I watched Candace's latest yesterday, and noticed that someone on the comments had said that her husband is a good friend of the Tates. Would that be why she can be so smart about many topics, yet so adamant about defending these two bullies?
I didn't know about Candace's husband's connection to Tate, but it didn't take me a lot of snooping around to find it.
Here's an X thread that summarises the connection, as well as Tate's criminal activities in general. It contains a number of videos demonstrating that Candace defending the Tates may not just be a severe case of wilful blindness, but premeditated attempt to cover up Tate's criminal activities. According to the author, Candace met Tate through her husband, George Farmer, back in 2019, and Farmer had known Tate for years prior to that. I wouldn't be shocked at all if Farmer had some dodgy dealings with the Tates and Candace's support for Andrew Tate was some kind of a vailed attempt to protect her husband.
A couple of more noteworthy quotes form the posts in the thread:
"Candace along with Tate repeat over & over that Tate stopped having anything to do with pornography 10 years ago (that would make it 2013). This is provably false."
During the episode Candace literally reads out text messages between the victim & one of the men where they're discussing the fact she's a minor.Most shockingly one of the men, Keith Fox, was actually found guilty & is serving a 24 year prison sentence for sexually abusing this victim when she was a minor & ANOTHER minor. There is no doubt Fox knew the victim was a minor. Candace beeps out Keith Fox's name so people can't look him up to realise her entire premise is a lie.
To this day Candace Owens has never disclosed the nature of her husband George Farmer's relationship with Andrew Tate. It invites many questions. Most obviously... Why would someone who comes from British nobility be floating in the same circles as a pimp from Luton? There's no doubt Candace Owens is lying on behalf of & protecting (at the very least) Andrew Tate.
Based on the evidence showed in the thread, what Candace is doing is not merely subconscious selection and substitution of data, it's deliberate editing of videos to obfuscate the truth. She knows exactly what she's doing and what I would be really interested to know why she's doing it. Unedited videos are shown next to Candace's edits, and I've seen these videos in other contexts before. It's really weird she chose to manipulate videos that widely circulate on the internet. That's what the BBC and CNN do -while also assuming the public is too dumb to check for themselves.
As Aba and Preach mention in
this video on Tate, when such bodies as DIICOT or FBI do their investigation, it takes years to press charges. But when they eventually do press them, a lot of people go down with the original suspects. At this point I will not be entirely surprised if Farmer is on the list in some capacity. Even if it's in connection to the Tates's other activities, such as casinos. At 3:24 of the Aba & Preach video there's a conference call between Andrew Tate and a few other men. The authors say one of them is Candace's husband. I see some resemblance, but I'm not entirely sure this really is George Farmer.
The relevant part of the video starts here:
In the same video, the authors also compiled quotes by both Tate brothers that refer to having sexual interactions with very young girls. They normally mention the age of 16, but this could just be because that's the legal age of consent and mentioning anything younger is admitting to committing a crime.
The compilation also contains a video that indicates the age of one of Andrew's girlfriends where she states the time she got into a relationship with Andrew. Simple maths points towards the age of 14-15. Tate was a grown-up at the time.
You can watch this section from here:
I have read lots of replies by the Tate fans under videos accusing Andrew and Tristan of pedophilia where they claim they're not pedophiles, they just like young girls who are unspoiled by other men and the society. Their argument is usually based on the fact that pedophilia is only limited to small children. Technically, they're right, pedophilia does refer to sexual attraction to prepubescent children, usually below the age of 13. But there are related disorders that are all lumped under the term pedophilia:
- Hebephilia is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent children who are in early adolescence, typically ages 11–14
- Ephebophilia is the primary sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19.
So technically speaking, the Tates are ephebophiles, but they won't get out of it on a technicality. In public awareness pedophilia has become an umbrella term that covers all three deviations. So no, it's not just a preference. It's a deviancy and there's a medical term that describes it. Even if the general public doesn't use the term correctly it's still sick. And it's interesting that Mrs "independent Journalist" Candace Owens failed to connect those dots. As the C's said, there's a program for everyone.
I'll finish off with an unrelated but interesting bit of X info that Candace's father-in-law is an Israel supported. He recently posted an entire thread on X starting with: "In view of public comments from a high-profile member of my family, I want to put my own views on antisemitism and Israel’s current military campaign in Gaza on public record." That family member is probably Candace. Should you decide to read through Lord Farmer's thread, do have a barf bag handy, he's a die-hard Israhell apologist. I guess family dinner convos are a lot of fun for Candace:
www.theguardian.com
