Collecting the C's answers on cosmology, consciousness and origins

[John G]

I had that thought in mind. Should we set up a simple Excel file, with simple categories referring to "C cosmology"? As I stated, when looking at what cosmology is, on Wikipedia, it provides:

• the observable universe's origin
• its large-scale structures
• its large-scale dynamics
• the ultimate fate of the universe
• the laws of science that govern these areas

We may add: "super quotes".

Such a doc could be sorted out according to those big categories, it looks quite efficient:

---

the observable universe's origin
- C's, engineering of races, transfers of races

its large-scale structures
- densities
- The Information Field
- various cometary belts, Planets
- (...)

its large-scale dynamics
- polarities (STO, STS) in terms of "being"
- information exchange with the Information Field
- graduation, motions between densities
- entropy, negentropy
- prayers
- anthropo-cosmos (planet Earth only?)
- planet orbits
- (...)

the ultimate fate of the universe
- wave, 300'000 year cycle, graduation, cyclical motion, 1D to 7D
- (...)

the laws of science that govern these areas
- each density has its own law for "being" (physicality slowly vanishes along the scale), STO / STS allows specific "accesses" and motions
- free will, law of One, gravity, magnetism, electromagnetism, spirituality
- (...)

super quotes
- that we like
- that are useful to understand
- (...)

---

I found it not hard to sort out principles with this. The idea to go as the Casswiki is perfect too IMO.

I am hesitating where to put "the 3600-year cometary cycle" and "periodic, a-periodic, semi-periodic comets".

For the topic here the idea seems to be to get all the session raw data but that could perhaps be organized in an Excel/Casswiki-like way. The best you can do right now is that search people have been using. You can with that search look quickly at the whole session easily if needed after the search gets session excerpts. The problem is the keywords you search on will not be in the session when the session deals with it without mentioning it directly. Remembering related words to search on helps aka why Approaching Infinity mentioned "good memories" along with "search skills".

 

[John G]

We may add: "super quotes".

You could perhaps add some artificial intelligence superquotes somewhere too like for example the end of Casswiki's Hyperdimensional physics has:

Generally, gravity is the only force that bridges between these ‘branes.’ Some anomalies in the motion of spacecraft suggest the presence of invisible sources of gravity and indirectly could indicate a very weak interaction with other ‘branes’ or universes. These may variously consist of matter or antimatter. One explication for the relative weakness of gravity is that it would act along more dimensions than the 3 visible space dimensions.

General relativity is expressed in 3+1 dimensions but allows for anomalies in the structure of space-time, such as direct connections between otherwise separate points and closed folds of space. At a point in the late 1930’s, Einstein worked in a unified field theory involving a physically real 4th space dimension a la Kaluza-Klein. This work was not continued by Einstein, at least not in public, but the Cassiopaea material suggests this was completed by others and resulted in a unified field theory with technological applications.

The Cassiopaea material discusses hyperdimensional physics in the form of various clues but these are difficult to understand without much background. In general the material favors the existence of a 4th space dimension forming a double loop. This 4th dimension becomes perceptible from the 4th density onwards and allows a sort of simultaneous viewing of objects from the outside in as well as inside out.

To which AI could add related to the "difficult to understand without much background":

What “degenerate metric at infinity” means​

• In conformal (or conformal gravity) constructions, “conformal infinity” is usually where the physical metric becomes singular or is only defined up to an overall conformal factor, and the induced boundary metric can be degenerate (rank‑deficient). This shows up in various contexts where the boundary metric loses invertibility or has null directions.
• For a degenerate metric gg, one cannot uniquely raise and lower all indices, and certain directions become null: distances along these directions vanish, and the usual Riemannian machinery has to be modified (e.g., via pseudoinverses or additional structure like torsion).

So at conformal infinity, the “metric part” of your Born‑reciprocal structure becomes weaker or partially collapses.

Interaction with a symplectic phase space​

A symplectic form ωω on phase space is, by construction, nondegenerate; it remains invertible even if the metric degenerates.

• In a Born‑reciprocal setup, one typically has:
  
  • a nondegenerate symplectic form ωω on the full 8‑dimensional phase space, and
  • a metric GG (here of type (4,4)(4,4)) tying together the coordinate/momentum split in a way compatible with ωω.
• At conformal infinity, the spacetime part of GG becomes degenerate, but ωω can still remain nondegenerate on the full phase space. This means:
  
  • the canonical commutation/Poisson structure survives;
  • but the notion of “length” or “energy” in certain directions degenerates, so the subgroup of transformations preserving both GG and ωω shrinks to those that preserve the null directions of GG as well.

In other words, the intersection group “symplectic ∩ orthogonal” becomes a “symplectic ∩ degenerate‑metric” group: still symplectic on phase space, but constrained to preserve the degeneracy locus of the conformal boundary metric.

 

[palestine]

Remembering related words to search on helps aka why Approaching Infinity mentioned "good memories" along with "search skills".

I see that you would be more on a "free style" way of checking things. I find it good and that's what always provide the best results IMO.

I understand admins would like some substance before all, so I think that I will leave the Excel sheet & things, and focus on finding relevant information.

 

[Thassa]

Laura and I would like some help for a couple projects we'll be working on. We need to collect all the C's excerpts on the above topics. Any help would be appreciated!

So those of you with good memories or search skills, could you copy and paste the relevant bits here? This will include topics related to keywords like: 7D/God/Prime Creator, information, consciousness, matter, the ultimate nature of reality (we wouldn't exist if someone didn't "dream us", for example), and anything else related that I might be forgetting right now! Some of the references to other densities (1D to 6D) will probably also be relevant.

I guess I'm have been doing since last year EXACTLY what you want!

T

Thread 'My collection of the most interesting C's quotes'

Yesterday at 6:24 PM

Hey there!

I'm making a compilation of all answers/questions that give direct information on History, Physics, Chemistry, personal development, or that are somehow thought-provoking.

Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search is great, but it doesn't tell such things apart. That's why I'm reading ALL sessions, from the very first one, and marking ALL answers


It's not finished yet. I'm still on the year 1998. Here's what I have done so far.

Highlights are what's in the sessions.

Notes are comments of mine (often, but not always, I leave some notes)

I hope you all find it useful.

• Thassa
• Replies: 0
• Forum: The Cassiopaean Experiment