I just thought that possibly the problem is in timing. STS hasn't had enough time to prepare properly for the lockdown. This release was possibly accidental. It should have happened this fall. That known plans had to be enacted sooner than they planned. This will give enough pause for people to actually start thinking rather than reacting and moving on. Enough time to actually decide whether or not they agree to the plan.

Yes, there likely will be people who may never see it. That would be up to the individual's choice. Likely there will be some balance in the equation. Let's hope the number is greater than 200.

Funny, backfires are hard to control sometimes.
 
In other church news, Chicago's mayor is going to be fining churches that open for worship.

The governor is suggesting they hold services over Zoom. How one is supposed to receive communion remotely is beyond me.

The fact that religious worship is considered 'nonessential', but liquor stores are not, is really rather telling as to the moral status of the people ruling over us.
Mayor Lori Lightfoot Plans To Fine Churches That Defied Stay-At-Home Order Rules To Hold Sunday Services
Lightfoot = Heavyhanded

Walk softly and carry a big stick!, also comes to mind.
 
-
The fact that religious worship is considered 'nonessential', but liquor stores are not, is really rather telling as to the moral status of the people ruling over us.
Mayor Lori Lightfoot Plans To Fine Churches That Defied Stay-At-Home Order Rules To Hold Sunday Services

Totally agree @psychegram. It’s crazy that abortions & liquor are considered essential services, but ongoing health care for the elderly/non-COVID sick, hair salons and attending churches are non-essential. Maybe part of their divide and conquer agenda has the populace unhealthy (if not downright sick), unkempt and losing their faith, too busy snitching on each other. I hope more people wake up (certainly seems to be the case slowly but surely).

It’s a totally upside down world we’re living in right now for sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Likely there will be some balance in the equation. Let's hope the number is greater than 200.

Funny, backfires are hard to control sometimes.
IMHO, our observations (and C's comments) point to the fact that the balance will be environmental / social / cosmic.
And the PTBs kinda expect the backfire, although in their faulty, wishful thinking way which is why we should always look for holes of opportunities. But the crossroad is getting nearer for sure.

 
Isn't there also a section in the law on blackmail? Since everything they're proposing about the vaccine is, in itself, blackmail.

You can also check international and individual country laws on anti-slavery with particular attention to entrapment into slavery and deceptive recruitment. There are also the elements of a legal contract or agreement to investigate. In particular a contract or agreement can be null and void if any form of duress or coercion is used or there has been a lack in full and frank disclosure of the subject matter of the agreement.

I'm not sure how helpful knowing the law for protection will be. How the spirit of the law is interpreted, adjudicated and enforced has a lot to do with what is in the hearts and minds of those that are enforcing it. The law itself also has loopholes for those who do not have our best interests at heart to exploit.

The Common Law in Australia has this to say about Informed Consent to Medical Treatments:

10.47 At common law, all competent adults can consent to and refuse medical treatment. If consent is not established, there may be legal consequences for health professionals. Under the law of trespass, patients have a right not be subjected to an invasive procedure without consent or other lawful justification, such as an emergency or necessity. At the international level, the CRPD expresses this in terms of a ‘right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity on an equal basis with others’.

10.48 ‘Informed consent’ refers to consent to medical treatment and the requirement to warn of material risk prior to treatment. As part of their duty of care, health professionals must provide such information as is necessary for the patient to give consent to treatment, including information on all material risks of the proposed treatment. Failure to do so may lead to civil liability for an adverse outcome, even if the treatment itself was not negligent.

Even the legal definition of the word 'right/s' has loopholes to exploit. In Blacks Law 4th Ed. the definition of 'right' covers over two pages, but in particular there's this:

Slide1.png

So with that in mind, and while the law may provide some protection with the right people at the right time, I think it's probably also a good idea to be prepared for the possibility that we won't be able to avoid vaccination so preparation for that possibility along the lines of the advice of the C's is probably the best approach to take.


21st March, 2020
Q: [laughter] (L) However, the question has been asked: If people are forced to be vaccinated, and it seems that it's not a good idea - because obviously if they get a vaccine that the PTB really want to spread around, one they've tested and does what they want it to, we certainly don't want the vaccine they push on us - are there ways we can counteract this? There are going to be situations where people can't refuse a vaccine.

A: Yes. You have done the research!

Q: (L) So what research have we done about healing DNA? Um... Melatonin heals DNA.

(Niall) Dietary changes.

(L) Being in a proper dietary state if you have to get a vaccine is going to be beneficial and maybe it is for just this type of situation that we were so motivated to do health research and experiments for so long; it was preparation and we didn’t even know it.

(Artemis) Being in ketosis heals you.

(Gaby) Vitamin C.

(Niall) Detoxification.

(L) Detox would be NAC and other things...

(Andromeda) Infrared sauna.

(Chu) Constant knowledge input.

(L) Willpower even. And they just mentioned that there are certain people with spiritual force who were able to modify the virus by their own inner powers in a positive way. I would imagine that having inner force or inner spiritual power would all be beneficial. Are we on the right track?

A: Yes yes yes!
 
For anyone interested in translating subtitles, I just found (thanks to 21centurywire's Patrick Henningsen, who's btw doing a fantastic job countering the narrative) web page that has a bunch of transcripts of the recent 'bombshell' interviews, featuring e.g. Wittkowski, Dr Ericsson, Dr. John Ioannidis. Not all the videos include transcripts, but it's in any case a good list of the most important recent videos:


Sadly, the thing that I originally was looking for, a transcript of Dolores Cahill's interview, wasn't to be found.
 
I will do my best to find out. Thursday I'm too busy but should know by Friday if authorities are quick enough to reply.

Thanks, Anka. I am considering to go via Germany to Austria, since this is the only viable route at the moment, but more than twice the distance. Any information is welcome. Very hard to find anything current in the Polish internet.
 
Alan Dershowitz says you have no right to refuse a vaccine! Maybe he doesn't, but I sure do!

The video appeared in an article on Sott: Gilad Atzmon: Pilpul for Beginners
When I heard it there, I decided to transcribe the video improving and correcting the automatically generated base available on Youtube, since if this clip disappears the whole article has less value.
Dershowitz: "00:00 Let me put it very clearly you have no 00:01 constitutional right to endanger the 00:05 public and spread the disease even if 00:08 you disagree you have no right not to be 00:10 vaccinated you have no right not to wear 00:13 a mask you have no right to open up your 00:16 business

Jason Goodman: Wait can I stop you, wait 00:18

Dershowitz: Yeah

Jason Goodman: No right not to be vaccinated 00:20 meaning if they decide you have to be 00:23 vaccinated we have to be vaccinated 00:25

Dershowitz: Absolutely and if you refuse to be 00:27 vaccinated the state has the power to 00:29 literally take you to a doctor's office 00:32 and plunge a needle into your arm if the 00:36 vaccine

Jason Goodman: Where is that in the constitution 00:38 i

Dershowitz: Prevent if the vaccination is designed 00:41 to prevent the spreading disease the 00:43 vaccination is only to prevent a disease 00:45 that you will get for example if there's 00:47 a disease that will kill you you have 00:49 the right to refuse that but you have no 00:51 right to refuse to be vaccinated against 00:54 a contagious disease Public Health, the 00:58 police power of the Constitution gives 01:00 the state the power to compel that and 01:02 there are cases in the United States 01:04 that bring forth"
The time in the original video posted by Jason Goodman is [Link] Alan Dershowitz Addresses the Systematic Destruction of the U.S. Constitution In another video by Jason Goodman Dershowitz in On the DOJ Protection Racket with Special Guest Mike Moore of True Pundit they talk about the focus on the vaccines as a detour from something they thought was even more interesting:
Alan Dershowitz has outright accused former Labor Secretary and US Attorney Alexander Acosta of lying and claims no knowledge of sexual blackmail allegations against DeadEp. Is he out of his mind or is he deliberately spreading a disinformation message?
What I hear Jason Goodman and his friend saying with regard to Dershowitz is that besides Covid-19 there are also other developments happening which may be significant. I think that is true in principle, although i'm not sure I agree in this particular case. Still, it is quite possible that side shows may open a door of understanding for those who have been very taken in with the Covid-19 narrative.
 
if I can travel from Poland to Hungary via Slovakia.
I´m not sure in which part of Poland you are currently and to which part of Hungary you must travel, but if you go east Hungary, did you check if there is a shorter route via Ukraine? :huh:

That is a real bummer if you will have to triple your journey.

I sympathize with you; as we moved to Germany we didn´t go back to Croatia for almost 2 years. I missed my parents and my brother very much. Wen we were off to the journey home, instead of the trip that takes 12-13h, we ended up stuck in the crowd from Frankfurth to the Austrian border, and in the end the journey took more than 20h in a car with 2 children.
On the Austrian border, we had to stop and take a nap in the car.....
On a journey that long, every minute counts because one simply cannot either stay wake or think.

I hope they will open borders soon and you will get home safely...
 
It’s crazy that abortions & liquor are considered essential services

Speaking of abortion, it's also considered nonessential for fathers to be present for the births of their children.

So murdering babies is considered essential, but being present for the miracle of childbirth, helping to usher a new soul residing in your flesh and blood into the world, and providing emotional support for the brave woman bringing this new life in (the Greeks considered that childbirth is to women as war is to men) ... that is very nonessential, in the minds of the pathocrats.

We can get a very good idea of the kind of soulless hell their hoping to construct simply by looking at what is considered non/essential to these psychopaths.

I'm not sure how helpful knowing the law for protection will be. How the spirit of the law is interpreted, adjudicated and enforced has a lot to do with what is in the hearts and minds of those that are enforcing it.

Well, look at Dershowitz, who somehow perceives in the Constitution the right for the government to stick a needle in your arm. Members of Dershowitz' tribe have long historical experience with blatant violations of the spirit of the law while ensuring the letter of the law is followed in every particular. Since they're overrepresented in the legal profession, I think we know what to expect in that regard.

But in a sense it might not matter, because we are no longer a civilization of rule of law. The ruling class just does whatever it wants; law doesn't apply to them, only to us.
 
Back
Top Bottom