Imminent Alien Disclosure?

Retired army Sgt. Major Robert Dean, a militar involved during 40 years in secret space projects, summarizing within two minutes the way he feels about all the deep military secrets being errased from public awareness:


I'm now watching a recent interview between him and Kerry Cassidy on rumble. I'm half way through it, surprisingly he asserts in passing having met face to face with Annunaki, don't know what to make out of it, but al least he seems quite knowledgeable about secrecies held around the moon and Mars, and much more topics.

Robert Dean - Secret space program-Kerry Cassidy Interview (updated Adrenochrone links in descript)
 
I keep coming across UFO and human trafficking linked stories, and this guy’s story seems to be genuine as well. I did a few online searches to some of the things he claims, and it supports his veracity.

I really hope this avenue of exploration and exposure continues in this specific area of the UFO phenomenon.

 
Has anyone else come across this one? And if so, what are your thoughts?

It has been reported on a few Spanish speaking countries, not in English, so I could not find an English video, however the video claims that this is a UFO that was shot at by the Iranian army, and it could not be shot down.

what's your take on this?

 
It has been reported on a few Spanish speaking countries, not in English, so I could not find an English video, however the video claims that this is a UFO that was shot at by the Iranian army, and it could not be shot down.

what's your take on this?

According to this article in Spanish, the governor of Bandar Anzali said it was an anti-aircraft exercise using decoy flares as targets.

Here's another video of a different exercise:

 
I keep coming across UFO and human trafficking linked stories, and this guy’s story seems to be genuine as well. I did a few online searches to some of the things he claims, and it supports his veracity.

I really hope this avenue of exploration and exposure continues in this specific area of the UFO phenomenon.

Here is part 2 in the series.


The Whistleblower Marathon continues with former Army Combat Veteran DC Long. DC and his Father, then government contractors, were tasked with standing up a shoot house at Range 19. Before they knew it, they were ushered underground at gunpoint only to encounter a "Monolithic Slab."

Long shares his story in great detail, recounting the sights and sounds of this UAP / UFO. Long describes a series of events that unfolded post his encounter that would ultimately separate he and his Father for life. This episode is a cold, hard look at how sinister the aftermath of such an encounter can be.
 
There are new milestones in the Congressional investigation of UFO secrets.



My comment:
We are hearing a lot of well-meaning but uninformed talk about aliens and extraterrestrials. But just because the source of the phenomena may be non-human does not necessarily mean ET is involved. The paranormal and/or religious implications of the phenomena may be what is motivating military sources, their paid politicians and contractors to so earnestly stonewall further release of documents, witnesses, photos and videos.
 
There are new milestones in the Congressional investigation of UFO secrets.

Hmm - maybe the real intent is to distract from all the Hunter/Joe Biden crime family corruption aided by federal agencies running interference! Plus, that little scuffle involving Ukraine, Russia, NATO, Syria, Turkey, China, Poland . . .

220px-Nagasakibomb.jpg


I mean really --- maybe the aliens really can make it all better! 🛸
 
I don't really know what to make of all of this disclosure business. In the past this has always been a huge disappointment and I'm half-expecting it to be rather lame. After all of the hullabaloo, I would expect the conclusion to be something along the lines of "We have documented things we cannot explain. Maybe it was aliens, but we can't prove it and we'll never really know." "Disclosure" would inch forward a tiny bit, but it would still be essentially a nothingburger. Now introducing some kind of breakaway civilization returned to Earth would be somewhat interesting even if it is a lie, it would shake the paradigm enough for the normies that some intriguing things might slip out into the public domain while providing a good cover for government corruption and black projects somewhat out in the open, but it wouldn't be enough to create total chaos because there would be no "aliens." It's a Goldilocks disclosure that provides the PTB a release valve for not having to maintain quite such strict secrecy, while still not disclosing much of actual value. I only see them allowing it if they perceive externalities forcing their hand to disclose small truths in service of maintaining the greater control matrix.
 
