Notice how quickly things fell apart after the Queen's death. She must have been a Royal Trump(ette), delaying nefarious plans and protecting her family from dark forces.
Where is Kate Middleton, Princess of Wales?
- Thread starter gottathink
- Start date
If Princess Diana's former butler told the truth the Queen must have been (much?) more aware than her children and grand-children. If his story is true (it was a private and confidential meeting) she showed great integrity and strength. This is what she told him:
From another source:
That said, I don't know what is going on with Prince William and what he knows. It must be a terrible situation to be in, especially with young children who also have to grow up without a mother. For all the riches they have I don't envy them.
Last edited:
I suppose they might have said that to show that she will have support while William and the kids are out doing the Royal thing.
As for her injuries, they need not be that serious from an average person perspective, i.e. not life-threatening. But because of who Kate is, and what her job is, if the injuries make her unable to do that job in the way that is expected of her - which includes looking and being "royal" - then yeah, she'll have to bow out.
I'm thinking here in terms of partial facial paralysis and slurred speech or something neurological like that. There's also the vax injury question that would come up if that is the kind of injury she has, since that kind of neurological issue has already been linked to the covid vax.
Last edited:
I do wonder about her emotional state, one would assume she feels betrayed and probably really angry, so maybe she's ashamed of being seen in public while looking injured, or being incapable of proper speech.
But then there's the angle that maybe they can't trust her not to spill the beans or lash out at someone, so maybe it's not so much that she won't be seen in public because she doesn't want to, maybe they won't let her see any of the public, or a combination of both.
Evan
Dagobah Resident
A scary thought: paralyzed (even slightly) and locked away.
We've always been told that being a princess is wonderful, every woman's dream. But even in fairytales, the princess is always in danger. And what about queens? We saw it with Princess Diana, let's look at what they were capable of doing to her. What's happening to Kate is perhaps similar: make her disappear in another way, but make her disappear from the public eye. Royalty is a world of snakes, venom, and betrayal. Read the "Accursed Kings" by Maurice Druon, a historical saga about the royalty in France and Europe. If kings, queens and princesses are our representatives, well, it's not pretty. And if they have always been the link between us and God, since it was God who put them there, well, that's clear. Snakes, venom and treachery.
Last edited:
Maybe. But Kate is no Diana. She sounds like the perfectly obedient princess, always behaving just as she should. That's why it seems much more possible that it is a vaccine injury, and that, having to cover that fact up and save face (and help big pharma and the government save face), her absence is just what they need to do, not something personal against her. OSIT.
Tuulikki
Dagobah Resident
I wonder how this will pan out with the time factor involved. Even un-medical members of the public will think it odd if Kate continues to remain absent for the rest of the year and beyond. It doesn't normally take a whole year to recover from abdominal surgery and just in case chemotherapy (which we know she has not had) and a new explanation for her continuing absence will have to be introduced. I expect another AI video will be made to allay public concerns and possibly a few more distant views of (Kate??) to pad it out. Perhaps they will play on the mental health angle. I bet it is all a bit of a headache for those in control.
Well I think their first mistake was saying both Charles and Kate had cancer. How come an old man (Charles) is up and about and doing things but Kate isn't? This is the question everyone will start asking.
Secondly, they put out that Garden scene of Kate saying she had cancer and everyone sussed it to be fake. What was the point of that.?
Two questions with no answers.
Anything they do from now on will be viewed under a microscope re Kate and people will form their own opinions. They blotted their copybook from the very start and adding more lies will just exacerbate things.
Secondly, they put out that Garden scene of Kate saying she had cancer and everyone sussed it to be fake. What was the point of that.?
Two questions with no answers.
Anything they do from now on will be viewed under a microscope re Kate and people will form their own opinions. They blotted their copybook from the very start and adding more lies will just exacerbate things.
Here is one that a fan made, but with another goal, asking the question 'Where is Kate' (still, it's eerie what you can do with AI):
They are also saying that she has been up and about while using old pictures of her. Also, that she is somehow still involved in her charities, being kept up to date or something like that. They really think we are completely daft.
Also, where are her two youngest kids? Are they kept away from the public out of fear that they may spill the beans or because they are very upset after what happened to their mum? Are they still going to school? If that's the case that means (head)teachers and parents are keeping mum too unless the kids are being home educated.
Scanning news using Kate's sister, article after article (May) makes reference to Pippa being made (if she wants) Kate's Lady in Waiting 'when' Kate becomes Queen.
Odd stuff, all things considering with distracting narratives, yet the show must go on.
www.mirror.co.uk
and
Odd stuff, all things considering with distracting narratives, yet the show must go on.
Kate could give sister Pippa major royal job as her role evolves, say experts
The Princess of Wales currently does not have ladies-in-waiting or companions like Queen Camilla, but according to two royal experts, this may have to change when she eventually becomes Queen
www.mirror.co.uk
and
I had similar thoughts. I mean, they could easily claim this is due to some medical condition or whatever, calling anybody who dares making the connection with the vax a conspiracy theorist and so on. They have done that with other famous vax victims. Unless of course they don't trust her not saying something. But maybe they just didn't want to cast a bad light on the royals and preserve optics, hoping she would get better, but it got worse and now they maneuvered themselves into a corner they don't know how to get out of.
Yes, seems so.
It is really quite something that things can get wrapped up so tightly, considering the amount of people involved - or not directly involved yet with eyes to see and ears to hear (the royal staff alone must be very large and the Ton circles are even larger). This does not include citizens at large of the UK who may not be under the media spell (what are they saying?).
If all this comes down to a jab-health relationship on the poor gel, the people controlling with their finger on the pulse must be very nervous, and if true, they have limited options, come clean or continue with the conspiracy theory slur (for much of society this tends to be an affective strategy as people have seen on any number of issues), until whatever the outcome is can't be held under wraps any longer, or it just won't matter for reasons not known.
On SOTT.net today:
Kate Middleton 'May not appear in public for rest of the year': Sources
The Princess of Wales will probably "not appear in public for the rest of the year," and is being "surrounded" by her birth family as she continues a course of preventive chemotherapy having been diagnosed with cancer earlier this year, royal...
www.sott.net