A Course in Knowledge and Being: Differential Diagnosis in Spirit Release Part 2

[happyliza]

What a treat and a lovely surprise for my Sunday! I re-watched part one and sat enjoying all the videos back to back! I was typing useful elements simultaneously so I have my fact file updated. Two subjects close to my heart as this is what I wish to do. Glad we have the go-ahead to practise with the board now and that it is out in the open for all those to see who think it is just a past-time!

I have further cleansing I need to do first, and have already asked a friend here in readiness who also is a truth-seeker, though via the David Icke site!! She is reading Amazing Grace and hopefully will read through the rest of Laura's books by the time I am ready to practise after doing the rest of the cleansing and psychic hygiene.

I think I will delay the MRI for my shoulder as could well be an attachment, on my knee as well, plus a couple of 'cravings' I need to sort out. It will be interesting to find out if this is also the source of my financial blocking here and the reactive 'emergencies' I get. Sounds very likely so will be interesting to discover if I can go some way in eliminating a lot of this. I know much is down to our unconscious 'choices' we make. Also that suffering can never be fully eliminated or we would never learn. What the crew and Laura have had to put up with is proof of that!

I am pleased to say that my doggie Sienna is just about recovered now thankfully. Also that I don't feel so bad missing out on the meetings as like everyone else here, I felt I was in the room with you all.

Plus I am really spoilt today as we also get to listen to the Sott Radio show tonight!

Heartfelt thanks and gratitude to everyone who has made this shared learning and knowledge possible.

 

[theos]

What a treat and a lovely surprise for my Sunday! I re-watched part one and sat enjoying all the videos back to back! I was typing useful elements simultaneously so I have my fact file updated. Two subjects close to my heart as this is what I wish to do. Glad we have the go-ahead to practise with the board now and that it is out in the open for all those to see who think it is just a past-time!

I have further cleansing I need to do first, and have already asked a friend here in readiness who also is a truth-seeker, though via the David Icke site!! She is reading Amazing Grace and hopefully will read through the rest of Laura's books by the time I am ready to practise after doing the rest of the cleansing and psychic hygiene.

Please don't take this video series as a "go ahead" to experiment on the board. This type of activity is not to be taken lightly and is fraught with danger which you'll learn more about in part 3. There are a multitude of ways to clean your machine without using the board (diet, continuous knowledge input, networking on the forum, EE etc.) and remember "there is no free lunch" and no shortcuts. Furthermore, if one put in all the work necessary (over years) and decided to experiment with the board they should definitely think twice before including a David Icke follower.

 

[Gertrudes]

I haven't yet watched part 3 (looking forward to it!) but part 2 was an extremely interesting video, thank you very much for sharing.
This was also very timely for me as I'm in the last 5 pages of the book "Healing lost Souls - Releasing Unwanted Spirits from Your Energy Body", Dr. William Baldwin's last book. Perhaps another book to add to Approaching Infinity's suggestions.

For those who are unfamiliar with him, Dr. Baldwin delved into Spirit Release therapy having written a manual of the practices that set the stage for other practitioners to follow. From what I remember Laura also used his techniques but had to further develop her own practice since Baldwin's experience hadn't reached the uncharted territories she came across.

In the book Baldwin mentions similar attachments to those described by Laura, and even though he shows ignorance in handling the subject of ETs I found it overall an interesting read on spirit release that follows a similar path to the one described by Laura.

He does talk about something that has intrigued me and since Laura has also mentioned it in the video I'll take the opportunity to share that here.
Laura talks briefly about a particularly nasty type of entity which I equate to be what Dr. Baldwin in his book calls the DFE, short for Dark Force Entitiy. His take, however, is that DFE have 3 core beliefs:
1. That they have no light at their centre
2. They can cease to exist
3. The Light is harmful

Contrary to the typical idea of an exorcism one may have, his procedure when dealing with these entities lies in addressing these 3 core beliefs which, according to him, are false, and were imprinted in them by higher DFE who feed on them.
After what may be a lengthy dialogue the entity ends up perceiving that it has been duped by those higher forces and agrees to go into the light (I'm simplifying, of course, but that's he gist of it).

I suppose the reason why I'm giving it as much importance so as to mention it is the fact that it came to me as a new approach to the idea I had of directly fighting against the "demons". Instead, he was talking them through in changing their core beliefs.

I don't know if this is possible or whether he was being duped himself though. He recounts the results to be convincing.

As for the board experiment, I find it fascinating as a subject and I very much wish to learn more about it, however, I have no inclination of actually trying it myself. Trying it with Laura and amongst the Chateau people in a very safe environment is one thing, otherwise, too many creepy things out there of which I have little knowledge for me to want to venture, I might gain more than what I bargained for.
I dunno, maybe one day I'll change my mind.

ADDED: Off to see part 3 now!

 

[Torstone]

Thank you for theses videos! I have much learning to do and many answers I can find through research before something like that would benefit and not hurt me I think. But very interesting to see how a session works and to get a view on how to use it as a tool for self-development.

During the 3. part of the series I started thinking about attachemenst and the probability of getting new ones.

Hypothetically, if one worked with a therapist and to a great degree got rid of them:
What would you have to do to limit the probability not to get attached in the same «entry point» again?
The awarness of it is obviously a big clue since during the session there would be asked questions as to what that persons state was at the time the attachment happened. Therefore one would get to understand when and how one is the most receptible to being attached.
But would advice from the therapist follow the session as to how to proceed to protect oneself against it? I guess the answers will depend on the situation of the individual but are there general guidelines for how to proceed?

 

[Gertrudes]

Laura let me tell you that you look great in this video, younger!

My thoughts exactly :) with every year that passes Laura seems to rejuvenate! Then again, she has never followed a "normal" course of life has she ;)

One thing I've always wondered about and was reminded while watching the video: why isn't a "space" added on the board, like a space bar on a keyboard, to separate the words as they're being spelled out? There's punctuation and whole words like "yes," "no," etc., so why not "space" between words? Does it have something to do with putting some extra effort in to decipher the replies? Or is it to save a little time on the board even if it will require more time later to separate the words when transcribing the session?

I have also wondered about that.

 

[Stoneboss]

I had a chance to watch the video yesterday and want to thank Laura and all involved for making this video possible. I was totally amazed at the pure and spontaneous connection that Laura has with the C's. Looking forward to the next one!

 

[Lucius]

watching thx!:)

 

[darksai]

Hypothetically, if one worked with a therapist and to a great degree got rid of them:
What would you have to do to limit the probability not to get attached in the same «entry point» again?

This is why it's so important for the therapist, or whoever is asking the questions to the attachment/entity, to find out the conditions under which the attachment took place, as well as what it was getting out, or feeding off of, through you. Then knowing of your particular vulnerability, you can take the steps necessary to protect yourself, which might be avoiding certain things or kinds of people altogether, or simply remembering to "draw the line" mentally when those kinds of situations arise. There's no recipe for that because there are too many things to consider for a one-size-fits all solution, but in applying some general rules of thumb alongside good observation and discernment, the chances of something else coming in it's place should be very low.

 

[Gertrudes]

Hypothetically, if one worked with a therapist and to a great degree got rid of them:
What would you have to do to limit the probability not to get attached in the same «entry point» again?

This is why it's so important for the therapist, or whoever is asking the questions to the attachment/entity, to find out the conditions under which the attachment took place, as well as what it was getting out, or feeding off of, through you. Then knowing of your particular vulnerability, you can take the steps necessary to protect yourself, which might be avoiding certain things or kinds of people altogether, or simply remembering to "draw the line" mentally when those kinds of situations arise. There's no recipe for that because there are too many things to consider for a one-size-fits all solution, but in applying some general rules of thumb alongside good observation and discernment, the chances of something else coming in it's place should be very low.

Also, building up good psychological hygiene can be one of our greatest strengths and act as a shield against an attachment. That way, not only can you more easily discern which thoughts are yours and which aren't, but the knowledge you gain of your self will also act as a protection. The Psychology & Cognitive Science section of the forum is a great start, as well as the recommended psychology related books.

Video 3 was great! It answered a lot of questions I had about spirit attachment. I had been toying around with the idea of trying a session with an experienced spirit release therapist since having read the book by William Baldwin but was unsure of wether that would be shortcutting a process that should be dealt with differently. After watching the video I no longer think so, if used consciously and with the intention of self growth, it seems to be a great tool to help you find some of your weaknesses. I may book my self a session.

Thank you very much for these videos Laura and crew, they were very informative and really helpful.

 

[Alcarohtare]

Thank you very much Laura and others for making insightful new videos. I've personally benefited especially from the third one, speaking of spiritual attachments and their prevention.

 

[mada85]

Hypothetically, if one worked with a therapist and to a great degree got rid of them:
What would you have to do to limit the probability not to get attached in the same «entry point» again?