I don't really know what to make of all of this disclosure business. In the past this has always been a huge disappointment and I'm half-expecting it to be rather lame. After all of the hullabaloo, I would expect the conclusion to be something along the lines of "We have documented things we cannot explain. Maybe it was aliens, but we can't prove it and we'll never really know."
That's pretty much the official direction so far judging by AARO statements and all other executive branch agencies who have commented.
"Disclosure" would inch forward a tiny bit, but it would still be essentially a nothingburger. Now introducing some kind of breakaway civilization returned to Earth would be somewhat interesting even if it is a lie,
More like a partial truth, if that civilization is framed as coming from underground (cryptoterrestrials), and if the Cs are right about the underground peeps. Part of the story, but not the whole story by any stretch of the imagination.
it would shake the paradigm enough for the normies that some intriguing things might slip out into the public domain while providing a good cover for government corruption and black projects somewhat out in the open, but it wouldn't be enough to create total chaos because there would be no "aliens."
I think even opening up this much might be 'dangerous'. It might satisfy some, but once such an admission is made, it opens up the space for a whole lot more questions of an inconvenient nature.
It's a Goldilocks disclosure that provides the PTB a release valve for not having to maintain quite such strict secrecy, while still not disclosing much of actual value. I only see them allowing it if they perceive externalities forcing their hand to disclose small truths in service of maintaining the greater control matrix.
Pretty much how I see it too.
 
I would like to share something interesting. Not too long ago Joe speculated on one of the "NewsReal with Joe and Niall" shows about possible reasons for disclosure. He said jokely among other things that maybe it's US's answer to Russia or Putin: Putin talks about a "multipolar world", then we will create a "galactic world"! A brave new world, a paradigm shift.

And here's a quote from the book "Three body problem" by Liu Cixin:

Scholars found that, contrary to the happy wishes of most people, it was not a good idea for the human race as a whole to make contact with extraterrestrials. The impact of such contact on human society would be divisive rather than uniting, and would exacerbate rather than mitigate the conflicts between different cultures. In summary, if contact were to occur, the internal divisions within Earth civilization would be magnified and likely lead to disaster. The most shocking conclusion of all was that the impact would have nothing at all to do with the degree and type of contact (unidirectional or bidirectional), or the form and degree of advancement of the alien civilization.

This was the theory of “contact as symbol” proposed by sociologist Bill Mathers of RAND Corporation in his book, The 100,000-Light-Year Iron Curtain: SETI Sociology. Mathers believed that contact with an alien civilization is only a symbol or a switch. Regardless of the content of the encounter, the results would be the same.

Suppose that the nature of the contact is such that only the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence is confirmed, with no other substantive information—what Mathers called elementary contact. The impact would be magnified by the lens of human mass psychology and culture until it resulted in huge, substantive influences on the progress of civilization. If such contact were monopolized by one country or political force, the significance would be comparable to an overwhelming advantage in economic and military power.

Apparently this particular quote and this particular sociologist (Bill Mathers of RAND Corporation) drew a lot of talk online. People were either looking for this individual and his book, or they were speculating if he is actually a real individual. Here's an article by an individual who works at RAND Corporation, and he did a research on the topic.


It appears that Bill Mathers doesn't exist, and that there were no such reports done by RAND, even if there are some similar ones. They are particularly interesting considering Game Theory and everything we learned from the Wave.

So the above quote is fictional and from the science fiction book. But it still rings true. And who knows, maybe there is indeed truth to Joe's comment made in a tongue in cheek manner. We know that "they" have a schedule and some other things may intervene first. But they probably also did their "game theory" calculations and maybe reached the same conclusion just like in the quote. At least the second part. Maybe someone thinks that having a "monopoly" on alien disclosure in whatever form will give the US or the West more power. Just some thoughts.
 
