other book out on the market that can compare. It goes step by step over evidence from many, many sources to show you just what really happened. Then the authors take you back in time to review the true history of what really happened here during an epoch that has been literally reinvented by certain parties to make history stack up to what they are trying to sell. And the amazing thing is that the two are related to each other. Reinvent history - you are able to do anything, even pull of 9/11 and get away with it.

In reply to your post on Oct 26, 2007 5:41 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts) (Show all unhelpful posts)]
This minion is VERY interested in Psychopaths!

'Nuff said!

Ouch! That one hurt, Andy. ;)

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 5:42 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts)]
And finally dear dear Peg!!!

Congratulations Peg - Laura and Ark will be SOOOOO appreciative!!!

book lays it all out.

Comment | Permalink


Political Ponerology (A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes)
by Andrzej M. Lobaczewski
Edition: Paperback
Availability: Currently unavailable
2 used & new from $34.95

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
Must Read, September 22, 2007
Simply a must read for anyone seeking to understand what we are currently experiencing in the world. Years ahead of its time, the information has been kept hidden for nearly 60 years. Now it's available for us. Don't miss this one.
Comment | Permalink


Amazing Grace
by Laura Knightjadczyk
Edition: Paperback
Availability: Currently unavailable
4 used & new from $129.99

An Amazing read, September 22, 2007
The author eloquently expresses her experiences in this account. It's easy to see the programs and patterns when someone puts it down for us to see. But can we see it so readily in our own lives? This one left me with many questions about my own experiences, and those around me. An eye opener.
Comment | Permalink


signs-of-the-times.org/
Availability: Sign up to be notified when this item becomes available.


The Best, February 7, 2007
It is simply the best site on the web. I can't think of any site that has as much information and news. In a world where the mainstream media seems to be bought, it is good to find a place that can deliver the news objectively.

Thank you Signs Team.
Comment | Permalink


The Secret History of the World and How to Get Out Alive
by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Edition: Paperback
Availability: Currently unavailable
3 used & new from $39.95

6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
For Everyone, March 12, 2006
This book is for everyone who's ever had questions about this world we share. Laura has done a fantastic job of putting it all together for us. A must read!
Comment | Permalink

This one was posted twelve times in response to all the responses to Jay.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 6:23 AM PDT
Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Check this out

__http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?messageid=115499&mpage=&showdate=

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 10:15 AM PDT

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 8:52 AM PDT
Shar says:
Somebody obviously can't count right, plus I review more than just books. I see YOU only have ONE review to your credit. Why do you care anyhow?

Anders says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post again. (Show all unhelpful posts)]
Sure you do Shar - here is one of your reviews - OOPS!!! It's about Laura and her Kult...

The High Strangeness of Dimensions, Densities and the Process of Alien Abduction
Availability: Currently unavailable


6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
Finally, some answers, January 30, 2007
Finally a book that gives me some insight to some of the weird things I've experienced ever since I was a child. Very well written.
Comment | Permalink

Jay's back from backstage, entering stage right.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 10:26 AM PDT

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 6:18 AM PDT
Last edited by the author 9 hours ago
Laura Knight-Jadczyk says:
Funny that "Anders AKA Andrew Roland" has only one review on amazon - of his own book. The only other reviewers of said book are minions of a real cult leader (Enochian Magick, anyone?), Vincent Bridges, co-author with Jay Weidner.

See: _http://laura-knight-jadczyk.blogspot.com/2006/01/how-to-spot-cointelpro-agents.html

and: _http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/swerdlow.htm (especially page two which discusses the activities of one of "Anders" minion/reviewers.)

For photographs of documentary evidence of the activities of this Black Magick cult, see:
_http://www.cassiopaea.com/Vincent_Bridges_COINTELPRO_Agent/

Jay C. Weidner says:
Laura's books are published by her vanity press called Red Pill. Apparently no real publisher will touch her. That is because she is a sloppy researcher and not a very good writer.

I think that Red Pill should be dropped by Amazon.com until a proper investigation of how it was financed commences. Since Red Pill was began soon after Laura Knight-Jadczyk and her husband Ark Jadczyk stole over a quarter of a million dollars and escaped to France it would appear that stolen money may have been used to finance Red Pill. Until the members of the board and Ms. Jadczyk come clean with how the company was financed I think it only proper that Red Pill be dropped from Amazon.com.

