A Course in Knowledge and Being: Differential Diagnosis in Spirit Release Part 2

I just finished watching, and it's a very moving (and informative!) video -- thanks very much to Laura and everyone else who had a hand in creating this. It was good to see the two other people at the board as well, and to hear the voices of everyone in the audience :)
 
The new video is awesome and very informative. I felt like I was right there with you all. Thank you! :cool2:
 
Just got done watching the first part and catching up on this thread. (Oddly, I clicked the link in the first post by Perceval, and it worked, before reading Mr. Scott's post with the new link to youtube).

It was very interesting and I'm looking forward to watching the next part! One thing I've always wondered about and was reminded while watching the video: why isn't a "space" added on the board, like a space bar on a keyboard, to separate the words as they're being spelled out? There's punctuation and whole words like "yes," "no," etc., so why not "space" between words? Does it have something to do with putting some extra effort in to decipher the replies? Or is it to save a little time on the board even if it will require more time later to separate the words when transcribing the session?
 
zhenqing said:
You are right Saieden. Now when I think about it, I of course do remember Laura covering this issue. I wonder if it just felt somehow safer for me to concentrate on the other part instead. I also might have gotten a bit overly excited with the concept of working with ouija board and hypnosis. But the the main reason was, I think, that lately I'm deadly tired of struggling, and I just wish I could tap into my subconscious mind and free myself of some of my problems, you know? But of course it's not that easy.

Thank you for your reply. I needed to read that :)
You're welcome, zhenqing, glad to have helped :)


Nancy2feathers said:
I watched the video this evening. Thank you all, especially Laura for laying out some valuable information. I have a spirit board.I haven`t used it at all. Bought it some years back in a vintage 2nd hand store and it`s been on the top shelf of a closet since. I really didn`t understand the importance of preparing oneself before using it.( And I`m glad I haven`t used it). I want to use it for the right reasons and after watching the video part 2 and re-watching video part1 I know I need a lot more preparation. I do find it fascinating though. It`s been a blessing for all of us that Laura has connected with the C`s. For me , after watching part 2, it felt like something shifted in me. Can`t really explain it, but something happened. I don`t want to dramatize...Just felt the bigger picture of our FOTCM Family. Thanks for sharing this video and info.


I had similar feeling while watching, and this may sound really cheesy, but it was almost like a "first day of school" except without any of the anxiety and nervousness, because everyone is there (here? ;) ) to learn, participate and cooperate willingly. I also take it with a grain of salt, but there really is a sense of some kind quantum leap that has taken place here, though I don't want to speculate on that too much.


SeekinTruth said:
Just got done watching the first part and catching up on this thread. (Oddly, I clicked the link in the first post by Perceval, and it worked, before reading Mr. Scott's post with the new link to youtube).

It was very interesting and I'm looking forward to watching the next part! One thing I've always wondered about and was reminded while watching the video: why isn't a "space" added on the board, like a space bar on a keyboard, to separate the words as they're being spelled out? There's punctuation and whole words like "yes," "no," etc., so why not "space" between words? Does it have something to do with putting some extra effort in to decipher the replies? Or is it to save a little time on the board even if it will require more time later to separate the words when transcribing the session?


I remember Laura asking the C's about this, and they pretty much said it's not necessary because the words will naturally be clear. With the video now, you (we) could try it yourself (ourselves). Just write the letters down as Laura calls them out and see if you would need spaces to make sense of it :)


edit: added more responses.
 
Perceval said:
Toda22 said:
Thanks for this interesting video!

Can someone please write down the word that Laura is saying on 00:31:40?
You have to use ......... you have to use willpower of the individual

I hear something like «zapers».

She says "zappers". You'll have to wait for her to explain exactly what she meant.

Thank you Perceval, I will wait for the explanation in some further video.
 
Thanks for sharing this, a historical event for youtube, first presentation of hyperlluminal communication uploaded in their page, I hope they appreciate it.

Amazing information, what I like from this is that the spirit release therapy it kinda for what I know, similar to the theory of carls jung of archetypes and other type of theories about, psychological demons, representations, it's just amazing all these about incarnate worlds, the psychic world.

I've always being kinda curious about something mouravieff mentions, when he talks about the polar opposites, he mentions about the negative polar opposite that is a man that has attached the spirit of his counterpart, and that he becomes very powerful thanks to this. I kinda get curious, if that situation is possible, it may be a real spirit attachment or some femenine psychologial energy created by that person, like the elemental beings Laura mentions. Also, what happens to those negative personalities like Hitler or those psychopathic people with social or economic power, do they get possessed by some elemental energies, do they open a door for some higher negative beings or energies, do they get some special type of power somewhere else that use them as proxies? or are they just psychopaths or normal humans that become disordered?

Thanks again. A lot of food for thought, I guess a good complement for these videos is the book of the high strangeness of dimensions and densities, as I started to have strange experiences I began to read the book, this may serve as a really good complement.
 
I'm sure there will be a thread for it soon enough, but for those that have already watched Part 2 and need to quench the thirst for more now:
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fuzt-diTRsQ
:clap:
 
Yes, the word was "zappers" referring to the remote control blast function.
 
Thanks Laura and crew for this great gift! Watched it before bed yesterday and wow, so many moving dreams and a LOT to think about...especially my own attachment issues...what a mess inside, fortunately I feel less alone with YOU ALL by my side and this knowledge you share
 
Prometeo said:
I've always being kinda curious about something mouravieff mentions, when he talks about the polar opposites, he mentions about the negative polar opposite that is a man that has attached the spirit of his counterpart, and that he becomes very powerful thanks to this. I kinda get curious, if that situation is possible, it may be a real spirit attachment or some femenine psychologial energy created by that person, like the elemental beings Laura mentions.

Could you share the specific quote here, please?

Also, what happens to those negative personalities like Hitler or those psychopathic people with social or economic power, do they get possessed by some elemental energies, do they open a door for some higher negative beings or energies, do they get some special type of power somewhere else that use them as proxies? or are they just psychopaths or normal humans that become disordered?

I would imagine that each situation is different, FWIW. For example, if a person doesn't have a soul, I doubt they can get any attachments, unless there are any attachments that can feed on "weak frequencies", or a soul pool, or whatever. And, if it relates to information theory, then yes, anybody with an "evil" substratum could attract all kinds of evil spirits and entropic forces because they are tuned into that, and therefore could be used by proxies. But either way, it is all very hard to prove, and as Laura explained, there aren't any scientific studies done on this. So we can only speculate. But I would imagine that anybody who lacks knowledge or has a psychological weakness, or wishful thinking, etc. could attract whatever matches their frequency. I say this because it is really interesting how, in the past, several people wrote to us saying the were experiencing all kinds of weird stuff, only to discover that they all faded away as they started doing the diet, practicing EE and reading more, which to me suggests a psychic protection, or a frequency that suddenly stops matching. If you don't feed your predator, programs, etc., they stop having a home. OSIT.
 
Just finished watching Part 3 - thank you Laura and crew for such an informative set of videos. It was fascinating to learn about Differential diagnosis and the fact that it can take ages to get rid of attachments. Also, to see the C's on camera (so to speak) was truly awesome!
 
Laura said:
Yes, the word was "zappers" referring to the remote control blast function.

Thank you Laura.
If I understand correctly, the remote control is not only a tool to get in a situation to find attachments but also a tool to make attachments go away (next to proper diet, EE and other work on yourself).
 
Back
Top Bottom