Last edited:
At least the second part. Maybe someone thinks that having a "monopoly" on alien disclosure in whatever form will give the US or the West more power. Just some thoughts.
At this point in time, the very odd focus on the US military (representing mankind? LOL!) having contact with alien technology or aliens could also be seen as sending the message "Oh yeah? You have supersonic missiles? Well we have extraterrestrial weapons and our friends know how to disable nuclear weapons!". After all, the super secret back-engineering of "non-human intelligence crafts" with black budgets is not meant to make coffee.
 
Last edited:
At this point in time, the very odd focus on the US military (representing mankind? LOL!) having contact with alien technology or aliens could also be seen as sending the message "Oh yeah? You have supersonic missiles? Well we have extraterrestrial weapons and our friends know how to disable nuclear weapons!".
I think there's something to this. Not sure if this is precisely it, but here are a few possible data points.

First, from Lacatski, Kelleher, and Knapp's recent book Skinwalkers at the Pentagon (which details the history Lacakski/Bigelow's AAWSAP program, which Reid was instrumental in getting off the ground):
Over the years [Senator Majority Leader Harry] Reid had caught various straws in the wind that both Russia and China were involved with, and heavily invested in, UAP-based advanced technology research programs. That chatter had intensified, and by May 2009 Reid was concerned that the United States was asleep at the wheel, that the mixture of bureaucratic fear, careerism, and scientific conservatism at the Pentagon was handcuffing the ability of the United States to make progress exploiting UAP-based technology.

In Reid's mind there was a grave danger that China and Russia, who were not similarly handcuffed, would succeed in taking quantum leaps forward from exploiting UAP-based hardware and thus gain an irreversible technological upper hand over the United States. On June 24, 2009, Reid took the bull by the horns and, in consultation wit the intelligence community, drafted a gold letter to then Deputy Secretary of Defense William Lynn. (pp. 90-91)
Don't know about China, but Knapp believes (based on interviews and documents from the early 90s) that Russia did have reverse engineering programs prior to that. Then there's this little anecdote, from an interview with Randall Nickerson, who spent years investigating the famous African Ariel School sighting. Nickerson was talking about how foreign officials and military are much more open about UFOs than in the English-speaking world, especially the U.S. In one conversation, he said African military told him that the U.S. is the country that knows the most (around 59:00 in the interview). In that conversation (with a South African air force base commander and a female Lieutenant Colonel at the base), he said:
She supported him [the base commander] about what they see on radar ... but they said that ... "we can tell the difference between the American version the Russian version and the real thing," really, and I'm like, what are you guys talking about, the American version the Russian version and the real thing, meaning there's technology that we have and that they have and there's technology that someone else controls and you can easily tell the difference, really, these are military guys, like straight laced, him and her, I mean, I couldn't be believe they were so open with me.
The guys around Knapp/Bigelow/Reid seem to think that the U.S. reverse engineering programs have mostly been a failure (along the lines of what Lazar talked about, where they've had the tech for years, but still knew very little about how it actually worked). Maybe that's just their cover story, but it's plausible that they may genuinely think that. It may also be largely true, to the degree that the program is highly compartmentalized and privatized and no real scientific progress can be made that way. (That's not to say that others haven't been successful, just that these guys might not have access to that level of information.)
 
Wow.. Once again, if anything this man claims is true, then what an absolute bombshell that’s being dropped for public thought and discourse.

He at least has verifiable photographic evidence that he was where he says he was, doing the things he says he was doing. It’s just the claims he makes that are so extraordinary. And a few of them go along with things the C’s have mentioned, if I remember correctly:

• Underground technology capable of creating earthquakes, although they quickly realized they were in way over their own heads in utilizing it.

• Technology to project and remote control voice commands mimicking our own internal voices within our minds, for manipulative purposes.

There’s a LOT to unpack in this 30 minute interview. He seems sincere in trying to bring about mass awareness to these technologies and how they are being weaponized against us. Worth the watch, IMO, if you have 30+ minutes to spare.

 
Back
Top Bottom