Laura Knight-Jadczyk has had over 24 hours to respond to the charge that she engineered a House Raffle Fraud and stole a quarter of a million dollars and she has not. One can only guess why as she has responded to every trivial remark that I have made until then?

The guilty always go quiet when their crimes are mentioned.

She has instead gone on her site and asked her cult followers to come here and attack me. Then she has come on here and used her own sloppy research to attack my co-writer, saying he is involved in black magic etc. Please note that she does not say that I am involved with this.

She does not know how to handle me. She spent thousands of dollars (very likely stolen money) and hired a private detective to go through my entire life. Too bad for Ms. Jadczyk but I am squeaky clean, I pay my taxes, I vote, I love children and I even go to church occasionally. With no evidence against me she has resorted to stealing my work and attacking me on her website, even going to the extent of saying that Paul Laviolette and I stole her research.

The question really becomes why? The answer is that I was watching her every move during the entire House Raffle Fraud. I saw that she had not announced a winner. I was watching when she then sold her house on the open market. I saw the thousands of tickets being sold, or so she claimed.

When a criminal sees that someone has seen them in the act of a crime they have two choices. The first is to bribe that person somehow to get them to be quiet and the second is to do a pre-emtive strike against that person to destroy them before they are destroyed. Ms. Jadczyk hired a Private detective to investigate me and see if I was "bribeable", when that turned out to be impossible she stepped up the attacks and has done everything she can to destroy me and my reputation.

It has not worked. Unless she sends one of her mindless hordes to hurt me I will follow her every where she goes and expose her criminal past in every way that I can.

I am ashamed that such a person would even consider writing about such a great man as Fulcanelli. He must be rolling in his grave ... if he is not still alive.

Rene Guenon says that at the end of time the worst people will gravitate towards alchemy and the ancient spiritual traditions. They will, in their ignorance and stupidity, try to take over traditions and become the new spiritual masters. He says that you will be able to identify them because they will use satanic methods to gain knowledge and they will start their own religions, that these religions will have nothing to do with the ancient traditions. This is what I see with Ms. Jadczyk. Like Aliester Crowley before her she uses a oiuja board to contact entities and she has a cult following made up of people who are hungry and needy and want her to tell them how to live. Ms. Jadczyk and her entire cult are the epitome of an end-time religion complete with criminality as the source of funding.

I await Ms. Jadczyk response on my charge that she stole a quarter of a million dollars and used some of that money to possibly start Red Pill Press.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 10:54 AM PDT
Jay C. Weidner says:
What Anders is saying is that all of the people who have responded on these pages, with the exception of myself and him, are members of laura-Knight-Jadczyk's cult. She has instructed them to write in and attack me. Instead of responding this is the action that she has chosen. She won't debate me because she cannot debate me.

Because she has stolen a quarter of a million dollars and because I and Anders and many others know about her crimes she has chosen to hide behind the apron of her cult followers.

My advice is to skip past the many comments here and go straight to my comments or Ms. Jadczyk's comments.

Do a content analysis of her cult follwer's comments and one can easily recognize that they are not in possesion of their mental faculties and all they wish to do is insult. Not one of them shows the least concern that ms. Jadczyk has stolen a quarter of a million dollars.

Laura Knight-Jadczyk is betting that all of the people who come here and read these comments are as amoral as her and her followers. She is betting the farm that the people who are interested in Fulcanelli will not care for her criminal actions.

Once the dust clears away and they many ridiculous comments by her cult followers are ignored all that will stand will be her comments and my comments. Those of you that are not in her cult will then be able to make up your own minds.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 2:56 PM PDT

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 12:59 PM PDT
Laura Knight-Jadczyk says:
Mr. Weidner, your defamatory and libelous (that means LIES in U.S. legal parlance) accusations are transparent attempts to sidetrack the discussion away from any real issues. Your fake emotionalism, fake "authority," fake "expert status", fake ignorance of the facts, name calling, labeling, and so on is simply a waste of my time and everyone else's. I invite any reader to visit the links I have provided where they will find all the facts and evidence they need to realize that you, sir, are little more than an internet grifter, a poseur and a con-artist of the most reprehensible sort.

Anders says:
Funny that. Beacuse Laura ADMITS to the felony theft of a quarter of a million dollars at this thread below. Go judge for yourself. The admittance of the felony was taken from Laura's own blog whilst on the run in France and can be backed up by searching the historical internet database.

