As Laura says, we should look at objective reality here not our preconceived, conditioned hang-ups and emotive responses.
Her purposes are clearly stated on the site:
'Pathologist assistant Nicole Angemi spends her days slicing, dicing and examining different organs of the human body taken from various autopsies. It's a field of work that many would find morbid, but the New Jersey native sees it as her mission to help educate people about the confronting realities of life and death.
That's lead to her running one of the most controversial Instagram accounts on the planet, where she posts daily updates of organs, grizzly body parts and a fair amount of gore. There's no desire to shock or scare anyone, only simply to inform.
In her interview with Motherboard she reveals her motivation for doing so:
‘I want to teach people and show the world the truth about death and life and diseases. But sometimes it’s hard for people to handle and they report my photos.’
I watched her video. It’s illuminating and valuable. She’s clearly passionate about education and believes everyone should know – has a right to know - what’s going on in their bodies. She’s using Instogram to get as many as possible interested in every aspect of the body through strong but also informative images. As she says in the fascinating video ‘It’s not that big of a deal and that this stuff happens to everyone’.
She also seems to be knowingly confronting the secrecy and obscuration of the medical profession as well as the controlling influences of such sites as Instogram. She talks about posting images that sure are confrontational but entirely valid and then when she dares to title what they are they get deleted. It’s as if she is testing the limits of people’s perceptions of what is and isn’t acceptable to know – for example an image of a foreskin was ok until she titled it ‘foreskin’ and then it was deleted. As she says it’s just a piece of skin, not a penis! She rightfully goes on to show that the system allows half naked photos of a 17 year old but wont allow scientific truths about the various conditions within the human body.
She is also completely upfront as to herself as a woman, a young mum, and her empathy for other women struggling to have a family. Her talk about miscarriages and the hidden nature of human reproductionary faults was inspiring as were the images she showed. She is being responsible about not being a doctor... she tells people she cannot give diagnosis as to their problems. She’s very careful not to show identifying marks… she talks about always being respectful.
Most importantly she talks about how scientists want to suppress what she is doing, that they tell her that this information should stay hidden in a medical museum… that it is for their learning and use and not for the general public… and so they stay in command of us and our bodies. She is rightly outraged at this and willing to put her career at risk to refute them.
All in all, I would suggest we are looking at a young crusader for truth here, a courageous, intelligent, perceptive individual, and what she is doing is important.
Think about the work of Leonardo da Vinci; his countless, detailed pictures of dissections and autopsies. His work hangs in a museum and is lauded. I think the real issue here is that she is an inteligent, erudite woman, with an individual look, daring to speak uncomfortable truths and present them with emotional perception and care and as such she is a target for that old fashioned predator; misogyny.
Her purposes are clearly stated on the site:
'Pathologist assistant Nicole Angemi spends her days slicing, dicing and examining different organs of the human body taken from various autopsies. It's a field of work that many would find morbid, but the New Jersey native sees it as her mission to help educate people about the confronting realities of life and death.
That's lead to her running one of the most controversial Instagram accounts on the planet, where she posts daily updates of organs, grizzly body parts and a fair amount of gore. There's no desire to shock or scare anyone, only simply to inform.
In her interview with Motherboard she reveals her motivation for doing so:
‘I want to teach people and show the world the truth about death and life and diseases. But sometimes it’s hard for people to handle and they report my photos.’
I watched her video. It’s illuminating and valuable. She’s clearly passionate about education and believes everyone should know – has a right to know - what’s going on in their bodies. She’s using Instogram to get as many as possible interested in every aspect of the body through strong but also informative images. As she says in the fascinating video ‘It’s not that big of a deal and that this stuff happens to everyone’.
She also seems to be knowingly confronting the secrecy and obscuration of the medical profession as well as the controlling influences of such sites as Instogram. She talks about posting images that sure are confrontational but entirely valid and then when she dares to title what they are they get deleted. It’s as if she is testing the limits of people’s perceptions of what is and isn’t acceptable to know – for example an image of a foreskin was ok until she titled it ‘foreskin’ and then it was deleted. As she says it’s just a piece of skin, not a penis! She rightfully goes on to show that the system allows half naked photos of a 17 year old but wont allow scientific truths about the various conditions within the human body.
She is also completely upfront as to herself as a woman, a young mum, and her empathy for other women struggling to have a family. Her talk about miscarriages and the hidden nature of human reproductionary faults was inspiring as were the images she showed. She is being responsible about not being a doctor... she tells people she cannot give diagnosis as to their problems. She’s very careful not to show identifying marks… she talks about always being respectful.
Most importantly she talks about how scientists want to suppress what she is doing, that they tell her that this information should stay hidden in a medical museum… that it is for their learning and use and not for the general public… and so they stay in command of us and our bodies. She is rightly outraged at this and willing to put her career at risk to refute them.
All in all, I would suggest we are looking at a young crusader for truth here, a courageous, intelligent, perceptive individual, and what she is doing is important.
Think about the work of Leonardo da Vinci; his countless, detailed pictures of dissections and autopsies. His work hangs in a museum and is lauded. I think the real issue here is that she is an inteligent, erudite woman, with an individual look, daring to speak uncomfortable truths and present them with emotional perception and care and as such she is a target for that old fashioned predator; misogyny.