I liked Martin in the Plandemic-2 documentary, and also in his interview with Fullmich's Corona Investigative Committee. However, in this presentation (posted by Joan above) his manner of presenting and talking appeared strange compared to his previous talks that I've seen. In this one, he appears to be energised – as Gurdjieff would say – from the wrong center, maybe the sexual center. Maybe the wide publicity he has gotten during the last years has 'gotten to him' in some way. I watched most of it but found myself fast forwarding because of his 'preaching style'.

But anyways, he brings up interesting points and maybe something other honest investigators can continue digging into. Regarding the "there's no SARS-CoV-2 virus", that he said, my interpretation is that what he means is that the virus that is circulating is not a 'descendant' or 'mutation' of the SARS virus family, but a specifically designed/assembled chimeric virus through gain-of-function research. Btw, I just looked up the word chimeric that Martin often uses, and the definition is:


In any case, I don't think that Martin is saying that "there is nothing out there circulating and making some people sick", instead he's highlighting the chimeric and synthetic aspect of this virus. Still, I agree that he could have been more precise and clear about what he was meaning but the above mentioned 'preacher manner' probably made him skip a deeper explanation.
Agree with all your points.
 
For the tetraphyloctomy.
At what temperature is the PCR test done and what does it detect?

From the link I posted before there was also something addressing your question,

 
I just listened to a podcast with RFK Jr giving a talk at the Ron Paul institute's Washington conference. The following segment (below) felt significant enough to transcribe it and share it here. It gives more insight in how this psyop was/is orchestrated and planned for ca two decades before. I can't wait for RFK Jr's new book on Fauci to come out...there's certainly more juicy details like this in the book.

Starting at ca 26 into the talk:



You can find the talk as a video at least here and as a podcast at least here. Let's see what more interesting things RFK Jr's new book will reveal once it comes out!

Thanks @aragorn for bringing this up, excellent podcast. I checked out some of the other ones by RFK Jr. and found them highly informative. He does a great job detailing how the medical tyrannical complex works, and has worked for quite some time. I found his discussion of the various "pandemic games" highly instructive as well, because he argues that these were to a large extend designed to prime the medical establishment and various governmental bodies around the world to respond to a pandemic precisely as they did during Covid. They were to a large degree actually a vehicle to brainwash the elites and the medical establishment into believing that THIS is how you deal with a pandemic even though it doesn't make any sense whatsoever! Never thought about it like that, but it seems to be an important part of the puzzle.
 
LAMPANG, THAILAND – A 16-year-old vocational student has died a week after her second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Aonjira Jaroonroj Na Ayuthaya, a previously healthy and happy girl, was pronounced dead on November 3rd at Lampang Hospital in Lampang Province. Doctors stated lung thrombosis and lung infection as the cause of death. The girl’s parents believe the vaccine is to blame and are calling for an investigation.

Aonjira Jaroonroj Na Ayuthaya.jpg

Source:
16-Year-Old Girl Dies From Blood Clots A Week After 2nd Dose Of Pfizer Vaccine, Parents Seek Answers

😞🙏
 
In 2010 the funding that actually started Moderna was Darwinian Chemical Systems. That is where Moderna comes from.

I tried to confirm this claim and cannot find anything linking Darwinian Chemical Systems to Moderna. The former was headed by three professors who never worked in the medical industry, as far as I can tell. Here is a summary of their creepy project:

Darwinian Chemical Systems. Professor Jack W. Szostak, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Steven A. Benner, of the University of Florida, and Gerald F. Joyce, of the Scripps Research Institute will pursue the long-term goal of synthesizing artificial chemical systems that exhibit Darwinian evolution.

In phase I of the project, the researchers will use a combination of molecular design and laboratory selection to generate RNA-like structures that undergo self-replication. Along the way, they will try to gain a better understanding of the principles that drive self-replication in molecular systems—an understanding that may provide important clues about the origin of life.