_http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?page=106&messageid=115499&showdate=10/26/07&mpage=1

There is an interesting letter from a former cass cult member on the net - her name is ´sophie´ and she gave full permission to put it on the net.

It makes intriguing reading, because it parallels exactly what I have experiened with Laura and Ark

Attached is an email I sent to the cassiopaea discussion group. It was of course not allowed to reach the group, and so I sent it privately to several of the group members. For that sin, I was banned from the group. I think that says it all. Use it as you see fit. Laura is one “petty tyrant” that no longer scares me at all.

Thanks,
Sophie

Dear cassiopaea group members,

First off, let me say that I am a long time reader of the cassiopaean material, and have always found it interesting and somewhat insightful. I always thought the raw material was of more interest than Laura’s rather overheated interpretations. The Wave was good, but didn’t seem to have a point, and seemed to have even less of one the more Laura re-arranged and re-wrote it. I read the Bridges expose, and the early stuff on psychopaths and it really helped me, personally, a great deal. I found the courage to deal with my personal psychopath, and in the aftermath of that, I stopped reading the website.

A few months later, after my life had stabilized, I began to read the Cassiopaean site again. The new direction was very unsettling and bizarre. I read about the Organic Portals, and just shook my head in wonder. The Death Threat article was so strange that I really began to think either I was insane, or the Cassiopaeans were. Why? Because my ex-mother-in-law, source of psychopathic ex’s behaviour, had pulled the very same thing. She’d send threatening letters to herself, and then stir up an incredible drama over it. Cops, detectives, the works. Finally, one of the PIs she hired caught her mailing one. She went into treatment, and as I thought about it I realized that Laura had many of the same symptoms.

That’s when I went back and re-read as much of the Cassiopaean archives as I could. I found many things I hadn’t noticed before. I forced myself to read Amazing Grace, and things began to add up. By the time I finished re-reading the new version of Adventures, I was certain I was “seeing” correctly. And it wasn’t something that I wanted to see.

For a long time after that, I didn’t look at Cassiopaea at all. Avoided the subject in fact. And then, one day last winter, I clicked on the site and saw the “Raffle of the Millennium.” That’s when I knew I was right.

I kept watching, and the Raffle was postponed, then the website went down, and then Laura and Ark moved to France. When the site began to go back up, I looked in vain for any information on the raffle. None, just a few comments in Laura’s French Connection. When the Bridges expose went back up, I knew it was just business as usual, and nothing had really changed.

And the latest public brawl started after Laura’s appearance on the Jeff Rense show. At first I thought it just two groups of psychopaths slugging it out for the territory. But then, finally, I went and read Bridges’ site. Then it became even more obvious. I watched the exchange on cassiopaea.net, where, even though Ark doesn’t want anyone to know this, the complete text of the letters and responses can be found. And I joined this group and read through the archives.

Frankly, I was shocked. Ark apparently is quite shameless. A “maybe” is 100% correct? What does he think we are? Cretins? The avoidance of any mention of where the “letter” came from, and who wrote it, in Laura’s article is so unlike her as to be shocking. Surely, a letter from VB/Dr. Evil would trumpeted as an example of psychopathic menace, not virtually ignored. Something was very wrong.

Here, in my opinion, is the reason:

The secret was out. Laura and Ark stole thousands of dollars from thousands of people in their scam to raffle off their house in Florida.

Then they split for France to escape the clutches of the Law.

It isn´t always so easy to encapsulate a series of complex and dramatic events and provide such a simple answer, but there it is.

Now we can understand why Laura and Ark is so afraid of Vincent Bridges and Jay Weidner. Now we understand the true nature of their unrelenting, virulent and vindictive attacks on Bridges and Weidner.

In this light, reading the Cassiopaean site unveils that the plan for the felony was hatched in the summer of 2001. Realizing that they were about to commit a major crime Laura Knight Jadczyk and Ark Jadczyk began a series of pre-emptive measures that would ensure the success of their future crime. First they began a purging of all of the people that they could not trust.They also began singling out certain individuals who just might be smart enough to figure out what they were doing before they actually did it. Remember, this is the summer of 2001.They needed to buy a year and a half of time before they would have everything in place to be able to pull off the crime. The last thing that Laura and Ark wanted was two journalists looking into their activities. So then they began a pre-emptive assault on Bridges and Weidner.

First they decided to paint Vincent Bridges as a criminal. That way, if he
ever decided to investigate them for their soon-to-be-committed crime, he would already be tainted by their charges.

The second problem they encountered was Jay Weidner. Laura decided to manipulate him into attacking Vincent in some private emails. She then released these private emails on her site even though she had promised not to do this. It is apparent now that she did this to attempt to destroy Jay Weidner´s reputation. Remember - no one can get close. That is the most important thing to do if the crime was to be successful. This had to hold until the crime had been committed and the subsequent escape to France was successful.

Once, safely ensconced in France, with a stash of cash readily available from the House Raffle Scam, they were either ordered, or decided on their own, to come out of the web closet again, this time as News Commentators. Also, conveniently, if the United States ever decides to come after Laura
Knight Jadczyk and Ark Jadczyk for their criminal activity, one just knows that the two of them will begin squawking about how they are ´being persecuted because of their criticism of the United States´. Everyone knows that they will claim to be “political refugees” from the evil United States, that the charges are untrue and part of a political conspiracy to destroy the Cassiopaeans.

All of this also explains why Laura Knight Jadczyk and Ark Jadczyk rejected the Peace p lan presented by Weidner in May 0f 2002, as shown in their posting of his emails. Inexplicably they rejected his private offer to end the Flame Wars between them and Vincent Bridges. Thi s refusal to even consider a peaceful resolution to the Flame War issue was apparently what put Jay Weidner firmly back into Vincent Bridges´ camp. He had no choice. Either Laura and Ark were crazy or something else was going on.
Of course now we know. In May of 2002 they still had ten months to go until the planned crime and eventual escape from the United States could be enacted.

By February of 2003 the plan had succeeded. The House Raffle Scam went as planned with no nosy journalists like Vincent Bridges and Jay Weidner snooping around. The escape to France was also successful and the rest is history.

So now we all understand the strange activities of Laura Knight and Ark over the last two years. It was simply part of a pre-meditated crime to steal thousands of dollars from thousands of people in a fake House Raffle Scam and escape to France with the money.

Pretty simple, isn´t it?

What I don’t understand is why no one else, either on this group or elsewhere, seems to catch on to this. I kno w I’m not crazy, and I’ve had experience with psychopaths. What they have pulled should be obvious to anyone not brainwashed by The Cassiopaeans to accept them “unconditionally” and who agree that Maybe is always 100% correct, a nd that the Cassiopaeans are never wrong, that Laura is never wrong, and that they deserve to be vacationing on the Rivera on stolen money.
Doesn’t anyone else see this as flat out wrong?

I’ve had my say, and I feel better.

Thanks,
Sophie

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 3:06 PM PDT
Last edited by the author 22 minutes ago
Anders says:
Here is the page where Laura admits the several house raffle felonies on August 18th, 2003, in French Connection 13.

_http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?page=108&messageid=115499&showdate=10/26/07&mpage=1

Laura Knight-Jadczyk Admits Fraud in Perseus Foundation House Raffle

August 19th, 2003

“And then, after making special arrangements to see that the purposes of the raffle were carried out anyway - using our own money and assets to ensure this - after we had left, since we were out of contact for about three months, we didn´t even learn that all our instructions were ignored, and manipulations began among those left in charge of the matter in their efforts to line their own pockets at our expense.” Laura Knight-Jadczyk, August 18th, 2003, in French Connection 13.

Laura has reason to worry about her children, stuck in France in the middle of this nightmare from no fault of their own. She faces at least three felonies, mail fraud, tax fraud and illegal gambling/racketeering (RICCO), if she returns to the US, and those felonies are serious enough that she might even be arrested and extradited from France. She might also have broken French laws and therefore be liable for jail time in France, which has very strict currency and anti-cult laws.

At the moment, a group of at least thirteen true believers, including several innocent children, are squatting on a rented farm in southwest France, with no money and perhaps no legal way to spend the money they have, watching their carefully laid plans for the cult of the new millennium crumble to ashes before their eyes. Laura is no doubt planning a sudden flight back to states, probably for health reasons, but this is a route that should be carefully thought out. Flight at this point would undoubtedly be seen as an admission of guilt.

The evidence presented above, including statements from participants, witnesses, tax records, bank records and so on, have been forwarded to the state, federal and international agencies concerned. As their investigation goes forward, they will want to talk to the following individuals implicated, in various ways, in the house raffle scam:

Laura Knight Jadczyk
Dr. Ark Jadczyk
<names deleted for privacy>

(These are the last known board members of the Perseus Foundation, and those most directly responsible for the conduct of the organization. Please note, that given Laura´s comments above, these are the people she will try to blame for the "lost" money. For anyone directly involved in the scam, your best bet, what you may need most, is a way to turn state´s evidence. You can start by calling the hot-line number below.)