This is why it's so important for the therapist, or whoever is asking the questions to the attachment/entity, to find out the conditions under which the attachment took place, as well as what it was getting out, or feeding off of, through you. Then knowing of your particular vulnerability, you can take the steps necessary to protect yourself, which might be avoiding certain things or kinds of people altogether, or simply remembering to "draw the line" mentally when those kinds of situations arise. There's no recipe for that because there are too many things to consider for a one-size-fits all solution, but in applying some general rules of thumb alongside good observation and discernment, the chances of something else coming in it's place should be very low.

Have a look at part 3, in which Laura goes into detail about mental blocking, and how awareness and knowledge can protect a person from attachments in various situations.

 

[Tempus Fugit]

Thanks for the video, very informative and loaded with helpful information - great job to Laura and everyone else involved!

 

[cubbex]

Could you share the specific quote here, please?

I would imagine that each situation is different, FWIW. For example, if a person doesn't have a soul, I doubt they can get any attachments, unless there are any attachments that can feed on "weak frequencies", or a soul pool, or whatever. And, if it relates to information theory, then yes, anybody with an "evil" substratum could attract all kinds of evil spirits and entropic forces because they are tuned into that, and therefore could be used by proxies. But either way, it is all very hard to prove, and as Laura explained, there aren't any scientific studies done on this. So we can only speculate. But I would imagine that anybody who lacks knowledge or has a psychological weakness, or wishful thinking, etc. could attract whatever matches their frequency. I say this because it is really interesting how, in the past, several people wrote to us saying the were experiencing all kinds of weird stuff, only to discover that they all faded away as they started doing the diet, practicing EE and reading more, which to me suggests a psychic protection, or a frequency that suddenly stops matching. If you don't feed your predator, programs, etc., they stop having a home. OSIT.

Yes, the cs mention in one session knowledge provides psychic protection, Laura asked how it worked or something like that and they said that was irrelevant.

Which quote do you want, the one about the negative polar opposite?
Ok, I guess that's one and if not pardon me. I did a fast search for that part and found it:

Besides the positive types of allegedly polar couples wc have just studied, there are other types of partial, negative polarity of a pathological nature. These cases are numerous. Here, wc will limit our description to an analysis of the only extreme case falling within this category.

This is characterized by a complete polarity of the motor centres, as well as of the negative parts of the two other centres, the positive parts of which are in a state of profound lethargy.

Only the heavy karmic burden of a past full of crime, of devouring passions, of violence, and of cold-blooded cruelty, accumulated in common through several incarnations, can lead to such a deformation of two Personalities and knit them together so closely.

As long as the two partners are alive, their activity is limited to the horrors of the crimes which fill the forensic news. But, in certain cases, the discarnate woman survives after death and takes on the demonic form of a succubtts. The man, who is still alive, then combines the presence and strength of the two Personalities in his being. Let us note that, with the integral polarity of the two motor centres, and with the positive parts of the two other centres atrophied, the'double-being* formed in this way has no doubts — and cannot have any. The total assurance he has of himself then doubles his strength, which becomes demonic.

This type represents the pathological phenomenon of the negative androgyne. Through a large usurpation of dual sexual energy, a black androgyne of this kind becomes extremely strong and wicked. Bringing together in him the two Personalities, closely united by strong negative passions; hate, jealousy, vengeance, and lastly a thirst for blood, this possessed man is a true danger to society.

This extreme case of the negative, pathological, demonic and bestial androgyne is the opposite of the angelic androgyne that can be achieved by man after he passes the Second Threshold. We mention it for this teason, and also to give the reader an idea of the profound meaning of the parable concerning the man of the Gadarenes who was possessed by nearly two thousand demons. Bringing together two dark Personalities in a
single body, this demoniac carried in himself: 987 + 987 = 1974 diabolical little

Gnosis Volume 3 p. 205

 

[mariowil7]

Hi Everybody!!!

Started watching the videos... and are extremely informative.

Thanks Laura and Crew for this work...

Time to get into CLEANSING/REVIEW mode of attachments et al...

Definely the DIET, EE, and the Assimilation of New Information (perpendicular to the "NEW" old Lies) Helps a lot.

Keep it going!!!. :P

 

[Tristan]

Fascinating, especially for learning and example of the daily affairs of life. We have to make diagnostic efforts ...don't we?
I'm looking forward to reading the transcript not to miss details