Furthermore, since these self-replicating systems will also have the capacity to mutate, the experimenters should be able to optimize various functions through a further artificial selection process. This opens up the possibility of many practical applications for Darwinian chemical systems. Indeed, such a program at the interface of chemistry and biology should provide broad interdisciplinary training for students, and is likely to capture the imagination of the public.
 
I've found this article published in 2007 on Technology Networks, section "Genomics Research":

Scientists Announce an Artificial Chemical System Capable of Darwinian Evolution

Presenting their work at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago, Dr. Steven Benner described the first example of artificial genetic system was capable of supporting Darwinian evolution.

Scientists from the Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution (FfAME) and the Westheimer Institute for Science and Technology in Gainesville Florida have announced previously that they have taken the next steps towards a synthetic biology.

Presenting their work at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago, Dr. Steven Benner described the first example of artificial genetic system was capable of supporting Darwinian evolution.

The presentation occurred at a session covering "Weird Life", which refers to life different from what we might know already on Earth. The symposium marked the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin.

Natural DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is the molecule that supports life on Earth. That molecule is built from four building blocks, or "nucleotides". These nucleotides are represented by four letters, A, T, G, and C, where the sequence of those letters in a gene determines what that gene means. When we inherit that information from our parents, DNA is copied according to simple rule (A pairs with T in the double helix, while G pairs with C).

"Darwinian evolution occurs only because natural copies of DNA are imperfect, and because those imperfections themselves can be copied," explained Dr. Benner. "Sometimes the mutations arising from imperfect copying make the child less fit to survive. Sometimes, however, those mutations make the child more fit to survive, especially when the environment is changing. In this case, natural processes select the mutation, and the species as a whole can improve itself to meet new challenges to its survival."

For twenty years now it has been possible to get DNA to evolve in a test tube, Dr. Benner explained. A process known as the "polymerase chain reaction" (of PCR) allows DNA to make copies of itself, and then to have the copies copied, and then to have the copies of the copies copied, and so on. The copying in a PCR is imperfect, and the mistakes cause mutations that themselves can be copied. Therefore, DNA can evolve in a test tube.

The advance reported by FfAME scientists in Chicago involves the application of PCR technology to an artificial synthetic genetic system. The synthetic genetic system was built from six different nucleotides, two more genetic letters than are found in natural DNA. While artificial genetic systems have been described by these scientists previously, the new results showed for the first time that PCR can be done with an indefinite number of unnatural synthetic nucleotides, various mutation processes can occur in the PCR at a low, but significant rate, the artificial genetic alphabet could support replications over dozens of copying cycles, and the reasons for mutations interconverting standard and synthetic nucleotides are understood.

"Scientists are excited about incremental advances," said Dr. Benner. "While genetic alphabets have been examined in the past as binding molecules, and single artificial nucleotides have been incorporated into synthetic genetic systems that have been copied, this is the first time where multiple artificial nucleotides have been so incorporated, where repeated copying with mutation does not lose the artificial nucleotides, and where we understand how we get the mutations that we observe."

Dr. Benner cautioned that this does not mean that synthetic life had been created. Referring to his upcoming book entitled Life, the Universe and the Scientific Method, Dr. Benner listed alternative theories of life, including cell theory, gene theory, and evolutionary theory that underlie the thinking of current biologists about what makes life.

In addition to these, the use of carbon compounds in water, the ability to metabolize those compounds, and the ability to be self sustaining are also considered important or essential to life by many in the biological community.

FWIW, there are a few instances of the same Professor Steven Benner on Sott:

And there is this study published by Indians Researchers, in Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) on March 25th 2021:

Self-Reproduction and Darwinian Evolution in Autocatalytic Chemical Reaction Systems
Abstract