Also, these are the people, other than Laura and Ark, known to be living at the cult’s commune in France:
<names deleted for privacy>
(There are other unidentified people living there, perhaps including Ignacious O’Reilly, if that isn’t a fake name.)

Laura Knight-Jadczyk Admits Fraud in Perseus Foundation House Raffle

August 19th, 2003

“And then, after making special arrangements to see that the purposes of the raffle were carried out anyway - using our own money and assets to ensure this - after we had left, since we were out of contact for about three months, we didn´t even learn that all our instructions were ignored, and manipulations began among those left in charge of the matter in their efforts to line their own pockets at our expense.” Laura Knight-Jadczyk, August 18th, 2003, in French Connection 13.

Between October 20002 and January 2003, Laura Knight-Jadczyk, leader of the Cassiopaean Channeling Cult, see www.cassiopaea.org, and her husband, the Polish physicist Dr. Ark Jadczyk, conducted a raffle sponsored by their semi-legal educational foundation, The Perseus Foundation. The Foundation, which has never filed the necessary documents to attain an official 501-c-3 status, was managed by Jadczyk Consulting, Dr Jadczyk’s for profit business, during the period of the raffle and the house being raffled belonged to his wife, Laura Knight-Jadczyk, a clear conflict of interest under the federal requirements for 501-c-3 non profit corporations. The raffle generated between $100,000 and $150,000, which disappeared into the coffers of the Perseus Foundation. No winner was ever declared, no raffle was ever held in other words, and the house at 6322 Montana Avenue, New Port Richey, Florida, remained in Ms. Knight Jadczyk’s name until it was sold to the Swanson family.

Needless to say the Swansons were NOT raffle ticket winners. Those 'true believers' who spebt well over a hundred thousand dollars on raffle tickets were cheated - pure and simple.

THERE WAS NEVER ANY RAFFLE AND NEVER ANY WINNER

In response to over a month of articles and emails requests from the website www.cassiopaea.net for the Jadczyk’s and/or the Perseus Foundation to at least publish the details of the raffle, such as the name of the winner, the Jadczyks admitted yesterday that the raffle never occurred as previously stated in various sections of the French Connection. Ms. Jadczyk, in the quote cited above, admits that they failed to pay off the mortgage on the house being raffled and simply left the country with the money. They are currently living in France, where they run a new age school, The Quantum Future Academy, and manage their website and its news page, Signs of the Times.

In reply to your post on Oct 26, 2007 3:07 PM PDT

YesNo
Harrison Koehli says:
Oh, Mr. Rowland! Congratulations on your discovery of the perennial usefulness of argumentum ad hominem! With the alacrity of a seasoned evangelist you have managed to divert the attention away from Jay Weidner's false logic and onto the individuals offering criticism, thus negating said criticism in readers unfamiliar with the nature of such tactics. My hat comes off to you, good sir, for your predations on the minds of the weak will no doubt be successful, albeit to a limited degree! If we can learn little from the tactics of right-wing punditry and chauvinistic religious groups, let us learn to attack not the substance of one's argument, but instead attack the critic's credibility in the eyes of the captive audience.

Let us recap for our dear readers the situation at hand.

A certain Mr. Jay Weidner, co-author of the book "A Monument at the End of Time", offered a comment on Laura Knight-Jadczyk's review of Fulcanelli's "Mystery of the Cathedrals". His comment is para-logical to an absurd degree. He accuses Ms. Knight-Jadczyk of using material from his book in her review, when in fact, the only information on the book that was included in her review were: a) the book's original French title, b) a description of the book's contents, and c) that the book includes a chapter on Hendaye, unavailable in previous editions.

What possible reason could Mr. Weidner offer for such an underhanded and illogical misstatement of fact? When called on his false conclusion (i.e., that Ms. Knight-Jadczyk's review contained information from Mr. Weidner's book, when the only information offered are public facts, like the number of illustrations in the text) by supporters of Ms. Jadczyk's work, he merely responded with more false argumentation.

