Imminent Alien Disclosure?

[Wandering Star]

Rest, sleep on it and then try to read the sessions later.

I am going to give my understanding on this.

The density of being is referred to the level of consciousness, which is accompanied by the appropriate vehicle for the work that is needed for the correct expression of said consciousness.

The higher the level of consciousness, the less tension in the soul, because the higher level of knowledge allows greater autonomy and less dependence on external factors.

The fifth and sixth densities seem to be non-physical in the sense of an environment different from the one we know, in which the illusion is made up of matter, both for the playing field and for the vehicles in which the soul acts.

However, the non-material world, which we cannot imagine or have a clear idea due to lack of information, is according to Ra (Law of One) just as rich or full of illusions in which the soul continues its path of learning.

In short, density is the level of consciousness and the higher the level of consciousness, the greater the ability to interact with creation, with fewer and fewer restrictions.

The density of the body used by the soul, in terms of greater intensity of concentration of matter, may not be correlated with the level of density of consciousness or may be.

It will be whatever is necessary for his being and his level of development.

Of course, behind everything I have said is a maybe.

 

[Laura]

I'm working on the next volume of the annotated transcripts. I keep having to refer back to the previous volume, the first half of the 1997 sessions and additional materials. There, in the April 5, 1997 session, is reproduced an email from Blue Resonant Human which includes a long email from Dick Farley AKA CloudRider. Those of you who have this book, please re-read that email from BRH and consider it in the light of revelations over the past few years and where the "gender identity" and trafficking of children has been revealed. BRH was really insightful and stuff we thought was largely unbelievable is now pretty much established as fact.

 

[mabar]

This is going to be fun

https://twitter.com/x/status/1681046773333147648

 

[Approaching Infinity]

New legislation from Schumer (D), Rounds (R), Rubio (R) and Gillibrand (D):

Bipartisan measure backed by Chuck Schumer aims to force release of UFO records

Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the majority leader, is pushing legislation to create a commission with broad authority to declassify government documents about U.F.O.s and extraterrestrial matters, in an attempt to force the government to...

www.sott.net

Full text of the amendment: https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/uap_amendment.pdf

Garry Nolan on the new legislation:

Nolan is upbeat about the bill's possible impact, and lauds the suggested inclusion of non-UAP-related professionals on the disclosure commission. We discuss the impact disclosure will have on science as an institution, and what to anticipate from the now-scheduled July 25 hearing in front of the House Oversight Committee.

 

[gottathink]

Another example: spider and its web; which is denser, i.e. more material, and which is of which density level?

I think it could be helpful to understand Density as ordinal data rather than numerical (discrete or continuous). In case you are not familiar with this:

Ordinal data​

Ordinal data is a kind of statistical data with a set order or scale. This means ordinal data can be classified into different categories with a natural ranked order. However, the distances between the values are uneven or unknown.

For instance, clothing sizes are an example of ordinal data, and you can quickly sort them in the order of small < medium < large. But there is no defined way to give meaning or note the differences between small and medium or small and large.

 

[Windmill knight]

The density of being is referred to the level of consciousness, which is accompanied by the appropriate vehicle for the work that is needed for the correct expression of said consciousness.

I can't remember if I read it from the Cs or from Ra, but I believe it was stated that 'density' refered to 'density of light'. So yes, I think 'density' is more along the lines of consciousness than matter, as meant by channelled sources.

 

[Bluegazer]

It seems to me that the confusion in the term density begins by not establishing that matter IS consciousness. A VERY DENSE consciousness. The C's used the word density to fit our level of understanding assuming that density can be used in the following way:

When a body is immersed in a fluid, the fluid exerts a force perpendicular to the surface of the body. This force per unit area is called pressure.

At a given level, the atmospheric pressure is equal to the weight of the column of air above that level, up to the upper limit of the atmosphere. Therefore, the higher the altitude, the lower the atmospheric pressure. The higher the altitude, the less air remains above, which therefore weighs less and exerts less pressure.

Using the analogy, when you go up in density level, the lower the pressure on the consciousness. BUT! for the consciousness to rise to the next level, it is the consciousness that becomes less dense. For example, Helium gas is less dense than the air we breathe and that is why it rises and floats.

 

[JEEP]

It seems to me that the confusion in the term density begins by not establishing that matter IS consciousness.

Yes, in addition to science determining plants have consciousness (they can react to even who murdered someone), there have been scientific papers showing inanimate objects have consciousness. Probably have posts on the forum referencing this. I was pretty amazed when I first read that objects have consciousness although I can't quite remember what the subject object was.

 

[lilies]

In 4thD we'll need conscious house walls, that will deny access to Lizzies trying to carry out their abduction.

In 4th Density everything - plants, animals, objects, clouds - must level-up, I think. I found the post, where I remembered (must have been pre-3rdD) an alive super-bright, stone arch gate. Writing that down caused me 'PTSD-strength'-homesickness, on two occasions, lasting for days.

 

[Wandering Star]

Yes, in addition to science determining plants have consciousness (they can react to even who murdered someone), there have been scientific papers showing inanimate objects have consciousness. Probably have posts on the forum referencing this. I was pretty amazed when I first read that objects have consciousness although I can't quite remember what the subject object was.

Referring to consciousness, I remember a session in which Laura asked more or less, what is consciousness? and the C's respond something like What is not conscience?

I was looking in the sessions but at the moment I have not located it, perhaps in some exchange related to gravity and its unstable waves.

 

[Natus Videre]

Referring to consciousness, I remember a session in which Laura asked more or less, what is consciousness? and the C's respond something like What is not conscience?

I was looking in the sessions but at the moment I have not located it, perhaps in some exchange related to gravity and its unstable waves.

Session 15 June 1996? Pretty much the whole session is about gravity and unstable gravity waves.

A: If gravity is everything, what isn't it? Light is energy expression generated by gravity.
Q: (L) Is gravity the "light that cannot be seen," as the Sufis call it: the Source.
A: Please name something that is not gravity.
Q: (L) Well, if gravity is everything, there is nothing that is not gravity. Fine. What is absolute nothingness?
A: A mere thought.
Q: (L) So, there is no such thing as non-existence?
A: Yes, there is.

As to the link between gravity and consciousness (Session 6 August 2005):

Q: (A) I asked a question long ago about mathematically modelling consciousness, and the answer was "visualise the inverted representation of the gravity geometric model" and that this would lead me to the geometric model of consciousness. But I couldn't find what inverted representation means. So what is it?
A: Do you have an equation for that model for gravity?
Q: (A) No. I don't have any equation. The model is a model and can have many different equations. Equation is something additional that makes the model work one way or another.
A: Find the equation, and then "invert."
Q: (A) Okay, so say I found the equation; I still don't know how to invert the equation. Read it backward? Upside down?
A: Gravity is consciousness "expressed."

And more recently, about "inverting" gravity to find consciousness (Session 10 December 2022):

(Ark) Gravity. I was wondering again and again how to include consciousness... how to extend mathematics and physics to deal with consciousness. And the answer was that it's necessary to invert mathematical representation of gravity. And I have no idea how to invert equations for gravity. But it occurred to me today that maybe I know. And so, I wanted to ask whether my ideas that it's something similar to what is called conformal inversion in mathematics, whether this idea that occurred to me today may be the right one. Invert like conformal inversion inverts, like, here into infinity.

A: Close enough!

 

[Wandering Star]

Session 27 May 1995

Q: (L) What is the link between consciousness and matter?

A: Illusion.

Q: (L) What is the nature of the illusion? (T) That there isn't any connection between consciousness and matter. It is only an illusion that there is. It is part of the third density...

A: No. Illusion is that there is not.

Q: (L) The illusion is that there is no link between consciousness and matter.

A: Yes.