Understanding the emergence of life from (primitive) abiotic components has arguably been one of the deepest and yet one of the most elusive scientific questions. Notwithstanding the lack of a clear definition for a living system, it is widely argued that heredity (involving self-reproduction) along with compartmentalization and metabolism are key features that contrast living systems from their non-living counterparts. A minimal living system may be viewed as “a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution”. It has been proposed that autocatalytic sets of chemical reactions (ACSs) could serve as a mechanism to establish chemical compositional identity, heritable self-reproduction, and evolution in a minimal chemical system. Following years of theoretical work, autocatalytic chemical systems have been constructed experimentally using a wide variety of substrates, and most studies, thus far, have focused on the demonstration of chemical self-reproduction under specific conditions. While several recent experimental studies have raised the possibility of carrying out some aspects of experimental evolution using autocatalytic reaction networks, there remain many open challenges. In this review, we start by evaluating theoretical studies of ACSs specifically with a view to establish the conditions required for such chemical systems to exhibit self-reproduction and Darwinian evolution. Then, we follow with an extensive overview of experimental ACS systems and use the theoretically established conditions to critically evaluate these empirical systems for their potential to exhibit Darwinian evolution. We identify various technical and conceptual challenges limiting experimental progress and, finally, conclude with some remarks about open questions.

It's beyond my abilities of understanding, but I thought I should share this in case someone find it interesting.
 
Charles gave a very creepy speech to the global climate alarmist conference. In particular this:

"We also know that countries, many of whom are burdened by growing levels of debt, simply cannot afford to go green. Here we need a vast military style campaign to marshal the strength of the global private sector, with trillions at his disposal far beyond global GDP, and with the greatest respect, beyond even the governments of the world’s leaders."

Trillions at 'his disposal'? Who? Who is he talking about?

-------

 
I tried to confirm this claim and cannot find anything linking Darwinian Chemical Systems to Moderna. The former was headed by three professors who never worked in the medical industry, as far as I can tell. Here is a summary of their creepy project:


The link I found is this one, not implying that DCS found Moderna. He's at the top of the list, if that means anything I don't know but it could.


Dr. Szostak’s current research interests are in the laboratory synthesis of self-replicating systems and the origin of life. Dr. Szostak is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

 
Germany: "My son died two days after the vaccination"

Jason was only 12 years old.

October 15. "Jason was in his room, my husband was home, I was out. When my husband didn't hear anything for a while, he went to check and found Jason lifeless in the bed. My husband called the ambulance. But it was already too late."

Mutter Annika W. - son Janson.jpg

Source (German):

🙏😞
 

COP26: Carney’s $130tn climate pledge is too big to be credible​

Expansive use of statistics is unwise and implies private finance is ‘greening the world’


M.CARNEY.jpg
Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England, leads the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero © AFP via Getty Images
.
The bigger an estimated number, the lower its reliability. The over $130tn “of capital committed to net zero” by the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero proves the point. This group of banks, fund managers and insurers is led by Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England, and has admirable intentions. But its expansive use of statistics is unwise.

The COP26 summit in Glasgow has put pressure on business to produce eye-catching proofs of progress in the battle to halt global warming. A GFANZ press release came up with the goods, hailing “the deployment of this capital . . . through 24 major initiatives”.

Unfortunately, there are problems with that figure of $130tn. First, if it were an investment fund, as some observers wrongly assumed, it would be insanely large. The financial sector would be committing a sum six times larger than the annual gross domestic product of the US. The market capitalisation of the world’s stock markets is only about $120tn.

M.CARNEY3.png


To be fair, if “punching up” text to grab public attention were a crime, many journalists would be doing time alongside PR professionals. GFANZ is happy to explain that $130tn is not ready funds, but total assets managed by member financial institutions. These have all committed to setting targets at five-yearly intervals. Those way markers are meant to take them to net zero in their operations and asset bases by 2050, starting in 2030.

However, $130tn may still be wrong even as an aggregate of member assets. Banks account for half of the total. And banks habitually count single assets several times through chains of lending. Economist JK Galbraith, in his book Money, saw through this multiple accounting. Asset managers, the other half of GFANZ’s membership, do something similar when they subcontract specialist fund management to one another.

“The implication of this number is that finance is greening the world,” said one sceptical banker. The reality is that carbon transition will require huge state intervention and investment. The risk for GFANZ is that having overpromised, private finance will now under deliver.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom