From Chapter 65 Book 8 of the Wave Series:
In light of what Josepsh Clinton Pearce was quoted by Laura to have wrote in the past, here is an interesting video with some more examples of very early childhood imprinting regressing 3D beings back to very 2D like behavior and, dare I say, even temporary or even in some cases permament 2D level of awareness? Or perhaps these very rare and extreme cases were part of the separate lesson profiles of the 2D to-3D bridges a.k.a OPs/"Pre-Adamic man" types maybe/likely? And if so, then maybe "potentially" individuated Souled beings/"Adamic man" don't have these types of experiential lessons in their Souls' lessons profiles and instead more "advanced" types of early childhood imprinting to make them "food" for the Hyperdimentional Control System? Well regardless of the latter, I think these examples hit home the point of what early childhood imprinting can do to us 3D human beings; that is regardless of either being an OP or having the potential within to awaken and become more than an imprinted "machine."
Evidence that there is a critical period for the mother imprint in the higher animals was emphasized in the monkey experiments. In one instance, the experimenter was not prepared for the arrival of a new baby monkey and had to create a makeshift surrogate mother using a ball for the head. This was provided to the baby, while the experimenter worked on a better model with a face. But, it was too late. The baby monkey had already bonded to the faceless mother and turned the face of the new model around so that it was blank. A mother with a face was simply not acceptable because the imprint had already been made.
Joseph Chilton Pearce writes:
Occasionally we hear of people found chained in attics and such places from infancy. Their world view is either scanty or different for they are always feeble minded at best. In 1951 a child was found in an Irish chicken-house, having somehow survived there with the chickens, since infancy. The ten-year old’s long hair was matted with filth; he ate at the chicken trough; roosted with the flock; his fingernails had grown, fittingly, to semicircular claws; he made chicken-like noises, not surprisingly; he had no speech and showed no promise of learning any in the time he survived his rescue.
Forty years ago there was interest in two feral children found in India. They had apparently been raised by wolves. They were taken from an actual wolf den along with some cubs, the older wolves scattering or being killed. One of the children, Kamala they called her, survived for nine years. Only with difficulty was she taught table manners and such niceties as walking on the hind legs. Nevertheless she exhibited a growing awareness of the reward system of her new group, and displayed a strong drive toward such orientation. As with the chicken-child, however, she had missed the formative period of human infant development, and there was no easy or complete going back to retrace the steps. Kamala had formed according to the pattern eliciting response around her during her mirroring [imprinting] period. For her first two years of captivity – or rescue – she howled faithfully at ten, twelve, and three at night, as all Indian wolves do. She would also, in spite of precautions, manage to get at the chickens, rip them apart alive and eat them raw. Only when the new social reward system grew strong enough to outweigh the earlier rewards did she abandon her early training. (Pearce 1971)
We are all Kamala. We are all divine children raised by wolves.
But how can this be?
We are all programmed. Our programs are written in the circuits of our brains by those around us in our formative years, just as their programs were written during their formative years, and so on back into the mists of time. Each generation just adding a few more lines of code.
It is our ideas that shape our children. We provide what we may consider to be the ideal environment for the child, but our own programming determines what we may consider to be the proper environment. Once we have provided the environment, we then want our children to like it, to approve of it, to agree with us that it is right. And our ideas come from our culture. And our culture is created by … what? A Control System?
There is considerable evidence that agreement is also in the genes. There seems to be a genetic drive toward communion with others, for speech and preferences and disposition. As newly born human beings, it seems we come into the world with intent to be in agreement with others. But the details of how we go about being agreeable is related to the imprints we receive at the various stages of childhood development.
Everyone carries in their genes, it seems, deep archetypes that are very much like a database program just waiting for someone to input data. The thing is, this database is only open to input for a limited period of time, and whatever data is entered during that time determines how all other data will be evaluated forever after. It will produce over and over again the same response to any set of stimuli that have one or more items that have been organized by the database. Anything that is not found in the database is discarded. If the database is not utilized and no data is entered during the period of readiness, or imprinting, that possibility goes dormant and diminishes.
In light of what Josepsh Clinton Pearce was quoted by Laura to have wrote in the past, here is an interesting video with some more examples of very early childhood imprinting regressing 3D beings back to very 2D like behavior and, dare I say, even temporary or even in some cases permament 2D level of awareness? Or perhaps these very rare and extreme cases were part of the separate lesson profiles of the 2D to-3D bridges a.k.a OPs/"Pre-Adamic man" types maybe/likely? And if so, then maybe "potentially" individuated Souled beings/"Adamic man" don't have these types of experiential lessons in their Souls' lessons profiles and instead more "advanced" types of early childhood imprinting to make them "food" for the Hyperdimentional Control System? Well regardless of the latter, I think these examples hit home the point of what early childhood imprinting can do to us 3D human beings; that is regardless of either being an OP or having the potential within to awaken and become more than an imprinted "machine."