(As an aside, is there something odd about this fact that the critics of Weidner's para-logicism are supporters of Ms. Knight-Jadczyk's work? Mr. Rowland and Mr. Weidner would have us believe so. But would not a supporter of an author's work, when seeing their work criticized with false arguments of all sorts, speak his or her mind in a public forum? Wouldn't keeping one's mouth shut in such circumstances be a sign of intellectual cowardice? But enough of this aside...)

Now, Mr. Weidner claims that because at the time of their correspondence Ms. Knight-Jadczyk had not read "Mystery of the Cathedrals", that her research could not possibly have been misrepresented in Weidner and Bridges book, effortlessly sliding over the fact that, again, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. When called again on his poor grasp of the notion that false premises lead to false conclusions, he simply responded with more. I could go on, and I will if the need arises, but suffice it to say that Weidner predictably rebutted with the idea that his critics are the ones who lack logical abilities, and not himself. Oh, to what lengths the mind will go to keep hold of its illusion in its own greatness.

No, Mr. Weidner and Mr. Rowland, I am not a psychologist, but I know that it is a curious property of weak minds that they are functionally incapable of comprehending their own incomprehension. Logic is either right... or it is wrong. And no matter how many times you repeat a lie, it does not become true. I also know that it is a curious property of a corrupt mind to be convinced of its own ability to corrupt the minds of others (i.e., to gain support for false logic, lies, and spurious insults), only to be disappointed in the small numbers of those who are susceptible. You see, Mr. Weidner, persons of even moderate intelligence can see through your cheap attempts at mental coercion.

A third thing I know: none of this will convince you of anything. You will simply respond with more twisted logic, blatant and repeated lies, innuendo, and para-moralistic language. You will probably even try to convince your readers that it is I who cannot think.

Or will you surprise me with a display of human decency? I am not counting on it.

Obviously, the tirades of Weidner and Rowland have nothing to do with Fulcanelli's work. So what then? A glance at their recent comments will answer this question with crystal clarity. I am sure readers have encountered someone in their lives like Mr. Rowland and Mr. Weidner, and can see their agendas for what they are.

Anders says:
Harrison - just read French Connection 13 on Aug 19th, 2003.

Laura Knight-Jadczyk Admits Fraud in Perseus Foundation House Raffle

August 19th, 2003

“And then, after making special arrangements to see that the purposes of the raffle were carried out anyway - using our own money and assets to ensure this - after we had left, since we were out of contact for about three months, we didn´t even learn that all our instructions were ignored, and manipulations began among those left in charge of the matter in their efforts to line their own pockets at our expense.” Laura Knight-Jadczyk, August 18th, 2003, in French Connection 13.

In reply to your post on Oct 26, 2007 3:34 PM PDT

Your post, in reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 3:18 PM PDT
Harrison Koehli says:
Please, Anders, because my weak mind is not grasping it--How does this comment prove the comically ridiculous imaginings of Sophie in your previous post. Doing some research of my own, I find that this comment by Ms. Knight-Jadczyk differs in no great amount from statements made at a much later date.

_http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=673.msg3456#msg3456

If you read the thread above, as I have, I can see no reason why you should choose to believe the paranoid imaginings of "Sophie" and not the testimony of those who have seen the documentation that says there was no raffle fraud.

Your "game" is a transparent one, Anders. If you are merely lying, I can at least respect your tenacity. But if you actually believe your own nonsense, what is there to do but pity?

Anders says:
Your 'game' Harrison cannot disguise what we all know about the fake house raffle.

It came from the horse's mouth: Laura

“And then, after making special arrangements to see that the purposes of the raffle were carried out anyway - using our own money and assets to ensure this - after we had left, since we were out of contact for about three months, we didn´t even learn that all our instructions were ignored, and manipulations began among those left in charge of the matter in their efforts to line their own pockets at our expense.” Laura Knight-Jadczyk, August 18th, 2003, in French Connection 13.

In reply to your post on Oct 26, 2007 3:39 PM PDT
Anders says:
The Perseus Foundation is announcing The Six Bedroom House Giveaway

Entry deadline is January 1st, 2003 - Drawing date: January 16, 2003.

ONLY 6,000 TICKETS ARE AVAILABLE and they will go fast!

This increases your chances of winning, but only if you make your entry in time!

For only a $50.00, tax deductible donation, you could WIN a house!

Make your donation and get YOUR ticket TODAY!

