One final point; calling them "elite" is a misnomer in my view. They are clearly more degenerate than the masses, driven by basic and primal drives. Awareness of this fact has exploded in the last 10 years They will be seen for what they are; primitive, ruthless, pathological.
I can see where you're coming from and think it to be true to an extent..
But to believe that they are primitive per se or only driven by basic and primal drives could be a mistake, not recognizing the enemy for what it is.
As for being more degenerate than the masses I suspect a big part of the masses only lack opportunity to display similiar behaviour.
It's true, the executive body may often consist of exactly such people.
In the upper echelons though we'd probably find the best of education, masters of their drives and instincts for what they consider a 'higher goal'.
Anyway, what is called 'elite', 'tptb', the 'deep state', the 'overlords' etc. is obviously part of a hyperdimensional game so grand we might not always be able to grasp it in all its enormity and repercussions yet.
The C's say, their Achilles' heel is their 'wishful thinking'. So there is hope for all of us.
To believe the dark forces to be primitive strikes me as a bit reckless.
Very often I cannot but admire their knowledge of the human psyche when they push us around on that big chess board called 3D life on earth.
On the other hand, calling them 'primitive' could also be a smart thing since it might lead to recognize our own primitivity thus knowing ourselves a bit better. As Castaneda wrote:
".... They are infinitely more efficient and organized than that. In order to keep us obedient and meek and weak, the predators engaged themselves in a stupendous manoeuvre stupendous, of course, from the point of view of a fighting strategist. A horrendous manoeuvre from the point of view of those who suffer it. They gave us their mind! Do you hear me? The predators give us their mind, which becomes our mind...."