SARS-Cov-2 Virus - The jury is still out there !
I wish to know more about the truth, in terms of closing in on it - and therefore I do not consider that the final answer is given as you said
@Niall , that the existence of SARs-CoV-2 virus is a "fact" (in the way it is claimed to exist)
In my mind personally, I keep
both options open (yes it exists. No it does not exist) - while in the mean time, I love to follow up all available (pro as well contra) information that I can access (which doesn't mean I access all of it, nor that I can understand it all),
but I am certainly at it - and have been at it since March 2020.
There are still a lot of question marks revolving the existence of a SARS-CoV-2 Virus - even the Investigative Corona Comity in Berlin, with it's 38 meetings this far, has very high doubts -
because no definite proof of existence has been put forth ! That must mean something - as is now considered to be the centrum of all
evidence collection revolving the Plandemic, including the many scientists that have been interviewed.
If the virus exist as a "fact" - the Investigative Corona Comity in Berlin (since July 2020)
would not call the existence of the virus in question - because othrwise it would seriously damage their reputation as e.g. medical Lawyers, and weaken or even disintegrate many lawsuits.
It would be juridical suicide to claim something that ain't true.
As the Virus has still not met Koch's postulates yet, nor being isolated, purified and has not 100% proven to exist with
NON-PCR methods. It is an important aspect to keep in mind in the whole.
When you look at the ->
CDC-pdf document
"CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel" - which was originally published originally in February 2020, and re-published in July 2020 and in it's latest revision 006 from 1 Dec 2020 - it says on page nr 42:
“Performance Characteristics,” • “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
Then why would the CDC write "since no quantified virus isolates are currently available", even in the latest revision 06 as of 1 Dec 2020 ? So neither did they had an isolate available whether in Feb 2020, July 2020 and Dec 2020. That's odd !
If as you say the SARS-CoV-2 is a fact - then where is the fact ?
Where is the quantified virus isolate ?
Write I am writing this...
I am desperately trying to find on my harddrive (but have not found it yet), all those numerous emails a medical researcher (and with help of other researchers) has done during many months, by contacting many institutes in order to see if they have registered proof of a isolated specimen of SARS-CoV-2 which has
NOT been conducted though PCR test methods (due to that method does not show virus, only tiny viral fragments) - and therefore is NOT a golden Standard for the isolation of virus (even if they desperately wish that to be)
However, none of the 47 medical institutes could come up with the proof of having an isolate, a specimen of the very SARS-CoV-2 virus.
If the virus is a fact - then why would leading institutes,
including the CDC, not being able to provide any proof of evidence ? I find that to be a honest question / consideration, in the quest for answers about the true nature of "SARS-CoV-2", before saying that the virus is a fact !
It needs to be considered - and handled -
as being still open question; the possibility that the virus is not a factual virus in the way it has been claimed to be (e.g. the answer is STILL open in the room, undetermined)
A lab-made virus
is too unstable to do major damage during a long time -
due to the inherent nature of viruses mutating constantly (around 4000 times a year, in which the original virus is not even existent anymore (according to Dr Wolfgang Wodarg)
That explains why the mutations almost always result into weaker illness effects in humans. Plus that the human immune system is an intruiging,
very intelligent mechanism due to the development of cross-immunization,
e.g. it covers not just one virus - but many of the many of the original virus following mutations / versions !
That is the very answer to why mutating viruses are giving much weaker illness responses in human bodies (seen from a Germ-Theory point of view). Medicine fails in not doing the proper testing of other reasons, by claiming it is all SARs-CoV-2 / Covid-19, despite there are
Multiplex Tests, in which you assess a so called
Differential diagnosis - but those are never done !