One lucky ticket holder will win the approximately 3,000 sq. ft, 6-bedroom, 2-bath, 2 living room, double lot (100X 150 feet) home located in the quiet, picturesque, small town of New Port Richey, Florida. The home's market value is $200,000. You may obtain more than one ticket, however, a limit of 6,000 are available.

New Port Richey is a bedroom community for the greater Tampa-St. Petersburg area. Located just a mile or two from the Gulf of Mexico, graced by a small-town atmosphere with admirable services, quiet neighborhoods, excellent police and fire protection, up-to-date hospitals, parks and recreation areas, there are few places in the US that can compare for charm and convenience. A lovely river meanders through the center of town, its banks graced with lovely homes, a park, and jogging paths.

During the 12 years that Laura Jadczyk has lived in the home, many improvements have been made, and 80% of the planned renovations have been completed. This includes new electrical wiring throughout, insulation, new walls and ceilings, complete ductwork for AC/Heat pump, vinyl siding, new windows, new roof, a new 40 X 12 terrace, landscaping, tool shed, pool, and other features too numerous too mention. Care has been taken to preserve the character of the 1925 Cracker Style Florida home, which includes a small celler - unusual for Florida homes.

Click photo for a tour of the house

Ark and Laura will make their house available to the Perseus Foundation, Inc, a Florida not-for-profit corporation qualified under Sec. 501c(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Foundation will award the house to some lucky winner who can then do whatever he or she likes with it - live in it, use it as a vacation home, income property, or sell it.

Make your donations before January 1st, 2003 - in order to receive your raffle tickets! Drawing date: January 16, 2003.

This raffle ticket is offered for a Fifty and 00/100 Dollar ($50.00) donation to the Perseus Foundation, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation qualified under Sec. 501c(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No purchase is necessary in order to participate. Upon receipt of a voluntary donation either by cash, cleared check made payable to Perseus Foundation, or funds credited Perseus Foundation via Paypal, Perseus Foundation will will enter the stub on the face of a raffle ticket inscribed with the name of the donor into a drawing, to be held at approximately 5:30 p.m. on January 16, 2003 at the offices of Perseus Foundation, Inc., located in New Port Richey, Pasco County, FL.

The winner will be selected at random from eligible entries and will be notified by certified mail to the address given on the stub. The winner must present the winning ticket and identification to claim the prize and has until 5:00 p.m. on the fifth business day beginning with the business day after the postmark of the mailed notice to do so. If the prize is not claimed by the deadline, the next drawn ticket may be awarded the prize, subject to presentation of that ticket and identification by 5:00 p.m. on the fifth business day beginning with the business day after the postmark of the mailed notice to such party.

You may make your donation by mail. Mail donations must be postmarked no later than December 31, 2002 and received prior to drawing while tickets last. After January 16, 2003, to receive the number of the winning ticket please send a self-addressed, stamped envelope to Perseus Foundation, Inc., P.O. Box 2068, New Port Richey, FL 34656-2068 with your request.

By entering the raffle the winner agrees to have his/her name and ticket number publicized.

The prize to be awarded the winner is title to the home. Said prize shall be acquired by Perseus Foundation, Inc. from proceeds of this fund raising drive, i.e. donations made to Perseus Foundation. The remaining proceeds will be used to establish a Quantum Future School center that will function as the focal point for Perseus Foundation activities. The maximum number of tickets issued is 6,000. The number of entries received will determine the odds of winning. A Notary Public will be present to certify the drawing. The donor need not be present to win. In the event of any challenge or dispute, the winner to be awarded the prize will be selected by Perseus Foundation's President and Executive Director, whose decision will be final. Copies of these rules may be obtained by mailing a stamped self-addressed return envelope along with a request for such a copy to Perseus Foundation, Inc., P.O. Box 2068, New Port Richey, FL 34656-2068.

Entrants must be at least 18 years of age.

The Perseus Foundation's Board of Directors and members of their households are not eligible to enter. The winner is responsible for all applicable taxes. Void where prohibited by law.

Donate $100.00

Click the button at left to make your $100.00 donation and receive two tickets to win The Cassiopaea House! Click button at right to donate $50.00 and receive one ticket to win The Six Bedroom House!

Be sure to enter your name and address in the paypal form options. Remember, only 6,000 entries will be accepted! This increases your chances of winning, but only if you make your entry in time! You may also enter by mail: Send your entry request and donation to:

Perseus Foundation, Inc.
P.O. Box 2068
New Port Richey, FL 34656-2068
Donate $50.00