H
Hildegarda
Guest
Re: Cancer and candida
Hi Elisa,
could you explain the doctor's idea in a few words for other forumites?
Hi Elisa,
could you explain the doctor's idea in a few words for other forumites?
Elisa said:Thanks Psyche,
But I got a problem with the link. It cannot be accessed.
Divide By Zero said:Also, 300 meters is a huge distance. So from my electrical understanding, there is no real exposure there.
The F.C.C. concurs about the best way to avoid exposure. It is not by choosing a phone with a marginally lower SAR, it says, but rather by holding the cellphone “away from the head or body.”
Devra Davis,[ Ph.D]., presents an array of recent and long suppressed research in this timely bombshell. Cell phone radiation is a national emergency. Stunningly, the most popular gadget of our age has now been shown to damage DNA, break down the brain's defenses, and reduce sperm count while increasing memory loss, the risk of Alzheimer's disease, and even cancer. The growing brains of children make them especially vulnerable. And half of the world's four billion cell phone used by people under twenty.
[and ends with this:]
As this eye-opening call to action shows, we can make safer cell phones now. Why would we put our children at risk of a devastating epidemic of brain illness in the years to come?
Henry Lai, a research professor in the bioengineering department at the University of Washington, began laboratory radiation studies in 1980 and found that rats exposed to radio frequency radiation had damaged brain DNA. He maintains a database that holds 400 scientific papers on possible biological effects of radiation from wireless communication.
One study listed by Mr. Lai found effects like loss of memory in rats exposed to SAR values in the range of 0.0006 to 0.06 watts per kilogram. “I did not expect to see effects at low levels,” he said. (The Federal Communications Commission mandates that the SAR produced by phones be no more than 1.6 watts per kilogram)
Skyfarmr said:One further note, as I was checking out "Ms Devre" and "Mr. Lai", which is how the NYTs refer to them...
my question: wouldn't it have been more respectful to refer to these Ph.D. earning individuals as Drs (doctors)? or would that have made them seem too credible?
Galaxia2002 said:I think that the solution is precisely to mix sodium bicarbonate with a little of vitamic c. They will react to produce sodium ascorbate plus CO2. The sodium ascorbate is now alkaline and when go in in blood they will transform again in ascorbic acid. But this can only be done it with the amount of bicarbonate to take, because if you transform all the vitamic c in ascorbate you will take very much sodium!
Remember that sodium bicarbonate (because of sodium) will rise the arterial pressure, ( very bad for persons with hearth diseases) and you would become thirsty at least, the ideal would be potassium bicarbonate.
I think the better is to deliver the NaHCO3 inside the body, as the protocol advice, because you could get a much alkaline media in the intestines and promote that candida grows there