Q: (T) The illusion is that there is not a link. In third density... (L) I got it! (T) Don't disappear on me now! [Laughter] The relationship is that consciousness is matter.

A: Close. What about vice versa?

 

[SasaM]

It seems to me that the confusion in the term density begins by not establishing that matter IS consciousness. A VERY DENSE consciousness. The C's used the word density to fit our level of understanding assuming that density can be used in the following way:

Bolded part in quote above seems to be corroborated by what was discussed in the April 5, 1997 session with the C's referenced in Laura's post, where the C's said that an atom (primal constituent of matter) has an objective existence, but does not exist (like everything else) if there is no observer which must be consciousness, which together implies that an atom (matter) is a consciousness being an observer (of itself).

Q: But still, what you said still implies that an atom has an objective existence. Is this correct?

A: Yes.

Q: Would you please tell us what constitutes objectivity?

A: The effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice "at the door."

Q: How does the effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door relate to the objective existence of an atom?

A: An atom, as with absolutely everything else, cannot exist without an observer.

Q: So, in the case of the objectivity of an atom, if the human observers are not objective, where is the observer who makes the atom objective, or does the atom not exist if there is no observer?

A: Yes. to the latter comment.

Q: Yes to which part?

A: The latter comment.

Q: So there must be an observer. Must the observer be human?

A: The observer must be a consciousness.

Q: If you say that an atom has an objective existence, yet it only exists if it is perceived by a consciousness, then an atom does not have an objective existence, correct?

A: No.

Q: Okay, what is the distinction? You say that objectivity is the ATTEMPT on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door.

A: Without consciousness, there is neither objective or subjective!!

Q: So the crux is the attempt to leave prejudice at the door in the same manner as one would be non-anticipatory in order to create?

A: Yes.

Q: Well, that is a VERY tricky... (A) Is consciousness objective?

A: Consciousness is objective, until it has the capacity to choose to be otherwise.

Q: (L) What is the stimulus for the change, for the giving of the capacity to choose?

A: The introduction of prejudice.

Q: In a cosmic sense, cosmic consciousness, in the sense of The One Unified Consciousness, what is the stimulus there for the ability to choose?

A: When the journey has reached union with The One, all such lessons have been completed.

Q: But, that doesn't answer the question.

A: Yes, it does!

 

[SasaM]

When a body is immersed in a fluid, the fluid exerts a force perpendicular to the surface of the body. This force per unit area is called pressure.

At a given level, the atmospheric pressure is equal to the weight of the column of air above that level, up to the upper limit of the atmosphere. Therefore, the higher the altitude, the lower the atmospheric pressure. The higher the altitude, the less air remains above, which therefore weighs less and exerts less pressure.

Using the analogy, when you go up in density level, the lower the pressure on the consciousness. BUT! for the consciousness to rise to the next level, it is the consciousness that becomes less dense. For example, Helium gas is less dense than the air we breathe and that is why it rises and floats.

Becoming less dense in the context above, can be accomplished by reducing the amount of consciousness in the Being or/and by enlarging the Being encompassing the consciousness in question. Although that seems obvious enough without saying.

IOW, I think that "becoming less dense" with respect to the consciousness advancing to the next level of density, does not mean 'becoming less material', i.e. it doesn't deal with physicality/materiality in general as in density of matter, but with the consciousness in particular in the sense of how dense the consciousness (in its Being) is. And consciousness is not per se equal to matter, i.e. materiality, but the other way around, as can be seen in @Wandering Star post above.

 

[SasaM]

Session 15 June 1996? Pretty much the whole session is about gravity and unstable gravity waves.
[...]
As to the link between gravity and consciousness (Session 6 August 2005):
[...]
And more recently, about "inverting" gravity to find consciousness (Session 10 December 2022):

If everything that exists is a consciousness being an observer (of itself), and gravity binds everything together, then de facto gravity is an act of observation which binds consciousness with its Being, OSIT.