Why modern architecture is making us sick

Belgium, Politico had this to say:

1706596760957.png

with many examples of the bad and ugly.

Eye of the beholder and all, my vote for the bad/ugly goes to NATO HQ:

1706596913252.png

Perhaps in 4D it might provide some better meaning, however in 3D its like some type of front end combine mower, mowing the grass, and NATO is not opposed to mowing.
 
Finishing the vatican axle/perspective was facilitated by Mussolini. They are nice but tyrants really seem to have a thing for Grandiose Perspectives and axial symmetry in general.
So would be interesting to know which kind of "democracy" was ruling Teotihuacan at the time. Managed by 4D STS influence? And we can wonder if the central place had an obelisk similar to the Vatican one at the time.
 
So would be interesting to know which kind of "democracy" was ruling Teotihuacan at the time. Managed by 4D STS influence? And we can wonder if the central place had an obelisk similar to the Vatican one at the time.
Maybe not an obelisk but water in the axial basins? Not my theory but it seems plausible to me.
 
There may be some encouraging news on the horizon, as a number of architects and professors are finally pushing back against the ugly modern paradigm. I found this YouTube channel recently and watched a number of videos where the creator discusses the things we have been discussing on this thread - why we are hard wired to enjoy and need beauty and why these urban monstrosities, not only cause stress but people consistently abandon the areas where they are located in favor of more human environments.



There are a number of architecture schools that have now changed their curriculum, so that students are required to learn skills that had been abandoned in the push towards modernism. They learn about classical designs and the importance of beauty! So - there is hope!
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom